SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2021 Draft Signing Period
|
Post by GyIantosca on Jul 28, 2021 11:53:35 GMT -5
I know not related but the Mets are getting cold feet in Rockers elbow.
Sorry Vermontsox1, I just saw you posted this a while ago.
|
|
shagworthy
Veteran
My neckbeard game is on point.
Posts: 1,864
|
Post by shagworthy on Jul 28, 2021 12:02:33 GMT -5
I guess I understand believing in yourself and all, but I still think it's a pretty foolhardy bluff. Approximately what, 10 percent of players who play in the minors ever see the majors and the real money. Here, you're given a shot at that for an investment of 2 - 2.4 million up front.
Think of most of our careers, unless you come from wealth, imagine being 20-24 with already 2 million in the bank, no debt, that money working for you in the market while you live off the compound interest, even if you flame out of the sport, you still have in most cases a fully paid for college education for free/next to nothing thanks to scholarships. You're set up quite nicely for life even in failure if you plan correctly, I know I wish I was given 2.4 million at 21 to start my adulthood with.
You can argue the owners have enough money to pay more per say, but they are the ones underwriting most of the risk here. Even in the deepest of pockets you can find lint at some point.
|
|
|
Post by tjb21 on Jul 28, 2021 12:16:49 GMT -5
It's an accounting trick, IIRC. I figured, but what's the trick? Hat tip to @ethanhullihen on 7/22/21: "Contingent payments. A first-year player may be offered a specified sum of no more than $2,500 contingent upon the player's being retained by the signing Major or Minor League Club for a period that may not exceed 90 days of one Minor League playing season. If a player whose contract contains such a contingent bonus provision is selected under Rule 5 (annual Selection of Players) before the date the bonus becomes payable, the bonus shall become due immediately and shall be paid by the Club from which the contract was selected."
|
|
|
Post by kingofthetrill on Jul 28, 2021 12:24:47 GMT -5
All of these pre-draft negotiation makes me wonder what constitutes tampering.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Jul 28, 2021 12:24:50 GMT -5
Leiter signs for $7.9M. Pending Fabian, still much happier with Mayer and how other areas worked out. Guess we'll see!
|
|
|
Post by bcsox on Jul 28, 2021 12:32:59 GMT -5
if they knew that they were going to have to go over on Fabian and Hickey, and were obviously going to have a big number in Mayer, wouldnt they have been better off drafting college senior organizational depth guys at say rounds 8-10. $5K signings a piece?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jul 28, 2021 12:36:11 GMT -5
I don't have an issue gambling when the pick is protected. I have a massive issue if those reports are right and best case was you sign one of your 2nd and 5th round picks. Last report showed only 13 unsigned guys picked in the first ten rounds among all teams. Five of them belong to just two teams in Texas and Boston.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jul 28, 2021 12:36:39 GMT -5
But that's kind of the unfortunate (borderline bush league) position the Red Sox have put him in though right? I mean yeah, he should be thrilled about a $2M to $2.5M offer to play professional ball, but if he had a $3M deal in place, and the Red Sox knew this and willingly prevented him from signing that deal, he should be understandably pissed. I don't know, I'm not loving the way we handled this assuming all of these reports are true and some of our assumptions are sound. I can see your point of view and maybe agree with it on some level but at the end of the day this is a draft and it's kind of tough luck for Fabian in my mind. I don't see why the Red sox should have said oh well someone offered him 3 million so we'll move on if they liked the player. It's not free agency so Fabian can either take the Red sox offer or be pissed at them for taking him and offering less than he was offered even though that team didn't pick him. yeah as pedroelgrande said above, the Red Sox have done this and so have other teams. Like if we're saying a draft is bad then yes, I'm with you. But within the construct of a draft, then I completely disagree with the idea the Red Sox committed some ethical foul here. Like, if they picked him and offered him the bare minimum in order to protect their 2022 comp pick? Yeah, bush league. Even under $2M I'd say yeah what're you doing here. But the way a draft is supposed to work is that you select a player and then negotiate a contract with that player. They're almost certainly offering him an overslot contract. If it's not as far overslot as another team would've gone, I completely get being disappointed - I'm certainly not in the "take the money you got and like it" camp - but at the same time, this is how the system basically works, and they're operating within that construct in a way I find is fine ethically. Did the Rangers make a bush league move by drafting Leiter 2nd so he couldn't fall to his preferred team? I'm sure the Red Sox have had their pockets picked other times too.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Jul 28, 2021 12:41:20 GMT -5
