SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Predicting The 2025 Opening Day Roster
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,655
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 8, 2024 14:22:08 GMT -5
It is becoming semi tiresome and to be honest lazy when folks say "We need an ace!" and then don't name who that is or quite frankly name someone who isn't even an ace. Houck was good enough this year that he'd be the #1 starter on 2/3 of the league. If the Sox believe that sustainable then no they don't need an ace. Would I like them to get another one if the cost wasn't prohibitive? Sure. It just isn't really an absolute need. They do need another solid SP or two but that could frankly be anyone from a 2 through 4 SP IMO. Houck, Bello, Crawford is the makings of a good trio already, with Giolito/Criswell/Fitts/Priester/Whitlock as fighting it out for that #5 spot as well as interesting arms working their way up further down in Sandlin, Early, ERC, Monegero, Tolle Etc.
Personally I hope they aim for a 2/3 SP vs a 3/4 SP but no they don't need an ace as Houck very well could be said ace.
|
|
|
Post by melvinhoggs on Oct 8, 2024 14:29:17 GMT -5
In my initial comment you responded to, I wasn't talking about the Red Sox "big four" or even specifically about the Red Sox at all. I was responding to a comment about the risk/reward of trading for pitching, and how the supposed risk of trading for starters needs to take into account the high bust rate of prospects. I disagreed with the premise that starting pitchers weren't all that important, and then I disagreed with your method of only looking at #1 prospects to determine bust rate.
In the context of the Red Sox, you can hold the prospects in as high a regard as you want. But top prospects still bust, and even those that don't often just turn into solid contributors (as you already pointed out). Teams need solid contributors, but the Red Sox already have a lot of those – so if you can do a good job identifying (or make a good bet on) which ones will just be solid and package them up for a star, they should do that.
To put it another way, three players who put up 2-3 WAR might easily "out-value" a guy that puts up 5-6 WAR during the same time frame – but if you want to compete for the division and win in the playoffs, you need some of those top guys. If you believe that all of Anthony, Campbell and Mayer are going to be 5+ WAR guys, then obviously you wouldn't trade them for a Crochet or a Gilbert type. But I think that's unlikely, and for that reason I'd like to see the Red Sox pick the one they think might just be solid and bring in some high-end pitching.
Not to keep harping on this, but even in this post you just described Crochet and Gilbert as 5-6 WAR types. By Fangraphs, each of them has reached the 4 WAR threshold once. By BREF Crochet has hit that mark once (4.1 bWAR this year), and Gilbert has never bested 3.2 bWAR. This is the whole point: trading value for elite pitchers makes sense, except that truly elite pitching is incredibly rare right now. Harping is fine, I don't mind the discussion – and I didn't describe those guys as 5-6 WAR types, those were separate points on theoretical value. The point being that you don't need to get the most possible "sum value" for the trade to be good. Even so, I can see how it looks like I said that – and I actually do believe Crochet is a 5-6 WAR type. He put up 4.7 WAR in only 146 innings with all the expected stats and advanced metrics to back it up.
I would also definitely trade one of the non-Anthony big four for Gilbert, because I think there's a bigger chance that they flame out or turn out just okay than people want to believe.
|
|
|
Post by kwodes on Oct 8, 2024 14:33:38 GMT -5
It is becoming semi tiresome and to be honest lazy when folks say "We need an ace!" and then don't name who that is or quite frankly name someone who isn't even an ace. Houck was good enough this year that he'd be the #1 starter on 2/3 of the league. If the Sox believe that sustainable then no they don't need an ace. Would I like them to get another one if the cost wasn't prohibitive? Sure. It just isn't really an absolute need. They do need another solid SP or two but that could frankly be anyone from a 2 through 4 SP IMO. Houck, Bello, Crawford is the makings of a good trio already, with Giolito/Criswell/Fitts/Priester/Whitlock as fighting it out for that #5 spot as well as interesting arms working their way up further down in Sandlin, Early, ERC, Monegero, Tolle Etc. Personally I hope they aim for a 2/3 SP vs a 3/4 SP but no they don't need an ace as Houck very well could be said ace. I will continue to bang the drum for Jack Flaherty. He's not a lefty, but I feel like he's perfect for this team. It also allows you to include kutter, fitts, Quinn in a package for Crochet if you wanted to. Fits your mold of more like a 2 than an ace, but is still an impactful addition. He will also not cost $200 mil to sign.
|
|
|
Post by johnnygooch on Oct 8, 2024 15:35:32 GMT -5
Skubal this season (and especially this postseason) is showing just how valuable a true number one starter is. AJ Hinch doesn't have to worry at all about the games Skubal starts from a pitching perspective, he knows he is going to get 6-7+ innings of shutdown ball every time he toes the rubber. There aren't many players like that available in free agency in the coming years, and no one in the system right now that looks like they could come up in the next few years and have the potential to become that (with the exception of Perales, who most likely won't pitch at all next season). Honestly there aren't many people who look like they could become, or currently are at that level in the entirety of baseball. Skenes, Skubal, Wheeler, DeGrom (previously), Sale (this year). Maybe just outside of that definition are Ragans, Webb, Gallen, Glasnow, Strider, and Burnes?
