SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots 2024 Offseason Thread
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 30, 2024 18:46:44 GMT -5
Brady and Bill are both gone, let’s stop the talk about them here. Go to the throw down forum to hash that crap out. Please and thank you.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,874
|
Post by cdj on Mar 30, 2024 21:09:12 GMT -5
I understand there is a chance PM1999 you may in fact be agreeing with what I'm about to state, but I feel compelled to say my spiel. You can't have one without the other, this debate will go on ad nauseum forever and makes NO sense at all. To many people in the world think you can go for this or you can go for that. That type of thinking is simplistic and child like, it doesn't nor should it be, in most cases one or the other. It can also be both or in some case neither. A lot of choices are not binary they way we are pigeon holed to think it has to be, it can and often is multi-faceted with deeper layers of understanding and nuances that take you beyond that simplistic mindset. Your just in denial and I'm not going in details to explain it to you that Brady has been more successful in three seasons with Tampa Bay then BB has had in 10 full years without Brady because you will not going comprehend it. I go by what I see and numbers not how I feel that means nothing. Do you think Belichick played no role in turning Brady into what he ended up being? I agree with the above, this debate is dumb af and mind-numbing at this point. Brady is undeniably the best Qb of all time and Belichick is arguably the best coach of all time. These are indisputable facts. They both had immense contributions to 6 rings. That is all that matters. Not this sports radio trash Belichick got to the playoffs with Mac Jones, something that in hindsight looks about 5x more impressive than it seemed at the time. It genuinely may be his best accomplishment.
|
|
|
Post by pedromartinez1999 on Mar 30, 2024 21:12:25 GMT -5
Your just in denial and I'm not going in details to explain it to you that Brady has been more successful in three seasons with Tampa Bay then BB has had in 10 full years without Brady because you will not going comprehend it. I go by what I see and numbers not how I feel that means nothing. Do you think Belichick played no role in turning Brady into what he ended up being? I agree with the above, this debate is dumb af and mind-numbing at this point. Brady is undeniably the best Qb of all time and Belichick is arguably the best coach of all time. These are indisputable facts. They both had immense contributions to 6 rings. That is all that matters. Not this sports radio trash Belichick got to the playoffs with Mac Jones, something that in hindsight looks about 5x more impressive than it seemed at the time This ends now I'm done with it
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 31, 2024 12:09:42 GMT -5
I'm so over this, let's trade up to #2 and make sure we get Maye.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Mar 31, 2024 20:26:31 GMT -5
I'm so over this, let's trade up to #2 and make sure we get Maye. This draft is all about that, I've never felt so invested in a draft pick since Matt Barnes oddly enough, because I REALLY wanted Sonny Gray and he ended up going one pick ahead. I'll never forget that. I'd give Washington a second round pick and the rights to the name Redskins again.
|
|
|
Post by marrcus on Mar 31, 2024 20:52:16 GMT -5
Certainly in the DC team's best interest to indicate they want Maye whether they really do or not. That's where the Pats instincts have to be good. Do Comm's really want DAniels?
Maybe Felger has some answers tonight (if he's working).
|
|
|
Post by pedromartinez1999 on Apr 1, 2024 7:50:20 GMT -5
I'm so over this, let's trade up to #2 and make sure we get Maye. umass you called me out three times and you should be glad it's over because I will silents you again with facts. I never said Bill was a bad NFL coach but you babys think that. This is why Felger is a millionaire and it can only happen in Boston and Dallas. He was smart to turn down ESPN offer.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 1, 2024 8:56:31 GMT -5
I'm so over this, let's trade up to #2 and make sure we get Maye. umass you called me out three times and you should be glad it's over because I will silents you again with facts. I never said Bill was a bad NFL coach but you babys think that. This is why Felger is a millionaire and it can only happen in Boston and Dallas. He was smart to turn down ESPN offer. Let it go man.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Apr 1, 2024 10:02:14 GMT -5
I can’t stand Folgers and his holier than thou attitude. And his sidekick is dumb as rocks. So I don’t listen..
