SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2018 Boston Celtics offseason
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 13, 2018 16:14:01 GMT -5
Jabari Bird will be cut any hour now. I didn't think it could get worse, but wow it did. The ESPN article is horrible, but also points out he had a seizure or something close to that. So something was going on. He says there is two sides to the story and pleades not guilty. I'm sure that is true, but even if one percent of what she said being true means his career is over. I'd like to believe that even if I had a mental breakdown I wouldn't come close to doing what he is accused of doing.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Sept 14, 2018 9:03:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 14, 2018 9:07:27 GMT -5
Man, I like to believe the guy if he pleaded insanity in court, but I don't know. This is just out of my league in terms of judgment. Put this guy in a mental hospital. Prevent him from hurting people, including himself.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Sept 14, 2018 9:11:06 GMT -5
"There never was an Aaron, Councilor"
Sorry - I shouldn't make light of the situation but I can't get it out of my head ever since the reports/rumors of that being a factor came out.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Sept 14, 2018 11:06:53 GMT -5
For me real plus minus and boxscore plus minus and then those two brokendown into offense and defense are the advanced stats that show you Marcus Smarts value. They just measure how the team does points wise while a certain player is on the court. It's not perfect because it doesn't adjust for who you play with, but overall it does a very good job. Smart was 102 in RPM last year, Rozier was 86th and likely much higher if you looked at when he started and got big minutes. It rates Smart as one of the better defensive guards in the league, but his negative rating on offense kills his value. If he was just neutral on offense he'd be ranked around 70th in the league for example. This is also the stat that can measure things like hustle plays. That seems to matchup with what you see watching the games. For me, our Draymond Green is Horford and it's funny they rank 18th and 19th in RPM. Both are better defensively, but also positives on offense. That's the difference with Smart, his offense takes away a good amount of his defensive value. Outside of Smart improving his shooting, which is a long-shot, he needs to shoot less and cut the turnovers down. Given the players he'll be playing with that just makes sense and will greatly improve his numbers. That being said, good luck with that. Smart is who he is at this point, a very good defensive player that most likely will be a negative on offense due to poor shooting and turnovers. Stevens just isn't the coach to tell any player to stop shooting, even when it seems so obvious. Next year there won't be many players playing that won't be better options to take shots, but that likely won't stop Smart. As good as Stevens is as a coach, I wonder if he'll be able to get the most out of Smart. I guess you are correct when thinking the C's Green is Horford. I think for me the comparison is more about the attitude and tenacity that Smart brings reminds me of Green.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Sept 14, 2018 15:34:00 GMT -5
It why I though Rozier was a better PG than Irving last year. He just ran the offense. He wasn't playing tons of one on one ball and made sure players got to touch the ball. Rozier would drive and pass just as much as he would drive to score. Irvings ratio was much higher on just driving to score. I'd love to know the percentage of plays he just took the ball, went to the cover to create and then took a shot without anyone touching the ball. It had to be one of the higher percentages in the league, if he wasn't #1. Yeah I don't know man. Maybe in the regular season depending on what you're looking for, but in the post-season you definitely need an alpha scorer and Rozier can't do that. Irving can. You need a guy who's able to take over games and there's only one dude who can do that currently in the roster (two if/when Tatum develops).
