SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 6, 2017 9:19:59 GMT -5
Players are still drunk from the parties last night, but the off-season is now here... we will dissect the crap out of this and already started last week, but a couple things that last night has told me:
1. Unless his market doesn't develop or the Pats franchise him, Marty is gone. Last night he said "I'm going into free agency as a SB champion. You know how they overpay SB champions"
See ya Marty, it's too bad because he's a great fit here.
2. Danny Amendola has another huge game in a big spot. Unfortunately, that contract has to be reworked in a big way or he will be cut.
3. Hightower's overall stat line wasn't special, in fact it wasn't much of anything, but he blew up Freeman on the opening drive of the 3rd that set the tone and that strip sack was a massive play. He's the Mayo of this team and they paid Mayo, they will pay 54, even if it's via the franchise tag for another year. Patriots have the most cap room they have ever had.
4. Ryan and Harmon sound like players who will be back. Won't surprise me if they take team friendly extension with high percentages of guarantees. Think 5 years 30- 35m for Logan with 20 guaranteed (might be a year too long) and something like 4 years 20m with 12-15 guaranteed for Harmon.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 6, 2017 15:42:03 GMT -5
I wouldn't think Bennett is gone just yet. Remember a year ago no one wanted him because of all his issues. So I don't think it's a given so team gives him a huge deal. If I'm the Pats I try to resign him, but I will not give him a crazy deal. This year's draft looks to have some good TEs.
Ryan is the guy I think gets a massive offer. He's young, keeps getting better and hasn't had an issues like Bennett.
I don't see Pats giving Harmon that much and I can see some other team giving him that, so I think he's gone.
I'm torn on Amandola. He does make huge catches all the time, but he's clearly the 4th WR how and is getting older. If he reworks his deal again I can see him back, but it might be time to try and get an upgrade. We really need more Size at WR. I can see us signing Floyd on the cheap on one year deal and drafting another guy. Call me crazy but I would love to see them go after an elite guy in draft at end of first round if there is one.
One thing I would look at would be kickers in draft, if this is a good year we might get a new kicker. Bill has to hate 5 missed extra points. If we missed one 2 point conversion that could have cost us game.
The other big issue is RB, what do we do? I love our 3rd down backs. I wouldn't be against bringing Blunt back on a short term deal, but we need a young RB.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 6, 2017 16:39:02 GMT -5
I agree with you on Bennett but his comments say he's going for top dollar. Chances are he won't get that here. Depending on the market we might get close but is he a guy that leave ANY money on the table? We will see...
There are a lot of corners on the market and there is a distinction in lag between number 1 corners and the next tier. I doubt anyone will look at Ryan as even an up and coming number 1 guy. If he's the best corner on your team you're screwed... also, he's the consummate Patriot. I could see both him and Harmon taking fair contracts to stay for less money than they could get elsewhere, but we will see...
I pray that Branch gets overlooked again and keeps playing here on these cheap deals.
|
|
|
Post by rookie13 on Feb 6, 2017 17:11:31 GMT -5
The main thing I've been wondering for weeks is what they'll end up doing with Jimmy G. If some team offers a very high 1st round pick I don't see how the Pats could turn it down. I know that QBs can flame out quickly, especially at age 40, but Brady sure didn't look like he was declining this last season.
What would the Pats need to get back to make a Jimmy G trade realistic?
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Feb 6, 2017 17:26:10 GMT -5
The main thing I've been wondering for weeks is what they'll end up doing with Jimmy G. If some team offers a very high 1st round pick I don't see how the Pats could turn it down. I know that QBs can flame out quickly, especially at age 40, but Brady sure didn't look like he was declining this last season. What would the Pats need to get back to make a Jimmy G trade realistic? It starts with a 1st, but they'll likely want another draft pick as well. I think locking up defensive talent will be the priority - namely Hightower and Butler. It wouldn't surprise me to see them let Amendola go, especially since Malcolm Mitchell looks like a legit WR2.
|
|
|
Post by mattpicard on Feb 6, 2017 17:43:23 GMT -5
- No chance Amendola is back at a $7.9M cap hit. Not sure how much he'll be willing to restructure. Would love to see him back, and I think he wants to be back, but you have to think there's no more than a 30% chance or so of that happening.
- I would be shocked if Logan Ryan re-signs. He'll get a deal from another team that sharply exceeds what BB is willing to pay.
- They'll do everything in their power to bring Hightower back, and I think it's more likely than not that he returns. They'll also probably target a LB early on in the draft, either way.
- Harmon I think walks, for similar reasons to Ryan.
- It's definitely time to bring in a kicker to give Gost a little competition, even if Gost is most definitely going to be our K next year.
