SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 22, 2019 8:15:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sarasoxer on Jan 22, 2019 8:39:18 GMT -5
Was he incompetent last year?...or the year before? Were all those high compliments from around the league and our players calling him a genius just BS? He’s a terrific coach, but he’s always been terrible at using timeouts, yes. We all get frustrated when our teams fall below our hopes and expectations. At the same time, it's tiring for me to see the writers (not yet on Stevens), or the fans "eat their own"....as is the reputation. Sure we are all entitled to our opinions...Mine is that the board has turned on Stevens too harshly.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 22, 2019 8:41:01 GMT -5
Was he incompetent last year?...or the year before? Were all those high compliments from around the league and our players calling him a genius just BS? He’s a terrific coach, but he’s always been terrible at using timeouts, yes. I’m not sure if you read the rules but around here if you offer up any sort of observation of a coach or player that is not positive and point out anything that wasn’t good then that means you are a hater. If you do this with demigods, like Brad Stevens and Tom Brady then watch out the back last is particularly harsh. Oddly enough, Kyrie is exempt from this rule.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 22, 2019 11:40:17 GMT -5
He’s a terrific coach, but he’s always been terrible at using timeouts, yes. We all get frustrated when our teams fall below our hopes and expectations. At the same time, it's tiring for me to see the writers (not yet on Stevens), or the fans "eat their own"....as is the reputation. Sure we are all entitled to our opinions...Mine is that the board has turned on Stevens too harshly. I don’t think anyone has turned on him.
|
|
|
Post by sarasoxer on Jan 22, 2019 13:24:30 GMT -5
He’s a terrific coach, but he’s always been terrible at using timeouts, yes. I’m not sure if you read the rules but around here if you offer up any sort of observation of a coach or player that is not positive and point out anything that wasn’t good then that means you are a hater. If you do this with demigods, like Brad Stevens and Tom Brady then watch out the back last is particularly harsh. Oddly enough, Kyrie is exempt from this rule. Nope yours is an attempt at biting sarcasm. Nor does your thrust reflect me. I think I'm pretty middle of the road...not all 'heroes or villains' when it comes to our teams. I didn't like Farrell's managing (or that of other Sox managers over the years), or various players on Boston teams. I was critical of spygate and deflate gate...and received negative responses here for saying so from the type of mindset you describe. I went back in this thread several pages and there were a number of negative comments on Stevens for a variety of reasons. This was likely borne of frustration. I didn't feel he deserved it while others obviously did. Just sayin'.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 22, 2019 14:54:10 GMT -5
So much depends on tier rankings. Usually you get tier one and tier two guys in the top four. Pick 12 is usually like tier 4 to 5, maybe in a crazy deep draft tier 3. So in a normal draft almost no chance 12, 15, and 23 gets you into top four. More like pick 7 or 8 and right now that seems like a bad deal. All depends, maybe if some team really liked lower guys. I just wouldn't bet on it, nor do I think Danny would do that. Right now NBA draft net has Culver at 11... i think that’s pretty low for him but if the Celtics were able to snag him I’d be thrilled.... right now my dream scenario, outside or Sacramento winning the 2nd pick in the lottery would be for Reddish to fall. But getting Langford would be pretty sweet as well. Add DeAndre Hunter to your list too; a guy that can shoot like him always finds a place in the league. Plus, he plays at Virginia and shouldn’t have trouble settling into a role. I'm not even close to being ready to judge this draft, just a very quick look at a few places a use. Don't hold me to anything or certain players. Just wanted to point out that it looks rather deep right now Because Bol and Langford are two guys I really like. Maybe I'm wrong but you could be getting tier 3 guys at the end of the lottery. Some drafts those guys are gone by pick 8 to 10. Reddish could easily fall a ton. Already seen him on a few most disappointing lists. Yet lots of time left and why this is a little crazy now. It's way early. I just picked Langford because he was in a lot of top 10's to start the year. Has been good, yet still dropped because of other players being better. I also love the fit next to Irving long-term. Kinda reminds me of Bradley Beal. Outside of getting a Horford replacement, getting a SG that fits next to Irving is my second goal. A guy that can score, shot, has good size to defend, plus can handle the ball also. I will say I'd be surprised if Langford and Bol didn't go higher, yet that means others will drop.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 22, 2019 15:49:54 GMT -5
In regards to the boxscore of the 2nd unit in the last game. If you go look back at the last handful of games you'll find a bunch that was the exact opposite. The second unit was all plus and the starters negative. A big part of that is Stevens does whole sale changes where he puts in 4 subs almost all at once. Usually leaving Tatum in also. That is crazy unique in this league. Most coaches don't do that, they stagger the second unit in. What I've been seeing is other coaches playing on that. Stevens does everything like clockwork. Players come in and out at the sametime in every game. Some teams are leaving the starters in and playing them against our second unit. Now they are talented and Baynes helps. Yet without Horford they lack any type of scoring in the post. Nevermind the second unit is filled with streaky players getting limited minutes. If you really want the second unit to be killer they need another big that can play small ball. A guy like Morris's brother. Thus helping opening up driving lanes for Tatum, Brown, Hayward, and Rozier. Or have Stevens not do whole sale substitutions. While also giving minutes based on how guys are playing, not a pre-game plan like he does.