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 14, 2018 17:16:44 GMT -5
It why I though Rozier was a better PG than Irving last year. He just ran the offense. He wasn't playing tons of one on one ball and made sure players got to touch the ball. Rozier would drive and pass just as much as he would drive to score. Irvings ratio was much higher on just driving to score. I'd love to know the percentage of plays he just took the ball, went to the cover to create and then took a shot without anyone touching the ball. It had to be one of the higher percentages in the league, if he wasn't #1. Yeah I don't know man. Maybe in the regular season depending on what you're looking for, but in the post-season you definitely need an alpha scorer and Rozier can't do that. Irving can. You need a guy who's able to take over games and there's only one dude who can do that currently in the roster (two if/when Tatum develops). Not sure I agree you need a guy that can take over games. You need go to scorers, but you don't need ball hogs. Remember Irving is also the PG and has a responsibility to make sure we run our offense and getting other players involved. Nevermind this year will be a lot different than last year. You'll have Tatum, Irving, Hayward, Brown, and even a guy like Rozier coming off the bench. With that talent level, the way Tatum, Brown and Rozier improved we don't need the Irving from last year. Ball movement and everyone touching the ball is what almost got us to the finals. It's what allowed those players to shine I want to see Irving driving to pass a lot more, just not looking to score. He has the ability to be a very good PG, while being a very good scorer. We see flashes of it, but not nearly enough. That's how we beat Golden State and become a better team. It's all about team basketball, not Irving just trying to act like LeBron. He can take as many shots as he wants, as long as they come within the offense. Not him dribbling up the court, to one side of the court then going one on one without anyone else touching the ball. That happend a ton last year, everyone just watching Irving.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Sept 16, 2018 12:03:32 GMT -5
]Not sure I agree you need a guy that can take over games. You need go to scorers, but you don't need ball hogs. Remember Irving is also the PG and has a responsibility to make sure we run our offense and getting other players involved. Nevermind this year will be a lot different than last year. You'll have Tatum, Irving, Hayward, Brown, and even a guy like Rozier coming off the bench. With that talent level, the way Tatum, Brown and Rozier improved we don't need the Irving from last year. Ball movement and everyone touching the ball is what almost got us to the finals. It's what allowed those players to shine I want to see Irving driving to pass a lot more, just not looking to score. He has the ability to be a very good PG, while being a very good scorer. We see flashes of it, but not nearly enough. That's how we beat Golden State and become a better team. It's all about team basketball, not Irving just trying to act like LeBron. He can take as many shots as he wants, as long as they come within the offense. Not him dribbling up the court, to one side of the court then going one on one without anyone else touching the ball. That happend a ton last year, everyone just watching Irving. What you said would be correct if the Celtics didn't have the roster it has. Irving doesn't need to be a primary creator and ball movement isn't solely his responsibility, not in a team with Hayward and Horford who are both fantastic playmakers for their position. They also bring Smart from the bench and he's going to see a lot of time playing as 2 next to Irving. They need Irving to be a scorer, not a distributor. Look at game 7 against the Cavs last year. Once they went under every screen and packed the lane and fools couldn't hit anything long, no amount of distribution would do you any good. You need a reliable alpha scorer that at least gets the other defense jumpy. And we all loved the team effort last season, but let's be honest here, they probably would have reached the Finals with Irving starting instead of Rozier.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 16, 2018 13:18:14 GMT -5
Yeah I'm in the camp of wanting a scorer and not a distributor after watching that game 7 performance. I was bordering thinking that Kyrie was expendable before that game and then reality set in.
You need as many great players more importantly. It's all about talent in the NBA and how they play together.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 17, 2018 1:38:40 GMT -5
