SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2018 Boston Celtics offseason
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 13, 2018 21:09:28 GMT -5
Let's say DA does love Bamba -- here's an interesting trade scenario for you amateur GMs to dissect: Bos trades LAC future #1 pick + Bos 2018 #1 to LAC for 2018 #1 (#13 overall); then: Bos trades Memphis future #1 + Bos 2018 #1 (#13 overall) to Memphis for 2018 #1 (#4 overall). Rationale: 1) I expect both Memphis & LA would pay a slight premium to have their own picks returned safely to them -- call it the "embarrassment factor." GM's that give away high lottery picks: turn off their fan base; get unemployed. Plus they now are free to rebuild/retool, or full on tank, as they see fit. 2) The deals can be sweetened with a player or pick, if needed. The future LA pick might prove very valuable so I think for LA moving from late lottery to late 1st, is fair value. And they keep pick #12. Likely it would be considered a savvy draft day deal for them. Memphis is taking the bigger drop, from 4 to 13, and likely would require more compensation. So give them more. What say -- Bamba or bust? I like your thought process but you’d have to give up more for both scenarios. you’d probably have to end up dealing: Rozier, Celtics 2018 1st (27th), Clippers pick, the Sacramento pick and another of your firsts to get up to 4. You might be able to get away with keeping the Memphis pick by subbing in the Kings pick. I think ultimately though l, Memphis has very little desire to deal out of that spot. They are getting a top end talent. That matters too much in the NBA. Talk that Donic may fall to them and they may have him number 1 on their board. Kind of like Danny getting his number 1 at 3 last year.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jun 14, 2018 9:23:32 GMT -5
Doncic is weirdly getting underrated right now prior to the draft, I'd take him before Ayton and Bamba without any second thought. I'm also the guy that liked Dragan Bender over Jaylen so what do I know lol.
But seriously, Doncic is going to be a STUD.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 14, 2018 14:48:59 GMT -5
Why do you like Donic over Ayton? Please don't give me he's the MVP at 19. He's dropping for a reason, he's not a great athlete. From the scouting reports he's a level below Tatum. A guy that struggles guarding athletic players and only has an average first step going to the hole. Which is going to be a problem for a guy that goes to the line a ton in the Euro league. He'll be going against the best athletes at SF in the NBA. He's going to be good because of his basketball IQ, shooting and passing, but Ayton is a special athlete.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jun 14, 2018 19:05:59 GMT -5
Why do you like Donic over Ayton? Please don't give me he's the MVP at 19. He's dropping for a reason, he's not a great athlete. From the scouting reports he's a level below Tatum. A guy that struggles guarding athletic players and only has an average first step going to the hole. Which is going to be a problem for a guy that goes to the line a ton in the Euro league. He'll be going against the best athletes at SF in the NBA. He's going to be good because of his basketball IQ, shooting and passing, but Ayton is a special athlete. I'm obviously not a scout, but I sincerely don't think he's a level below Tatum as an athlete and I don't think the questions about his first step are in any way larger than they were with Tatum last year. Doncic scored a lot at the rim and he rebounded reasonably well which don't corroborate the questions about his athleticism, he will never be peak Wade, but an improved version of Gordon Hayward is definitely in play. I don't buy the questions on his defense as well, he's 19, you put Ayton in the Euroleague and he'd get exposed harder (there are questions about his defense too, bigger ones than Doncic in fact). This is a wing league now and Doncic is very complete with plenty of room to improve, he'll on be on the floor the full 48 doing everything guarding multiple positions. Unless they're crazy switchy, guys like Bamba or Ayton will have to be benched a lot or get picked on for mismatches on every possession. You draft these guys with expectations of them being Embiid, but how realistic is it to expect this kind of generational talent to be there? And if they fall short of that, they will have to be on the bench during key stretches of the game. I mean, this happened to Gobert and, again, how realistic is it that either of them is as good as Gobert? The skill floor for big men to be on the court for over 30 minutes a game is way higher than it is for ball handlers and wings. When you draft in the top 5, you shouldn't be looking for the next Clint Capela.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 15, 2018 6:52:51 GMT -5
I’m coming around some on Ayton so I won’t compare the two, but if Donic goes lower than 2 that is a mistake. His questions are the types of questions that are in the realm of “I don’t understand how this guy is this good - surely at the next level this is going to hold him back”, versus “he needs to fix this flaw in his game, but he’s so athletic and young so...”
Face it, Uber athletic guys with broken shots get more love than less athletic guys with great ones even if that less athletic guy is a 6’6” guard who’s been described as an offensive savant because of how good his all around offensive game is.