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Apr 1, 2024 10:19:11 GMT -5
I can’t stand Folgers and his holier than thou attitude. And his sidekick is dumb as rocks. So I don’t listen.. It certainly isn't the best part of waking up.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 1, 2024 10:43:33 GMT -5
I'm so over this, let's trade up to #2 and make sure we get Maye. umass you called me out three times and you should be glad it's over because I will silents you again with facts. I never said Bill was a bad NFL coach but you babys think that. This is why Felger is a millionaire and it can only happen in Boston and Dallas. He was smart to turn down ESPN offer. That's not even about you, it's about the draft and pick #3. Facts like how you were wrong about Patriots revenue ranking? Like comparing the Yankees Revenue wise and Tampa spending wise? Those aren't facts, they are made up fantasies. No team in football can be Tampa, it's literally impossible. Do you actually even know the difference in spending of Yankees and Tampa? Football has a spending floor, baseball doesn't. Football shares TV revenue, baseball doesn't. I literally posted an article showing how when you measure the Patriots cash spending, it changes their ranking. Just like I showed you what the Patriots have been eating for over a decade in a detailed video, that also shows what they used to eat. I've also posted how the Patriots spend all their cap space except for Covid year because they had the most opt outs in football. I'm not at all surprised you bring up Felger, the guy that literally just complains about Boston sports 24/7. If you want true unbiased facts, you won't get them watching or listening to Felger.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,874
|
Post by cdj on Apr 1, 2024 13:58:09 GMT -5
Vontae Davis died, only 35
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Apr 1, 2024 17:47:46 GMT -5
Cash Spending (real dollars) on the Patriots football roster.
Patriots 2013 $101,574,859 28 of 32 2014 $128,327,017 22 of 32 2015 $156,798,730 6 of 32 2016 $139,950,857 28 of 32 2017 $179,907,374 8 of 32 2018 $178,233,398 19 of 32 2019 $202,145,339 11 of 32 2020 $164,101,399 32 of 32 <-- Covid Opt Outs (even still, last place?) 2021 $234,590,342 4 of 32 2022 $207,575,618 26 of 32 2023 $194,850,812 31 of 32
I will give a list of 5 random teams just for comparisons sake:
Bills 2023 -- $279,137,376 2022 -- $273,140,766 2021 -- $223,481,748 <-- Patriots are higher 2020 -- $223,119,406 2019 -- $186,325,681 <-- Patriots are higher 2018 -- $154,411,721 <-- Patriots are higher 2017 -- $149,018,144 <-- Patriots are higher 2016 -- $159,640,251 2015 -- $166,003,402 2014 -- $130,246,765 2013 -- $117,163,765
Bills have outspent the Patriots in real dollars 7 out of 11 years.
KC 2023 -- $237,226,435 2022 -- $220,917,321 2021 -- $202,661,142 <-- Patriots are higher 2020 -- $202,374,489 2019 -- $181,488,372 <-- Patriots are higher 2018 -- $182,309,602 2017 -- $159,569,682 <-- Patriots are higher 2016 -- $173,201,879 2015 -- $135,369,267 <-- Patriots are higher 2014 -- $134,734,379 2013 -- $151,468,847
KC outspent the Patriots in real dollars 7 out of 11 years
Jaguars 2023 -- $238,820,991 2022 -- $255,441,586 2021 -- $215,719,822 <-- Patriots are higher 2020 -- $168,199,070 2019 -- $203,419,509 2018 -- $216,199,336 2017 -- $181,575,890 2016 -- $168,464,462 2015 -- $146,197,164 <-- Patriots are higher 2014 -- $106,800,268 <-- Patriots are higher 2013 -- $87,056,262 <-- Patriots are higher
Jaguars have out spent the Patriots 7 of the past 11 years and that's because of the earlier years.
Commanders/Football Team/Red Skins 2023 -- $203,736,562 2022 -- $210,013,840 2021 -- $225,388,585 <-- Patriots are higher 2020 -- $202,457,438 2019 -- $173,291,820 <-- Patriots are higher 2018 -- $186,128,031 2017 -- $182,363,763 2016 -- $149,909,864 2015 -- $159,037,520 2014 -- $136,886,181 2013 -- $87,350,570 <-- Patriots are higher
Commanders/Football Team/Red Skins outspent the Patriots in real dollars 8 out of 11 years
Falcons 2023 -- $249,790,243 2022 -- $166,600,153 <-- Patriots are higher 2021 -- $158,560,509 <-- Patriots are higher 2020 -- $205,499,600 2019 -- $262,565,119 2018 -- $188,494,393 2017 -- $175,557,948 <-- Patriots are higher 2016 -- $139,679,095 <-- Patriots are higher 2015 -- $135,400,241 <-- Patriots are higher 2014 -- $166,718,107 2013 -- $119,798,981
Falcons have outspent the Patriots in real dollars in 6 out of the 11 years.
