SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2019 Patriots Offseason Thread
|
Post by texs31 on May 10, 2019 14:48:25 GMT -5
Is that true? How long could NE wait to bring someone in while MIN tries to get a deal done. Love Watson but his contract/age suggest he's a bubble guy right now.
EDIT: For that matter, couldn't they play together? Not like ASJ is a lock either?
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 10, 2019 16:12:19 GMT -5
A couple things:
1) Gronk wasn’t his All-Pro self but teams still doubled him a lot which opened space for other guys. Also, he was a beast blocking and having a receiving threat who’s a great run blocker opens a lot in the run game. Point being it’s not as simple as replacing his catches; it’s the affect he had on other players producing thats the greatest loss.
2). While it’s possible Rudolph is cut, Kevin Stefanski, the Vikings offensive coordinator likes to use 2 tight-end sets and Smith and Rudolph are different players with differing skill sets that would compliment that system in theory.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 13, 2019 5:52:11 GMT -5
This article basically explains the entire Patriots strategy for building their defense without saying so. They found this before any other team and exploited the market. It explains why they invest so heavily and regularly in the secondary but seemingly piece together the defensive line. www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-pff-data-study-coverage-vs-pass-rushI hope they can keep the same type of play calling Flores had last year. I have to think Belichick had a lot to do with that.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 13, 2019 11:22:10 GMT -5
Is it though? Like the Patriots have invested way more draft capital in D line recently than the secondary. With the likes of Jones, Easley, and Brown as first round picks. The recent CBs before this draft were late round picks, undrafted guys, or old Veterans, guys like Ryan, Butler, McCourty, Jackson, Jones and Crossen. Then two recent second round guys who have yet to play. They paid Gilmore because he was a good value. Bill jumped on it.
I don't know I kinda have a big issue with that whole article. It's all based off one signing and the fact Brady and the Patriots are awesome. Like other QBs just can't scheme away pass rush, can any other QB have a release time like that for a whole game?
Our two Superbowl wins had us getting great pressure, our one loss in the last three years we couldn't get any pressure. They go hand in hand. Nevermind the Patriots are sneaky, they save special plays for important parts of the game. So while there pass rush numbers might not stand out overall, they sure do in certain games and situations. Like the pass rush dominated the Superbowl. The minute the Chiefs had time, they killed us.
The Patriots strategy is like it's always been, find the best values. Don't pay Flowers, because you can get Bennett. Yet you pay Hightower and Van Noy because they can rush the passer and make plays while costing a fraction of what a DE costs. Given the new rules on instant replay on pass interference calls, pass rush will be more important than every.
The other thing that bugs me about that article and draft ranking is they don't bring bust rate into the equation. Defensive linemen are safer picks than cornerbacks. Like Farrell is one of the safest picks in the draft. It's why I loved him so much. Plus given the market and contracts that top DEs get, that 5th year option means more for DEs than CBs. Like PFF has some interesting data, yet basing prospects just off College production while useful isn't close to an end all either. It's like using Basketball draft rankings and WARP. WARP is useful, but your standard draft rankings are better. WARP can find you some underrated guys, but it also overrates a ton of guys based on production that won't translate. You need to use both when looking at players.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 14, 2019 6:56:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 14, 2019 7:09:15 GMT -5
Is it though? Like the Patriots have invested way more draft capital in D line recently than the secondary. With the likes of Jones, Easley, and Brown as first round picks. The recent CBs before this draft were late round picks, undrafted guys, or old Veterans, guys like Ryan, Butler, McCourty, Jackson, Jones and Crossen. Then two recent second round guys who have yet to play. They paid Gilmore because he was a good value. Bill jumped on it. I don't know I kinda have a big issue with that whole article. It's all based off one signing and the fact Brady and the Patriots are awesome. Like other QBs just can't scheme away pass rush, can any other QB have a release time like that for a whole game? Our two Superbowl wins had us getting great pressure, our one loss in the last three years we couldn't get any pressure. They go hand in hand. Nevermind the Patriots are sneaky, they save special plays for important parts of the game. So while there pass rush numbers might not stand out overall, they sure do in certain games and situations. Like the pass rush dominated the Superbowl. The minute the Chiefs had time, they killed us. The Patriots strategy is like it's always been, find the best values. Don't pay Flowers, because you can get Bennett. Yet you pay Hightower and Van Noy because they can rush the passer and make plays while costing a fraction of what a DE costs. Given the new rules on instant replay on pass interference calls, pass rush will be more important than every. The other thing that bugs me about that article and draft ranking is they don't bring bust rate into the equation. Defensive linemen are safer picks than cornerbacks. Like Farrell is one of the safest picks in the draft. It's why I loved him so much. Plus given the market and contracts that top DEs get, that 5th year option means more for DEs than CBs. Like PFF has some interesting data, yet basing prospects just off College production while useful isn't close to an end all either. It's like using Basketball draft rankings and WARP. WARP is useful, but your standard draft rankings are better. WARP can find you some underrated guys, but it also overrates a ton of guys based on production that won't translate. You need to use both when looking at players. In regards to drafting yes the Pats have used higher picks on DTs and DEs as they are a better gamble in the draft but when was the last time they broke the bank and payed 1? Interesting correlation between drafting and paying. Did they give Vince the biggest deal? They also seem willing to let them go after the rookie deals are up while on the other hand they are willing to pay for the DBs and it isn't even all that close.