Just pray Sacramento keeps being stupid and passes on Donic because they have Hield and Fox and that Atlanta is smart enough to take him so he doesn’t fall to Memphis.
I’m a big Duke fan and I don’t think Bagley is ready to make a big impact in year one. Of course, Tatum made a bigger impact than I expected - so it Bagley surprises defensively and with his jump shot he same way I can be surprised again. Thing is guards can take over games without much help more easily than a big can.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 15, 2018 11:53:17 GMT -5
Why do you like Donic over Ayton? Please don't give me he's the MVP at 19. He's dropping for a reason, he's not a great athlete. From the scouting reports he's a level below Tatum. A guy that struggles guarding athletic players and only has an average first step going to the hole. Which is going to be a problem for a guy that goes to the line a ton in the Euro league. He'll be going against the best athletes at SF in the NBA. He's going to be good because of his basketball IQ, shooting and passing, but Ayton is a special athlete. I'm obviously not a scout, but I sincerely don't think he's a level below Tatum as an athlete and I don't think the questions about his first step are in any way larger than they were with Tatum last year. Doncic scored a lot at the rim and he rebounded reasonably well which don't corroborate the questions about his athleticism, he will never be peak Wade, but an improved version of Gordon Hayward is definitely in play. I don't buy the questions on his defense as well, he's 19, you put Ayton in the Euroleague and he'd get exposed harder (there are questions about his defense too, bigger ones than Doncic in fact). This is a wing league now and Doncic is very complete with plenty of room to improve, he'll on be on the floor the full 48 doing everything guarding multiple positions. Unless they're crazy switchy, guys like Bamba or Ayton will have to be benched a lot or get picked on for mismatches on every possession. You draft these guys with expectations of them being Embiid, but how realistic is it to expect this kind of generational talent to be there? And if they fall short of that, they will have to be on the bench during key stretches of the game. I mean, this happened to Gobert and, again, how realistic is it that either of them is as good as Gobert? The skill floor for big men to be on the court for over 30 minutes a game is way higher than it is for ball handlers and wings. When you draft in the top 5, you shouldn't be looking for the next Clint Capela. That is what Donic is rated, a step below Tatum. That is what you see on tape watching him. He's rated as a Marcus Smart type athlete. All the scouting reports bring it up way more than Tatum. To put a number on it, Tatum was rated 8/10, Donic is 7/10, same as Smart. I don't think you know enough about Ayton. Not sure why you are lumping him with Bamba either, they are completely differently players. Ayton is much more like Embiid, than Gobert or Capela. The guy can score at will, really reminds me of David Robinson. He's a crazy good athlete, you won't be taking him out. You're taking one of the best offensive centers to come along in recent memory and trying to make him sound like DeAndre Jordan. That guy is Robert Williams in this draft. Even Bamba is much more advanced offensively than Gobert, Capela or Jordan were at the same age. I worry about him, maybe he becomes a Gobert, but not Ayton. For me with Donic the Debate is the next tier after Ayton.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 15, 2018 12:11:30 GMT -5
I’m coming around some on Ayton so I won’t compare the two, but if Donic goes lower than 2 that is a mistake. His questions are the types of questions that are in the realm of “I don’t understand how this guy is this good - surely at the next level this is going to hold him back”, versus “he needs to fix this flaw in his game, but he’s so athletic and young so...” Face it, Uber athletic guys with broken shots get more love than less athletic guys with great ones even if that less athletic guy is a 6’6” guard who’s been described as an offensive savant because of how good his all around offensive game is. Just pray Sacramento keeps being stupid and passes on Donic because they have Hield and Fox and that Atlanta is smart enough to take him so he doesn’t fall to Memphis. I’m a big Duke fan and I don’t think Bagley is ready to make a big impact in year one. Of course, Tatum made a bigger impact than I expected - so it Bagley surprises defensively and with his jump shot he same way I can be surprised again. Thing is guards can take over games without much help more easily than a big can. I'm actually the opposite of you, I hope they take Donic, because I think a Bagley could make more of an impact on that team next year. Bagley seems perfect for them, giving them an athletic scoring and rebounding big that they so badly need. I think either player is going to make them better. We should really be hoping they take Porter and his injury is an issue. Otherwise we likely aren't getting a top 5 pick. They were at number 6 this year and only luck got them number two. Seeing as you're so high on Donic, which position does he play? Scouts can't come close to agreeing. Seen PG, SG, and SF. At the same time he's 6'8'' 230 pounds and not a great athlete. Some think its SF only because he won't be able to guard the quicker players. He looks like a point forward to me, not a guard.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 15, 2018 13:45:28 GMT -5