This all ignores context based on roster constructions and how close they were. For example, the Patriots outspent the Eagles by a few hundred thousand in 2016, but in 2019 the Falcons outspent the Patriots by 60 million. The inverse is mostly true with their spending splurge in 2021 where the Patriots were up by about 30 million on teams.
Not exactly the most scientific approach to it, but this shows me, when compared to other owners, that Kraft is willing to spend at times, but for the most part he's not overly interested in spending on the football roster itself. Maybe some of that was Bill Belichick, maybe, but that shield is gone and so far in year 1 Kraft didn't spend real cash on the team. It will be interesting to see if they're going to wait until they hit on a QB or if they're going to splurge next off-season with hopefully a better free agent market. Again, not saying Kraft will never spend because he has, but it seems to be more they go hard for a year and then don't make heavy investments for a few years.
I'm glad football does have a floor because I'm curious if the Patriots would have spent as much as they did this year if there wasn't.
But even looking at the other team's angle you can see the waves in spending.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,874
|
Post by cdj on Apr 1, 2024 18:56:10 GMT -5
Kraft paid for Gillette himself and didn’t make us foot the bill as taxpayers, he ain’t cheap. We wouldn’t have a local football team with the history it does without him
You know how many scumbag billionaire owners make taxpayers pay for their construction projects? Most of em
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Apr 1, 2024 19:14:42 GMT -5
Kraft paid for Gillette himself and didn’t make us foot the bill as taxpayers, he ain’t cheap. We wouldn’t have a local football team with the history it does without him You know how many scumbag billionaire owners make taxpayers pay for their construction projects? Most of em He certainly reinvested in the area and the stadium/team and made it one of the most profitable franchises in sports and he did so when the Patriots couldn't pay to be on TV. With that said it was a reinvestment that paid off nicely for him. I think he's a very good business man. Cheap isn't the right word, but he has spent less on players than almost every other team the past decade.
|
|
|
Post by dcb26 on Apr 1, 2024 21:02:06 GMT -5
Kraft paid for Gillette himself and didn’t make us foot the bill as taxpayers, he ain’t cheap. We wouldn’t have a local football team with the history it does without him You know how many scumbag billionaire owners make taxpayers pay for their construction projects? Most of em You weren't here for the years he spent threatening to move the team because of how "cheap" the State was being in not building him a new Stadium, were you? For reference, he battled the State for years for public money, and eventually signed an agreement to move the team to Hartford, before the NFL stepped in and brought he and the State back to the negotiating table, settling on a deal that led to the NFL contributing and the State paying a large chunk for infrastructure improvements all around the stadium, while he paid for the stadium itself. Neither Kraft nor the State came out of that looking very good. (Note, this has nothing to do with my thoughts on the Patriots annual spending, which I do not have a strong feeling or opinion on)
|
|
|
Post by foreverred9 on Apr 1, 2024 21:53:57 GMT -5
Kraft paid for Gillette himself and didn’t make us foot the bill as taxpayers, he ain’t cheap. We wouldn’t have a local football team with the history it does without him You know how many scumbag billionaire owners make taxpayers pay for their construction projects? Most of em He certainly reinvested in the area and the stadium/team and made it one of the most profitable franchises in sports and he did so when the Patriots couldn't pay to be on TV. With that said it was a reinvestment that paid off nicely for him. I think he's a very good business man. Cheap isn't the right word, but he has spent less on players than almost every other team the past decade. Your data above has them average at 19.5 out of 32 teams in spending. Seems middle of the pack rather than below almost every other team. Why are you so fixated on cash spending? Is it proven that cash spending equals success? I'm seeing Kansas City between 16th and 27th dating back at least 5 years. Cleveland's been up at the top recently, along with some other bad teams. The spending 2020-23 is certainly questionable, but tying it back to this general statement about Kraft when he's presided over a dynasty from the day he stepped into Foxborough up to 2018 makes the argument feel hyperbolic. Especially when it felt like BB had the pen for all football decisions.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 1, 2024 22:07:45 GMT -5
Kraft paid for Gillette himself and didn’t make us foot the bill as taxpayers, he ain’t cheap. We wouldn’t have a local football team with the history it does without him You know how many scumbag billionaire owners make taxpayers pay for their construction projects? Most of em You weren't here for the years he spent threatening to move the team because of how "cheap" the State was being in not building him a new Stadium, were you? For reference, he battled the State for years for public money, and eventually signed an agreement to move the team to Hartford, before the NFL stepped in and brought he and the State back to the negotiating table, settling on a deal that led to the NFL contributing and the State paying a large chunk for infrastructure improvements all around the stadium, while he paid for the stadium itself. Neither Kraft nor the State came out of that looking very good. (Note, this has nothing to do with my thoughts on the Patriots annual spending, which I do not have a strong feeling or opinion on) archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/sports/football/120498fbn-pats-stadium.htmlDo you have more information on Kraft battling for more money? From day one I see he was going to pay for the Stadium, Boston couldn't get it passed in South Boston. There was also some mega stadium with Red Sox that again the people voted down. He turned down "biggest give away in sports history " A new stadium paid for by CT, rent free, 17.5 million a year for unsold luxury boxes, pay teams insurance, catering rights to UConn home games, new $15 million practice facility, infrastructure improvements and CT pays for all major repairs. To get from what I see as $75 million for infrastructure improvements from Massachusetts, while Kraft pays 100% for his own stadium.
