SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Boston Celtics 2013-14 Season
|
Post by jmei on Nov 10, 2013 12:37:47 GMT -5
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Nov 10, 2013 17:56:15 GMT -5
Horrible win.
|
|
|
Post by sierram363 on Nov 10, 2013 22:11:39 GMT -5
I blame the Heat more than the Celtics on that. You don't let that Celtics lineup beat you. I'm sure we can still grab a lottery pick with this team though.
|
|
|
Post by 1mpaz10 on Nov 11, 2013 1:35:13 GMT -5
I blame the Heat more than the Celtics on that. You don't let that Celtics lineup beat you. I'm sure we can still grab a lottery pick with this team though. I think they have far too much talent to get a lottery pick. They look like at least a .500 team until Rondo comes back, which will only help. I find it hard to believe this team stays out of the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Nov 11, 2013 10:18:59 GMT -5
If the Celtics play anything close to .500 ball, Danny Ainge will trade some guys at the deadline (Bass, Lee, Wallace) to consolidate the assets a bit and make the team worse to maximize the number of ping-pong balls.
But I don't think the Celtics are anywhere near a .500 (or playoff) team. They've only played two good teams so far (Grizzlies and Heat), and losing close games to the Raptors and Bucks isn't exactly impressive. Their defense, utterly lacking any rim protectors, is going to get a lot worse when they face real competition, and their stagnant offense is going to stay that way due to a lack of shot creators.
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Nov 11, 2013 23:21:45 GMT -5
Horrific win today....Showing lack of #want.
On a more serious note its looking like a banner year. Wiggins, Randle and Parker are already impressing.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Nov 12, 2013 10:17:35 GMT -5
So this Jordan Crawford guy is pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by johnsilver52 on Nov 12, 2013 16:17:27 GMT -5
This is so stinking off topic, but got to post it.. Hammer it at will JMEI...
My main DR is an old Celtics fan, as was I for years until McHale, Parrish and Bird finally retired. He's got this really cool picture of mcHale putting in this layup over Jeff Turner of the Magic. Think it's like their 1st year in the league.. Everytime go to see him, we start naming off every guy in the picture, you can barely see many of them and we remember all the glory years.. Hondo Havlicek, joJo White, DJ, Russell. Think I put him way behind every time go to see him.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Nov 12, 2013 19:55:44 GMT -5
I absolutely despise Jordan Crawford, but he's balling right now. He's always had the court vision, but he's never been able to rein his shot selection in enough to turn his passing ability into a legit asset.
I really have no idea what to make of this team, other than: 1) They've had a legitimate chance to win all 8 games this season. That doesn't happen in the NBA if you suck. 2) This is the most entertaining Celtics team to watch since the 2007-08 title team. The 2011-12 team was a blast to root for, but they weren't always (and by that, I mean almost never) pretty to watch.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,638
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 14, 2013 19:47:29 GMT -5
And it sucks because this was the year to blow. The NBA is the worst.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Nov 15, 2013 8:32:48 GMT -5
Not too worried. Of their 4 wins, they have 2 against Orlando and 1 against Utah (both of whom are Tank suspects themselves) and 1 is against Miami (who is sleepwalking right now but who will likely drub them next time they play Boston). By all account, there are at least 5 stars in this draft (assuming all come out) in Wiggins, Randle, Exum, Parker and Gordon (some have even suggested Embiid, Andrew Harrison and Smart have star talent). I still think we'll end up with a top 5 pick. I'd love to try and get another lottery ticket (trading Rondo?) but I'm not sure that's possible. The best they can do is likely more future picks.
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Nov 18, 2013 13:16:45 GMT -5
Rajon Rondo for Shumpert..... What joke this was it lasted a second.
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Nov 21, 2013 1:02:21 GMT -5
Rajon Rondo upon checking the Celtics' score sheet:
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 17, 2013 10:32:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Dec 17, 2013 10:49:32 GMT -5
I saw that and summarily ignored it.
I'd do Bass for Asik, though. This team just isn't bad enough to seriously compete for a top draft pick, especially when Rondo comes back. The popular narrative that Ainge can deal enough players away to make this team bad rings false to me, because their entire rotation, outside of the guys they wouldn't trade (mostly Sullinger), is pretty much equally good. Even if Danny ships out Bass and Lee and gets nothing in return, those minutes would just go to Humphries and Brooks, who are both rotation-level players. Getting Asik means Sully doesn't have to play out of position at C too much, and a Asik-Sullinger-Green-Bradley-Rondo team would absolutely grab a 3rd or 4th seed and make it to the second round. I'd rather do that than deal away some of the vets and still end up with just the 12th pick and hope someone falls. If they're not going to get a franchise player, might as well start building that winning culture and getting playoff experience.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 17, 2013 11:06:36 GMT -5
Yeah, it was so crazy I just had to see if anyone else saw it.
I agree. The tanking isn't working when a) a lot of other teams are tanking; b) some teams that were supposed to be successful are quite bad and c) both the Eastern Conference and the Atlantic Division are terrible.