Last year when Skubal came back from injury was when he really started to break out, is it so crazy that Crochet breaking out as a full time starter in the majors this year could show the opportunity for a similar future for him? Taking a look at Skubal's 2023 and Crochet's 2024 under the hood, they're similar in a lot of ways. I don't mean that they are the same pitcher at all: Skubal's curve and slider give him a different pitch mix than Crochet's cutter and sweeper, but their 4-seam fastballs, sinkers, and changeups have similar profiles despite the 10 degree difference in arm angle. I don't necessarily think we are in need of an "ace", but that doesn't change the fact that it would benefit us to have someone with the potential to be a true number one starter and dominate games in the regular season and postseason. Getz would probably ask for Anthony, Mayer, or Campbell given how crazy his market is going to be this offseason, but if there is any chance we could get it done without sending one of them then I think it could be worth the risk.
Anyways, here is another unlikely but fun to think about roster idea for 2025:
Traded players: OUT: Wilyer Abreu, Franklin Arias, Miguel Bleis, Masataka Yoshida (and cash), Kutter Crawford, Connor Wong IN: Garrett Crochet, Luis Robert Jr., Willson Contreras, Ryan Helsley
Free agents: OUT: Nick Pivetta, Tyler O'Neill, Chris Martin, Kenley Jansen, Danny Jansen, Lucas Sims, Luis Garcia IN: AJ Minter, Shane Bieber
1: Crochet 2: Houck 3: Bieber 4: Bello 5: Giolito Depth: Priester, Fitts
Pen: Weissert Whitlock Penrod Minter Guerrero Slaten Hendriks Helsley
C: Contreras (R) 1B: Casas (L) 2B: Campbell (R) SS: Story (R) 3B: Devers (L) LF: Duran (L) CF: Rafaela (R) RF: Anthony (L) DH: Robert Jr. (R)
Bench: Teel, Grissom/Meidroth, Hamilton, Refsnyder
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 8, 2024 16:14:12 GMT -5
Some of these comments from Breslow were a little more gung-ho than the impression I got from reading the comments from people here. In parsing CB’s comments, I think it’s worth calling out what it seems he is saying, and what he isn’t. He commits to being more “aggressive” in roster building, but he’s not saying they’ll be stupid. Trading two top 100 guys for a TOR starter, as some on this board have suggested, makes no sense for this team. That qualifies as stupid, not aggressive. If they were a starter away from being a sure-fire upper echelon contender, maybe you justify a trade like that; but we aren’t there. And remember, ownership hired CB1 to implement a more value-driven approach to team building. CB2 seems committed to that course, as well. After five years of mediocrity, we’re finally on the cusp of having a foundation that will enable that model. I don’t think they’re gonna to throw that goal in the trash and go back to the spend-like-there's-no-tomorrow approach. That said, I do think it signals a willingness to go beyond $241M, as long as we don’t do it by saddling the team with bloated long-term contracts to guys already on the other side of 30. The biggest failure modes in 2024 (hence our biggest gaps to fill heading into next season), in order of importance IMO were: bullpen; defense (esp C and SS); hitting against LHP; lack of viable depth (1B, SS, SP, RP, and though it didn’t hurt us too much, 3B); starting pitching. What does aggressive look like in addressing these needs? Bullpen
Losing Jansen and Martin are holes that need to be filled, and who knows what production we’ll get from guys like Hendricks, Whitlock, and Fulmer coming off injuries. There’s a lot of risk in that group. There are several options in the FA market, and trades for relievers are always options. This is where we can be more aggressive in dealing from mid-tier prospect depth. I’d rather have 3-4 new relievers and keep guys like Winc, Guerrero, and Penrod in AAA as depth (I think our AAA depth is pretty bad). Total AAV added: $20MDefense
Story should dramatically improve IF defense—not just SS, but 3B, as well. Problem is, if he goes down (does anyone feel comfortable relying on his health?), do we have an answer? We see how that impacted us this year. More on that in the depth section. As for C, this is about the most obvious need, but one that can be addressed fairly easily. We just have to win the Carson Kelly sweepstakes (if there is one). How much are we talking about anyway? $6M AAV? Two, possibly three years? An aggressive team doesn’t blink at that for the immense value it would bring. AAV added: $6M Hitting against LHP
This is where the youngins start to factor in. Campbell and Anthony (despite being LHH) both excel vs LHP (RHP, too). Grissom, interestingly, has actually had reverse splits throughout his career, so he’s not as much of an answer here. I think it’s quite possible, and consistent with CB2’s comments, that both make the OD roster. Slot KC at 2B (primarily) and RA in RF. That would be aggressive. Also, I don’t see the downside of offering TON a QO, as long as there’s a willingness to go over LTT. If he accepts, what’s $21M on a one-year deal? Trade Rafaela and install Duran in CF. If he rejects, we keep CR in CF. Potential AAV added: $14M (if offset by CR trade) Depth
