SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2019 Patriots Regular season thread
|
Post by kingofthetrill on Jan 5, 2020 0:53:41 GMT -5
I'm disappointed that they lost to Miami and that they lost at home to Tennessee (especially against some ex-Pats and a WR that signed with them over the Pats) but I think losing to Miami was a bit of karma since if Pat Mahomes didn't get injured for a few games I don't think NE would have gotten a first round bye anyway, and I don't think that NE would have beaten KC on the road, let alone Baltimore, and let alone one of the 4+ dangerous teams in the NFC. If they lost by 30 to KC that's about where I'd have put them but this was a little disappointing. Either way a loss is a loss and it felt like poor planning (ie drafting) and at this point I hope that any team but Baltimore wins.
|
|
|
Post by dirtywater43 on Jan 5, 2020 6:33:43 GMT -5
What also sucks about this is that there is now a huge lull between now and the start of spring training or exhibition season (I had almost gotten used to being excited about football in February and only having a two week lull if that long), plus honestly I don't think the 2020 Sox are going to be very good as they look to shed salary, so the excitement I have where you dream of winning is kind of not there. The Pats look like their on the downward slide and the Sox look about the same as the Pats - on the way down. It's been a wonderful ride the past two decades, but that time looks like it's going to recede into the past. Knew it couldn't last forever and am thankful it happened at all, but the short-term present doesn't look too promising. When we're in a situation where they best we can hope for is that they get a back end pitching prospect like Gonsolin along with Verdugo for dumping Price AND Betts, that doesn't exactly inspire excitement. Sad to think that soon the Patriots could be without Brady and the Red Sox could be without Betts. The Celtics are good, fun, and young. I would recommend the Bruins and hockey, but that's boring. The Pats were the only bright side to the Sox having a down year most years. Now that looks like it's coming to a close now too. There's about to be a huge lull between Boston seeing another parade for a while imo, unless the hockey team has one soon.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 5, 2020 10:54:53 GMT -5
So can we call out absolutely horrid homerish takes like this or do we just call out someone who isn't a complete homer on this board? STFU idiot. It was a joke. Go throw a tantrum because the Patriots don't win a Super Bowl every f'ing year. Biggest baby sports fan I've ever come across.
|
|
|
Post by dirtywater43 on Jan 5, 2020 13:41:38 GMT -5
So can we call out absolutely horrid homerish takes like this or do we just call out someone who isn't a complete homer on this board? STFU idiot. It was a joke. Go throw a tantrum because the Patriots don't win a Super Bowl every f'ing year. Biggest baby sports fan I've ever come across. So the answer is no? Lol. Hahaha. Judging by your behavior on this board it's hard to know when you're joking about being a homer and when you're not. Yeah I'm the worst, you're right. As you're cussing me and insulting me for no reason whatsoever. I got a tantrum problem. Right.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Jan 5, 2020 19:36:43 GMT -5
I think BB realizes that Brady is done, sad as it is to see. But, Brady wants to play some more. So, he will accept a deal from another team for one year, sort of like Johnny Unitas did when he went to the Chargers for a year. No one remembers he retired from San Diego. It didn't go well. I read that Johnny was shocked that at half time, some of the players were smoking joints. They didn't do that in Baltimore. The West Coast is different.
Anyway, it's not up to BB to decide. It's on Kraft. And Kraft probably sees the same thing. Brady is essentially done and a new QB has to take the reins. All the money saved on Brady's contract ($26 mil) can be used to built another strong team.
Anybody here see it differently?