I’m coming around some on Ayton so I won’t compare the two, but if Donic goes lower than 2 that is a mistake. His questions are the types of questions that are in the realm of “I don’t understand how this guy is this good - surely at the next level this is going to hold him back”, versus “he needs to fix this flaw in his game, but he’s so athletic and young so...” Face it, Uber athletic guys with broken shots get more love than less athletic guys with great ones even if that less athletic guy is a 6’6” guard who’s been described as an offensive savant because of how good his all around offensive game is. Just pray Sacramento keeps being stupid and passes on Donic because they have Hield and Fox and that Atlanta is smart enough to take him so he doesn’t fall to Memphis. I’m a big Duke fan and I don’t think Bagley is ready to make a big impact in year one. Of course, Tatum made a bigger impact than I expected - so it Bagley surprises defensively and with his jump shot he same way I can be surprised again. Thing is guards can take over games without much help more easily than a big can. I'm actually the opposite of you, I hope they take Donic, because I think a Bagley could make more of an impact on that team next year. Bagley seems perfect for them, giving them an athletic scoring and rebounding big that they so badly need. I think either player is going to make them better. We should really be hoping they take Porter and his injury is an issue. Otherwise we likely aren't getting a top 5 pick. They were at number 6 this year and only luck got them number two. Seeing as you're so high on Donic, which position does he play? Scouts can't come close to agreeing. Seen PG, SG, and SF. At the same time he's 6'8'' 230 pounds and not a great athlete. Some think its SF only because he won't be able to guard the quicker players. He looks like a point forward to me, not a guard. Bagley may be more of what they need but he’s not going to make a huge impact year one. There are reports they might take Porter and I’d love that. Sacramento has no motivation to lose next year but you’d think they’d want to finally develop some young kids and let them play not play all these veterans like they did last year. We will see. They are going to be bad regardless but they won’t be worst team in the league bad. They’ll be one of the worst 10 teams tho easy. Donic won’t be able to guard certain PGs but they won’t be able to guard him either. He can run an offense if you want him to be the PG tho or he can be a wing who handles the ball a lot. It won’t be hard to fit him into almost any situation.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 15, 2018 14:04:44 GMT -5
Let the Leonard rumors begin.
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Jun 15, 2018 14:15:59 GMT -5
Let the Leonard rumors begin. I think they're off and running. No surprise, C's squarely in the mix.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 15, 2018 14:32:49 GMT -5
I'm actually the opposite of you, I hope they take Donic, because I think a Bagley could make more of an impact on that team next year. Bagley seems perfect for them, giving them an athletic scoring and rebounding big that they so badly need. I think either player is going to make them better. We should really be hoping they take Porter and his injury is an issue. Otherwise we likely aren't getting a top 5 pick. They were at number 6 this year and only luck got them number two. Seeing as you're so high on Donic, which position does he play? Scouts can't come close to agreeing. Seen PG, SG, and SF. At the same time he's 6'8'' 230 pounds and not a great athlete. Some think its SF only because he won't be able to guard the quicker players. He looks like a point forward to me, not a guard. Bagley may be more of what they need but he’s not going to make a huge impact year one. There are reports they might take Porter and I’d love that. Sacramento has no motivation to lose next year but you’d think they’d want to finally develop some young kids and let them play not play all these veterans like they did last year. We will see. They are going to be bad regardless but they won’t be worst team in the league bad. They’ll be one of the worst 10 teams tho easy. Donic won’t be able to guard certain PGs but they won’t be able to guard him either. He can run an offense if you want him to be the PG tho or he can be a wing who handles the ball a lot. It won’t be hard to fit him into almost any situation. I guess its how you define huge impact? On wins and losses or raw numbers to completely changes the teams culture? I could see Bagley being the Kings best player next year leading that team in points and rebounds. A true ROY contender. Learning from a great Vet in Randolph. Those new owners want to win, so I fully except more veteran signings. Even though I do agree its stupid. It would be better to just let the young guys play. Going to be a huge debate if we get pick number 10 next year, when we could have got pick 10 this year. Pick 10 this year would have put us in range to easily trade up for a big or maybe even have a Carter fall in your lap. Donic can for sure run an offense, his passing is by far his best skill. I just think people are going to be surprised when they finally see him play. He's been so hyped that a ton of people think he's going to be elite. Number one player type on a contender and I just don't see that. He's more like the 2nd or 3rd best player on a contender.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 15, 2018 15:46:52 GMT -5