I can see your point of view and maybe agree with it on some level but at the end of the day this is a draft and it's kind of tough luck for Fabian in my mind. I don't see why the Red sox should have said oh well someone offered him 3 million so we'll move on if they liked the player. It's not free agency so Fabian can either take the Red sox offer or be pissed at them for taking him and offering less than he was offered even though that team didn't pick him. yeah as pedroelgrande said above, the Red Sox have done this and so have other teams. Like if we're saying a draft is bad then yes, I'm with you. But within the construct of a draft, then I completely disagree with the idea the Red Sox committed some ethical foul here. Like, if they picked him and offered him the bare minimum in order to protect their 2022 comp pick? Yeah, bush league. Even under $2M I'd say yeah what're you doing here. But the way a draft is supposed to work is that you select a player and then negotiate a contract with that player. They're almost certainly offering him an overslot contract. If it's not as far overslot as another team would've gone, I completely get being disappointed - I'm certainly not in the "take the money you got and like it" camp - but at the same time, this is how the system basically works, and they're operating within that construct in a way I find is fine ethically. Did the Rangers make a bush league move by drafting Leiter 2nd so he couldn't fall to his preferred team? I'm sure the Red Sox have had their pockets picked other times too. Steering the conversation a different direction, do you think that Leiter (if the Sox really were his preferred destination) would've commanded nearly $8 mil from Boston too? Because given the million dollar difference in draft slots for the picks that would've pretty much tanked the rest of our draft bonus pool which makes the Mayer pick better to me for that reason alone, let alone the fact that I like Mayer more in a vacuum.
|
|
|
Post by congusgambler33 on Jul 28, 2021 12:43:06 GMT -5
All this speculation is happening because except for the rash of signings previously, nothing has happened since and there is a lot of worry that we will see the draft collapse on us. Bloom is an expert at keeping his negotiating terms away from the general public and I have a great deal of faith that he will do fine in this process. It is just so hard to hear nothing and speculation runs rampant.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jul 28, 2021 13:01:30 GMT -5
I hope the Sox are able to sign Fabian, but if they don't they don't. The Sox will recoup the pick next season if they have to.
Whether he signs or not he's an intriguing prospect with strikeout issues that may hamper his career.
I can understand his unhappiness at losing out on the guaranteed 3 million the Orioles had pocketed for him, and I can understand his unhappiness that the Sox will go nowhere near that figure, whether it's between 2 or 2.5 million.
The reality is that the $3 million isn't happening and that even 2.4 million would be a helluva windfall for a young kid. That's 40 years of averaging $60K, which is a lifetime of earnings for a lot of people and he'd have whatever he earns on top of it regardless if baseball fails plus his interest compounding daily. Wish I had 2.4 million in my 401k with 40 years of growth to accumulate.
So in reality 2.4 million is nothing to sneeze at, at all. Let's just say my heart won't bleed for him if he turns it down, and if he winds up with lesser after next season.
Some of these guys have big egos. You're the best in your class, among the best in your country. Sometimes that can make a person think, 2.4 million? That's nothing. I have zero doubt I'll be better next season and triple that figure.
And if he feels that, it's his choice. It means that he didn't want to wager on himself to rocket up the minor league and make the even bigger dollars as CF of the Red Sox. He'd rather bet on himself at the college level after one season and make it up front.