First order of business, trade Yoshida. He offers no versatility, and his bat isn’t so compelling that it justifies a full-time DH role. Even if we have to eat some money, that’s a no brainer. This would open up another obvious FA option: Carlos Santana. I know he’s 39, but he continues to be productive at the plate, especially vs LHP, and he remains one of the better defensive 1B, so he would be a much better depth option at that position. A hybrid DH/1B who still hits for power while keeping K% relatively low, is a much better use of the Yoshida slot. And he’s at the point where he’s going year to year. AAV added: $5MA defense-first FA option for 2B/SS/3B would be Kevin Newman. He should be available for a relatively modest 1-2 yr commitment. He’d be a solid depth option for SS in case Story misses time. Not much with the bat, but defense at SS is paramount, and it’s not likely Story will be lighting the world on fire at the plate anyway. I’d hate for Mayer to be counted on to be Story’s backup in 2025. Hate to force a promotion before the prospect is ready. A one-year deal with the likes of Newman takes pressure off and pushes Romy or Hamilton back to AAA for even more depth. AAV added: $3M Starting Pitching
I don’t think starting pitching was a huge problem in 2024, aside from very little depth and impact from fatigue as some of our SPs blew well past prior IP totals, both of which problems should be mitigated in 2025. Of course we have to replace Pivetta, but I just don’t think there’s a TOR option available via trade without it qualifying as stupid (as mentioned above), and I don’t like the idea of signing one of the top FAs to a $30M per year contract into perpetuity, especially since they’re all nearing the end of their prime. Just bad business. If they can swing it, and if he’s amenable to going back to a large market AL East team, I like the idea of trading for Gray. He may not be a #1, but figures to be a solid #2. And STL looks to be in the market for offloading salary. A Yoshida-for-Gray trade, as others have suggested, kills two birds with one stone. Given the price tag attached to Gray, I think he could be had at a cost that isn’t too painful. This feels like a move that a team that wants to be aggressive without jeopardizing their farm would make. Outside of this, it shouldn’t be unreasonable to expect pitching to improve year over year as our young arms are still developing (e.g., Bello, Crawford). Combined with the force multiplier of having a strong defensive catcher that should raise all boats, along with adding Gray to replace Pivetta, that could provide far more aggregate value at a more reasonable cost than ponying up the prosect haul for Crochet (who scares me regardless) or another arm of his ilk, or the $200M+/6-8yr commitment for a 30+ year old FA. LineupLHHs: Casas, Devers, Anthony, Duran, Hamilton* RHHs: Kelly, Campbell, Story, TON or CR, Santana (DH), Wong*, Newman*, Refsnyder*) * bench CBT Payroll (all in, including medical, MILB cost, bonus/incentives)
$231M (CR in, TON out), or $245M (TON in, CR out) 26-Man Moves
Yoshida (trade) Rafaela (trade, if TON comes back) Abreu (AAA, but realistically, one of the five OF, including Abreu, will likely be on the IL throughout the season, so he'll be on the active roster most of the time) Romy (AAA)
|
|
|
Post by awalkinthepark on Oct 8, 2024 16:26:21 GMT -5
I personally don't have any issue with the Red Sox giving up elite prospects as long as they feel like they are getting good value back in return. The Beckett/Hanley trade was good, and I would do it again, even though Hanley was a superstar in Florida.
It's obviously easier said than done but in my opinion hanging on to all of your prospects is not the best use of your farm system.
Well sure, but that brings us back to taiwansox's original question: how valuable are the pitchers we're talking about? Just looking at WAR, you'd be absolutely foolish to trade Jarren Duran (for example) for one of the SEA guys, but that idea gets floated a lot - presumably because they're "Top of the Rotation Pitchers" and you need a "Top of the Rotation Pitcher" to be a great team. But is that still true when teams get less value out of these fringy #1/#2 types than ever before? I hear what you are saying and think it's a fair point. And I tend to lean that the whole 'we need an ace' thing is a bit overblown. But when you look up and down the roster, pitching is the biggest need and this org can absolutely afford to part with their good position player prospects in order to improve it.
I do think if they aren't going to make a big splash SP acquisition, then I would at least like Breslow to put serious resources into building a better bullpen. If you aren't going to have a strong rotation, at least give Cora late game weapons to win close contests.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,794
|
Post by asm18 on Oct 9, 2024 8:45:17 GMT -5
Was listening to the SP Podcast yesterday and it was sort of anxiety inducing listening to Ian make the case that they might need to find up to 5 new bullpen pieces by next year. Slaten and Guerrero were seen as locks, Hendriks will be there but you don't know what you'll get after his surgery (same with Whitlock), and then... *shrug emoji* I don't usually like diving into bullpen acquisitions because "Relievers Are Weird" but these are the top Free Agents by WAR over the last two years (via MLB.com/Fangraphs): Tanner Scott (30 years old, 4.5 WAR) Jeff Hoffman (32, 3.6) David Robertson (40, 3.1) -- mutual option Aroldis Chapman (37, 2.9) Clay Holmes (32, 2.8) Kenley Jansen (37, 2.5) Chris Martin (39, 2.4)Carlos Estévez (32, 2.1) Shawn Armstrong (34, 2.0) Dylan Floro (34, 1.8) Kirby Yates (38, 1.8) José Leclerc (31, 1.7) See more at: www.mlb.com/news/2024-25-mlb-free-agents-by-positionCan't say I feel super great about 1) the premium options after from Tanner Scott, 2) that you could stand to lose two of the better options available.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 9, 2024 9:06:45 GMT -5
Was listening to the SP Podcast yesterday and it was sort of anxiety inducing listening to Ian make the case that they might need to find up to 5 new bullpen pieces by next year. Slaten and Guerrero were seen as locks, Hendriks will be there but you don't know what you'll get after his surgery (same with Whitlock), and then... *shrug emoji* 5 seems like a bit much.