Stevens has always been a coach that lets his team play through rough stretches. Yea he absolutely waits too long to call timeouts in some games. Though to be fair you also need to look at the times other coaches would call timeouts and the Celtics play there way out of it. Those won't ever stick in your head, but they happen all the time. Given that overall this is a young team that style fits them most games. Where he drives me crazy is waiting till teams go on plus 10 or more runs. You can't allow that all the time and he does. He takes it to the extreme a lot.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 23, 2019 20:02:27 GMT -5
What a lousy first quarter tonight.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 23, 2019 21:01:15 GMT -5
Oladipo blew out his knee - that’s a tough break for him... hope he can fully recover
|
|
|
Post by sarasoxer on Jan 23, 2019 22:05:08 GMT -5
This was the Rozier of last season...and then some. He was a water bug...defense on it's heels. Brown played well too. Both attacked. I know it was Cleveland....but this was a fun game to watch.... Williams impressive block of Zizic. OTOH, if this were Oz, Williams would be asking the Wizard for a jump shot.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 24, 2019 10:39:00 GMT -5
So is the idea that C's have 0 interest in developing any kind of post-game for Williams? I understand why it wouldn't take place during "real" minutes but he's also playing garbage time and I have yet to see an instance where they've fed him in the post (for a set post up).
I do recall a couple of years ago reading that Brad's ideal lineup would have 4 shooters and a rim runner/protector. And while I know he'll never be a shooter, I'd think blowouts would provide a chance to work on some versatility in game.
Not necessarily a complaint. Just strikes me as weird.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 24, 2019 15:05:36 GMT -5
Assuming silence at the deadline, Ryan Bernardoni posed the idea of C's using the Tax MLE (~$5M) to sign a player who is bought out by his team and including a 2nd Non-Guaranteed year. As he suggests, it would be expensive (tax) but it would give Boston a player to include as a salary match in a trade (insert the name of any random player you think Boston might be interested in . . . )
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 24, 2019 20:00:23 GMT -5
I thought about that recently. Yet one big negative. I'm hoping for a rather good player like Kanter. He won't sign a contract like that, no solid Vet will. It would really help if your goal is to go after Davis. Yet it would require you spending a lot of money on a bum, not a good Vet. We'll see but our big advantage in the buyout market is being able to pay guys.
As to Williams. I have to think the Celtics goal is to get him ready for a maybe role late in the season and in the playoffs. So the focus is him knowing the basic defensive and offensive plays and learning the NBA speed of the game. Even if they wanted to teach him a post-game it would likely come in practice or next year in games. Personally I don't think Brad would do that. He'll have the guy practice jumpers, it fits his style more. Has Brad had any big ever practice his post game since he joined the Celtics? Does Danny draft any players that have post games?
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 24, 2019 22:30:56 GMT -5
Yabu gets the ball in the post a couple times. Just seems strange that, in the last 5 mins of blowouts there isn't even 1 look. Probably not worth thinking about but just struck me.
As to the buyout market, I'm just not sure a player is going to sign with the expecatation of playing much (short of an injury). If im a guy like Kanter, if want 20 mins a game. Still young enough to get a contract next year but hes not getting that kind of time in Boston, is he?
Think about last year when our 2 best players were out. They still only got a 3rd string C (Monroe). This year, unless someone is out (trade or injury) you're looking at more of the same. Unlike last year, you tack on a non-guaranteed year.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 25, 2019 8:44:35 GMT -5
Has a veteran that was bought out ever signed a deal like that? Maybe some one has but I'm just not remember a single deal like that.