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 5, 2020 19:45:13 GMT -5
Imagine if Brady had a DeAndre Hopkins, a Michael Thomas or a DJ Metcalf to throw to? He'd be 10 times better.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,783
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 5, 2020 21:16:10 GMT -5
What also sucks about this is that there is now a huge lull between now and the start of spring training or exhibition season (I had almost gotten used to being excited about football in February and only having a two week lull if that long), plus honestly I don't think the 2020 Sox are going to be very good as they look to shed salary, so the excitement I have where you dream of winning is kind of not there. The Pats look like their on the downward slide and the Sox look about the same as the Pats - on the way down. It's been a wonderful ride the past two decades, but that time looks like it's going to recede into the past. Knew it couldn't last forever and am thankful it happened at all, but the short-term present doesn't look too promising. When we're in a situation where they best we can hope for is that they get a back end pitching prospect like Gonsolin along with Verdugo for dumping Price AND Betts, that doesn't exactly inspire excitement. Sad to think that soon the Patriots could be without Brady and the Red Sox could be without Betts. The Celtics are good, fun, and young. I would recommend the Bruins and hockey, but that's boring. The Pats were the only bright side to the Sox having a down year most years. Now that looks like it's coming to a close now too. There's about to be a huge lull between Boston seeing another parade for a while imo, unless the hockey team has one soon. I can't really get into the NBA until playoff time. It's 82 games of seeding pretty much. When the Celtics get into the playoffs I'll pay attention. Hate to admit it, but I'm more of a bandwagon fan. I started following the UCONN Huskies when that was a big thing in the 1990s so I was more into college basketball than pro basketball, especially with the fun of March Madness, but I have kind of soured on college basketball since then. As far as hockey goes I used to go to the Civic Center occasionally. I was a Hartford Whalers fan, not a Bruins fan. I actually missed Roger Clemens' 1st 20K on April 29, 1986 because I didn't have cable TV then and I could only follow the Red Sox on WTIC AM radio and they were broadcasting Game 7 of whatever the hell they call the second playoff round in hockey, and the Canadiens crushed the Whalers' dreams in overtime on a Claude Lemieux breakaway goal, but when the Whalers stupidly traded Ron Francis away, the team started to suck again and before long their jerk of an owner, Peter Karmanos moved them to North Carolina to become the Hurricanes and when they won the Stanley Cup (was in 2006?) I remember catching the last few minutes and it felt kind of weird and empty. It was the Whalers franchise but not the Whalers. Probably what Expos fans felt when they saw the Nationals win the World Series this year. I watched the Bruins win the Cup in 2011. I watched them blow a 3-0 series lead the year before I think. Saw them lose the Stanley Cup to Chicago I believe (Joel Quenneville the ex-Whaler was the coach) and I did watch the Stanley cup last year when they failed to beat St. Louis in their own building during Game 7. Honestly, even when the Bruins won in 2011, it didn't do much for me. I definitely enjoyed the Celtics' title in 2008 with Allen (former Husky! One of my faves), Garnett, Pierce, Rondo, and Perkins and was disappointed when the Lakers got revenge two years later (Allen was so bad in Game 7 that year!). I enjoy it but it's just not the same for me as it is with the Patriots (I go back to 1983 with the Pats - the Steve Grogan (to Stanley Morgan) years), so I feel their losses more heavily and enjoy the victories all the more, but even so that totally pales in comparison to my Red Sox. I live and die with them.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,783
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Jan 5, 2020 21:23:10 GMT -5
I think BB realizes that Brady is done, sad as it is to see. But, Brady wants to play some more. So, he will accept a deal from another team for one year, sort of like Johnny Unitas did when he went to the Chargers for a year. No one remembers he retired from San Diego. It didn't go well. I read that Johnny was shocked that at half time, some of the players were smoking joints. They didn't do that in Baltimore. The West Coast is different. Anyway, it's not up to BB to decide. It's on Kraft. And Kraft probably sees the same thing. Brady is essentially done and a new QB has to take the reins. All the money saved on Brady's contract ($26 mil) can be used to built another strong team. Anybody here see it differently? Kind of. Brady wasn't as good as he has been - obviously, but this guy had absolutely NO help whatsoever. Antonio Brown really screwed them up. He's exactly what Brady needed. But Gordon wasn't very good and we saw what happened to him. Sanu was a bust. Harry was disappointing. Dorsett never really blossomed - again. Meyers was a joke at times. And even Edelman - he had so many damn drops this year, including the fatal one in the 4th quarter. Who knows how far they get if he doesn't drop that easy reception? So I think on a team with better receivers, a better offensive line than what he had the first half of the year before Wynn returned, a field goal kicker who's reliable (the Pats were so scared to rely on FG kicking from any far distance), and a better running game (Michel was useless for a lot of the season) Brady will look more like a guy who didn't age at all. You certainly wouldn't see him purposely throwing the ball away as often as he did this year. Brady is still a quality QB on a quality team. He didn't really have a quality team surrounding him. I thought White played well. But they never really did replace Gronk. That was a huge loss. Watson, LaCoss and whoever else were not even close to being a replacement. That would be like replacing Big Papi with Pablo Sandoval or something like that as opposed to JD Martinez. I do think your end premise is what plays out. Belichick will probably think to himself "This team has a ton of holes and giving Brady all that money to surround him with mediocre talent - we know that won't work", so he'll probably use Brady's money to upgrade as many of those holes as possible, but they won't have Brady to make it work unfortunately, and I doubt Stidham will be ready for the challenge, so he'll probably get some mediocre QB and figure they can do for him what they did for Matt Cassell all those years ago. My gut (which has been known to be wrong) tells me that Brady is a goner, which makes me really sad, even more sad than the fact that the team was pretty lousy during the second half of the season (4-5 after with 3 home losses after an 0-8 start).