Slaten, Guerrero, Hendricks, Whitlock, Weissert, Booser, Winckowski, sign two free agents, shuffle around the usual randos for AAAA depth. If it's the right two free agents (I might would bring back Martin and add one of the top of the market guys) that could be a very solid bullpen.
And where does Fulmer stand? And whatever happened to Isaiah Campbell? If he's healthy he could still be good.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,655
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 9, 2024 9:17:52 GMT -5
In regards to the bullpen, I like the idea of trying to make a trade for a guy like Devin Williams in MIL, Helsley in STL, or pick your favorite good RP starting to make decent money on a team looking to shed salary. On top of that sign a guy like Tanner Scott, Scott + theoretical high leverage RP trade to go along with the guys in house could be a good BP. I'd like to try and get one more BP arm since two BP arms are just replacing Martin/Jansen but if they think Hendriks can be close to what he once was as well as Slaten staying healthy and whatever they plan to do with Whitlock that sounds like a BP upgrade to me.
|
|
|
Post by bloomstaxonomy on Oct 9, 2024 9:20:16 GMT -5
Breslow did make a comment about the specific need to "re-build" the bullpen, so perhaps there will be more additions and investments in those roster spots than expected.
|
|
|
Post by johnnygooch on Oct 9, 2024 11:38:20 GMT -5
I know he is cheap and affordable but I do not want Josh Winckowski pitching important innings next year. He's fine as bullpen depth, but he cannot miss bats at all. Every single time he came in games this season I wanted to turn the game off.
We have a decent basis for the bullpen next year with Weissert, Whitlock, Penrod, Guerrero, Slaten, and Hendriks. Maybe Fulmer too? Definitely need to add a couple arms though. Preferably a high leverage option and a lefty.
AJ Minter and Wandy Peralta (if he opts out) are the main free agent lefties. Obviously Tanner Scott too, but he would classify more as a high leverage reliever than someone who purely pitches in lefty lanes.
Andres Munoz, Ryan Helsley, Jhoan Duran, and Kyle Finnegan could all possibly be available by trade. Would be tough to pry Jhoan Duran from the Twins but he's hitting arbitration next year and if they are slashing payroll, he could be on the table if we also take on more money in a salary relief trade. Cardinals slashing payroll and Chaim's familiarity with our farm system could allow us to better match up in a trade for Helsley though.
|
|
|
Post by bg23 on Oct 9, 2024 12:07:40 GMT -5
I would feel much more comfortable if Penrod and Weissert are AAA depth rather than on the opening day roster. Slaten and Hendriks feel like automatics. Whitlock if he is back from injury, Criswell as the long man/spot starter/innings eater, and hopefully Fulmer is back full go as well. That is five right there. Guerrero may have earned himself an opening day nod too, so I think they need two leverage relievers (at least one lefty), and maybe another middle relief arm depending on how Whitlock and Fulmer have recovered. My preference would be Tanner Scott and resigning Chris Martin. Maybe they sneak Bernardino on the opening day roster instead of Whitlock if he is still building up? Having Weissert, Winck, Kelly, Campbell, Penrod, Booser, & Murphy (assuming Shugart, Mata, and Horn get booted from the 40) as relief depth would potentially turn the bullpen into a strength next year.
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 9, 2024 12:15:51 GMT -5
I know he is cheap and affordable but I do not want Josh Winckowski pitching important innings next year. He's fine as bullpen depth, but he cannot miss bats at all. Every single time he came in games this season I wanted to turn the game off. We have a decent basis for the bullpen next year with Weissert, Whitlock, Penrod, Guerrero, Slaten, and Hendriks. Maybe Fulmer too? Definitely need to add a couple arms though. Preferably a high leverage option and a lefty. AJ Minter and Wandy Peralta (if he opts out) are the main free agent lefties. Obviously Tanner Scott too, but he would classify more as a high leverage reliever than someone who purely pitches in lefty lanes. Andres Munoz, Ryan Helsley, Jhoan Duran, and Kyle Finnegan could all possibly be available by trade. Would be tough to pry Jhoan Duran from the Twins but he's hitting arbitration next year and if they are slashing payroll, he could be on the table if we also take on more money in a salary relief trade. Cardinals slashing payroll and Chaim's familiarity with our farm system could allow us to better match up in a trade for Helsley though. I don't know that I agree with the bolded statement. Whitlock, Hendriks, and Fulmer are coming off significant arm injuries. I don't think we should be relying on those guys getting back to normal. Maybe they will, and if so, fantastic. Just very high risk. Weissert should be in AAA. Penrod, too. Guerrero looked great in his cup of coffee, but he's so new, who knows. And Winc, as you said, should be further down the AAA depth chart. That leaves Slaten and Criswell (swingman) as the only two guys I feel really good about. I think they need to pick at least 3-4 quality and proven arms, including a FA like Tanner Scott or trade target like Devin Williams, Ryan Helsley, (heck, even Jansen again on a one-year deal) to be the closer. I aim for bullpen of: Criswell (Swingman), Guerrero, Hendriks, Whitlock, Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition (closer). That would push Penrod, Winckowski, Weissert to AAA, which would constitute solid depth. If Fulmer shows well, maybe he takes one of the acquisition slots, but they'll really need to be confident in his recovery as soon as this month, or else they would be better served to replace him with someone else and let him force his way onto the roster in spring training (pushing Guerrero back down to AAA). Injuries are bound to occur, too, so 1-2 of the projected active roster arms are likely gonna need to be backfilled by the likes of Guerrero / Penrod anyway. The point is our current BP situation is not good and AAA depth remains very poor. This unit needs a massive investment, and it sounds like CB is committed to that.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 9, 2024 13:01:21 GMT -5
