SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by rjp313jr on Aug 31, 2016 9:31:26 GMT -5
That's just not accurate with regards to Trout. He had one year over 25% and the rest are under.
17.2 19 26.1 23.2 20.2
For an average of 21.6
But yes K rates are higher and more acceptable.
|
|
|
Post by sibbysisti on Aug 31, 2016 9:46:03 GMT -5
They should call him up and have him start at third against Left Handers. If that doesn't work use him on the bench in the playoffs to steal bases. If his weakness is batting RH, why start him against left handlers? A pennant race is not the place to learn how to hit. The AFL would help..
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Aug 31, 2016 10:49:32 GMT -5
So does the moment of truth come tomorrow, September 1,next Tuesday at the end of the Portland season, or sometime before september 30th? We find out if moncada gets called up this year. A month ago it seemed a sure thing, now not so sure. Looks like starting the clock issue, strikeouts, and where to play him show negatives. The speed and athlete that he is, adds a skill the sox could use. Shaw and hill not getting it done. Then if you do call him up does he play in the post season? Fun problem. Emotion and predictive stats at odds. What does DDo do?
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Aug 31, 2016 11:01:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by grandsalami on Aug 31, 2016 11:02:50 GMT -5
“@bradfo: The way Farrell was talking sure sounds like Moncada will be coming up to play third base soon”
|
|
|
Post by bookiemetts on Aug 31, 2016 11:14:58 GMT -5
I guess I'll start working on the Moncada minor league highlights video so I can put it up when he gets the call!
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,607
|
Post by nomar on Aug 31, 2016 11:16:51 GMT -5
The Red Sox are becoming the old Phoenix Suns. Offense is the best bullpen.
|
|
|
Post by Canseco on Aug 31, 2016 11:47:15 GMT -5
I'm sort of hazy on postseason eligibility, but wouldn't Moncada be ineligible for the playoffs if he isn't up before September 1st?
|
|
|
Post by DesignatedKyle on Aug 31, 2016 11:54:12 GMT -5
I'm sort of hazy on postseason eligibility, but wouldn't Moncada be ineligible for the playoffs if he isn't up before September 1st? Nope, he just has to be in the organization
|
|
|
Post by Canseco on Aug 31, 2016 11:58:15 GMT -5
I'm sort of hazy on postseason eligibility, but wouldn't Moncada be ineligible for the playoffs if he isn't up before September 1st? Nope, he just has to be in the organization Ahhhh... that makes more sense. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by philsbosoxfan on Aug 31, 2016 13:33:58 GMT -5
Nope, he just has to be in the organization Ahhhh... that makes more sense. Thanks. Not specifically true, however, he'll be eligible as a substitute, for example, for Carson Smith. Teams can pretty much get anyone in because every team has season ending injured players.
|
|
|
Post by deepjohn on Aug 31, 2016 13:48:15 GMT -5
Ahhhh... that makes more sense. Thanks. Not specifically true, however, he'll be eligible as a substitute, for example, for Carson Smith. Teams can pretty much get anyone in because every team has season ending injured players. Yes, Moncada could substitute for Sandoval or Swihart on the 40 man. I think it's position players for position players who have served their full 60 regular season days (and pitchers for pitchers). It also requires approval of the commissioner to be sure the team is fully complying.