Bagley may be more of what they need but he’s not going to make a huge impact year one. There are reports they might take Porter and I’d love that. Sacramento has no motivation to lose next year but you’d think they’d want to finally develop some young kids and let them play not play all these veterans like they did last year. We will see. They are going to be bad regardless but they won’t be worst team in the league bad. They’ll be one of the worst 10 teams tho easy. Donic won’t be able to guard certain PGs but they won’t be able to guard him either. He can run an offense if you want him to be the PG tho or he can be a wing who handles the ball a lot. It won’t be hard to fit him into almost any situation. I guess its how you define huge impact? On wins and losses or raw numbers to completely changes the teams culture? I could see Bagley being the Kings best player next year leading that team in points and rebounds. A true ROY contender. Learning from a great Vet in Randolph. Those new owners want to win, so I fully except more veteran signings. Even though I do agree its stupid. It would be better to just let the young guys play. Going to be a huge debate if we get pick number 10 next year, when we could have got pick 10 this year. Pick 10 this year would have put us in range to easily trade up for a big or maybe even have a Carter fall in your lap. Donic can for sure run an offense, his passing is by far his best skill. I just think people are going to be surprised when they finally see him play. He's been so hyped that a ton of people think he's going to be elite. Number one player type on a contender and I just don't see that. He's more like the 2nd or 3rd best player on a contender. Wins and losses and I do question his numbers. He’s not going to be good defensively and/or will be in a lot of foul trouble. So does he play big minutes and be a sieve on defense contributing to losses or do his minutes suffer and his numbers are depressed. He should play big minutes. They’ll still be in position to trade up from 10 next year if they want. Hell they might have to just to consolidate picks if they have 4 firsts.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 15, 2018 16:34:56 GMT -5
I guess its how you define huge impact? On wins and losses or raw numbers to completely changes the teams culture? I could see Bagley being the Kings best player next year leading that team in points and rebounds. A true ROY contender. Learning from a great Vet in Randolph. Those new owners want to win, so I fully except more veteran signings. Even though I do agree its stupid. It would be better to just let the young guys play. Going to be a huge debate if we get pick number 10 next year, when we could have got pick 10 this year. Pick 10 this year would have put us in range to easily trade up for a big or maybe even have a Carter fall in your lap. Donic can for sure run an offense, his passing is by far his best skill. I just think people are going to be surprised when they finally see him play. He's been so hyped that a ton of people think he's going to be elite. Number one player type on a contender and I just don't see that. He's more like the 2nd or 3rd best player on a contender. Wins and losses and I do question his numbers. He’s not going to be good defensively and/or will be in a lot of foul trouble. So does he play big minutes and be a sieve on defense contributing to losses or do his minutes suffer and his numbers are depressed. He should play big minutes. They’ll still be in position to trade up from 10 next year if they want. Hell they might have to just to consolidate picks if they have 4 firsts. The Kings rated 29th in offensive efficiency and 28th in defensive efficiency last year, while rating 28th in rebounding. So I think he really helps them with scoring and rebounding, while not being very good defensively. Thing is they sucked last year, overall its going to be a net positive. They also have a defensive coach and some players that should be good at D. In theory a guy like WCS should be a pefect match next to Bagley. Sometimes it just takes a player that can really help you win to get your team to compete. I just like the fit, it seems perfect. They could, I just liked this class for bigs a lot more, yet Bassey reclassifying certainly helps next years class. Also I liked how it would space out the picks better. Along with trying to get a good future big sooner rather than later. If Horford gets injured this team is in trouble. He's the one player we can't replace right now.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jun 15, 2018 17:02:56 GMT -5
That is what Donic is rated, a step below Tatum. That is what you see on tape watching him. He's rated as a Marcus Smart type athlete. All the scouting reports bring it up way more than Tatum. To put a number on it, Tatum was rated 8/10, Donic is 7/10, same as Smart. I don't think you know enough about Ayton. Not sure why you are lumping him with Bamba either, they are completely differently players. Ayton is much more like Embiid, than Gobert or Capela. The guy can score at will, really reminds me of David Robinson. He's a crazy good athlete, you won't be taking him out. You're taking one of the best offensive centers to come along in recent memory and trying to make him sound like DeAndre Jordan. That guy is Robert Williams in this draft. Even Bamba is much more advanced offensively than Gobert, Capela or Jordan were at the same age. I worry about him, maybe he becomes a Gobert, but not Ayton. For me with Donic the Debate is the next tier after Ayton. I think you and other people are really underrating Doncic's athleticism, it actually reminds me a bit of the situation with Harden in his draft that people knocked him for the same reason. While Harden has beefed up quite a lot recently, it was one criticism with him. I think both are kind of goofy looking and they're not insanely fast, but they're sneaky quick and they will beat you with crossovers and finesse moves. Doncic is big for his position, smooth and he's a terrific playmaker. Watch him running the fast break, he's insanely precise. In the half court sets he has NBA range and he picks his spots perfectly for someone so young. He's very versatile and well rounded, his floor is very high and he could be a legit superstar in the right organization. I do need to watch more out of Ayton, but he's a center. In he modern NBA, he needs to hit his Embiid ceiling or he's a limited role player. He could even be someone like KAT, who is great and puts up big numbers, but the flaws in his game flat out kill his team. I'm not a great amateur evaluator and again, I badly wanted Bender over Jaylen, so I'm probably wrong here and Ayton is the next huge All-NBA uber talented dude. But my reasoning here is that given his size and position, he has a considerably smaller margin for error than someone like Doncic or Porter or heck even Bagley.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jun 15, 2018 17:13:50 GMT -5