At this point, I really have no idea if he's going to sign or not. I can imagine a lot of this is agency driven, but in a few days the kid is going to have to make a potentially life altering decision. Hope it's to take the guaranteed money up front, join the Red Sox organization, kick butt in the minors, and make a mega-fortune as Sox CF.
If that's how he feels, that's fine - his decision. I don't think he's a generational talent, so I'm ok with the Sox drawing a line in the sand and moving on to next year's draft with the 41st pick if need be.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jul 28, 2021 13:36:32 GMT -5
I can see your point of view and maybe agree with it on some level but at the end of the day this is a draft and it's kind of tough luck for Fabian in my mind. I don't see why the Red sox should have said oh well someone offered him 3 million so we'll move on if they liked the player. It's not free agency so Fabian can either take the Red sox offer or be pissed at them for taking him and offering less than he was offered even though that team didn't pick him. yeah as pedroelgrande said above, the Red Sox have done this and so have other teams. Like if we're saying a draft is bad then yes, I'm with you. But within the construct of a draft, then I completely disagree with the idea the Red Sox committed some ethical foul here. Like, if they picked him and offered him the bare minimum in order to protect their 2022 comp pick? Yeah, bush league. Even under $2M I'd say yeah what're you doing here. But the way a draft is supposed to work is that you select a player and then negotiate a contract with that player. They're almost certainly offering him an overslot contract. If it's not as far overslot as another team would've gone, I completely get being disappointed - I'm certainly not in the "take the money you got and like it" camp - but at the same time, this is how the system basically works, and they're operating within that construct in a way I find is fine ethically. Did the Rangers make a bush league move by drafting Leiter 2nd so he couldn't fall to his preferred team? I'm sure the Red Sox have had their pockets picked other times too. But don't you think when an agent lines up a deal for his player and tells teams "we're not signing below $X" then its usually a pretty safe deterrent from having other teams draft that player ahead of the deal? Leiter isn't one of those cases. The Rangers are paying him top $ (more than what we would have offered) even if TEX isn't his preferred team. I obviously have no issue with that. Its purely drafting a player who has a sizable deal in place at the very next pick that I feel to be questionable....maybe not bush league, but you're at the very least putting the agent and player in a difficult spot. I guess another way of thinking about this is this: If I'm an agent, and I have a deal lined up for my player for $3M, I'm then making it very clear in any communication with other teams that my player will not sign for below $3M (in order to get my player to that deal). If a team chooses to blatantly ignore that and force you into a situation of taking a lesser bonus or going back to school, that puts the agent and the player in a tough position based on what was previously communicated. Now I'm not entirely sure how things went down between the Red Sox and Fabian's agent...maybe it wasn't made blatantly clear that Fabian wouldn't be signing for less than $3M, but if it was in an effort to get Fabian to pick #41, then there as at least some pressure to stick to your guns even if the fully rational thing to do is take the money.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jul 28, 2021 13:46:00 GMT -5