My question would become whether or not you'd do Green (some suggest he's the target for Houston; others that he's involved it's to a 3rd team) instead of Bass. I like Green for what he is but he's being asked to be more than what he is. If you could make a trade for Asik you'd have
PG Rondo (Elite playmaker) SG Bradley (Defender who can score some points - would love to see more consistency from 3) C Asik (Above Avg defender in the post - which is hard to come by) PF Sullinger (looking like the lottery talent he once was projected to be) SF Green
Given the other 4, I'd want the SF position to be my go-to guy night in an night out (Pierce of old, for example)
You add in a strong bench and that's a nice core for the future (I think Olynyk could be a nice 3rd big - doubt he can be a starter, especially at the 5).
Back on the tanking topic, folks seem to be suggesting that Danny will wait until Feb to decide the ultimate course. Things could change if Brooklyn and New York (especially if getting Chandler back changes their ways). Cleveland, too, could turn it around given some of their talent.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Dec 17, 2013 12:03:41 GMT -5
I don't think I'd trade Green for Asik. The two reasons you'd want Asik are (a) to make the 2013-14 team better and (b) to improve your collection of tradeable assets. Trading Green for Asik improves neither. The drop-off between Green and Wallace is huge, and this team needs as many shot creators as possible (Green isn't great there, but he both stretches the floor and can occasionally get to the rim or post up) if it wants to secure the division. I also think Green is a better asset than Asik-- while Asik only counts $8m against the cap next year, he's actually getting paid $15m (because of the poison pill-esque contract he was signed to in RFA), so he would be harder to move and have less value. Green is also under team control for an extra year, although I believe he has the option to opt-out of that last year and may do so.
I agree that Ainge would prefer to wait until February and see how things are looking before deciding to deal, but Asik is going to be moved by the end of the week, and he fills the biggest hole in the organization (defensive-oriented center).
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 17, 2013 12:17:48 GMT -5
I, too, am not sure about trading Green but I was thinking of reason 3 you trade for Asik (he gives you that defensive stopper in the middle for your future core as well). I agree that the dropoff is significant which means you could still go into tank mode should the situation change quickly (but now you have a piece of the puzzle, defensively, at least). If Lee can't play SF, you could swing another deal to get a SF.
Meanwhile, if we assume Sully and Rondo (currently a wild card, of course) as the scoring big and elite distributor respectively, then one of the swingmen needs to be a go-to scorer. While Green looks like that guy on some nights, I don't see it consistently. Meanwhile, even outside the lottery, the draft looks SF heavy so you could replace Green with a young guy too.
Don't get me wrong, I think your arguments are very compelling (maybe more than the above) and I'm not sure I'd do it either. Just thinking it out loud.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,638
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Dec 17, 2013 12:25:52 GMT -5
I'm still all about this team losing. All you need is a chance, ask San Antonio. I also think the team is a lot more fragile then you think. Trade Crawford and Green, even if you get Omar Asik back, the team should stumble quite a bit. They should've waited a year to hire Stevens. Guy is too good. Ha!
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Dec 17, 2013 12:38:47 GMT -5
I don't think it's at all easy to get a SF who is as much or more of a "go-to scorer" than Green is, and I think you're underrating him somewhat. Green is the 7th highest scoring small forward in the league right now (behind Lebron, Durant, George, Gay, Deng, and Parsons). You're certainly not getting a player of that caliber outside the lottery (unless you get super lucky), even in this stacked draft class. Yeah, scoring wings are probably easier to get than defensive centers, but I discussed above why I think Asik's contract makes him less of an asset than Green. I think Green for Asik is mostly a lateral move, and if I'm Danny, I'm only making moves that make this team clearly better or clearly worse.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 17, 2013 15:06:06 GMT -5
Other outlets were, apparently, feeding off the LatinoPost report and Donny Marshall was quoted as saying a deal of Rondo (and others) to Sacramento was impending. It has subsequently been refuted by "sources".
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Dec 17, 2013 16:35:04 GMT -5
Donny Marshall has no clue what he's talking about - the guy is too busy fawning over Ray to know anything.
I don't think you trade Rondo unless you can a legitimately fair package in return. And since there's almost no chance of the Celtics getting a fair package in return, you probably just hold on to him and let this season play out.
What a complete and utter disaster Stevens has been so far. With Salty gone, he's propelled himself to my least favorite Boston sports figure at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Dec 18, 2013 11:25:52 GMT -5
Would you do Bass and Vitor for Asik? That trade works for salary-matching purposes, and fulfills both of Houston's priorities (another PF who can play with Howard and a C who can back him up). Vitor is signed to a cheap contract (three years, $2m per year) and looks to have a little potential, but I think his ceiling is not very high and that giving him up is worth it for a player in Asik who might be one of the top 5 defensive centers in the league.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 18, 2013 11:46:25 GMT -5
I would do that, yes. For this year, Asik/Sully are your 4/5 with Olynyk backing up both. Humphries is your 4th (or make him, if healthy, your backup to increase his trade value). Following years, it's basically the same with a 4th big needed.
For Houston's sake, I think a 3-way makes the most sense. Cleveland getting Green; Houston getting Varejao (can start at either 4 or 5 and be a very good backup at either) and Boston getting Asik (there would have to be some other parts moving around).
Of course, then you get into the whole trading Green issue which we covered yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Dec 18, 2013 15:41:11 GMT -5
According to Yahoo, talks are centering on Brandon Bass, Courtney Lee and a 1st. Unless we're getting something else back, this would have to involve another team since Houston and Boston are both over the cap so the salaries don't match.
|
|
|