And sorry for the double post but this is so unrelated I can't edit this one in my previous one: Kawhi indeed wants out and the Celtics will make an offer. No idea how I feel about this, Kawhi is a top 5 player in the NBA when healthy, but should Danny take that bet? I'm starting to warm up to pedrofan's idea of trading Kyrie for Leonard lol. Hayward-Brown-Leonard-Tatum-Horford would be ridiculous defensively, not sure how I feel about Hayward as the primary ball handler, but that team wouldn't get scored on by anyone. Other than that, as much as I love Kawhi, I think the Celtics should really stand pat and pass on this one. Edit: oops I'm late and this was already brought up. But man oh man this could get NUTS.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 15, 2018 17:44:23 GMT -5
Wins and losses and I do question his numbers. He’s not going to be good defensively and/or will be in a lot of foul trouble. So does he play big minutes and be a sieve on defense contributing to losses or do his minutes suffer and his numbers are depressed. He should play big minutes. They’ll still be in position to trade up from 10 next year if they want. Hell they might have to just to consolidate picks if they have 4 firsts. The Kings rated 29th in offensive efficiency and 28th in defensive efficiency last year, while rating 28th in rebounding. So I think he really helps them with scoring and rebounding, while not being very good defensively. Thing is they sucked last year, overall its going to be a net positive. They also have a defensive coach and some players that should be good at D. In theory a guy like WCS should be a pefect match next to Bagley. Sometimes it just takes a player that can really help you win to get your team to compete. I just like the fit, it seems perfect. They could, I just liked this class for bigs a lot more, yet Bassey reclassifying certainly helps next years class. Also I liked how it would space out the picks better. Along with trying to get a good future big sooner rather than later. If Horford gets injured this team is in trouble. He's the one player we can't replace right now. Do you really think Bagley is ready to come in and just score a lot? His offensive game is really raw. His jump shot is funky but he was effective last year but until I see it in the NBA I’ll question how good it will be. He basically, just over powered people in college. He’s got nice touch though. It won’t surprise me if he comes right in but I’m not sold on it being a given.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 15, 2018 18:15:26 GMT -5
That is what Donic is rated, a step below Tatum. That is what you see on tape watching him. He's rated as a Marcus Smart type athlete. All the scouting reports bring it up way more than Tatum. To put a number on it, Tatum was rated 8/10, Donic is 7/10, same as Smart. I don't think you know enough about Ayton. Not sure why you are lumping him with Bamba either, they are completely differently players. Ayton is much more like Embiid, than Gobert or Capela. The guy can score at will, really reminds me of David Robinson. He's a crazy good athlete, you won't be taking him out. You're taking one of the best offensive centers to come along in recent memory and trying to make him sound like DeAndre Jordan. That guy is Robert Williams in this draft. Even Bamba is much more advanced offensively than Gobert, Capela or Jordan were at the same age. I worry about him, maybe he becomes a Gobert, but not Ayton. For me with Donic the Debate is the next tier after Ayton. I think you and other people are really underrating Doncic's athleticism, it actually reminds me a bit of the situation with Harden in his draft that people knocked him for the same reason. While Harden has beefed up quite a lot recently, it was one criticism with him. I think both are kind of goofy looking and they're not insanely fast, but they're sneaky quick and they will beat you with crossovers and finesse moves. Doncic is big for his position, smooth and he's a terrific playmaker. Watch him running the fast break, he's insanely precise. In the half court sets he has NBA range and he picks his spots perfectly for someone so young. He's very versatile and well rounded, his floor is very high and he could be a legit superstar in the right organization. I do need to watch more out of Ayton, but he's a center. In he modern NBA, he needs to hit his Embiid ceiling or he's a limited role player. He could even be someone like KAT, who is great and puts up big numbers, but the flaws in his game flat out kill his team. I'm not a great amateur evaluator and again, I badly wanted Bender over Jaylen, so I'm probably wrong here and Ayton is the next huge All-NBA uber talented dude. But my reasoning here is that given his size and position, he has a considerably smaller margin for error than someone like Doncic or Porter or heck even Bagley. If you mean basically every site that scouts players ok, we'll see. Harden was rated as an 8/10 athlete, just to throw that out there. The NBA is all about athletes and in this generation there isn't a superstar player that isn't at least a very good athlete. You keep slamming bigs and acting like they are useless in todays NBA unless they reach there full potential. Yet have you for once thought what if the reports are right and Donic doesn't reach his full potential? You have a lot more room for error when your a 9/10 athlete that is skilled than an 7/10 athlete. I won't debate Donic having a high floor, it's his ceiling I question. What flaws in KATs game kill his team? The guys 22 years old and a monster. Wiggins kills that team.