- Jimmy G will be traded. If it's a first rounder, you do that instantly. I think they end up moving him for something like a second + fourth rounder.
- Marty probably walks, although if they're going to make try to make a splash for anyone, he's gonna be up there. Most likely case is he walks, we draft a TE, and pray Gronk has a healthy season.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 6, 2017 22:07:04 GMT -5
Remember they have a lot of cap room and traded away Collins and Jones. I don't think they did that to let most of the other defensive key pieces go. I expect Ryan back unless he gets 10m a year some place. Fingers crossed.
I'd be upset with that trade return with Jimmy. I'd keep him before I'd trade him for a second rd pick.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 7, 2017 0:36:26 GMT -5
Patriots don't just overpay players because they can. I have to think they want to pay Butler in that 7-10 million range. So they can't come close to that for Ryan.
We have to get like a 1st and 4th round pick for Jimmy. Look what they got for Bradford with his contract. You get Jimmy for one year on the cheap, before having to commit big money. Now we could get a package of picks that equal that like two second rounders and a 4th, or something like that. Its got to be big or I just keep him as insurance.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Feb 7, 2017 5:59:48 GMT -5
Everyone keeps talking about the cap room but in order to keep your most important defensive pieces in Hightower and Butler, it's going to literally suck all of that cap space away. That's if they decide to even pay these guys.
I'm expecting a complete remake on defense outside of one or two guys. Remember too, Edelman only has one year left on his deal. Gronk has one year left until he really starts getting paid on his extension (meaning the Patriots might look to trade him after next season).
The Patriots can't pay all these players. They are going to have to pick and chose the players they want to keep most and try to get the best draft picks for Garrapolo to help this process of rebuilding this team on the fly. This isn't the Sox unfortunately and the biggest pockets don't matter in a capped league.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Feb 7, 2017 6:24:50 GMT -5
I keep saying this, Bill Belicheck will always make the unpopular decisions to do what he feels is best for the football team.
Bill hasn't always been the best GM either, as a coach he's undeniable but he has proven to make mistakes as a GM and at least shown that he's human on that side of football.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 7, 2017 7:18:35 GMT -5
Not sure that you know how the NFL cap works.... it won't take even close to all that money to sign Hightower and Butler. They have roughly 61m plus another potential 6.4m from cutting Amendola. So if he's cut they have 67.5m and if he's just reworked then it's likely 64. Franchising Hightower (worst case for 2017 cap) lowers the room to 50.
NFL cap figures fluctuate year to year based on what that years salaries are combined with the average of the signing bonus. Then you have to factor in guaranteed money to figure savings etc. Most extensions have low(er) cap figures early.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 7, 2017 7:26:01 GMT -5
Patriots don't just overpay players because they can. I have to think they want to pay Butler in that 7-10 million range. So they can't come close to that for Ryan. . No they certainly don't, but they are also very well prepared and they they have been preparing for this talking to players etc. I won't question letting him go if he gets big money somewhere else. I just really hope he's back. He's not great, but he's young, flexible, smart and tackles like a beast. In other words, he's perfect for this team.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Feb 7, 2017 8:38:58 GMT -5
There are 4 teams out there desperately needing a good quarterback. There are no sure things in the draft. I think there might be a bidding war for Jimmy G. Better him then some DE or LT. It's a quarterback driven league and if you don't have one, you have no chance of doing much.
So, you might see a 1st and a 3rd or even more. Cleveland has 2 first round picks. Would they give them both up if the bidding gets too insane? Cleveland starts off with a 1 and a 4. Chicago jumps in with a 1 and a 3. SF ups it to and 1 and a 2. Cleveland gives them an offer they can't refuse...both their 1's. Can you imagine the Pats with 3 firsts?
Dream a little dream with me.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 7, 2017 9:33:51 GMT -5
@patscap is a great follow. As he puts it, NE COULD resign everyone. Admittedly, he predicts they won't.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Feb 7, 2017 9:43:34 GMT -5
There are 4 teams out there desperately needing a good quarterback. There are no sure things in the draft. I think there might be a bidding war for Jimmy G. Better him then some DE or LT. It's a quarterback driven league and if you don't have one, you have no chance of doing much. So, you might see a 1st and a 3rd or even more. Cleveland has 2 first round picks. Would they give them both up if the bidding gets too insane? Cleveland starts off with a 1 and a 4. Chicago jumps in with a 1 and a 3. SF ups it to and 1 and a 2. Cleveland gives them an offer they can't refuse...both their 1's. Can you imagine the Pats with 3 firsts? Dream a little dream with me. I think the Pats will have a tough time getting a first. I just don't think Cle/SF/Chi will give up a top 3 pick for Jimmy G, so that leaves the Cle pick at 12, but if they the only ones who can offer a one they have leverage. Do we really want to wait for a 1 next year? I'd take a high 2 this year and a 1 next year but doubt those teams will go that high. If not Cle/SF/Chi, who steps in? Doubt BB deals with Jets/Bills. Are KC or Hou bold enough? I'm beginning to worry we'll get stuck with something like two 2s or else the market doesn't bear it and the Pats keep him. Pick 12 or bust!