|
|
|
Post by dcb26 on Apr 1, 2024 22:33:14 GMT -5
You weren't here for the years he spent threatening to move the team because of how "cheap" the State was being in not building him a new Stadium, were you? For reference, he battled the State for years for public money, and eventually signed an agreement to move the team to Hartford, before the NFL stepped in and brought he and the State back to the negotiating table, settling on a deal that led to the NFL contributing and the State paying a large chunk for infrastructure improvements all around the stadium, while he paid for the stadium itself. Neither Kraft nor the State came out of that looking very good. (Note, this has nothing to do with my thoughts on the Patriots annual spending, which I do not have a strong feeling or opinion on) archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/sports/football/120498fbn-pats-stadium.htmlDo you have more information on Kraft battling for more money? From day one I see he was going to pay for the Stadium, Boston couldn't get it passed in South Boston. There was also some mega stadium with Red Sox that again the people voted down. He turned down "biggest give away in sports history " A new stadium paid for by CT, rent free, 17.5 million a year for unsold luxury boxes, pay teams insurance, catering rights to UConn home games, new $15 million practice facility, infrastructure improvements and CT pays for all major repairs. To get from what I see as $75 million for infrastructure improvements from Massachusetts, while Kraft pays 100% for his own stadium. No articles. My recollection is that the earlier proposals (I believe one was somewhere in South Boston, there were others but I don't recall any specifics) were asking for public money, but by the time the proposal in Foxboro was put forward Kraft would pay for the Stadium and the State for the infrastructure upgrades to support it. Which was rejected by the State, which seemed to be more about political posturing than any kind of sound logic. About the only thing I'd disagree with is the notion that Kraft wouldn't have moved the team to Hartford - as far as I know nobody but Kraft knows for sure if that was ultimately a bluff (and these days he's certainly quick to imply that the team was never leaving MA) but he definitely seemed serious about it at the time, signed all the papers etc. Clearing the site was delayed, which gave the NFL time to get involved and reopen negotiations between Kraft and the State, which ultimately led to the current setup. I'm not trying to call Kraft cheap, just pushing back on the idea of him as this purely benevolent force for Patriots fans - life was pretty miserable for a few years there as a Pats fan wondering what would happen to the team. Edit Add: took a very quick look and found this www.si.com/nfl/2017/01/23/nfl-new-england-patriots-abandoned-move-hartford-connecticut - didn't read it word for word but while it barely discusses the earlier negotiations between Kraft and the State it does have some background on the potential move to Hartford and how that was avoided.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Apr 2, 2024 6:05:58 GMT -5
He certainly reinvested in the area and the stadium/team and made it one of the most profitable franchises in sports and he did so when the Patriots couldn't pay to be on TV. With that said it was a reinvestment that paid off nicely for him. I think he's a very good business man. Cheap isn't the right word, but he has spent less on players than almost every other team the past decade. Your data above has them average at 19.5 out of 32 teams in spending. Seems middle of the pack rather than below almost every other team. Why are you so fixated on cash spending? Is it proven that cash spending equals success? I'm seeing Kansas City between 16th and 27th dating back at least 5 years. Cleveland's been up at the top recently, along with some other bad teams. The spending 2020-23 is certainly questionable, but tying it back to this general statement about Kraft when he's presided over a dynasty from the day he stepped into Foxborough up to 2018 makes the argument feel hyperbolic. Especially when it felt like BB had the pen for all football decisions. I'm curious where you got 19.5 in cash spending? Using a radio talking point as gospel here (so could be very wrong) but my recollection was that they were dead last over the last decade. In terms of cash spending = wins. That's a bit tougher too because the Patriots were 4th in 2021 and it netted them a blowout loss in the playoffs. I guess you could argue for the correlation because last year they were very low and had 3 wins. Winning with Tom Brady was easy because he's Tom Brady and on top of being Tom Brady he was always willing to take less than deserved. That's why there's a