|
|
|
Post by ctfisher on Jun 15, 2018 18:25:19 GMT -5
I do need to watch more out of Ayton, but he's a center. In he modern NBA, he needs to hit his Embiid ceiling or he's a limited role player. He could even be someone like KAT, who is great and puts up big numbers, but the flaws in his game flat out kill his team. I'm not a great amateur evaluator and again, I badly wanted Bender over Jaylen, so I'm probably wrong here and Ayton is the next huge All-NBA uber talented dude. But my reasoning here is that given his size and position, he has a considerably smaller margin for error than someone like Doncic or Porter or heck even Bagley. That's not really true though - Capela, Gobert, and Deandre Jordan are all very good NBA starters who aren't anything like Embiid aside from defense and rebounding. The Tyson Chandler archetype is still very useful. I guess that isn't entirely relevant to Ayton because the general point with him is that he does have that Embiid-type upside - touch, range on a jumper, big time athleticism, NBA body. He doesn't have the defensive credentials, but he also doesn't have any of the injury questions. It definitely seems to me that guys like Doncic do tend to have their question marks exaggerated at this time of year because they don't have the elite athleticism or measurables that are really projectable, and if I were running an NBA team then I'd probably think of them as being neck and neck at the top of the board. If I were going to swing for the fences though, I'd take Ayton every time and I wouldn't feel like I had to worry much about whiffing entirely
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jun 15, 2018 21:03:45 GMT -5
If you mean basically every site that scouts players ok, we'll see. Harden was rated as an 8/10 athlete, just to throw that out there. The NBA is all about athletes and in this generation there isn't a superstar player that isn't at least a very good athlete. You keep slamming bigs and acting like they are useless in todays NBA unless they reach there full potential. Yet have you for once thought what if the reports are right and Donic doesn't reach his full potential? You have a lot more room for error when your a 9/10 athlete that is skilled than an 7/10 athlete. I won't debate Donic having a high floor, it's his ceiling I question. What flaws in KATs game kill his team? The guys 22 years old and a monster. Wiggins kills that team. Ah man like I said, I'm nowhere close to being a scout and I could be dead wrong here. But I think Luka's athleticism questions are a bit overblown and he definitely reminds me of Harden when he came out. He's not going to wow anyone right now, but he could fill his frame and be decent out there. And frankly, if he's even a decent athlete then every other skills will make him a star. And bigs definitely are not useless today, but they're limited unless they're super switchy. KAT is a surprisingly very poor defender and teams will get him chasing smaller guys around. It limits his usefulness and as the league proceeds more and more into off the ball defensive switches to prevent mismatches, you need mobile bigs and KAT is a bit slow for his position. He's still evidently a fantastic player, but relying on him to be your number 1 option is not going to work and that's the thing with me. When you draft in the top of the lottery, it probably means your team sucks and needs a new main guy and this main guy today needs to be a big guard or a wing. Obviously if he's good enough to be drafted there. A short version of what I mean is that wings are more central today than bigs. I don't think the difference in talent between Ayton and Doncic is big enough to offset the difference in usefulness between their positions. I think I need to watch more tape of Ayton, but he didn't impress me that much to the point of being the consensus number 1 pick. Maybe I'll come around.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 16, 2018 13:46:16 GMT -5
We'll see, there are just a bunch of red flags with Donic. Not trying to bash him either, I like him. I just like other players more at the top of this draft. He can do things that Harden can do, but he's not Harden. For me that's like comparing Carter to Horford. He looks similar on the box, his moves and how he takes his time to score. That looks like Horford, but the rest of his game doesn't. He's not the athlete Horford is, he can't move around like Horford. Same thing with comparing Donic to Harden. Also don't overlook the difference in defense from the Euro league to the NBA. Much better athletes playing a very physical style of D. More than one report has said he gets LeBron like treatment from the Refs in the Euro league, that won't happen in the NBA for years if ever.