]Not sure I agree you need a guy that can take over games. You need go to scorers, but you don't need ball hogs. Remember Irving is also the PG and has a responsibility to make sure we run our offense and getting other players involved. Nevermind this year will be a lot different than last year. You'll have Tatum, Irving, Hayward, Brown, and even a guy like Rozier coming off the bench. With that talent level, the way Tatum, Brown and Rozier improved we don't need the Irving from last year. Ball movement and everyone touching the ball is what almost got us to the finals. It's what allowed those players to shine I want to see Irving driving to pass a lot more, just not looking to score. He has the ability to be a very good PG, while being a very good scorer. We see flashes of it, but not nearly enough. That's how we beat Golden State and become a better team. It's all about team basketball, not Irving just trying to act like LeBron. He can take as many shots as he wants, as long as they come within the offense. Not him dribbling up the court, to one side of the court then going one on one without anyone else touching the ball. That happend a ton last year, everyone just watching Irving. What you said would be correct if the Celtics didn't have the roster it has. Irving doesn't need to be a primary creator and ball movement isn't solely his responsibility, not in a team with Hayward and Horford who are both fantastic playmakers for their position. They also bring Smart from the bench and he's going to see a lot of time playing as 2 next to Irving. They need Irving to be a scorer, not a distributor. Look at game 7 against the Cavs last year. Once they went under every screen and packed the lane and fools couldn't hit anything long, no amount of distribution would do you any good. You need a reliable alpha scorer that at least gets the other defense jumpy. And we all loved the team effort last season, but let's be honest here, they probably would have reached the Finals with Irving starting instead of Rozier. The Irving from last year won't allow Hayward and Horford to be playmakers, that really my whole point. I fully agree he doesn't to be the primary playmaker, but he needs to play different than last year if those two will be big time playmakers. Just to prove my point, Irving only played PG 69% of the time last year. Stevens jumping at the chance to play a guy like Rozier at PG when playing with Irving. Lets be frank I love Rozier, but right now he's probally average at running a team and getting guys involved. He shows flashes of being well above average, but he's not close to a Chris Paul type player or a Rondo in his prime. Just for refrence, Thomas played 100% PG in his time in Boston, Irving had played nearly 100% PG the last four for the Cavs. So it sure seems Stevens agrees Irving wasn't great last year at running the team and getting players involved. Irving has the ball in his hands more than anyone. As much as it would be great to make him a full-time SG, you just can't, not if you start Brown. So he needs to play team ball, start the offense and make sure everyone is getting involved. That means a ton less trips where only he touches the ball and takes a shot. He can take all the shots he wants once we run our offense. The age old saying were you want everyone touching the ball before a shot is taken most of the time. That is Steven's offense and the exact opposite of what Irving did in Cleveland and here last year. Yes we need Irving the scorer, but we need Irving the scorer playing team ball. You can debate what Irving could have done for us in the playoffs. There is certainly games were he would have helped a ton and others were I wonder. Who really knows, maybe. Sure game 7 he makes a difference, Rozier and Brown couldn't hit the side of a barn shooting. You just don't know if Tatum, Brown, and Rozier to a lesser extent take the large jumps they did if Irving is leading the team. It's not like Irving is just Rozier but a much better scorer. That scoring came at a cost last year. That Orlando game where he had 40 point. It was a crazy impressive display, but it highlights the problems when Irving plays that way. It was his second highest point total and he was very efficient. We lost and the final score doesn't even do it justice. A late run when the game was over. Irving just wanting to be the man and four other guys just watching him. Basketball is a team sport and even the great LeBron can't win games without playing team ball. Gotta keep everyone engaged even if your on fire. He has the ball more than anyone, so he can't not do it.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 17, 2018 1:41:26 GMT -5
Yeah I'm in the camp of wanting a scorer and not a distributor after watching that game 7 performance. I was bordering thinking that Kyrie was expendable before that game and then reality set in. You need as many great players more importantly. It's all about talent in the NBA and how they play together. Talent and HOW THEY PLAY TOGETHER being the big key. Its a team sport!
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 17, 2018 7:44:35 GMT -5
All that matters is this team is starting off the year better than last years team. They lost to the Cavs because they couldn’t score and they are adding one of the best scorers in the league, plus another top 20 scorer in Hayward. On top of it, Tatum won’t be as tentative like at times last year. Brown and Rozier should hopefully continue their improvements like previous years.