Steering the conversation a different direction, do you think that Leiter (if the Sox really were his preferred destination) would've commanded nearly $8 mil from Boston too? Because given the million dollar difference in draft slots for the picks that would've pretty much tanked the rest of our draft bonus pool which makes the Mayer pick better to me for that reason alone, let alone the fact that I like Mayer more in a vacuum. I think they would've drafted completely differently. Green's father on Twitter suggested he thought the Red Sox would've taken Payton in the second if Mayer hadn't fallen to them. I'm not sure about that (although doubling up on HS SS's with 4 and 40 would've been a bit weird), but drafting Green in the 2nd if they got Leiter at 4 does make a lot of sense, right? Maybe you get him for a little under slot. But at that point we're in butterfly-flapping-its-wings chaos theory. But don't you think when an agent lines up a deal for his player and tells teams "we're not signing below $X" then its usually a pretty safe deterrent from having other teams draft that player ahead of the deal? Leiter isn't one of those cases. The Rangers are paying him top $ (more than what we would have offered) even if TEX isn't his preferred team. I obviously have no issue with that. Its purely drafting a player who has a sizable deal in place at the very next pick that I feel to be questionable....maybe not bush league, but you're at the very least putting the agent and player in a difficult spot. I guess another way of thinking about this is this: If I'm an agent, and I have a deal lined up for my player for $3M, I'm then making it very clear in any communication with other teams that my player will not sign for below $3M (in order to get my player to that deal). If a team chooses to blatantly ignore that and force you into a situation of taking a lesser bonus or going back to school, that puts the agent and the player in a tough position based on what was previously communicated. Now I'm not entirely sure how things went down between the Red Sox and Fabian's agent...maybe it wasn't made blatantly clear that Fabian wouldn't be signing for less than $3M, but if it was in an effort to get Fabian to pick #41, then there as at least some pressure to stick to your guns even if the fully rational thing to do is take the money. Not really. Again, they did the same thing with Groome and with Denney, and I don't see how Leiter is different. Jim on our podcast and on his own used the term "prisoner of his own talent" for Leiter in that teams were going to just pick him if they wanted him, whatever he was saying about a deal later in the draft or not. We don't know what Leiter was saying - maybe he said he had a deal for $8.5M and $7.9M is settling, right? The point is that the way the draft is set up, players don't get to dictate where they go. And like I said, if they are actually low-balling him, that is one thing. If they're offering him a first-round bonus, no I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jul 28, 2021 14:09:42 GMT -5
I guess then I'm focused more on how irrational and stupid refusing to sign with them out of spite would be. He graduated from HS early to matriculate at UF and get his college career started a year earlier. It's not like this is some guy who was just strolling along in his career and then suddenly realized he was an MLB draft prospect. We can assume he and his camp are informed, rational actors. Turning down a Red Sox offer of, say, $2.4M or higher would be completely irrational and just silly. If we're lower than that, it gets more rational the lower it goes. But that's kind of the unfortunate (borderline bush league) position the Red Sox have put him in though right? I mean yeah, he should be thrilled about a $2M to $2.5M offer to play professional ball, but if he had a $3M deal in place, and the Red Sox knew this and willingly prevented him from signing that deal, he should be understandably pissed. I don't know, I'm not loving the way we handled this assuming all of these reports are true and some of our assumptions are sound. Be pissed all you want, but that $3 million offer is not on the table, so therefore it's irrelevant. Maybe we can return the favor to the Orioles and promise their target $10 million more than the Orioles want to sign him for next time.
And why is anyone doing anything but naming their price tag to sign before the picks are made? Why are the Orioles telling him how much they are willing to offer?
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jul 28, 2021 14:17:24 GMT -5
Yeah I just don't see the Leiter situation as an applicable parallel unless he truly had a deal for >$7.9M lined up. Anything else is just posturing and clearly we weren't going to pay him $8M. I'd wager the Rangers knew that.