I know he is cheap and affordable but I do not want Josh Winckowski pitching important innings next year. He's fine as bullpen depth, but he cannot miss bats at all. Every single time he came in games this season I wanted to turn the game off. We have a decent basis for the bullpen next year with Weissert, Whitlock, Penrod, Guerrero, Slaten, and Hendriks. Maybe Fulmer too? Definitely need to add a couple arms though. Preferably a high leverage option and a lefty. AJ Minter and Wandy Peralta (if he opts out) are the main free agent lefties. Obviously Tanner Scott too, but he would classify more as a high leverage reliever than someone who purely pitches in lefty lanes. Andres Munoz, Ryan Helsley, Jhoan Duran, and Kyle Finnegan could all possibly be available by trade. Would be tough to pry Jhoan Duran from the Twins but he's hitting arbitration next year and if they are slashing payroll, he could be on the table if we also take on more money in a salary relief trade. Cardinals slashing payroll and Chaim's familiarity with our farm system could allow us to better match up in a trade for Helsley though. I don't know that I agree with the bolded statement. Whitlock, Hendriks, and Fulmer are coming off significant arm injuries. I don't think we should be relying on those guys getting back to normal. Maybe they will, and if so, fantastic. Just very high risk. Weissert should be in AAA. Penrod, too. Guerrero looked great in his cup of coffee, but he's so new, who knows. And Winc, as you said, should be further down the AAA depth chart. That leaves Slaten and Criswell (swingman) as the only two guys I feel really good about. I think they need to pick at least 3-4 quality and proven arms, including a FA like Tanner Scott or trade target like Devin Williams, Ryan Helsley, (heck, even Jansen again on a one-year deal) to be the closer. I aim for bullpen of: Criswell (Swingman), Guerrero, Hendriks, Whitlock, Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition (closer). That would push Penrod, Winckowski, Weissert to AAA, which would constitute solid depth. If Fulmer shows well, maybe he takes one of the acquisition slots, but they'll really need to be confident in his recovery as soon as this month, or else they would be better served to replace him with someone else and let him force his way onto the roster in spring training (pushing Guerrero back down to AAA). Injuries are bound to occur, too, so 1-2 of the projected active roster arms are likely gonna need to be backfilled by the likes of Guerrero / Penrod anyway. The point is our current BP situation is not good and AAA depth remains very poor. This unit needs a massive investment, and it sounds like CB is committed to that. Weissert was 52nd out of 87 relief pitchers with 60 IP in fWAR. He was 90th out of 203 with 40+ IP. By ERA he was 39th with 60+ IP and 60th with 40+ IP. He would have been among the top 6 relievers in any bullpen in MLB, and top 3 in most of them. How is that a guy who "should be in AAA"?
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 9, 2024 13:49:05 GMT -5
I don't know that I agree with the bolded statement. Whitlock, Hendriks, and Fulmer are coming off significant arm injuries. I don't think we should be relying on those guys getting back to normal. Maybe they will, and if so, fantastic. Just very high risk. Weissert should be in AAA. Penrod, too. Guerrero looked great in his cup of coffee, but he's so new, who knows. And Winc, as you said, should be further down the AAA depth chart. That leaves Slaten and Criswell (swingman) as the only two guys I feel really good about. I think they need to pick at least 3-4 quality and proven arms, including a FA like Tanner Scott or trade target like Devin Williams, Ryan Helsley, (heck, even Jansen again on a one-year deal) to be the closer. I aim for bullpen of: Criswell (Swingman), Guerrero, Hendriks, Whitlock, Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition (closer). That would push Penrod, Winckowski, Weissert to AAA, which would constitute solid depth. If Fulmer shows well, maybe he takes one of the acquisition slots, but they'll really need to be confident in his recovery as soon as this month, or else they would be better served to replace him with someone else and let him force his way onto the roster in spring training (pushing Guerrero back down to AAA). Injuries are bound to occur, too, so 1-2 of the projected active roster arms are likely gonna need to be backfilled by the likes of Guerrero / Penrod anyway. The point is our current BP situation is not good and AAA depth remains very poor. This unit needs a massive investment, and it sounds like CB is committed to that. Weissert was 52nd out of 87 relief pitchers with 60 IP in fWAR. He was 90th out of 203 with 40+ IP. By ERA he was 39th with 60+ IP and 60th with 40+ IP. He would have been among the top 6 relievers in any bullpen in MLB, and top 3 in most of them. How is that a guy who "should be in AAA"? I suppose for me it's his consistency. He started strong (12IP: .259 wOBA, 1.50 ERA), then he imploded (44.2 IP: .350 wOBA, 5.19 ERA), but rebounded with a strong Aug/Sep (16.2 IP: .247 wOBA, 0.00 ERA). Even in the final months (when he didn't give up any ER) some alarming peripherals (with ranking out of 191 pitchers): 39% hard hit rate (130), 5.94 K/9 (182), 3.66 xFIP (88). The Aug/Sep counting stats look strong, but his hard hit% went from 30% to 39% and his K/9 went from 9 to under 6. Makes me wonder how strong his finishing kick really was, which makes me worry that he's more like the summer Weissert than the spring Weissert. One other tidbit, he allowed the 13th most inherited runners to score of all pitchers with 65 or fewer innings, so maybe he just needs to start innings. I suppose he could be a back of the bullpen type, but I'd rather stash him in AAA for depth.
