|
Post by julyanmorley on Nov 21, 2024 16:38:30 GMT -5
Heyman saying the Phillies meeting hasn't happened yet
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Nov 21, 2024 16:45:17 GMT -5
Heyman saying the Phillies meeting hasn't happened yet I'll never rule out DD from acquiring top talent but I really can't see the Phillies getting him. If it's true that he is focused on the future of the organization and their ability to win I don't see how an aging Phillies roster that already has guys like Harper, Turner, Nola signed for big bucks long term who frankly are probably getting close to the end of their peaks. Not to mention the short term next with Wheeler adding $42M to that 120 until 2027. Not a particularly strong farm either.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Nov 21, 2024 16:48:32 GMT -5
Just offer 650/15 and see if he bites this weekend and see if he bites. It certainly sounds like he’s open to getting a deal done and not drawing this thing out all winter. If Boston really did make a good impression and we take the F.O. At their word (whatever that’s food for) then there’d be no better Christmas present to Sox fans than an early Soto contract so we can all get back to being productive at work.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Nov 21, 2024 16:52:23 GMT -5
I can get on board with the thought just throw out their top offer now and get all this over with 15/650M seems reasonable. If the rumor is true that the Mets are going to pay $50M more than the next team no matter what then go ahead and call their bluff if the Mets want to pay him 15/700M they frankly they can have him.
I want Soto but at some point you gotta just walk away from the table if the bidding gets out of the stratosphere.
|
|
|
Post by Canseco on Nov 21, 2024 17:00:48 GMT -5
Can we pay extra to ensure he never does that nauseating shuffle again? Haha.
|
|
|
Post by johnsilver52 on Nov 21, 2024 17:21:30 GMT -5
I can get on board with the thought just throw out their top offer now and get all this over with 15/650M seems reasonable. If the rumor is true that the Mets are going to pay $50M more than the next team no matter what then go ahead and call their bluff if the Mets want to pay him 15/700M they frankly they can have him. I want Soto but at some point you gotta just walk away from the table if the bidding gets out of the stratosphere. You know as well as I do Boras would spend another month shopping said 600m contract attempting to top it. It's far to early in the offseason for boras to sign away his prize and plenty of time left for his normal shenanigans.
|
|
chaimtime
Veteran
Posts: 1,033
Member is Online
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 17:22:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by chaimtime on Nov 21, 2024 17:22:38 GMT -5
Call me crazy, but if the spreadsheet-approved offer is 13/620, as Szymborski said ZiPS would give Soto, then 15/700 seems kind of reasonable to me. We’re talking a couple million in AAV and a couple extra years over the projection system valuation, which seems pretty par for the course with superstar contracts these days.
|
|
|
Post by threeifbaerga on Nov 21, 2024 17:27:07 GMT -5
Those two extra years take us from an already potentially painful 39 to an extremely painful 41.
|
|
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 17:28:37 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by redsox04071318champs on Nov 21, 2024 17:28:37 GMT -5
Call me crazy, but if the spreadsheet-approved offer is 13/620, as Szymborski said ZiPS would give Soto, then 15/700 seems kind of reasonable to me. We’re talking a couple million in AAV and a couple extra years over the projection system valuation, which seems pretty par for the course with superstar contracts these days. Yup, I think 15 years 701 million dollars might do the trick although Cohen could go to 750 or so and Soto will have to figure out where he wants to play. If being friendly with the owner matters the Mets have a big advantage as Cohen is accessible. Henry is a lit more reclusive, so if that relationship matters that would favor the Mets. All this is exciting but I still think hes going to wind up with the Mets.
|
|
shagworthy
Veteran
My neckbeard game is on point.