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 9,027
|
Post by ericmvan on Aug 31, 2016 13:57:15 GMT -5
Ahhhh... that makes more sense. Thanks. Not specifically true, however, he'll be eligible as a substitute, for example, for Carson Smith. Teams can pretty much get anyone in because every team has season ending injured players. The injury loophole ought to be closed (as I read the rule, there's no restrictions on who can replace whom, and no commissioner oversight, BTW). It essentially amounts to no restrictions at all on players in the organization. What I'd do: 1) Eligible players are those: a) On the 40-man roster or 60-day DL as of August 30th, or b) Acquired by August 31. 2) Players may be selected to the 40-man roster and optioned simultaneously, i.e., selected into option status. Teams will be forced to decide at the end of August which non-40-man players they wish to make post-season eligible, and add them to the 40-man (while still being able to wait until 9/1 to recall them). They may have to waive some players to make room for these additions, which is why there's a day between the deadline for promoting from within the organization and acquiring from the outside; the waived players, if claimed, can be post-season eligible for their new teams. Without the intervening day, teams would make their internal roster tweaks just before midnight. If this rule were in place, Moncada and probably Rusney and Kyle Martin would have been selected and optioned yesterday, and Cuevas and Jerez DFA'd. Now, no one's going to want either of those guys on a post-season roster, but there may be other players who do get waived on the 30th who would be credible candidates. You could imagine the Pirates claiming a AAA reliever and working their Happ / Nova magic on him in September, for instance. The interesting call for the Red Sox would be whether to select and option Kopech (and DFA Brentz, probably) for a September trial to cover the small possibility that he 8th inning remains a catastrophe for whom he actually is the best option. I'm not endorsing deepjohn's delusion, just acknowledging that it has a 1-5% of happening, and maybe it would be smart to cover that possibility. Under the current rules, the team will get a few more Kopech starts to factor into that decision.
|
|
|
Post by ancientsoxfogey on Aug 31, 2016 14:40:20 GMT -5
That's just not accurate with regards to Trout. He had one year over 25% and the rest are under. 17.2 19 26.1 23.2 20.2 For an average of 21.6 But yes K rates are higher and more acceptable. Oh s**t. I neglected all those walks.
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Sept 1, 2016 7:01:19 GMT -5
The next phase of the discussion now opens. Just like with the benintendi thread, do we agree with how they play moncada? This is what makes these boards fun, listening to the stats and the emotion of what is the best thing to do. Good luck Yoan!!!
|
|
ericmvan
Veteran
Supposed to be working on something more important
Posts: 9,027
|
Post by ericmvan on Sept 1, 2016 12:20:15 GMT -5
Imagine if the Yankees had outbid us as we expected. At the time, they looked like they were facing a fallow rebuilding phase. After their great July 31 fire sale and unexpected subsequent improvement, their near-term outlook is hugely rosier.
We and they can be expected to find a solid player at any position, so Moncada's marginal value over our replacements may be more on the order of 2.5 wins a year. But we have him and they don't, so it's 5 wins per year. Or $40M. Talk about non-buyers remorse.
|
|
|
Post by James Dunne on Sept 1, 2016 12:29:04 GMT -5
The Red Sox have four players 25 and under in the major leagues who would be #1 on any Yankees 25-and-under list.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,607
|
Post by nomar on Sept 1, 2016 14:14:08 GMT -5
The Red Sox have four players 25 and under in the major leagues who would be #1 on any Yankees 25-and-under list. And Devers. I also wouldnt trade Groome for anyone in that system.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Sept 1, 2016 14:38:26 GMT -5
How good would Moncada have to look out there this season and during spring training next to be the opening day 3rd baseman? Personally I would rather they allow him more seasoning down in AAA and get the extra year of cost control for him. If they don't make a move for a corner infielder this off season I could see him breaking camp with the team though.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Sept 1, 2016 16:49:19 GMT -5
How good would Moncada have to look out there this season and during spring training next to be the opening day 3rd baseman? Personally I would rather they allow him more seasoning down in AAA and get the extra year of cost control for him. If they don't make a move for a corner infielder this off season I could see him breaking camp with the team though. It all depends on the CBA, but all he'd need is 30 days in AAA next year for an extra year of control under the current one. What I do not want is for them to pencil him in at 3B or any position and not have sufficient alternate plans, like what happened with JBJ and Bogaerts in 2014.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Sept 1, 2016 18:07:19 GMT -5
How good would Moncada have to look out there this season and during spring training next to be the opening day 3rd baseman? Personally I would rather they allow him more seasoning down in AAA and get the extra year of cost control for him. If they don't make a move for a corner infielder this off season I could see him breaking camp with the team though. It all depends on the CBA, but all he'd need is 30 days in AAA next year for an extra year of control under the current one. What I do not want is for them to pencil him in at 3B or any position and not have sufficient alternate plans, like what happened with JBJ and Bogaerts in 2014. I completly agree that I'd like to see them have another alternative at 3rd base. Guess that could be shaw and a righty corner infielder again though. Looking at moncada's numbers he could use some more reps in the minors. On another note, this is probably a discussion for another thread but I have to believe that the completly arbitrary 30 day rule will be reworked. Ud think that'd be one of the priorities for the mlbpa.