|
|
|
Post by finaliz3d on Oct 9, 2024 13:55:25 GMT -5
On the bullpen, Slaten, Hendriks, Guerrero I'm happy having in the bullpen. I think Weissert is fine to be your 7th or 8th reliever, I think you should just sign Chris Martin back. I think you should take the money you were giving to Kenley Jansen and give it to Tanner Scott. So that would get you to six... for the second lefty, I'd go with Penrod or Murphy, you could go out and get a reliever, I don't think you see that though. And then you also have Whitlock. I think with both Penrod/Whitlock you can use them in short bursts or in longer stretches, Penrod would probably be the de facto mop-up guy but I think he can also pitch just one inning if needed.
so to make this look cleaner:
Hendriks (de-facto closer) Scott (he'd probably pitch the most in high-leverage situations) Slaten (7th inning guy, could swap with Hendriks potentially) Martin (highest leverage guy who's not exclusively a late inning guy) Whitlock (highest leverage guy for multiple innings) Guerrero (could move up if he performs) Weissert (with what he showed in the second half, I think he's earned a spot) Penrod (second lefty, de-facto longman but won't always play that role)
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 9, 2024 14:07:51 GMT -5
Weissert was 52nd out of 87 relief pitchers with 60 IP in fWAR. He was 90th out of 203 with 40+ IP. By ERA he was 39th with 60+ IP and 60th with 40+ IP. He would have been among the top 6 relievers in any bullpen in MLB, and top 3 in most of them. How is that a guy who "should be in AAA"? I suppose for me it's his consistency. He started strong (12IP: .259 wOBA, 1.50 ERA), then he imploded (44.2 IP: .350 wOBA, 5.19 ERA), but rebounded with a strong Aug/Sep (16.2 IP: .247 wOBA, 0.00 ERA). Even in the final months (when he didn't give up any ER) some alarming peripherals (with ranking out of 191 pitchers): 39% hard hit rate (130), 5.94 K/9 (182), 3.66 xFIP (88). The Aug/Sep counting stats look strong, but his hard hit% went from 30% to 39% and his K/9 went from 9 to under 6. Makes me wonder how strong his finishing kick really was, which makes me worry that he's more like the summer Weissert than the spring Weissert. I suppose he could be a back of the bullpen type, but I'd rather stash him in AAA for depth. Fair points. I guess I'd say that if he were just the guy he was when he was going great he'd be Emmanuel Clase. But when you get down to the 5th or 6th guy in the bullpen, precious few are the teams that have wartless options.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,794
|
Post by asm18 on Oct 9, 2024 14:08:32 GMT -5
On the bullpen, Slaten, Hendriks, Guerrero I'm happy having in the bullpen. I think Weissert is fine to be your 7th or 8th reliever, I think you should just sign Chris Martin back. I think you should take the money you were giving to Kenley Jansen and give it to Tanner Scott. So that would get you to six... for the second lefty, I'd go with Penrod or Murphy, you could go out and get a reliever, I don't think you see that though. And then you also have Whitlock. I think with both Penrod/Whitlock you can use them in short bursts or in longer stretches, Penrod would probably be the de facto mop-up guy but I think he can also pitch just one inning if needed. so to make this look cleaner: Hendriks (de-facto closer) Scott (he'd probably pitch the most in high-leverage situations) Slaten (7th inning guy, could swap with Hendriks potentially) Martin (highest leverage guy who's not exclusively a late inning guy) Whitlock (highest leverage guy for multiple innings) Guerrero (could move up if he performs) Weissert (with what he showed in the second half, I think he's earned a spot) Penrod (second lefty, de-facto longman but won't always play that role) I like this set-up alot. Would still be in a good spot even if Hendriks/Whitlock don't bounceback from surgery or Martin looks 39 years old. What's a good free agent comp for Scott - 30 to 40 mil over several years? He's good but can't imagine he asks for Hader/Edwin Diaz money. His agency is MVP Sports Group.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,655
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 9, 2024 14:15:24 GMT -5
On the bullpen, Slaten, Hendriks, Guerrero I'm happy having in the bullpen. I think Weissert is fine to be your 7th or 8th reliever, I think you should just sign Chris Martin back. I think you should take the money you were giving to Kenley Jansen and give it to Tanner Scott. So that would get you to six... for the second lefty, I'd go with Penrod or Murphy, you could go out and get a reliever, I don't think you see that though. And then you also have Whitlock. I think with both Penrod/Whitlock you can use them in short bursts or in longer stretches, Penrod would probably be the de facto mop-up guy but I think he can also pitch just one inning if needed. so to make this look cleaner: Hendriks (de-facto closer) Scott (he'd probably pitch the most in high-leverage situations) Slaten (7th inning guy, could swap with Hendriks potentially) Martin (highest leverage guy who's not exclusively a late inning guy) Whitlock (highest leverage guy for multiple innings) Guerrero (could move up if he performs) Weissert (with what he showed in the second half, I think he's earned a spot) Penrod (second lefty, de-facto longman but won't always play that role) Criswell is out of options and was more than good enough for them to keep around for cheap to see if he can replicate his 2024 so he is almost a sure thing to be in the bullpen unless he takes the 5th SP slot which seems unlikely to me. Honestly when it comes to Guerrero/Weissert/Penrod, I'd be perfectly happy sending one of them to AAA and bringing in a 3rd solid BP arm this offseason. Something like sign Scott, trade for Devin Williams/Heisley/name any other high leverage BP arm on a team looking to shed payroll and maybe bring Martin back or sign someone like Estevez, Holmes etc. 3 may be overkill but I have a hard time banking on Hendriks or Whitlock for anything. There's no such thing as too many BP arms.