Posts: 1,866
|
Post by shagworthy on Nov 21, 2024 17:29:46 GMT -5
Call me crazy, but if the spreadsheet-approved offer is 13/620, as Szymborski said ZiPS would give Soto, then 15/700 seems kind of reasonable to me. We’re talking a couple million in AAV and a couple extra years over the projection system valuation, which seems pretty par for the course with superstar contracts these days. If it's front loaded I am fine with it. Give him the $ when he is at peak performance and taper down at the end of the deal.
|
|
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 17:30:09 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by rhswanzey on Nov 21, 2024 17:30:09 GMT -5
Those two extra years take us from an already potentially painful 39 to an extremely painful 41. Sure, but Miguel Cabrera’s Special Veteran Presence wasn’t the difference between Detroit being a playoff contender and being what it actually was during the last few years of his career. Maybe we should just bag the hall of famer, and worry about his age 41 season in 203whatevertheyearis.
|
|
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 17:30:14 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by alexcorahomevideo on Nov 21, 2024 17:30:14 GMT -5
Those two extra years take us from an already potentially painful 39 to an extremely painful 41. Is it really painful if the Luxury Tax goes up significantly and Soto is apart of multiple titles in Boston? You’re getting him for more or less his entire prime. He’s 26 right now. Right now I’d put the odds of him coming below the two NY teams and maybe slightly below the Dodgers but ahead of Toronto and Philadelphia. I believe the Phillies are in on him, Dombrowski loves big game hunting.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,622
|
Post by nomar on Nov 21, 2024 17:31:24 GMT -5
15/666 would be provocative
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Nov 21, 2024 17:32:07 GMT -5
Call me crazy, but if the spreadsheet-approved offer is 13/620, as Szymborski said ZiPS would give Soto, then 15/700 seems kind of reasonable to me. We’re talking a couple million in AAV and a couple extra years over the projection system valuation, which seems pretty par for the course with superstar contracts these days. I could be wrong but I think the only giant contracts that were above ZiPS projections were the Padres owner's deathbed deals and some of the pitcher deals.
I'm still thinking he does worse than 13/620
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 3,070
Member is Online
|
Post by asm18 on Nov 21, 2024 17:32:23 GMT -5
Is 2040 even a real year
|
|
chaimtime
Veteran
Posts: 1,033
Member is Online
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 18:10:11 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by chaimtime on Nov 21, 2024 18:10:11 GMT -5
Call me crazy, but if the spreadsheet-approved offer is 13/620, as Szymborski said ZiPS would give Soto, then 15/700 seems kind of reasonable to me. We’re talking a couple million in AAV and a couple extra years over the projection system valuation, which seems pretty par for the course with superstar contracts these days. I could be wrong but I think the only giant contracts that were above ZiPS projections were the Padres owner's deathbed deals and some of the pitcher deals.
I'm still thinking he does worse than 13/620
Seager comes to mind, too. Even if you credit a lot to Seidler wanting to push as he got closer to the end, that’s still a fair few top of the market players. The sense I got last year was that the Boras 4 probably could’ve beaten the spreadsheet numbers too, but were holding out for so much more than that that teams just moved on to their next targets. You’re probably onto something with pitchers specifically beating the numbers, though—given the team’s struggles on the mound in recent years, I’ve definitely been more focused on the contracts feee agent pitchers have gotten, so perhaps I’m off base on position player contracts. Add: that being said, this is Juan Soto here. If there were ever a free agent to go above and beyond what your projections say he’s worth for, he’d be the one.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Nov 21, 2024 18:14:59 GMT -5
Yeah with inflation etc who the hell cares? The CBT has basically doubled since 2004 even if we assume the growth is linear we're talking a $360m CBT threshold at that point.
|
|
|
Post by keninten on Nov 21, 2024 18:15:08 GMT -5
Well if he wants a strong rapport with the owner of where ever he signs you can probably stick the Red Sox at the bottom of the list of the rumored teams since Henry has been MIA for years now. I cannot believe he would give a crap about being friends with the owner, than hanging with Pedro and Papi.
|
|
|
Post by Darwin's Curve on Nov 21, 2024 18:24:51 GMT -5
Signing Juan Soto will buy ownership 48* hours of peace before everyone goes back to holding their breath and promising to walk away forever unless they sign (Insert Name).
*(Feel free to disagree with me on the exact number of hours.)