|
|
|
Post by soxjim on Sept 1, 2016 20:06:09 GMT -5
How good would Moncada have to look out there this season and during spring training next to be the opening day 3rd baseman? Personally I would rather they allow him more seasoning down in AAA and get the extra year of cost control for him. If they don't make a move for a corner infielder this off season I could see him breaking camp with the team though. I prefer the team try its best to win this year. You have to play to win. Not every player is JBJ that totally collapses. XB just needed a year. Not every player when brought up is assured they will play well every year their 1st five.
For what the Red Sox pay in salary, and just as important for the prospects they've given up, if the Sox think Moncada can help them win games this year, then they better play him. I would have given this year a pass. But once they signed Kimbrel, they told us that they are all in. With the move with Pomeranz they reiterated that.
Now that they've given up so much, the last thing I want to see them do is chicken out/being scared of a few extra raindrops that might fall to the ground. We've gone too far to not try to pull out every stop. We have to go all in. Welcome aboard Mr. Moncada.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Sept 1, 2016 20:20:04 GMT -5
How good would Moncada have to look out there this season and during spring training next to be the opening day 3rd baseman? Personally I would rather they allow him more seasoning down in AAA and get the extra year of cost control for him. If they don't make a move for a corner infielder this off season I could see him breaking camp with the team though. I prefer the team try its best to win this year. You have to play to win. Not every player is JBJ that totally collapses. XB just needed a year. Not every player when brought up is assured they will play well every year their 1st five.
For what the Red Sox pay in salary, and just as important for the prospects they've given up, if the Sox think Moncada can help them win games this year, then they better play him. I would have given this year a pass. But once they signed Kimbrel, they told us that they are all in. With the move with Pomeranz they reiterated that.
Now that they've given up so much, the last thing I want to see them do is chicken out/being scared of a few extra raindrops that might fall to the ground. We've gone too far to not try to pull out every stop. We have to go all in. Welcome aboard Mr. Moncada.
Yes that is this year, I think most can probably agree there is little to lose by bringing him to the majors this year to get an idea of what it is like and well shaw and hill have been bad. My question though is next year, as it stands I really do not know what the chances are of him being the starting 3rd baseman opening day. I think it's probably on the low side. I think that some combo of shaw/holt/sandoval+right handed 3rd base fa can do well enough for a month to maybe the whole year. It really depends on yoan but I don't think he is ready. I very much hope he proves me wrong.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Sept 2, 2016 0:54:17 GMT -5
How good would Moncada have to look out there this season and during spring training next to be the opening day 3rd baseman? Personally I would rather they allow him more seasoning down in AAA and get the extra year of cost control for him. If they don't make a move for a corner infielder this off season I could see him breaking camp with the team though. It all depends on the CBA, but all he'd need is 30 days in AAA next year for an extra year of control under the current one. What I do not want is for them to pencil him in at 3B or any position and not have sufficient alternate plans, like what happened with JBJ and Bogaerts in 2014. I mentioned in another thread the smart move for the Sox would be to have Moncada gain more experience in the minors next season until they are satisfied that he's ready. Call him up and when they feel he's likely up for good, then trade of Shaw but hold onto Shaw until that point in time.
|
|
gerry
Veteran
Enter your message here...
Posts: 1,809
|
Post by gerry on Sept 2, 2016 1:21:24 GMT -5
It all depends on the CBA, but all he'd need is 30 days in AAA next year for an extra year of control under the current one. What I do not want is for them to pencil him in at 3B or any position and not have sufficient alternate plans, like what happened with JBJ and Bogaerts in 2014.'s I mentioned in another thread the smart move for the Sox would be to have Moncada gain more experience in the minors next season until they are satisfied that he's ready. Call him up and when they feel he's likely up for good, then trade of Shaw but hold onto Shaw until that point in time. Why trade Shaw who could be that above average lefty, cost controlled, experienced, homegrown, core, 20HR backup 3B, 1B, LF, PH, DH. Perhaps Panda would be a better choice. Let's see how he finishes the year
|
|
|