|
|
|
Post by ramireja on May 15, 2019 18:05:05 GMT -5
I thought for sure there would be some talk going on here about Jamie Collins coming back. Thoughts? What can we expect? What are his odds of even making the team? I guess it will help to see his signing figures before making that call.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 15, 2019 18:26:18 GMT -5
Are we going full on 3-4? How else does he even start? As a part-time player it's not a bad move if he's changed and willing to buy in. He adds great depth, yet I don't see a roster lock, not on this roster. Not with his history. He's either a Chung, finally gets it, career 180 or he's Brandon Spikes.
|
|
|
Post by philarhody on May 15, 2019 21:00:17 GMT -5
Like Jamie Collins coming back. Great on stunts.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on May 15, 2019 21:16:48 GMT -5
With all the new rookies and the new veterans signing on, it's going to be a very interesting camp. Which of the new veterans actually make the team? Which of the rookies impress enough to stick? What about the guys who were rookies last year but went on the IR, so we never saw them? Then there is the loss of so many coaches. it's going to be crazy sorting out everyone. The preseason games could actually be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by ghostofrussgibson on May 15, 2019 21:27:13 GMT -5
Regarding Collins, if he does return... Two things. 1. He'll be on a short leash. No freelancing. Limited role. 2. It'll be on a "prove it" deal. No way NE overpays for Collins.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 15, 2019 21:44:34 GMT -5
Are we going full on 3-4? How else does he even start? As a part-time player it's not a bad move if he's changed and willing to buy in. He adds great depth, yet I don't see a roster lock, not on this roster. Not with his history. He's either a Chung, finally gets it, career 180 or he's Brandon Spikes. Agree with the last part but does the base defense even matter anymore? What are they in it 30% of the time? Collins could maybe work well in that playground standup defense they like to run.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 15, 2019 22:57:48 GMT -5
Before this signing I had heard that the coaching assignments might indicate a lean towards 3-4.
With the added depth at LB I could also see a tendency towards 3-4. Collins could provide depth there while also adding the athleticism to cover TEs.