Sit back and enjoy. The situation Kyrie or any of these guys will be playing in is drastically different despite basically the same team returning. The majority of the players we are talking about as proven guys were basic unknowns last season and early on were just along for the ride feeling it out.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Sept 17, 2018 11:08:30 GMT -5
The Irving from last year won't allow Hayward and Horford to be playmakers, that really my whole point. I fully agree he doesn't to be the primary playmaker, but he needs to play different than last year if those two will be big time playmakers. Just to prove my point, Irving only played PG 69% of the time last year. Stevens jumping at the chance to play a guy like Rozier at PG when playing with Irving. Lets be frank I love Rozier, but right now he's probally average at running a team and getting guys involved. He shows flashes of being well above average, but he's not close to a Chris Paul type player or a Rondo in his prime. Just for refrence, Thomas played 100% PG in his time in Boston, Irving had played nearly 100% PG the last four for the Cavs. So it sure seems Stevens agrees Irving wasn't great last year at running the team and getting players involved. Irving has the ball in his hands more than anyone. As much as it would be great to make him a full-time SG, you just can't, not if you start Brown. So he needs to play team ball, start the offense and make sure everyone is getting involved. That means a ton less trips where only he touches the ball and takes a shot. He can take all the shots he wants once we run our offense. The age old saying were you want everyone touching the ball before a shot is taken most of the time. That is Steven's offense and the exact opposite of what Irving did in Cleveland and here last year. Yes we need Irving the scorer, but we need Irving the scorer playing team ball. Your opinion on Irving doesn't match a lot of his career. He played alongside Lebron James for a good chunk of that time and Lebron was clearly the number one playmaker on that team. He had Kevin Love also creating shots for others. Yes he did kind of ball hog at times last season, but who was playing with him? A very green Tatum, a still inconsistent Brown, Horford who never had a shot he wouldn't like to take, the options were limited. I'll give it to you that if he comes out of the gates this season not playing within the Stevens offense with Hayward and a (hopefully) much improved duo of Tatum/Brown then yes, it's a cause for concern. As it is, I really think it will work out fine.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Sept 17, 2018 20:28:59 GMT -5
Couldn't disagree with umass more. On top of that I will say that Kyrie has been instrumental in Roziers development based on what Terry has said.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 18, 2018 6:55:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 18, 2018 6:56:17 GMT -5
Marcus Smarts mother died... sad day. I know she’s been really sick and struggling but losing your mom this young just isn’t right. Pray for Marcus 🙏
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 18, 2018 13:35:22 GMT -5
Rozier isn't saying he doesn't like his Basketball nickname, he's just saying he doesn't want his friends calling him that. He litterally says I don't mind it when fans call me it. Sure sounds like it was taken out of context to me.
As far as Irving I'm not surprised that people think I'm crazy or don't like my opinion. Thing is its really a fact. After playing Thomas 100% of the time at PG, Irving was at 69% last year. If Stevens loved how he ran the team and started our offense that wouldn't have happened. Heck Thomas would drive me crazy sometimes when he'd just stop driving and passing, but he almost always scored within the offense. He also played with a lot less talent and was forced to do what he did. You can't just ignore the fact that Stevens felt the need to get the ball out of Irvings hands. Irving is a brillant scorer, probably top 10 in the league, but he wasn't great at playing team ball last year and running our offense.
My opinion absolutely matches Irving career in Cleveland. He wasn't asked to run the offense in Cleveland LeBron did. The big difference being he wouldn't every think of not getting LeBron the ball. He litterally said he wanted out because he wanted to be the man. That is exactly how he acted last year. I'm the man and I'll do whatever I want. The end result was far too much one on one ball with the rest of his teammates just watching him. That would be fine if we were the Rockets, but that is the opposite of Stevens offense. Clevelands offense was much more like Houston's than ours. LeBron, Love, and Irving were so good they didn't to play team ball. Heck they didn't have the depth to make it worth it overall. They filled the team with specialists like Thompson and then shooters, guys that don't need the ball. That is the exact opposite of our team.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Sept 18, 2018 14:26:01 GMT -5
After playing Thomas 100% of the time at PG, Irving was at 69% last year. I don't think that's a statistic than means anything. Position designations in stat databases, more often than not, are based solely off the height of the players on the floor. Thomas was obviously the shortest guard on the Celtics whenever he took the floor (and so was always designated at the PG), but that wasn't true for Irving, who is taller than Rozier and Larkin. As such, whenever he played with those guys, he was nominally designated the SG even though he probably handled the ball and ran the offense more often than those guys did.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 18, 2018 14:56:38 GMT -5
After playing Thomas 100% of the time at PG, Irving was at 69% last year. I don't think that's a statistic than means anything. Position designations in stat databases, more often than not, are based solely off the height of the players on the floor. Thomas was obviously the shortest guard on the Celtics whenever he took the floor (and so was always designated at the PG), but that wasn't true for Irving, who is taller than Rozier and Larkin. As such, whenever he played with those guys, he was nominally designated the SG even though he probably handled the ball and ran the offense more often than those guys did. Plus, Thomas literally cannot play off the ball, the fact Kyrie can and is willing to is a positive not a negative.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Sept 18, 2018 15:13:54 GMT -5
Here’s the ESPN top 100. It differs a lot from the SI one. Sports Illustrated does have some of the worst NBA coverage around right now, unfortunately.
