|
Post by pedroelgrande on Apr 8, 2024 11:31:15 GMT -5
So I may have missed it from last week but according to Tony Pauline, Elliot Wolf is hot for JJ McCarthy….
Also a late round WR prospect I’m hoping the Pats take a look at is Jalen Coker from Holy Cross.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,046
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 8, 2024 13:14:51 GMT -5
Here's what I don't get about trade down. So we move from the best spot we've had since Drew Bledsoe, get two coin flips (1st round WR/OT), move from a QB coinflip to a double-flip (Top 5 QB vs 2nd Round). And somehow in the future we're supposed to end up in a better position to get a QB? Last time we bottomed out with no QB we were still at 15. This team is not so bereft of talent that it should expect to be up at #3 again. The QBs this year are feast-or-famine types. We're not trying to convince ourselves Bo Nix is worth a high 1st, Maye/Daniels have plenty of tools to succeed and cause a team to succeed, or not. No one from next year looks like that yet, and if they do I don't anticipate we or anyone we get a 1st from will be close enough. So then we just end up paying the same thing we just got back to try for a coinflip a year or two later.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 8, 2024 14:27:48 GMT -5
In the tweet where he first shared this, Evan did say he doesn't endorse the trade down. He was just entertaining the scenario.
I've also read him say that he only believes they should trade down IF they don't like the options enough at 3 to bet their draft on it (or something like that).
Remember, content providers have to . . . provide content.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 8, 2024 14:45:51 GMT -5
I'd say that's why there are so many QB busts and why so many QBs rise up ranking after the season. It's the we need one, so just take one who cares if it makes sense value wise.
You trade down potentially if you feel like I do, that Daniels and McCarthy aren't top 3 pick type QBs. Nevermind you have them in the same tier as 5 other QBs in this draft.
Per reports the Patriots are asking for the moon right now, example given Vikings two first, next year's first and a player. If that gets Vikings into top 3, can't we do the exact same thing next year with 2 first round picks?
Nevermind I have a feeling if we trade down, they have another QB they like a lot that they will target.
I'd only complain if there's a QB at 3 that they think is worth the pick and they still trade down, just to get more value. No way they should do that and I don't think they will.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,046
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 8, 2024 15:36:36 GMT -5
I'd say that's why there are so many QB busts and why so many QBs rise up ranking after the season. It's the we need one, so just take one who cares if it makes sense value wise. You trade down potentially if you feel like I do, that Daniels and McCarthy aren't top 3 pick type QBs. Nevermind you have them in the same tier as 5 other QBs in this draft. Per reports the Patriots are asking for the moon right now, example given Vikings two first, next year's first and a player. If that gets Vikings into top 3, can't we do the exact same thing next year with 2 first round picks? Nevermind I have a feeling if we trade down, they have another QB they like a lot that they will target. I'd only complain if there's a QB at 3 that they think is worth the pick and they still trade down, just to get more value. No way they should do that and I don't think they will. I get all that, and fully agree if they are truly unbelieving in whoever is left at three, trading down or picking #1 player on the board is correct. But expecting we'll have a better chance at a franchise QB in the future is wrong. History says this is our best near-term chance, especially since there are consensus Top 10 pick-worthy QBs (not like Kenny Pickett type years). I don't want to see another situation where they are trying to outsmart everyone and only outsmart themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Apr 8, 2024 16:02:07 GMT -5
I get all that, and fully agree if they are truly unbelieving in whoever is left at three, trading down or picking #1 player on the board is correct. But expecting we'll have a better chance at a franchise QB in the future is wrong. History says this is our best near-term chance, especially since there are consensus Top 10 pick-worthy QBs (not like Kenny Pickett type years). I don't want to see another situation where they are trying to outsmart everyone and only outsmart themselves. In general I agree with you, this is probably as good of a chance they will get at getting that franchise QB without random draft luck. However, there IS a question if that guy will be there at #3. Williams is not falling and Washington picks before us. Drake Maye IS the guy, but if he isn’t there, then what? Daniels and lord help me McCarthy are very middling prospects, do you take one of them and pray for the best? That’s a terrible use of resources.
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Apr 8, 2024 16:26:41 GMT -5
The only thing that bothers me a bit about these trade down discurse is that a lot of proponents (not in this group more on the content creator side) hoist it as a strategy w/o downside that will guarantee the Patriots build a juggernaut of a team or that its the only way for the Patriots to improve the talent level of the offense and its not.