30% is not insignificant.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 15, 2019 23:49:16 GMT -5
Are we going full on 3-4? How else does he even start? As a part-time player it's not a bad move if he's changed and willing to buy in. He adds great depth, yet I don't see a roster lock, not on this roster. Not with his history. He's either a Chung, finally gets it, career 180 or he's Brandon Spikes. Agree with the last part but does the base defense even matter anymore? What are they in it 30% of the time? Collins could maybe work well in that playground standup defense they like to run. Our sub package D for two years had mostly been two LBs and either a safety or starting late last year another CB. Given how they use Van Noy, Hightower, S, and CB isn't he just a match up guy and depth guy? Sure he's great depth because he can rush the passer like Van Noy and Hightower in the stand up and delayed blitz packages they love. Yet while in certain cases I can easily see using all three, I don't think it will be even remotely close to our normal sub defense package. Like Collins should be elite in coverage but his free lancing killed us before. I guess it really depends who we get, the old Collins or a new Collins that maybe can finally unlock that full potential he never really did. One gives you awesome LB depth, best we've had in a long time, the other gives you maybe the best LB group in the NFL. We'll see, like we didn't have enough to watch during training camp.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 16, 2019 10:41:09 GMT -5
Agree with the last part but does the base defense even matter anymore? What are they in it 30% of the time? Collins could maybe work well in that playground standup defense they like to run. Our sub package D for two years had mostly been two LBs and either a safety or starting late last year another CB. Given how they use Van Noy, Hightower, S, and CB isn't he just a match up guy and depth guy? Sure he's great depth because he can rush the passer like Van Noy and Hightower in the stand up and delayed blitz packages they love. Yet while in certain cases I can easily see using all three, I don't think it will be even remotely close to our normal sub defense package. Like Collins should be elite in coverage but his free lancing killed us before. I guess it really depends who we get, the old Collins or a new Collins that maybe can finally unlock that full potential he never really did. One gives you awesome LB depth, best we've had in a long time, the other gives you maybe the best LB group in the NFL. We'll see, like we didn't have enough to watch during training camp. His PFF grades by year are telling. He’s been pretty terrible even while compiling numbers in Cleveland but was near elite here (besides that last year when he went rouge). I agree with your assessment. I haven’t heard of his athleticism dropping off so it gives hope that he’s matured (wake up call?) and the Patriots know how to use him. Skinny Hightower, Van Noy, Collins and Bentley could be a scary versatile group that could play off one another and keep everyone healthy and fresh.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 16, 2019 10:42:24 GMT -5
Before this signing I had heard that the coaching assignments might indicate a lean towards 3-4. With the added depth at LB I could also see a tendency towards 3-4. Collins could provide depth there while also adding the athleticism to cover TEs. 30% is not insignificant. It’s not, but the point was signing guys who might not fit your “base” isn’t what it used to be. Sub packages and versatility is the name of today’s game.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 17, 2019 6:42:30 GMT -5
Obviously injuries change everything, but assuming health the training camp battles on this team are going to be fun to watch. This 91 man roster is so deep across most position groups and the questionable ones (TE/WR) still have intriguing battles and unknowns (Thomas and Gordon’s statuses).
Focusing on defense tho, my god if this defense is healthy and they don’t miss their coaches too much it could be incredibly fun. I have mixed feelings on Bill calling the defensive plays. I hate when hear coaches play call. They are supposed to manage everything, not focus on one area during a game. That being said, McDaniels and Brady are on another level offensively so it may work our fine. But I digress...
Bill probably wants to do it because he can have so much fun with the game plans. The way I look at is they now have 3 specialist chess pieces on defense. This doesn’t count the other corners that offer differing matchup options like speed, size, inside/outside etc.
Chung - is weird to call a specialist because of how much he plays but he’s not a traditional safety, he’s mostly a coverage specialist on tight ends. That’s how he’s used most effectively. As well as in run support.
JoJuan Williams - no way he was drafted to Be a traditional man corner like the Patriots like to have. He’s not fast enough to be a Gilmore replacement. He’s here to match up with huge receivers, with help over the top and hulking tight ends. Which is fine, that’s the Patriots defense. Find a matchup your number 1 can erase on his own then man up the other guy with safety shadow help over the top.
Jamie Collins - I seriously doubt he’s going to be used as a traditional linebacker. He’s going to rush the passer and be put in spots to use his athleticism. Probably spells the end of Rivers time here (even though they play different positions). Collins is not a roster lock, but I do expect him to make the team... in 3rd and long situations we will probably see Collins, Hightower, Van Noy and Winovich all standing up around the line of scrimmage mixing and matching who rushes and who drops into coverage.. will be hard for QB to read.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 17, 2019 6:47:46 GMT -5
Injuries will help some of these problems, but this is not the year to be carrying 3 QBs.... In and ideal world Stidman beats out Hoyer and they have Ettling in the PS again with improved play. The chances of Ettling being claimed even with a good pre-season in limited snaps is very low. He’s not going to be good enough for a team to be confident in him as a back up on game day and his pedigree is too low.
I’ll get into it another day but putting injuries aside, there will be trades. Too many good players and not enough spots.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 17, 2019 8:30:49 GMT -5
Maybe or obviously a sign of the times for the Pats D this season but it looks like they will be thin at big DTs to clog up the middle. Not sure I like that but I expect it is inline with playing more sub defenses which you really cn't call then sub anymore when you have 5 DBs on the field more often than not.