To make myself clear, you can certainly get a player to sign a deal like that and it makes a lot of sense. I just don't think the top buyout guys you'll want to sign will sign deals like that.
Getting a guy like Kanter could be hard. You won't get him based on the best fit. More like a good shot at winning and the biggest offer. Most likely he'll have a smaller role unless Horford gets injured, yet isn't that true for most of the top teams?
Example reports say Lopez wants to join the Warriors. They won't pay him the most, he'll have a very small role. Its all about winning for him.
Maybe I'm crazy but I like Kanter on our second unit. His scoring ability and rebounding would really add something even if he's a bad defender
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 25, 2019 10:20:16 GMT -5
Kanter makes sense, but more so if you think your need is more depth upfront because we saw what happened when Horford and Baynes were out. The second unit is basically 4 guys: Baynes, Hayward, Brown and Rozier. If all are healthy, I don’t see Kanter as enough of an upgrade in this offense; in some respects he hurts it because there is zero stretch ability so I don’t see Stevens playing him over Baynes so it’s ultimately a depth signing, which is perfectly fine btw.
In an ideal world, we’d get a pure shooter for the bench (not even necessarily to receive full second unit minutes), but this is hard to find and probably won’t exist.
So that leaves Hayward, Brown and Rozier as guys to upgrade. It shouldn’t be necessary or possible to do that if those guys are playing the way they can and should. All 3 have struggled at times and overall. Hayward, has the injury excuse and they will cling to the hope by the end of the year he’s back. Brown has already turned things around for the most part so that leaves Terry. We all know he does better as a starter for whatever reason, but he needs to figure out how to play as a reserve. He’s good, the skill set is there so it’s on him to figure it out. They won’t find someone more capable than him, but if they are convinced he’s gone st the end of the year and that he won’t figure out how to be an effective player off the bench on the regular then a case can be made you trade him and try someone else. I wouldn’t do it but he’s kind of the guy by default.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 25, 2019 10:56:11 GMT -5
I'm worried about Horford, he's the one guy that kills the team if he gets injured. Now Kanter isn't close to Horford, yet he adds a big that can score. Something no one else on the team can do. I also think he has unlocked potential. That's probably wrong, yet he moves well and he should be better defensively than he is. He's not a lumbering big like Monroe. Right now he's my top buyout guy.
He's not my top target though, that is Morris's brother and Vonleh. Heck Vonleh is my top target, but you'll have to trade for him, just like Morris most likely. Yet Vonleh can shoot, pass, and rebound.
I love Baynes, but I look at the top two teams in the East and they don't have true low post centers. The raptors start two PFs and the bucks have Lopez but he's become a jump shooter. A guy like Vonleh could play with Horford, help our size issues, while not hurting our shooting ability. Nevermind it would really change the second unit. It really comes down to how healthy is Horford going to be for the playoffs?
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 25, 2019 11:05:53 GMT -5
I'm worried about Horford, he's the one guy that kills the team if he gets injured. Now Kanter isn't close to Horford, yet he adds a big that can score. Something no one else on the team can do. I also think he has unlocked potential. That's probably wrong, yet he moves well and he should be better defensively than he is. He's not a lumbering big like Monroe. Right now he's my top buyout guy. He's not my top target though, that is Morris's brother and Vonleh. Heck Vonleh is my top target, but you'll have to trade for him, just like Morris most likely. Yet Vonleh can shoot, pass, and rebound. I love Baynes, but I look at the top two teams in the East and they don't have true low post centers. The raptors start two PFs and the bucks have Lopez but he's become a jump shooter. A guy like Vonleh could play with Horford, help our size issues, while not hurting our shooting ability. Nevermind it would really change the second unit. It really comes down to how healthy is Horford going to be for the playoffs? I’m a Vonleh fan too but have you seen any indication the Knicks would move him? He could be a building block for them...
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Jan 25, 2019 11:19:08 GMT -5
Vonleh would make sense, but he's not an euro. I demand an euro. For me if they're going to trade for anyone, it better be for Vucevic.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 25, 2019 16:14:02 GMT -5
Not sure if one has been signed but, unless there are negative ramifications to the player, I'm not sure that's an issue. Is it?
