SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Predicting The 2025 Opening Day Roster
|
Post by maxwellsdemon on Oct 1, 2024 17:19:09 GMT -5
What if Casas is the big trade bait with Devers moving to first solving his biggest defensive liabilty, his throwing? It seems like a waste to move Story to 3b and does he have the arm for it, who else is the obvious replacement Campbell, Mayer (do either fit)?
|
|
|
Post by trajanacc on Oct 1, 2024 17:32:28 GMT -5
I totally understand folks’ reactions to any trade that would include Duran. He was a stud this year. However, I think the question of whether you trade him or not completely lies on whether you believe he has the ability to perform at this level in the long term. Personally, I’m leaning on that this season was a Jacoby Ellsbury anomaly. If that’s indeed the case, why wouldn’t the team extract the most value out of him now to get a controllable stud of SP? As good and promising Abreu is, he’s not getting that return. Teams aren’t dumb and know they can ask the world and then some. In short, if the team is to get one of the M’s SPs, it certainly means Duran or Casas goes. If it’s indeed likely that Duran had an anomalous year and the Red Sox should try to cash in on his value now, wouldn’t other front offices be wise to this and not offer as much in a potential trade? As you say, teams aren’t dumb—in fact, they have far more information and expertise than we have. If they value him the same as you (or the Red Sox), then there’s no longer any value in getting rid of him.
|
|
|
Post by pappyman99 on Oct 1, 2024 18:17:33 GMT -5
Let’s not pretend there are not gms out there that won’t make dumb or what look like dumb moves
|
|
|
Post by bellhorndingers21 on Oct 1, 2024 21:16:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 1, 2024 21:51:38 GMT -5
That's a pretty big number for Kutter as a super two and it's only going to go up. He's gonna be a nontender candidate as soon as he has one bad year. Duran's gonna get a lot of money in his four years of arb. Cool to see these guys starting to get rich
|
|
|
Post by keninten on Oct 2, 2024 4:40:04 GMT -5
What if Casas is the big trade bait with Devers moving to first solving his biggest defensive liabilty, his throwing? It seems like a waste to move Story to 3b and does he have the arm for it, who else is the obvious replacement Campbell, Mayer (do either fit)? SS needs a better arm than a 3B does. SS actually has a longer throw if they go to their right into the OF.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 2, 2024 4:51:54 GMT -5
If anything would be wasted at 3rd for Story it'd be his range. Mayer seems the obvious choice to me in a theoretical scenario where you want to move Devers to DH and replace him from within. That being said I doubt they pull the plug on Devers playing 3rd yet.
|
|
|
Post by dmdmd on Oct 2, 2024 7:36:37 GMT -5
Cardinals seem like a natural trading partner w Chaim stepping up, knowing our system, and signing and trading for a couple players he has seemed to like and who are movable for the Sox: Yoshida and Abreu. Cardinals looking to cut payroll and get younger: Perhaps Sox can exchange contracts of Gray for Yoshida, and move Abreu (finally the Cards getting a young OF rather than trading their good ones!) for Helsley. Something like Yoshida, Abreu, Z. Kelly, L. Guerrero for Gray and Helsley. Sox accomplish a few goals with this: get a high-end starter, get a good reliever, open up positions for right-handed bats (and 40-man slots). I have more ideas for other moves to complete the line-up/roster, but one deal like this could get the ball rolling.
|
|
|
Post by bellhorndingers21 on Oct 2, 2024 8:17:22 GMT -5
Cardinals seem like a natural trading partner w Chaim stepping up, knowing our system, and signing and trading for a couple players he has seemed to like and who are movable for the Sox: Yoshida and Abreu. Cardinals looking to cut payroll and get younger: Perhaps Sox can exchange contracts of Gray for Yoshida, and move Abreu (finally the Cards getting a young OF rather than trading their good ones!) for Helsley. Something like Yoshida, Abreu, Z. Kelly, L. Guerrero for Gray and Helsley. Sox accomplish a few goals with this: get a high-end starter, get a good reliever, open up positions for right-handed bats (and 40-man slots). I have more ideas for other moves to complete the line-up/roster, but one deal like this could get the ball rolling. Gray faded considerably in the second half, ended the season with a forearm issue and his AAV would be 30 million. If they're open to adding that type of salary I'd rather they spend it in free agency and not poorly managing asset value. Yoshida is not that much of a sunk cost.