Go check out the winners of the Euro league MVPs to see my concerns about his game fully transitioning to the NBA. Then remember that Saric was billed as one of the best young players in the Euro league for years. He's a very good player, but not even close to a star. While Donic is very skilled, his 3 point percentage has gone down the last 3 years and was 30.9% this year. Fit is going to be so important for him. He could look very good as a third piece on the Grizz, which looks by far the best place for him. Asking him to be the man on the Kings or Hawks is about the worst thing for him.
I get what your saying about bigs, I just don't agree. For example KAT just put up a 4.5 defensive boxscore rating during the playoff series against the Rockets. Which was best on the team besides Dieng who didn't play much. So the guy can play D. He's just your classic young player that doesn't yet always play that way in the regular season. He's 22 years old and a monster. He's not an Okafor, those are the guys your talking about or guys like Monroe. Just to show you KAT was rated an 8/10 and Ayton is an 9/10 athlete. Ayton's upside is best big in the league, with a realistic ceiling of a better offensive Drummond type player.
Embiid was also ranked an 9/10 athlete and shows you that if your a good enough athlete teams can't use small ball on you. You will kill them scoring in the post, samething with KAT. You force teams to play different lineups. For example as good as Draymond Green is defensively he can't guard Embiid. It would litterally force the Warriors to go big. Ayton is that type of player. If you look at the Suns with Booker, Jackson, Warren, Chriss,and Bender he's a perfect fit. I don't see how Donic and Booker fit. Both need the ball and both won't be good defenders.
Basketball goes in cycles based on its best players. You seem to think that the era of big men is gone for good. I don't agree. We just haven't seen a ton of highly skilled athletic bigs recently. That seems to be changing and if it does the NBA will adjust. Instead of building teams to beat Durant and LeBron, teams will build teams to beat Embiid, KAT, Davis/Cousins, Ayton and maybe even players like Bamba. Its already started really, if you build a team that can't contain Embiid in the East your in trouble.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 16, 2018 15:56:12 GMT -5
Id like to add it’s not just the players that make it go in cycles it’s the style of play. We have seen the defensive switch trend come into force and it will be interesting to see if more teams start playing D that way. The Cavs even started doing it and they don’t have the personnel for it. If that happens, you are going to see a renaissance of the low post game return. If you’re going to switch, then teams will eventually start posting guys up again.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 17, 2018 7:39:49 GMT -5
Is there a team in a worse spot than the Orlando Magic in this draft? First of all their team blows and the guys they’ve drafted lately haven’t gone the way they’ve hoped. Their two best young guys are Gordon and Isaac and they have bigs like Biyombo (way over paid) and Vucevic on their roster who clog things up.
There are 5 top guys in this draft and they sit at 6. The guy who’s the wild card home run swing outside the top 5 is Porter who at 6’11 is the power forward small ball center type who’s not really suited to play the 3 like Isaac and Gordon already are. In other words, he’s a horrible fit. Now you should always draft best available in the NBA, but Porter is such a wild card he’s not clearly that guy and you have to consider, how can you develop him with Gordon and Isaac. Move on from Gordon? Plausible.
Theoretically, they really need a point guard so they’ll take Young. Which is too bad for them, because he’s the guy that will get picked high and everyone will look back on in a couple years and realize he had too college player but not an NBA player written all over him. My prediction on him is he’s a backup point guard at best. He’s under 6’1 and small framed.
If I were them, I’d be calling the Clippers and trying to get picks 12 and 13 for 6, but the more I think about it, it really makes sense for them to talk to the Celtics about Rozier, the Sacramento pick and our first this year for 6. The point guards in this draft suck, they can have their pick and he Sacramento pick both in the top 10 next year plus get a late first this year. Or they can draft Sexton or Young and regret it forever.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jun 17, 2018 12:15:27 GMT -5
Who do you want a 6 to give up all that for?
I don't think the Magic are in a bad spot. I like the top 7, so for me the Cavs are in a bad spot unless someone drops. If there's a team out there that should swing for the fences with Porter its the Magic. Unless there is a major red flag with his back, which so far we haven't heard anything like that. If not take Carter and look to move Vucevic.