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 7, 2017 11:20:05 GMT -5
I have no issues keeping him. Brady is playing phenomenal but let's not fool ourselves. Most players go down hill quick once they do so keeping him thru next season is more valuable than a second round pick. Cleveland has no leverage if they really want him because the Patriots don't have to trade him and there is very good reason not to. Pats have all the leverage.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Feb 7, 2017 12:35:28 GMT -5
I have seen that the Pats have anywhere from 61 to 71 million in cap space for 2017, I know that's a big spread and I don't plan on analyzing each site or how they got there. Either way they are in better shoes than normal coming off a SB win when the winning team is often in a bad place cap wise. So in short, the Pats are in good shoes. Rather than argue how much each guy is going to get in FA or who will stay I will just say this. Historically it is always surprising who they sign and for how much, usually the guys they sign do so for less than most predict. And when it comes to who they don't sign, way more often than not the players who leave are not as successful in their new home. BB knows what he is doing and doesn't overpay. Having said that I expect Hightower and Butler to be signed and for a smaller annual cap hit than many will predict. When the GOAT is playing with a cap hit of 15m the rest know to fall in line or move on. As for Jimmy G. I expect there to be a bidding war between the top 3 teams in the draft. Those teams 2nd rd picks are obviously just outside the 1st and might just be the highest pick the Pats get in a deal, with the real battle being about the next best piece. We shall see but once again the Pats are winners either way and the rest of the league is bumming.
They could be even better next year. Of course health will have much to do with it. That being said I wouldn't mind seeing Gronk wait til half way thru to come back. A healthy Gronk in the playoffs would be nice for a change.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 7, 2017 14:48:31 GMT -5
I don't think we are going to get a top 5 pick for Jimmy. The reason the 49ers, Browns, and Bears would want Jimmy is because they can use there top pick on a top rated player. QB class really doesn't have an QBs worth a top 3 pick, even though I love Kizer. So I agree deal likely starts with a 2nd round pick, but I would want two of them. I would be happy with Clevelands two second rounders this year and a 4th/5th round pick. I wouldn't have a problem with 49ers or Bears 2nd and 3rd rounders this year and a 2nd rounder next year.
A dark horse team might be Cardinals, as I have seen reports that Palmer moved his family out of Arizona.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Feb 7, 2017 16:11:26 GMT -5
There are 4 teams out there desperately needing a good quarterback. There are no sure things in the draft. I think there might be a bidding war for Jimmy G. Better him then some DE or LT. It's a quarterback driven league and if you don't have one, you have no chance of doing much. So, you might see a 1st and a 3rd or even more. Cleveland has 2 first round picks. Would they give them both up if the bidding gets too insane? Cleveland starts off with a 1 and a 4. Chicago jumps in with a 1 and a 3. SF ups it to and 1 and a 2. Cleveland gives them an offer they can't refuse...both their 1's. Can you imagine the Pats with 3 firsts? Dream a little dream with me. I think the Pats will have a tough time getting a first. I just don't think Cle/SF/Chi will give up a top 3 pick for Jimmy G, so that leaves the Cle pick at 12, but if they the only ones who can offer a one they have leverage. Do we really want to wait for a 1 next year? I'd take a high 2 this year and a 1 next year but doubt those teams will go that high. If not Cle/SF/Chi, who steps in? Doubt BB deals with Jets/Bills. Are KC or Hou bold enough? I'm beginning to worry we'll get stuck with something like two 2s or else the market doesn't bear it and the Pats keep him. Pick 12 or bust! You don't need 2 teams to create a bidding war. You need only 1 and the illusion there is another. How does 1 team who wants him KNOW that there is not another team out there that does too? They don't. Before any negotiation you need to set your limit and not excede it, then evaluate your own evaluation of you routinely are out in LF.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 7, 2017 16:57:06 GMT -5
I think the Pats will have a tough time getting a first. I just don't think Cle/SF/Chi will give up a top 3 pick for Jimmy G, so that leaves the Cle pick at 12, but if they the only ones who can offer a one they have leverage. Do we really want to wait for a 1 next year? I'd take a high 2 this year and a 1 next year but doubt those teams will go that high. If not Cle/SF/Chi, who steps in? Doubt BB deals with Jets/Bills. Are KC or Hou bold enough? I'm beginning to worry we'll get stuck with something like two 2s or else the market doesn't bear it and the Pats keep him. Pick 12 or bust! You don't need 2 teams to create a bidding war. You need only 1 and the illusion there is another. How does 1 team who wants him KNOW that there is not another team out there that does too? They don't. Before any negotiation you need to set your limit and not excede it, then evaluate your own evaluation of you routinely are out in LF. You do need two teams to create a bidding war. You really think teams are stupid? They are going to know if another team at least has interest in Jimmy. You might be able to bend the truth about there level of interest or what they are ultimately willing to surrender, but you need that second team thats willing to trade for him. Now I agree they need to set a minimum level of compensation we need to get to trade Jimmy. We do have leverage, we don't have to trade him. He makes next to nothing and has another year on deal. If we don't get what we want, we just keep him because Brady is going to be 40 next year. I don't think it's going to be hard to get a couple teams interested. A bunch of teams need QBs. Teams love players from Super Bowl winning teams. Jimmy has spent 3 years being coached by the best coach ever and learning from the best QB ever. He's still young, going to cost next to nothing next year and is 100% ready to play now.