We can agree to disagree...but I would disagree with your point that "the way the draft is set up, players don't get to dictate where they go." This draft structure with bonus pools and flexibility to allocate $ within the bonus pools as you wish creates a structure in which there are more considerations at each pick other than best player available considerations. Its the reason why a player ranked #21 in Bubba Chandler falls to pick #72 and ends up signing for $3M. That doesn't happen with the draft structure of the NBA, NFL, or NHL. So to a degree, the player and the agent (assuming leverage) can line up the best $ deal available and often get to that deal and in our case, we prevented that from happening for Fabian. Its obviously allowable within the rules of the draft, no disagreement there, but I also understand why there is at least some hesitation on the part of Fabian and his agent. Thats all I'm trying to say.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jul 28, 2021 14:19:14 GMT -5
But don't you think when an agent lines up a deal for his player and tells teams "we're not signing below $X" then its usually a pretty safe deterrent from having other teams draft that player ahead of the deal? Leiter isn't one of those cases. The Rangers are paying him top $ (more than what we would have offered) even if TEX isn't his preferred team. I obviously have no issue with that. Its purely drafting a player who has a sizable deal in place at the very next pick that I feel to be questionable....maybe not bush league, but you're at the very least putting the agent and player in a difficult spot. I guess another way of thinking about this is this: If I'm an agent, and I have a deal lined up for my player for $3M, I'm then making it very clear in any communication with other teams that my player will not sign for below $3M (in order to get my player to that deal). If a team chooses to blatantly ignore that and force you into a situation of taking a lesser bonus or going back to school, that puts the agent and the player in a tough position based on what was previously communicated. Now I'm not entirely sure how things went down between the Red Sox and Fabian's agent...maybe it wasn't made blatantly clear that Fabian wouldn't be signing for less than $3M, but if it was in an effort to get Fabian to pick #41, then there as at least some pressure to stick to your guns even if the fully rational thing to do is take the money. If an agent told the Red Sox not to pick Fabian because Boston's divisional rival was going to select him later in the draft, I would call that strategic incompetence on the part of the agent. It can literally be as simple as 'hey we have a deal in place for $3M and my client won't be signing for less than that," without ever having to name a team.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on Jul 28, 2021 14:20:57 GMT -5
But that's kind of the unfortunate (borderline bush league) position the Red Sox have put him in though right? I mean yeah, he should be thrilled about a $2M to $2.5M offer to play professional ball, but if he had a $3M deal in place, and the Red Sox knew this and willingly prevented him from signing that deal, he should be understandably pissed. I don't know, I'm not loving the way we handled this assuming all of these reports are true and some of our assumptions are sound. Be pissed all you want, but that $3 million offer is not on the table, so therefore it's irrelevant. Maybe we can return the favor to the Orioles and promise their target $10 million more than the Orioles want to sign him for next time. And why is anyone doing anything but naming their price tag to sign before the picks are made? Why are the Orioles telling him how much they are willing to offer?
Literally to inform the agent of what his signing demands should be in an attempt to get that player to fall to your pick.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jul 28, 2021 14:32:45 GMT -5
Be pissed all you want, but that $3 million offer is not on the table, so therefore it's irrelevant. Maybe we can return the favor to the Orioles and promise their target $10 million more than the Orioles want to sign him for next time. And why is anyone doing anything but naming their price tag to sign before the picks are made? Why are the Orioles telling him how much they are willing to offer?
Literally to inform the agent of what his signing demands should be in an attempt to get that player to fall to your pick. I wouldn't put it past them to be doing that just to f with the Red Sox. They are not under obligation to pay that either if he did fall.
|
|
|
Post by jaffinator on Jul 28, 2021 14:33:27 GMT -5