Go back to Monroe. Would there have been a difference between saying that we are going to offer you a 1 yr deal vs 1 plus a non guaranteed yr that is certain to not be picked up. Same result to the player (FA).
Furthering the notion that it would be a lesser player though is that the guarantee date would have to be later in the offseason (so as to use the contract in a deal that could take place later in the summer). A good player would want to enter the market as early in the summer as possible.
As to the players, I think different players will have different reasons for joining teams. A Vonleh, I'd have to believe, would want an opportunity. There is plenty of time to be a ride along player. Someone in the later stages of their career, would likely want a ring.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 25, 2019 16:16:26 GMT -5
Not sure what Vonlehs hold is but I think NYK wants to clear as much space as possible. That being said, they may want to keep his rights until they are able to use the space (so I would think they'd keep him and then renounce his rights later if needed).
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 25, 2019 17:09:54 GMT -5
Not sure what Vonlehs hold is but I think NYK wants to clear as much space as possible. That being said, they may want to keep his rights until they are able to use the space (so I would think they'd keep him and then renounce his rights later if needed). He’s a UFA who signed a 1 year deal so there are no bird rights or early bird rights (this also lowers his trade value). His hold is 120% of this years salary (1.62m) or roughly 1.95m.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 25, 2019 18:17:09 GMT -5
I'm worried about Horford, he's the one guy that kills the team if he gets injured. Now Kanter isn't close to Horford, yet he adds a big that can score. Something no one else on the team can do. I also think he has unlocked potential. That's probably wrong, yet he moves well and he should be better defensively than he is. He's not a lumbering big like Monroe. Right now he's my top buyout guy. He's not my top target though, that is Morris's brother and Vonleh. Heck Vonleh is my top target, but you'll have to trade for him, just like Morris most likely. Yet Vonleh can shoot, pass, and rebound. I love Baynes, but I look at the top two teams in the East and they don't have true low post centers. The raptors start two PFs and the bucks have Lopez but he's become a jump shooter. A guy like Vonleh could play with Horford, help our size issues, while not hurting our shooting ability. Nevermind it would really change the second unit. It really comes down to how healthy is Horford going to be for the playoffs? I’m a Vonleh fan too but have you seen any indication the Knicks would move him? He could be a building block for them... I've seen his name floated a lot on sites. They can't resign him without killing cap space and he plays the same position as their best player.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 25, 2019 18:30:01 GMT -5
Not sure if one has been signed but, unless there are negative ramifications to the player, I'm not sure that's an issue. Is it? Go back to Monroe. Would there have been a difference between saying that we are going to offer you a 1 yr deal vs 1 plus a non guaranteed yr that is certain to not be picked up. Same result to the player (FA). Furthering the notion that it would be a lesser player though is that the guarantee date would have to be later in the offseason (so as to use the contract in a deal that could take place later in the summer). A good player would want to enter the market as early in the summer as possible. As to the players, I think different players will have different reasons for joining teams. A Vonleh, I'd have to believe, would want an opportunity. There is plenty of time to be a ride along player. Someone in the later stages of their career, would likely want a ring. How do you guarantee it won't be picked up when one of the main reasons you'd do this would be to trade the guy? You can't control what the other team does. If you look at Monroe from a money point of view it would have been smart. Yet last year after making big money was he ready to accept he was basically a Vet minimum guy going forward? A guy like Kanter is going to be looking to cash in, even if the chances of that are slim. If he some how goes off that option limits his upside. In theory giving him lets say 5.3 million this year and an option year could very well make a ton of sense for him. He could get a lot of extra money and most likely that is the smart play for him. Thing is guys coming off making 20 million aren't going to think that way. He'll be kicking himself when the offers come in next year, but then its too late. That's the problem with most buyout guys they are coming off of huge deals and think they will get another huge deal. So anything that limits that is going to seem crazy to them. They just aren't thinking rationally.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jan 26, 2019 4:22:11 GMT -5
Vonleh would make sense, but he's not an euro. I demand an euro. For me if they're going to trade for anyone, it better be for Vucevic. Vucevic, is a guy I like but his salary makes it nearly impossible for the Celtics to trade for. The package would have to include both Morris and Rozier then you’d have to either include Yabu to make it work or instead of Yabu you could include 2 guys like Semi and Jabari Birds contract.
|
|
|