|
|
|
Post by ghostofrussgibson on Feb 7, 2017 19:47:00 GMT -5
You don't need 2 teams to create a bidding war. You need only 1 and the illusion there is another. How does 1 team who wants him KNOW that there is not another team out there that does too? They don't. Before any negotiation you need to set your limit and not excede it, then evaluate your own evaluation of you routinely are out in LF. You do need two teams to create a bidding war. You really think teams are stupid? They are going to know if another team at least has interest in Jimmy. You might be able to bend the truth about there level of interest or what they are ultimately willing to surrender, but you need that second team thats willing to trade for him. Now I agree they need to set a minimum level of compensation we need to get to trade Jimmy. We do have leverage, we don't have to trade him. He makes next to nothing and has another year on deal. If we don't get what we want, we just keep him because Brady is going to be 40 next year. I don't think it's going to be hard to get a couple teams interested. A bunch of teams need QBs. Teams love players from Super Bowl winning teams. Jimmy has spent 3 years being coached by the best coach ever and learning from the best QB ever. He's still young, going to cost next to nothing next year and is 100% ready to play now.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Feb 7, 2017 20:27:20 GMT -5
Not sure that you know how the NFL cap works.... it won't take even close to all that money to sign Hightower and Butler. They have roughly 61m plus another potential 6.4m from cutting Amendola. So if he's cut they have 67.5m and if he's just reworked then it's likely 64. Franchising Hightower (worst case for 2017 cap) lowers the room to 50. NFL cap figures fluctuate year to year based on what that years salaries are combined with the average of the signing bonus. Then you have to factor in guaranteed money to figure savings etc. Most extensions have low(er) cap figures early. No I do and I'm accounting for the extentions and pay raises of the Patriots players have past this next season. Gronk will be expensive by 2019, him and Brady are going to need to restructure their current deals. In the case of Gronk, he might have to be traded if he doesn't want to restructure. Edelman, Hightower, and Butler are going to need new deals by this year or next year. The Patriots are going to have a lot of tough decisions to make the next two years whether anyone realizes this or not.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 7, 2017 21:02:33 GMT -5
Again, @patscap shows you how it all COULD work.
Seems to suggest Ryan and Harmon are most likely to go. Bennett he had at 50/50. He sounds like a guy who is moving on though.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 7, 2017 21:06:23 GMT -5
Not sure that you know how the NFL cap works.... it won't take even close to all that money to sign Hightower and Butler. They have roughly 61m plus another potential 6.4m from cutting Amendola. So if he's cut they have 67.5m and if he's just reworked then it's likely 64. Franchising Hightower (worst case for 2017 cap) lowers the room to 50. NFL cap figures fluctuate year to year based on what that years salaries are combined with the average of the signing bonus. Then you have to factor in guaranteed money to figure savings etc. Most extensions have low(er) cap figures early. No I do and I'm accounting for the extentions and pay raises of the Patriots players have past this next season. Gronk will be expensive by 2019, him and Brady are going to need to restructure their current deals. In the case of Gronk, he might have to be traded if he doesn't want to restructure. Edelman, Hightower, and Butler are going to need new deals by this year or next year. The Patriots are going to have a lot of tough decisions to make the next two years whether anyone realizes this or not. First we all know Brady will restructure his contract to lower cap number. Second your overlooking the increase in cap, for example by 2019 it's going to be about 18 million higher than right now. Next year it goes up about 5 million. So your numbers just don't add up. Butler and Hightower can easily be re-signed, along with other players. They aren't going to completely remake D. That just makes no sense.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Feb 7, 2017 21:08:09 GMT -5
Brady already structured his deal to a lower number last time he restructured. He isn't going to take a lower number.
|
|
|