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Nov 21, 2024 18:29:03 GMT -5
Well if he wants a strong rapport with the owner of where ever he signs you can probably stick the Red Sox at the bottom of the list of the rumored teams since Henry has been MIA for years now. This strikes me as a really eccentric preference. Who the hell wants to have a rapport with a) your boss, who is b) a weird (by definition) billionaire? The low point of every World Series celebration is when the awkward old guy hoists the trophy and gives a little speech in which he pretends he did anything other than stumble into a bunch of cash and pay a bunch of massively talented athletes to live out his vicarious fantasies. Which, to be clear, is a fabulous thing to do if you happen to be a billionaire; it keeps them out of trouble, if nothing else. But again, just strange that Soto wants to be pals with one of those weirdos. In any case, as others have said I nominate Theo for this role. Heyman casually inserted that this will be a 15 year deal. I'm thinking his get it done price is 15 years and a nominal amount over Ohtani's 700 with no deferrals. 15 x 47 = 705. If I woke up tomorrow and found out that the Red Sox signed him to that deal I would not be upset. Those two extra years take us from an already potentially painful 39 to an extremely painful 41. Let's stipulate he provides no value from ages 39-41. We are talking about 2038-2040 here. According to the social security administration, there's a 65% chance that John Henry will be dead by the beginning of that time frame. Those "future values" really start losing their luster at his age, I'd imagine.
In any case, it's not an unbearable burden. He'd cost the Sox less in nominal dollars, let alone real dollars, than Hanley/Sandoval/Pedroia did in 2018, and that team didn't exactly act in a financially hampered manner. They can suck it up for 3-5 years.
|
|
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 18:29:11 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by redsoxfan2 on Nov 21, 2024 18:29:11 GMT -5
Signing Juan Soto will buy ownership 48* hours of peace before everyone goes back to holding their breath and promising to walk away forever unless they sign (Insert Name). *(Feel free to disagree with me on the exact number of hours.) This would buy them a lot of good will I think. The only big name they've signed the last few years was Devers. Conversely, they have no more excuses not to spend big. If they walk away this off-season with Eovaldi and a couple expensive 1- year guys or Teoscar I think that'll just cement the type of ownership they are now.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Nov 21, 2024 18:29:23 GMT -5
Signing Juan Soto will buy ownership 48* hours of peace before everyone goes back to holding their breath and promising to walk away forever unless they sign (Insert Name). *(Feel free to disagree with me on the exact number of hours.) I think the odds of the Sox signing Soto and then making no major pitching upgrade is less than the odds of the Sox not signing Soto.
|
|
|
Post by threeifbaerga on Nov 21, 2024 18:31:09 GMT -5
Those two extra years take us from an already potentially painful 39 to an extremely painful 41. Sure, but Miguel Cabrera’s Special Veteran Presence wasn’t the difference between Detroit being a playoff contender and being what it actually was during the last few years of his career. Maybe we should just bag the hall of famer, and worry about his age 41 season in 203whatevertheyearis. Over the last seven years of his career Cabrera was worth -2.7 WAR and averaged over 100 games a year. We are not that far from people crying collusion because Adam Jones was out of the league at 34 which is why I don't understand why people are so flippant about giving a guy 15 years (intentionally being devils advocate here) who at 26 is already a DH in any park that isn't Yankee Stadium. Albert Pujols was worth -0.5 war over the last five years of his deal. We're already wringing our hands over Yoshida, a positive impact with the bat, being on the books for three more years. It's not his $18 mil that makes him unmovable, it's the three years. I'm not saying don't sign Soto or that they shouldn't give him a long deal. What I am saying is that just giving him more years isn't the fix you want it to be.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Nov 21, 2024 18:38:06 GMT -5
What is the luxury tax threshold going to be in 5-7-9-10 etc years from now.??
I have no ideal what’s what, to get an ideal of what 40-45 millions year might look like in 15 years from now look at what the top free agents were signing for in 2010.
Paying a position player around $15-20 was getting you elite players.
Also, there’s a good chance he’s opting out in 4-5 years and the back 9 is pointless anyways
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 3,070
Member is Online
|
Juan Soto
Nov 21, 2024 18:40:47 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by asm18 on Nov 21, 2024 18:40:47 GMT -5
Short of Soto having a horrific injury or committing murder, if John Henry decides in 7-8 years he doesn’t want to pay him can’t we just salary dump him to the Dodgers like we always do
|
|