I have read that the D last year that developed the stand around til the last second and confuse the QB was a BB plan with Flores just making some calls for him. We all know that BB has his fingerprints on all aspects of the game anyways so that makes sense. If he is even more involved with the D this year I have no problem with Tom and Josh running the O more. Is there a more capable tandem anywhere in the league of doing that with out the HC needing to get involved much? That would be a resounding NO.
Looking at this roster I have to believe the Pats will be able to make some training camp trades rather than just cutting guys. Maybe my glasses are rose colored but it looks like a lot of talent especially if they want to keep a lot of the past 2 years draft picks.
Getting excited about another season that the Pats are favored to win it all, should be another fun ride.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 17, 2019 11:02:48 GMT -5
King getting a 2 year extension
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on May 17, 2019 11:29:37 GMT -5
Maybe or obviously a sign of the times for the Pats D this season but it looks like they will be thin at big DTs to clog up the middle. Not sure I like that but I expect it is inline with playing more sub defenses which you really cn't call then sub anymore when you have 5 DBs on the field more often than not. Pennel is 6’4 326 Guy is 6’ 4 314 and Guy graded as an elite run stopping DT last year. They lost Brown and Shelton but brought in Pennel. If David Parry makes the team, he’s 6’2 317. I don’t think there’s a huge change there.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 17, 2019 11:51:41 GMT -5
DT depth is still rather weak and if your going to build this powerhouse roster I'd hope they add another body or two for depth. A guy like Allen Bailey would be huge.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 17, 2019 13:47:20 GMT -5
Like the idea of Bailey. Could fit as DT in a 4-3 or DE in a 3-4. Not sure if hes much of a pass rusher from the inside (fit for the sub package)
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on May 17, 2019 22:56:40 GMT -5
Obviously injuries change everything, but assuming health the training camp battles on this team are going to be fun to watch. This 91 man roster is so deep across most position groups and the questionable ones (TE/WR) still have intriguing battles and unknowns (Thomas and Gordon’s statuses). Focusing on defense tho, my god if this defense is healthy and they don’t miss their coaches too much it could be incredibly fun. I have mixed feelings on Bill calling the defensive plays. I hate when hear coaches play call. They are supposed to manage everything, not focus on one area during a game. That being said, McDaniels and Brady are on another level offensively so it may work our fine. But I digress... Bill probably wants to do it because he can have so much fun with the game plans. The way I look at is they now have 3 specialist chess pieces on defense. This doesn’t count the other corners that offer differing matchup options like speed, size, inside/outside etc. Chung - is weird to call a specialist because of how much he plays but he’s not a traditional safety, he’s mostly a coverage specialist on tight ends. That’s how he’s used most effectively. As well as in run support. JoJuan Williams - no way he was drafted to Be a traditional man corner like the Patriots like to have. He’s not fast enough to be a Gilmore replacement. He’s here to match up with huge receivers, with help over the top and hulking tight ends. Which is fine, that’s the Patriots defense. Find a matchup your number 1 can erase on his own then man up the other guy with safety shadow help over the top. Jamie Collins - I seriously doubt he’s going to be used as a traditional linebacker. He’s going to rush the passer and be put in spots to use his athleticism. Probably spells the end of Rivers time here (even though they play different positions). Collins is not a roster lock, but I do expect him to make the team... in 3rd and long situations we will probably see Collins, Hightower, Van Noy and Winovich all standing up around the line of scrimmage mixing and matching who rushes and who drops into coverage.. will be hard for QB to read. I agree with most of this but baring some miracle, our TE depth is bad, its not even questionable. Rest of the roster looks great though and they can always trade for someone later.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on May 18, 2019 8:33:42 GMT -5
Maybe or obviously a sign of the times for the Pats D this season but it looks like they will be thin at big DTs to clog up the middle. Not sure I like that but I expect it is inline with playing more sub defenses which you really cn't call then sub anymore when you have 5 DBs on the field more often than not. Pennel is 6’4 326 Guy is 6’ 4 314 and Guy graded as an elite run stopping DT last year. They lost Brown and Shelton but brought in Pennel. If David Parry makes the team, he’s 6’2 317. I don’t think there’s a huge change there. If you look at the history of the Pats DT depth they have always had more than 2 legit 300+ lb guys to clog the middle. Butler is 300 so they really only have 2 big guys. Don't know much about Parry but that isn't much in the way of girth up the middle. Seems like they should find another big body. I really like the Pennel signing, he also graded out very highly against the run.
|
|
|