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 9, 2024 14:49:30 GMT -5
On the bullpen, Slaten, Hendriks, Guerrero I'm happy having in the bullpen. I think Weissert is fine to be your 7th or 8th reliever, I think you should just sign Chris Martin back. I think you should take the money you were giving to Kenley Jansen and give it to Tanner Scott. So that would get you to six... for the second lefty, I'd go with Penrod or Murphy, you could go out and get a reliever, I don't think you see that though. And then you also have Whitlock. I think with both Penrod/Whitlock you can use them in short bursts or in longer stretches, Penrod would probably be the de facto mop-up guy but I think he can also pitch just one inning if needed. so to make this look cleaner: Hendriks (de-facto closer) Scott (he'd probably pitch the most in high-leverage situations) Slaten (7th inning guy, could swap with Hendriks potentially) Martin (highest leverage guy who's not exclusively a late inning guy) Whitlock (highest leverage guy for multiple innings) Guerrero (could move up if he performs) Weissert (with what he showed in the second half, I think he's earned a spot) Penrod (second lefty, de-facto longman but won't always play that role) I think there are quite a few good options on the FA market. Closers - budget 10-15M- Tanner Scott (Pros: relatively young, LHP, closing experience, 28% K%; Cons: most expensive (3/45?), high BB%) - Kenley Jansen (Pros: proven in BOS, closing experience, 28% K%, relatively cheap (1/10M), durable; Cons: older (37), a little scary at times) - David Robertson (Pros: proven in AL East, closing experience, 34% K%, relatively cheap (1/10M), coming off excellent season; Cons: older (40), injury history) Either of the above could be suitable options for closer. Other Relief (in order of preference) - budget 10-15M
Jeff Hoffman - $4M Mike Soroka - $2M AJ Minter (L) - $4M Blake Treinen - $4M Caleb Ferguson (L) - $2M Chris Martin - $5M Clay Holmes - $7M Ryne Stanek - $3M Trade Options
David Bednar - $6M Devin Williams - $7M In total, invest $20-25M. This is where the 'aggressiveness' should be fairly easy to achieve. And they're relievers, so relatively low commitments. Adding more BP arms and stocking AAA with good depth would be the kind of move a team that has just been through the bullpen PTSD of 2024 would do to mitigate chances of repeating the same sin. Not doing so and having another weak BP cause problems next season would be gross negligence. I can't imagine Breslow would be comfortable rolling the dice like that again. If we learn one thing from 2024, it has to be the value of (quality) depth (think 1B, 2B, SS, SP, RP).
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 9, 2024 14:52:50 GMT -5
Fwiw, Breslow went on Bradford's podcast after we recorded just this and said they need to "rebuild the bullpen." Probably got the idea from us but on the off chance it's a coincidence, he at least agrees. (I'm not necessarily saying they need ALL new guys to go with Hendriks, Slaten, and Guerrero, but this isn't a group where I see them only needing one or maybe two arms either.) Slaten, Guerrero, Hendricks, Whitlock, Weissert, Booser, Winckowski, sign two free agents, shuffle around the usual randos for AAAA depth. If it's the right two free agents (I might would bring back Martin and add one of the top of the market guys) that could be a very solid bullpen. And where does Fulmer stand? And whatever happened to Isaiah Campbell? If he's healthy he could still be good. You are much more confident in Whitlock, Weissert, Booser and Winckowski than I am.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 9, 2024 16:07:43 GMT -5
Fwiw, Breslow went on Bradford's podcast after we recorded just this and said they need to "rebuild the bullpen." Probably got the idea from us but on the off chance it's a coincidence, he at least agrees. (I'm not necessarily saying they need ALL new guys to go with Hendriks, Slaten, and Guerrero, but this isn't a group where I see them only needing one or maybe two arms either.) Slaten, Guerrero, Hendricks, Whitlock, Weissert, Booser, Winckowski, sign two free agents, shuffle around the usual randos for AAAA depth. If it's the right two free agents (I might would bring back Martin and add one of the top of the market guys) that could be a very solid bullpen. And where does Fulmer stand? And whatever happened to Isaiah Campbell? If he's healthy he could still be good. You are much more confident in Whitlock, Weissert, Booser and Winckowski than I am. How many free agent relievers would you be *more* confident in than those guys? For me it's maybe 10-12 or so. Once you get down to about the $5 million/year guys I don't think you're meaningfully improving on these options.
