wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Oct 9, 2018 16:44:42 GMT -5
Davis is a pipe dream that’s not worth thinking about right now. They would need that Sacramento pick to pan out for it to be at all enticing for New Orleans.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Oct 9, 2018 20:42:05 GMT -5
Per BSJ, C's are talking to Rozier about an extension.
Not sure if it means anything but . . .
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 0:20:25 GMT -5
Per BSJ, C's are talking to Rozier about an extension. Not sure if it means anything but . . . What could it mean if we are talking hypotheticals? Not following. I love Rozier. I see this as a awesome move.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Oct 10, 2018 6:57:25 GMT -5
Per BSJ, C's are talking to Rozier about an extension. Not sure if it means anything but . . . What could it mean if we are talking hypotheticals? Not following. I love Rozier. I see this as a awesome move. What are you asking? Asking about dollars? My guess is they’d try and go about 15-17 per year for 3-4 years. Depends what the owner is willing to do. Regardless, they would probably trade Smart or Rozier next offseason if they extended Rozier. Both of them would be very tradable and having a heftier salary would make it easier in some ways. If Terry signs any extension before October 15 then my guess is he is kept and Marcus is traded.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 7:03:33 GMT -5
What could it mean if we are talking hypotheticals? Not following. I love Rozier. I see this as a awesome move. What are you asking? Asking about dollars? My guess is they’d try and go about 15-17 per year for 3-4 years. Depends what the owner is willing to do. Regardless, they would probably trade Smart or Rozier next offseason if they extended Rozier. Both of them would be very tradable and having a heftier salary would make it easier in some ways. If Terry signs any extension before October 15 then my guess is he is kept and Marcus is traded. Why not keep both? Or is that impossible for the money to work? I was asking if he sees him being traded after he signs a extension and if there were any rumors about it.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Oct 10, 2018 7:51:19 GMT -5
By "not sure what it means" I was referring to whether it was REAL discussions (ie headed towards a signing) or just the due diligence/respecting the player discussions.
None of us see all 3 being on the roster next year. They wouldn't really be able to trade him (possible but extremely difficult due to poison pill) this year but it would give them the ability to trade a signed Smart or a signed Rozier next offseason.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Oct 10, 2018 10:16:09 GMT -5
By "not sure what it means" I was referring to whether it was REAL discussions (ie headed towards a signing) or just the due diligence/respecting the player discussions. None of us see all 3 being on the roster next year. They wouldn't really be able to trade him (possible but extremely difficult due to poison pill) this year but it would give them the ability to trade a signed Smart or a signed Rozier next offseason. My guess would be that it is just due diligence. The C's can't afford the 15m+ it will probably cost to keep him LT. They could have other strategies in mind to try and not lose the asset for nothing but that gets too complicated with all the options. I still expect them to trade MM some time this year to get out of the penalty stage which will start next year for sure but they really don't want to start that yet. It would be nice if their wasn't caps but their are and they get more expensive each yr the team is over the limit.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Oct 10, 2018 10:44:55 GMT -5
By "not sure what it means" I was referring to whether it was REAL discussions (ie headed towards a signing) or just the due diligence/respecting the player discussions. None of us see all 3 being on the roster next year. They wouldn't really be able to trade him (possible but extremely difficult due to poison pill) this year but it would give them the ability to trade a signed Smart or a signed Rozier next offseason. My guess would be that it is just due diligence. The C's can't afford the 15m+ it will probably cost to keep him LT. They could have other strategies in mind to try and not lose the asset for nothing but that gets too complicated with all the options. I still expect them to trade MM some time this year to get out of the penalty stage which will start next year for sure but they really don't want to start that yet. It would be nice if their wasn't caps but their are and they get more expensive each yr the team is over the limit. It's hard because Morris is kind of perfect for this team (irrationally confident tough vet on bench who can get hot on O and D is necessary at playoff time). But between too few minutes and the tax penalty kicking in, don't think he'll make the year.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Oct 10, 2018 11:59:22 GMT -5