82 -- Terry Rozier 55 -- Marcus Smart (unranked by SI) 40 -- Gordon Hayward 37 -- Jaylen Brown 34 -- Al Horford
Tatum and Kyrie are clearly both in the top 30. Will be interesting to see where they fall. 7 top 82 and 5 top 40 ain’t bad.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Sept 19, 2018 5:34:52 GMT -5
Marcus Smarts mother died... sad day. I know she’s been really sick and struggling but losing your mom this young just isn’t right. Pray for Marcus 🙏 Jesus. That's horrible. I don't know how you bounce back from that. No wonder why he hasn't been around all summer. So sorry Marcus.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Sept 19, 2018 13:27:24 GMT -5
Jimmy Butler has officially requested a trade per Shams/Woj/Others. Woj reporting that he's told Minny that he'd prefer LAC/BRK/NYK.
Changed to the reflect the spirit of Woj's tweet (originally was that he'd give a list of 1-3 teams he'd be willing to sign an extension with. When the 3 came out, it was "preference").
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 19, 2018 13:28:47 GMT -5
After playing Thomas 100% of the time at PG, Irving was at 69% last year. I don't think that's a statistic than means anything. Position designations in stat databases, more often than not, are based solely off the height of the players on the floor. Thomas was obviously the shortest guard on the Celtics whenever he took the floor (and so was always designated at the PG), but that wasn't true for Irving, who is taller than Rozier and Larkin. As such, whenever he played with those guys, he was nominally designated the SG even though he probably handled the ball and ran the offense more often than those guys did. Do you have any proof? You know in this day and age of advanced stats, I find it hard to believe there is a huge breakdown of playing time by position if its only based off height. They matched up with what was happening in games. Rozier would act as the PG a lot when playing with Irving, something he never did when he played with Thomas. It was glaring to see because it was the first time I'd ever seen another guard doing that playing with Irving. Irving has played with smaller guys like Mo Williams. He played a ton of minutes with Jack who is the exact same size, yet Irving was 100% PG, Jack was 50% PG, 50% SG. Which is what it was in games, SG when playing with Irving, PG when he was off the court. If this is based just off of height they seem to be crazy lucky getting it right. So I just checked 2008 Celtics because our center was shorter than our PF. Perkins at 6'10'' played 100% center, yet he played a ton of minutes with a 6'11" KG who played 80% PF and 20% C. Which is what happened, KG would play some C with Perkins on the bench. So I just don't see how this is off of just height.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Sept 19, 2018 13:34:38 GMT -5
I don't think that's a statistic than means anything. Position designations in stat databases, more often than not, are based solely off the height of the players on the floor. Thomas was obviously the shortest guard on the Celtics whenever he took the floor (and so was always designated at the PG), but that wasn't true for Irving, who is taller than Rozier and Larkin. As such, whenever he played with those guys, he was nominally designated the SG even though he probably handled the ball and ran the offense more often than those guys did. Plus, Thomas literally cannot play off the ball, the fact Kyrie can and is willing to is a positive not a negative. How can't Thomas not play off the ball? He's a great shooter. Sure he's more effective with the ball, but Smart plays SG and even a bunch of SF. There isn't a single part of Smarts game that is that of a SG offensively.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Sept 19, 2018 13:35:31 GMT -5
Always thought it was based off of who they guarded (otherwise, wouldn't Al get credit for time at PG). Then again, didn't IT technically guard Markieff Morris against Washington (basically conceding that matchup so they could get better defenders on Wall/Beal).
|
|
|