There’s a huge marginal difference between $2.4M and $3M. That’s $600,000! Even if he signs, odds are (unfortunately) that it’s unlikely that he will make meaningful money playing baseball, which means that that money is, what, a decade+ of living expenses? I mean, it has to be real money though. Until he gets drafted and gets that money, it's theoretical money. He doesn't have $2.4M or $2.1M or whatever is being offered in the bank. Turning down $2.4M and getting $0 is worse than accepting it and losing the opportunity at another $600k. In this year's draft, 18 guys have gotten >$3M so far (Leiter, Lawlar, Rocker, House, Watson yet to sign - all would get above that), and all but two were taken 22nd or sooner, which is the last $3M+ slot pick. The other 2nd-rounders yet to sign - Zavala, Bliss - don't seem like guys who'd sign for that much. To me, this shows us that to get that money next year, he only reasonably can be banking on being selected that high, not on finding another overslot deal in round 2. I think Fabian's agent has an interest, in both his own interest and his client's, in making this a tough negotiation for the Red Sox. However, it's one hell of a gamble for him to go back to school if the reason is because his price is $3M and that's what he's signing for. The only real way for him to get that next year as a COVID senior is going to be to be picked in the top 23 or so picks (assuming the slots increase). Maybe he will! But he's going to have to hit better than he did this year because if he shows strikeout issues again, that is potentially going to scare teams off. If he puts up another 30+% K rate, I'd be stunned if he went in the first round. It really all depends on the part we don't know - what the Red Sox are offering. If they're only offering like $2M I get it. If they're offering $2.5M he's nuts if he doesn't take it, because while that is life-changing money, in the context of the MLB draft, you're literally talking the difference between the slot value this year of picks like 22 and 28. He would also be re-entering the draft in a better year for college hitters (I don't know much about next year, but this year was pretty awful for that demographic). I just don't see how it makes sense for Fabian not to sign unless the Red Sox are really lowballing him. In 2020, there were 7 college hitters drafted before him (Cowser, Frelick, McLain, Sweeney, Black, Nelson, Zavala). For 2021, someone with his exact same profile would probably go lower. Brooks Lee, Jace Jung, Kevin Parada, Gavin Cross, Jacob Berry, Robert Moore, Daniel Susac, and Carter Young all look significantly more attractive now than Jud Fabian and the names picked before him. Carter Young already presents a more attractive version of Fabian's archetype to some degree. Obviously more people could (and probably will!) move up and some more names will move down, but without a dramatic improvement, Fabian's relative place in the class probably gets worse. My initial take on things is that I don't think there will be a huge shift in the HS/College balance this upcoming year, but within college performers, the skew is more towards hitting this upcoming draft. edit: Thinking about it further, there's a number of guys I would just generally think could go higher but am less certain about. Chase DeLauter (putting on a show on the Cape!), Dylan Beavers, Hayden Dunhurst, and Jared McKenzie for instance.
|
|
|
Post by johnsilver52 on Jul 28, 2021 14:37:24 GMT -5
I can understand feeling sympathy for Fabian. It's normal to feel that there is some injustice when one side has too much power in a negotiation. The villain here is the draft system itself, which fundamentally exists to strip negotiating power away from players as they enter professional baseball. The Red Sox have done a very normal job of responding to the incentives presented to them. I don't think it's fair to expect them to hand wins to the Baltimore Orioles. Amazing still see the draft system vilified as bad. How many others remember when the Bklyn/LAD and NYY had more talent within their farm systems than several MLB teams on the field, due solely because talent coming out of school wanted to sign with those organizations?
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Jul 28, 2021 14:42:08 GMT -5
Literally to inform the agent of what his signing demands should be in an attempt to get that player to fall to your pick. I wouldn't put it past them to be doing that just to f with the Red Sox. They are not under obligation to pay that either if he did fall. They wouldn't do that unless they wanted their word to be worthless. Even Hobbes and Machiavelli knew the importance of reputation for wielding political power...
|
|
|
Post by widewordofsport on Jul 28, 2021 14:49:01 GMT -5
Well, maybe it's just posturing, but it seems completely bananas to me to turn down a guaranteed $2.5 million. That's enough to live comfortably for the rest of your life. The difference in marginal utility between, say, $200,000 and $2.5 million is about 1000x more than the difference between $2.5 million and $6 million or whatever, if you ask me. I don't know about live comfortably the rest of your life, without the benefit of lucky investments or starting off with some wealth. It's certainly enough to get you through to your second career should baseball not work out. That said... he's not getting generational wealth without an MLB salary, 2.5 vs 3 or whatever. If you are doing this for the money, your only goal needs to be 1. get to the big league min salary as quickly as possible and 2. if you're lucky enough to be good, get to free agency as quickly as possible. (The implication that there is certainly an opportunity cost to giving up a year of prime ball-playing to be in college, unless you are studying something that will make you legit money later on).