They can get a PG like Duval, Milton or Melton in the second round. I think Porter and Duval would be a heck of a draft for them. Swinging for the fences and no team needs that more than them at this point.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jun 17, 2018 14:29:03 GMT -5
Who do you want a 6 to give up all that for? I don't think the Magic are in a bad spot. I like the top 7, so for me the Cavs are in a bad spot unless someone drops. If there's a team out there that should swing for the fences with Porter its the Magic. Unless there is a major red flag with his back, which so far we haven't heard anything like that. If not take Carter and look to move Vucevic. They can get a PG like Duval, Milton or Melton in the second round. I think Porter and Duval would be a heck of a draft for them. Swinging for the fences and no team needs that more than them at this point. I’m not so sure I’d do that deal if I were the Celtics to be honest. But at 6... I’d love Carter on this team. He could give nice minutes right away and fit in nicely with the Horford time line. Even if they extended Horford. I get Porters upside and his excitement but he doesn’t really do it for me. I don’t trust he’s going to be that special.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jun 17, 2018 23:23:11 GMT -5
We'll see, there are just a bunch of red flags with Donic. Not trying to bash him either, I like him. I just like other players more at the top of this draft. He can do things that Harden can do, but he's not Harden. For me that's like comparing Carter to Horford. He looks similar on the box, his moves and how he takes his time to score. That looks like Horford, but the rest of his game doesn't. He's not the athlete Horford is, he can't move around like Horford. Same thing with comparing Donic to Harden. Also don't overlook the difference in defense from the Euro league to the NBA. Much better athletes playing a very physical style of D. More than one report has said he gets LeBron like treatment from the Refs in the Euro league, that won't happen in the NBA for years if ever. Go check out the winners of the Euro league MVPs to see my concerns about his game fully transitioning to the NBA. Then remember that Saric was billed as one of the best young players in the Euro league for years. He's a very good player, but not even close to a star. While Donic is very skilled, his 3 point percentage has gone down the last 3 years and was 30.9% this year. Fit is going to be so important for him. He could look very good as a third piece on the Grizz, which looks by far the best place for him. Asking him to be the man on the Kings or Hawks is about the worst thing for him. I get what your saying about bigs, I just don't agree. For example KAT just put up a 4.5 defensive boxscore rating during the playoff series against the Rockets. Which was best on the team besides Dieng who didn't play much. So the guy can play D. He's just your classic young player that doesn't yet always play that way in the regular season. He's 22 years old and a monster. He's not an Okafor, those are the guys your talking about or guys like Monroe. Just to show you KAT was rated an 8/10 and Ayton is an 9/10 athlete. Ayton's upside is best big in the league, with a realistic ceiling of a better offensive Drummond type player. Embiid was also ranked an 9/10 athlete and shows you that if your a good enough athlete teams can't use small ball on you. You will kill them scoring in the post, samething with KAT. You force teams to play different lineups. For example as good as Draymond Green is defensively he can't guard Embiid. It would litterally force the Warriors to go big. Ayton is that type of player. If you look at the Suns with Booker, Jackson, Warren, Chriss,and Bender he's a perfect fit. I don't see how Donic and Booker fit. Both need the ball and both won't be good defenders. Basketball goes in cycles based on its best players. You seem to think that the era of big men is gone for good. I don't agree. We just haven't seen a ton of highly skilled athletic bigs recently. That seems to be changing and if it does the NBA will adjust. Instead of building teams to beat Durant and LeBron, teams will build teams to beat Embiid, KAT, Davis/Cousins, Ayton and maybe even players like Bamba. Its already started really, if you build a team that can't contain Embiid in the East your in trouble. You're actually right, I think I might be overthinking Ayton's fit. I didn't watch much of him, I still miss old draftexpress like crazy, so maybe that's why I'm not feeling the hype. You're spot on about Embiid, he's the most impressive big in the league nowadays other than AD (who's not a traditional big at all so I'm not even counting him) and having a guy like that feasting on you inside could screw up the other team's small ball line-up. Problem with Embiid at least in the Celtics series is that he took way too many outside shots, there's no reason he should be taking 3s when he could be taking it to the basket. That's also a problem Ayton or Bamba could face in the league, they need the proper coaching and not someone that is all about getting mismatches (usually far from the paint) or layups and 3s like you see so much today. But like you said, Doncic also needs a good landing spot for him to shine. A team like the Suns that already have a main option on offense is indeed an ideal place for a big to be drafted. Teams like Sacramento, Atlanta, Memphis, Dallas, Orlando or Chicago that still need that number one guy and are drafting really early? They better hope Bamba is that good to take him there.
|
|
|