|
|
|
Post by beasleyrockah on Jan 5, 2020 22:48:55 GMT -5
If Brady needs multiple elite pass catchers, an elite OL, and a good running game to go along with a top 3 defense that's a problem. Nick Foles types can win a title with a great balanced roster. Brady really struggled down the stretch last season even with an elite offensive line and Gronk and Edelman healthy, but the 2nd half of the AFCCG and a SB win made people forget. They need to get better at TE and WR, but there's a vibe from a lot of Pats fans that he only should play with Pro Bowl caliber WR's, yet the Patriots have never won titles with top WR's (with respect to Jules, Branch, and Brown).
This roster was absolutely flawed with real holes (so were former SB winning rosters), but Brady should've been more productive and is/was part of the problem. He's been more productive in the past with similar or lesser options. Brady limits the type of receiver they can acquire, each receiver needs to fit Brady's system and preferences…not the other way around. Look at how much the defensive system changes on a weekly basis and consider how predictable the Patriots offense has become, it's not like Brady can adjust his game to fit his current receivers. A guy like Metcalf would struggle here.
At this point my ideal scenario would be a three year extension on team friendly terms. The real compromise would be giving Brady a contract to play until his stated goal, and in return he takes less money. If Tom wants to get paid market value and/or Belichick doesn't believe he can be an above average QB the next two seasons they should part ways now. It doesn't make sense to bring him back for 1yr at $25-30m+.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Jan 6, 2020 7:59:33 GMT -5
We'll know on March 1st when he becomes officially a free agent. I wonder what kind of influence his wife has on him and what she is saying.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
Member is Online
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 6, 2020 9:11:10 GMT -5
From Jeff Howe on The Athletic (which has a lot more about how the Patriots and Brady might reunite as well): theathletic.com/1510849/2020/01/05/tom-brady-future-patriots/I think the Dolphins make some sense with Flores but they fired Chad O'Shea so might be starting over on offense, and Brady might not want to face the Pats twice. The Colts are weird because he'd be displacing Brisett and dealing with Manning's legacy. The Chargers are so snakebitten and don't even have a home crowd. Maybe the Bucs? Here's my sleeper: Las Vegas Raiders. No baggage, close to the West Coast, add a Franchise Savior buzz to a new team. Not sure if the coaching/ownership situation is too much of a minus, but for 2 more years who cares. If they were smart the Bears would ditch Mitch and make a push, but the money isn't easy to find. I still say Kraft drops the hammer and Brady comes back.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 6, 2020 9:12:30 GMT -5
We'll know on March 1st when he becomes officially a free agent. I wonder what kind of influence his wife has on him and what she is saying. Thought I read that his contract voids on March 14th (ie not the official start of FA) but I can't recall where.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Jan 6, 2020 11:04:11 GMT -5
Two guys whose opinions I respect both just said this morning that they don't put much of the blame on Tom for the Pats offensive woes this year, Rex Ryan and Dan Orlovsky. The problem is with weapons and the line.
Given what BB said in his press conference this could be an interesting offseason.
Lots of players on D with expiring contracts so their will be some losses their. Seems like for Tom to stick around they will need to spend money on the offensive side of the ball. Kraft wants Tom to stay so does that turn into an internal debate between the 3 most important Patriot leaders? I don't think BB is going to like being dictated to as to how he is going to build next years team.
Whether Tom is here next year or not I think the team is going to be very different.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
Member is Online
|
Post by mobaz on Jan 6, 2020 15:13:31 GMT -5
“Three years for $90 million could be the magic number,” this exec said. “That puts Brady under contract at 45 that last year. It’s fully guaranteed at signing. He gets the money. It is a little bit of a discount.” Anonymous NFL Exec Via Mike Sando (one of 6 Execs polled in the article, and yes I'm getting good use out of my The Athletic subscription). Not sure I'm on board at all with 3 years or $90m guaranteed. That seems insane to me. I definitely don't think Brady to blame for the offense. Nor was it a resources issue. Other than the approach to TE BB really did invest in it, but they just had so many misses (backup OL via draft and free agency, WRs per earlier discussions, 3 straight 1st round picks on offense). ADD:
|
|
|
Post by dirtywater43 on Jan 6, 2020 15:29:42 GMT -5
There's the injury that he was dealing with Umass. Not sure what Tennis elbow is, but you could see it in his throws consistently.