caveat too with Bill. Was he a shield for shrewd spending or did Bill always search for the value and left space open for flexibility? Year 1 without Bill was not a good look for Kraft but the sample is too small. There could be other factors too. Maybe he had a change of philosophy or now that he's older there's a concern about over extending his wallet or maybe he just didn't feel like there wasn't a good reason to invest because the one time he did in the last 5 years it didn't give him the returns he had been expecting. I don't hear about his other business ventures being a distraction or him not caring anymore like the accusations of another Boston owner. I will say that when you're not good and you don't spend there's an argument to be made to save thee flexibility, but there's a shelf life to that. I don't want them to not spend over the next decade because they keep missing on the QB.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 2, 2024 12:01:42 GMT -5
archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/sports/football/120498fbn-pats-stadium.htmlDo you have more information on Kraft battling for more money? From day one I see he was going to pay for the Stadium, Boston couldn't get it passed in South Boston. There was also some mega stadium with Red Sox that again the people voted down. He turned down "biggest give away in sports history " A new stadium paid for by CT, rent free, 17.5 million a year for unsold luxury boxes, pay teams insurance, catering rights to UConn home games, new $15 million practice facility, infrastructure improvements and CT pays for all major repairs. To get from what I see as $75 million for infrastructure improvements from Massachusetts, while Kraft pays 100% for his own stadium. No articles. My recollection is that the earlier proposals (I believe one was somewhere in South Boston, there were others but I don't recall any specifics) were asking for public money, but by the time the proposal in Foxboro was put forward Kraft would pay for the Stadium and the State for the infrastructure upgrades to support it. Which was rejected by the State, which seemed to be more about political posturing than any kind of sound logic. About the only thing I'd disagree with is the notion that Kraft wouldn't have moved the team to Hartford - as far as I know nobody but Kraft knows for sure if that was ultimately a bluff (and these days he's certainly quick to imply that the team was never leaving MA) but he definitely seemed serious about it at the time, signed all the papers etc. Clearing the site was delayed, which gave the NFL time to get involved and reopen negotiations between Kraft and the State, which ultimately led to the current setup. I'm not trying to call Kraft cheap, just pushing back on the idea of him as this purely benevolent force for Patriots fans - life was pretty miserable for a few years there as a Pats fan wondering what would happen to the team. Edit Add: took a very quick look and found this www.si.com/nfl/2017/01/23/nfl-new-england-patriots-abandoned-move-hartford-connecticut - didn't read it word for word but while it barely discusses the earlier negotiations between Kraft and the State it does have some background on the potential move to Hartford and how that was avoided. He was paying for South Boston also from the beginning. Thanks for that article it really fills in the gaps. Massachusetts was being stupid, 70 million in infrastructure improvements for a major sports stadium is as good as it gets. Using the Roger Goodell to negotiate not to get sued to literally his son conversation with members of Massachusetts government to get a deal done says it all. He turned down the best deal ever, one that would have made Patriots the top revenue team to keep them in Massachusetts.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 2, 2024 12:29:32 GMT -5
Drake Maye.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Apr 2, 2024 17:26:32 GMT -5
I can’t stand Folgers and his holier than thou attitude. And his sidekick is dumb as rocks. So I don’t listen.. It certainly isn't the best part of waking up. And, you couldn't silents Folgers if you tried.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,046
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 2, 2024 21:11:53 GMT -5
I've done a full 360, and I'm back to QB no matter what, Williams >> Maye >>> Daniels >>>> Trade Down >> McCarthy. I'd rather try and be wrong on Daniels than not try at all.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 3, 2024 5:45:19 GMT -5
I've done a full 360, and I'm back to QB no matter what, Williams >> Maye >>> Daniels >>>> Trade Down >> McCarthy. I'd rather try and be wrong on Daniels than not try at all. If Maye is gone then I like the trade back to 6 idea. Still get one of the top WRs or Alt.
|
|
|