If the QB they want is not there at 3 and they don’t feel like they want to go all in with any of the other top QBs left by all means fair game trade the pick for the price of the QB trade up but lets not dismiss the idea of adding that elite WR cornerstone to the team at 3 that has plenty of value and its a road worth going down.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 8, 2024 16:49:29 GMT -5
I'd say that's why there are so many QB busts and why so many QBs rise up ranking after the season. It's the we need one, so just take one who cares if it makes sense value wise. You trade down potentially if you feel like I do, that Daniels and McCarthy aren't top 3 pick type QBs. Nevermind you have them in the same tier as 5 other QBs in this draft. Per reports the Patriots are asking for the moon right now, example given Vikings two first, next year's first and a player. If that gets Vikings into top 3, can't we do the exact same thing next year with 2 first round picks? Nevermind I have a feeling if we trade down, they have another QB they like a lot that they will target. I'd only complain if there's a QB at 3 that they think is worth the pick and they still trade down, just to get more value. No way they should do that and I don't think they will. I get all that, and fully agree if they are truly unbelieving in whoever is left at three, trading down or picking #1 player on the board is correct. But expecting we'll have a better chance at a franchise QB in the future is wrong. History says this is our best near-term chance, especially since there are consensus Top 10 pick-worthy QBs (not like Kenny Pickett type years). I don't want to see another situation where they are trying to outsmart everyone and only outsmart themselves. No it doesn't if you don't think a franchise QB is there at #3. Just compare 2020 and 2021 drafts, one has a ton of them all the way into 2nd round, even if low end type franchise QB, the other has one and tons of busts. Quality of the draft and who's available matters more than what draft pick you have. Look at where Mahomes went and the Chiefs trading up to get him as another example.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,642
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 8, 2024 18:54:05 GMT -5
If Maye is off the board and the Giants are giddy for Daniels or JJ, it’d be great to trade down to 6. Still get a stud WR or someone like Alt plus some other assets. Not a big fan of trading with anyone further down the board unless it’s a complete over pay by the other team. If Maye is there and he’s not picked I’ll be devastated.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Apr 9, 2024 6:51:25 GMT -5
I'd say that's why there are so many QB busts and why so many QBs rise up ranking after the season. It's the we need one, so just take one who cares if it makes sense value wise. You trade down potentially if you feel like I do, that Daniels and McCarthy aren't top 3 pick type QBs. Nevermind you have them in the same tier as 5 other QBs in this draft. Per reports the Patriots are asking for the moon right now, example given Vikings two first, next year's first and a player. If that gets Vikings into top 3, can't we do the exact same thing next year with 2 first round picks? Nevermind I have a feeling if we trade down, they have another QB they like a lot that they will target. I'd only complain if there's a QB at 3 that they think is worth the pick and they still trade down, just to get more value. No way they should do that and I don't think they will. I get all that, and fully agree if they are truly unbelieving in whoever is left at three, trading down or picking #1 player on the board is correct. But expecting we'll have a better chance at a franchise QB in the future is wrong. History says this is our best near-term chance, especially since there are consensus Top 10 pick-worthy QBs (not like Kenny Pickett type years). I don't want to see another situation where they are trying to outsmart everyone and only outsmart themselves. The chance to draft a franchise QB doesn't matter if they don't think the guys available are franchise QBs (or there is enough doubt that they want to hedge their bets). And, despite every other narrative, that will be why they trade down (if they do). If you believe otherwise, than you have ZERO confidence in the FO (so any decision they make should be questioned). I'd also just add, if they DO trade back, you won't here the real reason why. Can't imagine the team saying "well, we didn't think he was valuable at 3 so we traded back and were lucky enough to get him". You'll, as we typically do, hear the "we would've taken him at 3 but . . ."
|
|
|
Post by rasimon on Apr 9, 2024 14:16:28 GMT -5
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,642
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 10, 2024 5:21:50 GMT -5
The Beast draft guide dropped today
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,874
|
Post by cdj on Apr 10, 2024 11:26:09 GMT -5
very underrated player his entire career
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,642
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 10, 2024 12:33:33 GMT -5
very underrated player his entire career Was he? He was a good/solid corner and got paid and treated like one. He was never a number 1 but was good.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,874
|
Post by cdj on Apr 10, 2024 12:34:12 GMT -5
very underrated player his entire career Was he? He was a good/solid corner and got paid and treated like one. He was never a number 1 but was good. Pats fans used to bag on him, I think they appreciated him by the end of his tenure tho
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Apr 10, 2024 14:28:45 GMT -5
The Beast draft guide dropped today Wonderful they made the password even more crazy.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,046
|
Post by mobaz on Apr 10, 2024 14:44:20 GMT -5
The Beast draft guide dropped today Wonderful they made the password even more crazy. I was SURE i typed it perfectly but it failed so then I just cut-and-pasted. Sad!
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Apr 10, 2024 16:03:14 GMT -5
Prepare yourself guys.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,642
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Apr 10, 2024 17:54:10 GMT -5
I’d prefer then take JJ over Daniels
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan2 on Apr 11, 2024 12:55:06 GMT -5
Bears better be right on Caleb if this is true. I'd have done it and taken Maye.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Apr 11, 2024 14:16:29 GMT -5
Assuming there is truth to that offer I'd have taken that deal if I was the Bears but I also am not too high on Williams, he has some growing up to do if he's going to be an NFL franchise QB.
|
|
badfishnbc
Veteran
Doing you all a favor and leaving through the gate in right field since 2012.
Posts: 516
|
Post by badfishnbc on Apr 12, 2024 10:04:59 GMT -5
I mean, if Washington is so hot for Caleb that they'd make that stupidly rich offer, doesn't that signal a Daniels backup plan?
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Apr 12, 2024 11:31:34 GMT -5
Mock Madness
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Apr 12, 2024 23:49:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by philarhody on Apr 13, 2024 19:32:42 GMT -5
|
|