|
|
|
Post by puzzler on Oct 2, 2024 10:00:33 GMT -5
Cardinals seem like a natural trading partner w Chaim stepping up, knowing our system, and signing and trading for a couple players he has seemed to like and who are movable for the Sox: Yoshida and Abreu. Cardinals looking to cut payroll and get younger: Perhaps Sox can exchange contracts of Gray for Yoshida, and move Abreu (finally the Cards getting a young OF rather than trading their good ones!) for Helsley. Something like Yoshida, Abreu, Z. Kelly, L. Guerrero for Gray and Helsley. Sox accomplish a few goals with this: get a high-end starter, get a good reliever, open up positions for right-handed bats (and 40-man slots). I have more ideas for other moves to complete the line-up/roster, but one deal like this could get the ball rolling. Gray faded considerably in the second half, ended the season with a forearm issue and his AAV would be 30 million. If they're open to adding that type of salary I'd rather they spend it in free agency and not poorly managing asset value. Yoshida is not that much of a sunk cost. This really isn't accurate. Gray was very good in 6 of is last 9 starts. What did him in was a really bad July. The injury is always a concern, but he just posted the highest K% and lowest B% of his career.
|
|
|
Post by bloomstaxonomy on Oct 2, 2024 11:08:53 GMT -5
My reasons for bringing up Bregman are: 1. It's a way to better balance the lineup (which Breslow mentioned he was interested in) 2. It's a way to improve the infield defense (which Breslow mentioned he was interested in) 3. Coming off a down year, he still put up 4+ WAR and would not command a huge financial commitment. 4. It helps to preserve Devers' health. 5. Fenway could help his swing. Not so much for HRs, but probably for extra base hits. I'm trying to find spray charts. His Baseball Savant page perplexes me. It seems like he has a down year (by statcast metrics) once every 4 years or so, but some of his metrics are still red hot. I agree with most of what you have. There's two things that concern me though - one is he will be 31 before next season starts and the second is why his walk rate plummeted. He basically replaces O'Neill and provides a great deal better defense. But then there is the contract. He's going to require at least what Chapman got - 6 years - $150 million. That doesn't bother me too much from 31-33 - but then it's concerning from 34-36. Honestly Bregman's 2024 compares very well with Chapman's 2023, after which he received a "disappointing" 3-year deal with an opt-out after each one. I think Bregman is going to get a better contract than that, but I think a 6/150 is unlikely. I'd be in on a 5/100 or a 4/90.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 2, 2024 11:13:09 GMT -5
- Vlad Jr. is set to make $29.6 million in arb. For those who would swap Casas for him, I leave the math to you.
- Cedric Mullins is still in arb? It feels like he's been around for like a decade but he barely has 5 years of service time. Meanwhile Skubal already has 4 years of service time and I feel like he showed up about 3 weeks ago. Ditto Crochet.