By "not sure what it means" I was referring to whether it was REAL discussions (ie headed towards a signing) or just the due diligence/respecting the player discussions. None of us see all 3 being on the roster next year. They wouldn't really be able to trade him (possible but extremely difficult due to poison pill) this year but it would give them the ability to trade a signed Smart or a signed Rozier next offseason. If they work an extension with Rozier, I really think they’ll be doing it to have him in the 6th man role for the next few years. Which is another way of saying, I think they’d trade Smart.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 12:24:01 GMT -5
By "not sure what it means" I was referring to whether it was REAL discussions (ie headed towards a signing) or just the due diligence/respecting the player discussions. None of us see all 3 being on the roster next year. They wouldn't really be able to trade him (possible but extremely difficult due to poison pill) this year but it would give them the ability to trade a signed Smart or a signed Rozier next offseason. If they work an extension with Rozier, I really think they’ll be doing it to have him in the 6th man role for the next few years. Which is another way of saying, I think they’d trade Smart. If I'm Rozier, I'd let it play out if I'm looking for the most money possible. I'd sign a one year deal next year for whoever wants to start me, and prove I deserve starting money. Maybe that's not his motivation though. Hard to know.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 15:23:56 GMT -5
Lol I guess Jimmy Butler really wants out of Minnesota. No way they can break camp with him still on this team now. What a prima dona. Glad the Celtics never got this guy.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 10, 2018 15:37:42 GMT -5
If you can sign Rozier to an extension in the 60 to 70 million range, you do it. If you truly want to win Championships and aren't worried about the money it makes a ton of sense! I don't think it would mean Smart is gone either. If you get under this year, you'd have three years till you'd get the highest tax amount. Giving you crazy options. If your the best team our owner would likely be willing to pay the tax money, like Golden States owners. If you aren't you have salary to trade.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Oct 10, 2018 16:06:23 GMT -5
If they work an extension with Rozier, I really think they’ll be doing it to have him in the 6th man role for the next few years. Which is another way of saying, I think they’d trade Smart. If I'm Rozier, I'd let it play out if I'm looking for the most money possible. I'd sign a one year deal next year for whoever wants to start me, and prove I deserve starting money. Maybe that's not his motivation though. Hard to know. The Celtics can match any contract as he will be restricted. He’s not signing a 1 year deal unless he’s signing for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted status.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Oct 10, 2018 16:09:36 GMT -5
I don't understand Butler's outburst. He grabbed a bunch of bench guys and then beat the other 1st teamers. Then he yelled at the GM saying "You $%#@ing need me! You can't win without me!"
Ummm, yeah. That's why they haven't traded you yet. They still want to win so they aren't just dumping you for prospects/picks.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 10, 2018 16:37:57 GMT -5
If I'm Rozier, I'd let it play out if I'm looking for the most money possible. I'd sign a one year deal next year for whoever wants to start me, and prove I deserve starting money. Maybe that's not his motivation though. Hard to know. The Celtics can match any contract as he will be restricted. He’s not signing a 1 year deal unless he’s signing for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted status. Don't you need to offer deals of two years or more to retricted free agents? I vaguely remember that when Sullinger was one and he only got a one year deal after he was a true free agent after we pulled his qualifying offer. If that isn't true, I think they would match any one year offer, even a max one.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Oct 10, 2018 17:10:47 GMT -5
The Celtics can match any contract as he will be restricted. He’s not signing a 1 year deal unless he’s signing for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted status. Don't you need to offer deals of two years or more to retricted free agents? I vaguely remember that when Sullinger was one and he only got a one year deal after he was a true free agent after we pulled his qualifying offer. If that isn't true, I think they would match any one year offer, even a max one. I really am not sure but agree they’d match any one year deal - maybe even any 2 year deal.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 18:33:50 GMT -5