But if you have a back end of the bullpen of Slaten, Hendriks, and two other high-leverage guys, then I think you can afford to bet on Whitlock's health, Weissert's consistency, etc.
|
|
|
Post by finaliz3d on Oct 9, 2024 16:30:25 GMT -5
On the bullpen, Slaten, Hendriks, Guerrero I'm happy having in the bullpen. I think Weissert is fine to be your 7th or 8th reliever, I think you should just sign Chris Martin back. I think you should take the money you were giving to Kenley Jansen and give it to Tanner Scott. So that would get you to six... for the second lefty, I'd go with Penrod or Murphy, you could go out and get a reliever, I don't think you see that though. And then you also have Whitlock. I think with both Penrod/Whitlock you can use them in short bursts or in longer stretches, Penrod would probably be the de facto mop-up guy but I think he can also pitch just one inning if needed. so to make this look cleaner: Hendriks (de-facto closer) Scott (he'd probably pitch the most in high-leverage situations) Slaten (7th inning guy, could swap with Hendriks potentially) Martin (highest leverage guy who's not exclusively a late inning guy) Whitlock (highest leverage guy for multiple innings) Guerrero (could move up if he performs) Weissert (with what he showed in the second half, I think he's earned a spot) Penrod (second lefty, de-facto longman but won't always play that role) Criswell is out of options and was more than good enough for them to keep around for cheap to see if he can replicate his 2024 so he is almost a sure thing to be in the bullpen unless he takes the 5th SP slot which seems unlikely to me. Honestly when it comes to Guerrero/Weissert/Penrod, I'd be perfectly happy sending one of them to AAA and bringing in a 3rd solid BP arm this offseason. Something like sign Scott, trade for Devin Williams/Heisley/name any other high leverage BP arm on a team looking to shed payroll and maybe bring Martin back or sign someone like Estevez, Holmes etc. 3 may be overkill but I have a hard time banking on Hendriks or Whitlock for anything. There's no such thing as too many BP arms. Not that I don't think Criswell could make it, but he's a longman only and I don't know if I want to just have a guy for that specific use. Five times this season he pitched two innings or less and two of them went well... it's not impossible, but I just don't see it. Maybe he's traded for cash considerations or something, idk. I think Weissert/Penrod could start in AAA if you bring in better options, I just don't know if they go out and get those guys to fill up the back of the pen this year? There's some solid cheap lefties available, like AJ Minter according to Spotrac is projected at 2y/5.4m... which if that is truly what he gets, than I would sign him in a heartbeat to replace Penrod's spot, and then Weissert, if you could find a guy who can pitch like three-four innings but also be a good one-two inning guy that would be great, I don't know who that necessarily is... Ryan Yarborough?
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,655
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 9, 2024 16:38:40 GMT -5
Criswell is out of options and was more than good enough for them to keep around for cheap to see if he can replicate his 2024 so he is almost a sure thing to be in the bullpen unless he takes the 5th SP slot which seems unlikely to me. Honestly when it comes to Guerrero/Weissert/Penrod, I'd be perfectly happy sending one of them to AAA and bringing in a 3rd solid BP arm this offseason. Something like sign Scott, trade for Devin Williams/Heisley/name any other high leverage BP arm on a team looking to shed payroll and maybe bring Martin back or sign someone like Estevez, Holmes etc. 3 may be overkill but I have a hard time banking on Hendriks or Whitlock for anything. There's no such thing as too many BP arms. Not that I don't think Criswell could make it, but he's a longman only and I don't know if I want to just have a guy for that specific use. Five times this season he pitched two innings or less and two of them went well... it's not impossible, but I just don't see it. Maybe he's traded for cash considerations or something, idk. I think Weissert/Penrod could start in AAA if you bring in better options, I just don't know if they go out and get those guys to fill up the back of the pen this year? There's some solid cheap lefties available, like AJ Minter according to Spotrac is projected at 2y/5.4m... which if that is truly what he gets, than I would sign him in a heartbeat to replace Penrod's spot, and then Weissert, if you could find a guy who can pitch like three-four innings but also be a good one-two inning guy that would be great, I don't know who that necessarily is... Ryan Yarborough? Trading Criswell for just cash considerations would be a horrible move. If his 2024 wasn't just a mirage he's a great 6th starter and mop up guy for peanuts. Absolutely no reason he shouldn't be on the Red Sox in 2025.
|
|
|
Post by finaliz3d on Oct 9, 2024 16:50:02 GMT -5
Not that I don't think Criswell could make it, but he's a longman only and I don't know if I want to just have a guy for that specific use. Five times this season he pitched two innings or less and two of them went well... it's not impossible, but I just don't see it. Maybe he's traded for cash considerations or something, idk. I think Weissert/Penrod could start in AAA if you bring in better options, I just don't know if they go out and get those guys to fill up the back of the pen this year? There's some solid cheap lefties available, like AJ Minter according to Spotrac is projected at 2y/5.4m... which if that is truly what he gets, than I would sign him in a heartbeat to replace Penrod's spot, and then Weissert, if you could find a guy who can pitch like three-four innings but also be a good one-two inning guy that would be great, I don't know who that necessarily is... Ryan Yarborough? Trading Criswell for just cash considerations would be a horrible move. If his 2024 wasn't just a mirage he's a great 6th starter and mop up guy for peanuts. Absolutely no reason he shouldn't be on the Red Sox in 2025. Then trade him for something more. I'm just under the assumption that you're not going to get much in a trade, and I don't really want a guy who's strictly a mop-up guy on the roster... if he had options the story would be different... honestly, there might be a slight chance he goes through on waivers, and you could just send him down. I think that means he would have to accept that assignment though since he's previously been outrighted, so that also might not be an option and we're back to square one.
|
|
|