|
|
|
Post by chaimtime on Oct 2, 2024 11:30:40 GMT -5
I agree with most of what you have. There's two things that concern me though - one is he will be 31 before next season starts and the second is why his walk rate plummeted. He basically replaces O'Neill and provides a great deal better defense. But then there is the contract. He's going to require at least what Chapman got - 6 years - $150 million. That doesn't bother me too much from 31-33 - but then it's concerning from 34-36. Honestly Bregman's 2024 compares very well with Chapman's 2023, after which he received a "disappointing" 3-year deal with an opt-out after each one. I think Bregman is going to get a better contract than that, but I think a 6/150 is unlikely. I'd be in on a 5/100 or a 4/90. I don’t think they compare well at all. The overall production was similar, I guess (though even in a down year, Bregman produced more WAR than Chapman did in any of his 3 seasons leading to free agency) but there were real questions about whether Chapman would make enough contact to be a major leaguer by the time he’s 34. I don’t expect Bregman to age especially well, but I think the floor is a lot higher with him. I’d expect him to get a hefty deal, definitely more than 4/90.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 2, 2024 11:39:20 GMT -5
Honestly Bregman's 2024 compares very well with Chapman's 2023, after which he received a "disappointing" 3-year deal with an opt-out after each one. I think Bregman is going to get a better contract than that, but I think a 6/150 is unlikely. I'd be in on a 5/100 or a 4/90. I don’t think they compare well at all. The overall production was similar, I guess (though even in a down year, Bregman produced more WAR than Chapman did in any of his 3 seasons leading to free agency) but there were real questions about whether Chapman would make enough contact to be a major leaguer by the time he’s 34. I don’t expect Bregman to age especially well, but I think the floor is a lot higher with him. I’d expect him to get a hefty deal, definitely more than 4/90. I think Bregman's ultimately going reel in something along the lines of what Chapman got with his extension this year, 6/151M maybe even exactly what Chapman got between this extension and last years FA contract which ultimately added up to 7/169. Either way if he's getting something in that type of ballpark it would be a hard pass. Honestly probably a hard pass in just about any scenario from me on Bregman, just don't like the fit as I don't see Devers getting moved off 3rd base yet so it doesn't add up to me.
|
|
|
Post by chaimtime on Oct 2, 2024 11:48:42 GMT -5
Hopped into the comments section of Jen McCaffrey’s offseason preview in the Athletic. Quickly remembered why I waste so much time on this website instead.
|
|
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Oct 2, 2024 11:58:23 GMT -5
- Vlad Jr. is set to make $29.6 million in arb. For those who would swap Casas for him, I leave the math to you. - Cedric Mullins is still in arb? It feels like he's been around for like a decade but he barely has 5 years of service time. Meanwhile Skubal already has 4 years of service time and I feel like he showed up about 3 weeks ago. Ditto Crochet.
In a vacuum Vlad Jr is simply better than Casas. He plays every day and is only a year older while Casas missed a chunk of time this year and has never even in the minors sniffed .323 as an average and Vlad launched 48 a few years back and I wouldnt be surprised if he tops 40 again. But yeah, the price difference, which should be spent on pitching unless the Sox actually plan on opening the budget that wide which I doubt. The reason why Vlad gets brought up is because of Breslow's continued and correctly pointed out stance that the Sox are too LH and slant even more lefty in the near future as 3 of the big 4 and even the switch hitting Montgonery are really lefties. So plan A is to retain O'Neill. For 1 year, great. Multiple years with him would make me nervous. His numbers were pretty good but I personally didnt think he was super impactful. He drove himself in more than his teammates which was kind of weird. In a perfect world Casas and Vlad coexist as teammates in 2026. At some point the Sox need to stop with their 1 year RH bopper rentals from Renfroe to Duvall to O'Neill. They need a RH power hitting cleanup fixture in the middle of the lineup. My guess is that Campbell and Grissom fit more as table setters, although Campbell could surprise on the big power department. But they need that anchor like JD Martinez or Manny. And Vladdy is as close as they come. I dont see aging 3b like Bregman and Arenado as great solutions, not do I see Story really reclaiming the big bopper status he had in Colorado, so when Breslow keeps harping on the need for a RH bat, that's why Vlad Jr comes up. In an ideal world O'Neill accepts the QO and leaves after a year and the Sox upgrade to Vlad, a complete hitter than just a HR or nothing low average hitter. But I do wonder if Breslow does make a multiyear deal, one that makes us glad to retain O'Neill but makes us skittish when he gets injured and that contributes to him hitting .215 in 100 games with 15 HRs, and we wish they'd do better. If O'Neill goes elsewhere I wonder if Breslow turns to Goldschmidt for a year, assuming maybe dubiously that he can trade Yoshida with the intent of Goldschmidt filling the bill for a season, king of like a Turner, if the plan is to go all on 26 on Vlad.
|
|
|
Post by wanderingdude on Oct 2, 2024 12:37:15 GMT -5
- Vlad Jr. is set to make $29.6 million in arb. For those who would swap Casas for him, I leave the math to you.