If I'm Rozier, I'd let it play out if I'm looking for the most money possible. I'd sign a one year deal next year for whoever wants to start me, and prove I deserve starting money. Maybe that's not his motivation though. Hard to know. The Celtics can match any contract as he will be restricted. He’s not signing a 1 year deal unless he’s signing for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted status. Ohh I understand the restricted free agency part, but would the Celtics blow a lot of money on a guy like Rozier for a year or two? Even potentially a max offer? That's a tough decision for the Celtics. You know some celler dweller team with cap space is going to desire a player like Rozier who could have considerable upside and could turn into a potential starting guard very very soon. Heck, he already did it for a month or 2 with the Celtics last year.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Oct 10, 2018 18:49:00 GMT -5
A lot of teams will have cap space next year because it’s 4 years after that spike which made teams give our stupid money. I am guessing there will be some huge contracts given but I think teams will also learn. Rozier likely isn’t getting a max contract. He’s not a max guy unless you want to be a mediocre team or you already have young stars like Phoenix, but Phoenix screwed themselves because they kind of had to by extending Booker early. They should have rolled the dice. Rozier would be perfect for them on so many levels.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 21:00:26 GMT -5
A lot of teams will have cap space next year because it’s 4 years after that spike which made teams give our stupid money. I am guessing there will be some huge contracts given but I think teams will also learn. Rozier likely isn’t getting a max contract. He’s not a max guy unless you want to be a mediocre team or you already have young stars like Phoenix, but Phoenix screwed themselves because they kind of had to by extending Booker early. They should have rolled the dice. Rozier would be perfect for them on so many levels. There are a lot of stupid teams in the NBA, I wouldn't bank on that. Teams wouldn't be exactly stupid either for taking a chance on a guy with starter ceiling either I don't think.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Oct 10, 2018 22:01:52 GMT -5
Giving a guy with a starter ceiling max money is how a lot of mediocre teams screw themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Oct 10, 2018 22:11:45 GMT -5
He’s not a max guy unless you want to be a mediocre team or you already have young stars like Phoenix, but Phoenix screwed themselves because they kind of had to by extending Booker early. They should have rolled the dice. Rozier would be perfect for them on so many levels. Ugh. I wanted to say we could work a deal out with them, but they don't have anything I want outside of obviously Ayton, Jackson or Booker. Maybe Mikal Bridges? Dragan Bender and picks? I'm still a believer in The Dragan.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on Oct 10, 2018 22:31:16 GMT -5
Yeah maybe the whole max contract idea is farfetched in the first place in terms of Rozier, but let's say some team offered Rozier 4/100. I don't know if the Celtics could match that, and I start to definitely wonder if Rozier gets that or close to that.
That's not max level money, but still way out of the Celtics range in terms of dollars, I think. The Celtics better extend him now if they prefer him over Smart someday, or want to keep that option open at least.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Oct 11, 2018 11:16:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Oct 11, 2018 18:47:42 GMT -5
I guess it's how you define starter frankly. Given the Talent in the NBA, Rozier is a starting caliber player right now. I guess you could mean above average or on a playoff team, yet he was the starter on a team that was one game from the finals. Rozier could get a max contract not because his ceiling is that of a starter, but more like All-star or close to that level. Given his age and playing time a team can look at Roziers playoff numbers and dream that he gets better. He's been improving every year, so that isn't crazy. He's also young, so a max deal for him is 25% of the cap, not 30% and he's certainly not getting super max money. So he has a decent chance at it if he keeps improving.
At the sametime it would seem foolish to turn down 60 to 70 million if he could get that from the Celtics. He won't get starter minutes again unless an injury happens. Not a lot of restricted free agents get huge offers. Teams prefer unrestricted because teams can't match.
I don't think the Celtics match a max offer,but you never know. Look at the Clippers, they paid Griffin crazy money and then traded him for assets. Danny could do the same thing. I hope he does something because as much as it will suck to see Rozier playing for another team. Getting nothing in return for a player like him will hurt more and just doesn't seem smart.
|
|
|
Post by ryan24 on Oct 12, 2018 4:54:04 GMT -5
Any one want to make a guess on the C's regular season record? How about how far they go in the playoffs? Assuming no significant injuries. What if any moves does Danny make?
|
|