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jul 28, 2021 14:58:05 GMT -5
Yeah I just don't see the Leiter situation as an applicable parallel unless he truly had a deal for >$7.9M lined up. Anything else is just posturing and clearly we weren't going to pay him $8M. I'd wager the Rangers knew that. We can agree to disagree...but I would disagree with your point that "the way the draft is set up, players don't get to dictate where they go." This draft structure with bonus pools and flexibility to allocate $ within the bonus pools as you wish creates a structure in which there are more considerations at each pick other than best player available considerations. Its the reason why a player ranked #21 in Bubba Chandler falls to pick #72 and ends up signing for $3M. That doesn't happen with the draft structure of the NBA, NFL, or NHL. So to a degree, the player and the agent (assuming leverage) can line up the best $ deal available and often get to that deal and in our case, we prevented that from happening for Fabian. Its obviously allowable within the rules of the draft, no disagreement there, but I also understand why there is at least some hesitation on the part of Fabian and his agent. Thats all I'm trying to say. That's a really good point about the bonus pools, but I quibble a little. For example, Bubba Chandler didn't necessarily fall because he had a deal with the Pirates (at least that I know of, but if he did pick a different guy). He fell because teams weren't willing to meet a price they thought he'd sign for (which, I would not, is not the same, necessarily, as the price he told teams he would sign for) for whatever reason, be it that they didn't think he was worth it, didn't want to try to fit that bonus under the cap, etc. If a team is willing to wind up not signing the player, I have no problem with them popping him whether or not he says he's got a deal with another team later in the draft, provided they make the player a realistically fair offer. Like I said, if the Red Sox are offering $2M, yeah that's a bit iffy. But if they offer first-round money, I have don't have an issue with it. Remember, it's called a contract negotiation not a contract execution of a formality. And for what it's worth, the pool thing is just as much a bug as a feature - it absolutely bones college seniors who get drafted and have an offer of a $10k signing bonus or indy ball. That part is asinine in the context of what minor league baseball players get paid.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jul 28, 2021 15:01:24 GMT -5
I can understand feeling sympathy for Fabian. It's normal to feel that there is some injustice when one side has too much power in a negotiation. The villain here is the draft system itself, which fundamentally exists to strip negotiating power away from players as they enter professional baseball. The Red Sox have done a very normal job of responding to the incentives presented to them. I don't think it's fair to expect them to hand wins to the Baltimore Orioles. Amazing still see the draft system vilified as bad. How many others remember when the Bklyn/LAD and NYY had more talent within their farm systems than several MLB teams on the field, due solely because talent coming out of school wanted to sign with those organizations? Doesn't seem to be what happens internationally though, no? Give me a free market, in theory at least. Maybe with some kind of cap to more equitably distribute talent. (And by the way if you have a problem with players signing with the team they want to sign with, you better stop cheering for Devers, who signed with the Red Sox over better offers because he liked them more.) In the time you're talking about the reserve clause was still in place and teams were vastly different in terms of their competence signing amateurs. There is zero comparison.
|
|
|
Post by rasimon on Jul 28, 2021 15:01:52 GMT -5
Well, maybe it's just posturing, but it seems completely bananas to me to turn down a guaranteed $2.5 million. That's enough to live comfortably for the rest of your life. The difference in marginal utility between, say, $200,000 and $2.5 million is about 1000x more than the difference between $2.5 million and $6 million or whatever, if you ask me. I don't know about live comfortably the rest of your life, without the benefit of lucky investments or starting off with some wealth. It's certainly enough to get you through to your second career should baseball not work out. That said... he's not getting generational wealth without an MLB salary, 2.5 vs 3 or whatever. If you are doing this for the money, your only goal needs to be 1. get to the big league min salary as quickly as possible and 2. if you're lucky enough to be good, get to free agency as quickly as possible. (The implication that there is certainly an opportunity cost to giving up a year of prime ball-playing to be in college, unless you are studying something that will make you legit money later on). if Fabian really thinks he has turned the corner and has his contact issues worked out, then (if I were him) I would be signing and trying to get to the bigs and the big-bucks as soon as possible. The extra $500K should be meaningless in the big picture unless he questions whether he will actually make the bigs. Im not in love with this pick to start with due to his contact issues, but if the Sox think he is worth the 2nd round pick then they should make every effort to sign him, even if it means losing a latter draftee. My guess is a deal gets done.
|
|
|