- Cedric Mullins is still in arb? It feels like he's been around for like a decade but he barely has 5 years of service time. Meanwhile Skubal already has 4 years of service time and I feel like he showed up about 3 weeks ago. Ditto Crochet.
Unfortunately, being placed on the MLB injured list does wonders for service time.
|
|
|
Post by cheers on Oct 2, 2024 13:14:04 GMT -5
I agree with redsox04071318champs last (long) post 100%. Thanks for saving me the effort of typing (or stringing together my own coherent thought).
|
|
|
Post by chaimtime on Oct 2, 2024 17:07:56 GMT -5
No thanks on Bregman if this is what they’re expecting going into the offseason. Disaster waiting to happen.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 2, 2024 17:12:31 GMT -5
If Boras is adamant on 200M+ in a contract for bregman and stays as steadfast as he did with Chapman last year then he may end up getting burnt like Chapman did last year. Now it worked out for Chapman in the end getting that extension now but he had to gamble to get it.
|
|
|
Post by finaliz3d on Oct 2, 2024 17:32:57 GMT -5
No thanks on Bregman if this is what they’re expecting going into the offseason. Disaster waiting to happen. Good, now I can stop hearing about Bregman to the Red Sox.
|
|
|
Post by dmdmd on Oct 2, 2024 17:58:55 GMT -5
C: Wong 1B: Casas 2B: Grissom, unless outplayed by Campbell in ST SS: Story 3B: Bregman/Devers LF: Refsynder, possibly Campbell, maybe Bregman in a pinch--beginning Alex Gordon-type transition CF: Rafaela RF: Duran DH: Devers/Bregman If/when Anthony is ready, he goes to RF, Duran to LF, Refsynder to bench
Bench: Hamilton, Romy, Sogard/Meidroth/Grissom/Ref. 2nd catcher (strong defensively) as placeholder for Teel later in year: perhaps via trade of Bernardino or Winckowski.
SP: Sonny Gray Houck Bello Giolitto Crawford Depth: Criswell, Fitts, Priester
RP: Ryan Helsley Slaten Hendriks Fullmer Whitlock (would love to see him as 2-3 inning guy every 3rd/4th game) Criswell (long-man) Penrod Booser Still a fair amount of AAA depth with Weissert, Shugart, Isaiah Campbell
Gray and Helsley acquired for Abreu, Yoshida, Zack Kelly (though Cora seems to love him), L Guerrero
Gray is only 2-year commitment. Bregman probably going to get 7 years, $175M-$203M. Bregman very polarizing w some downsides including cost but the pros: veteran leadership w tons of playoff experience who probably handles the pressure of Boston (a potential risk w Gray), good defense, RH-bat who could play pepper w the Monster, could even back-up SS in a pinch (Rafaela should not move off CF). Rotating Bregman through DH perhaps appeases Devers, while Bregman at 3B preserves Devers a bit.
If you can't get Gray or other top-flight starter like Fried in free agency, then go hard after Tanner Scott and make the bullpen dominant like the Guardians this year. If not able to get top starter and going w power bullpen approach w someone like Scott, then you could bring Pivetta back as SP (and even RP).
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 2, 2024 18:24:19 GMT -5
Boras does this every year. Get an outlandish contract demand in the papers early and then hope people think any deal less than that is an absolute steal.
|
|
|
Post by dirtdog on Oct 2, 2024 18:39:10 GMT -5
I have always thought Bregman was "enhanced" There I said it. Wrong side of 30 so in a take it or leave it world, more inclined to leave it.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 2, 2024 18:40:23 GMT -5
Fwiw, I cannot imagine a world in which Bregman, Devers, and Casas are all on the same roster.
|
|
|