|
|
|
Post by dirtywater43 on Jan 6, 2020 15:33:29 GMT -5
“It’s not all about Tom Brady. At 42 years old, two- or three-year deal. He’s still playing at a high level,” Moss said Sunday on ESPN. “What I talk about is the guys on that offensive side that didn’t step up in big situations. (Mohamed) Sanu, (Phillip) Dorsett, (Julian) Edelman dropping the ball — led the league in drops this year. So when you look at Tom Brady possibly coming back to be the Patriots quarterback and finishing out his career, man, get him some help. That’s the biggest thing that I’ll tell you. They tried to bring Antonio Brown in because they knew they needed a No. 1 receiver when Gronk (Rob Gronkowski) retired. But Tom Brady needs some help wherever he goes. If he’s going to be the Patriots quarterback and finish out his career, get this man some help ’cause the guys they have there are not the guys he wants.” nesn.com/2020/01/randy-moss-sends-message-to-patriots-with-tom-bradys-future-uncertain/I was saying it all year as a Pats fan.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Jan 6, 2020 15:40:31 GMT -5
They tried hard at TE bringing in many guys and going after others but failed. In retrospect I bet they wish they had drafted more over the last few years.
The elbow injury would explain the inaccuracy.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 6, 2020 22:02:13 GMT -5
I dont think their regret would be drafting more TEs bc I dont think they would ever approach the draft that way.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 6, 2020 23:25:51 GMT -5
I dont think their regret would be drafting more TEs bc I dont think they would ever approach the draft that way. I think that's an issue no? We've been talking about needing TEs for years and they take a late round Ryan Izzo. I don't mind that pick, but wow if you don't like anyone maybe you need to change what you are looking for no? Kinda crazy that a team that has had some of the best TEs in the NFL for years just won't draft guys when they have no one. Heck I thought you'd take two guys last draft. Now next year's draft looks just so so at best. One of the top guys production wise is Cole Kmet from Notre Dame and he only has one year of production. I love Brady, but he does make it crazy hard to add weapons. He expects so much and only clicks when he fully trusts the guys. Watching Stidham get Chemistry with Meyers in no time was kinda eye opening, because Brady never had that with him.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Jan 7, 2020 10:08:09 GMT -5
I dont think their regret would be drafting more TEs bc I dont think they would ever approach the draft that way. Maybe they should rethink how they approach the draft a little bit. For example they used a 2nd and a 3rd last year to pick positions that weren't a need at all so those guys didn't see the field, RB and CB. It isn't an exact science I know but it hasn't exactly been a strength of the Pats either, JS.
|
|
|
Post by prangerx on Jan 7, 2020 12:17:57 GMT -5
I think Brady is going somewhere else. I think Belichick is ready to move on..I don't think he is going to give into Brady's likely demands. Really Brady was ready to move on and go with Grappolo and was overruled. Which we might pay for now. But we did win another Super Bowl with Brady, which no one would want to give up.
I think the only way he stays is if Kraft steps in and personally brings Brady back. Which can be ruled out. Or perhaps Brady is really playing hard to get to prove a point and has no intention of going elsewhere. I still think its more likely he goes elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jan 7, 2020 13:07:08 GMT -5
I dont think their regret would be drafting more TEs bc I dont think they would ever approach the draft that way. Maybe they should rethink how they approach the draft a little bit. For example they used a 2nd and a 3rd last year to pick positions that weren't a need at all so those guys didn't see the field, RB and CB. It isn't an exact science I know but it hasn't exactly been a strength of the Pats either, JS. So you'd prefer they draft a player who (in their minds) has a lesser chance of success so that they can fill a need? How they are evaluating players (especially skill guys) and how they fit into their system might need addressing but, imo, not how they draft (if I may use that as shorthand for navigating the draft board and addressing needs)
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Jan 7, 2020 17:23:10 GMT -5
The thing I don't get is that they have a very long history of bringing in troubled veterans and gambling on them. Yet they don't do that at all in the draft and they have tons of picks every year, but they have such a limited number of players they would even consider drafting.
Our biggest need was TE in one of the deepest TE drafts in a long-time and they took no one. They didn't need to go big, heck they didn't even need to try and replace Gronk. Just a quality blocking TE would have been huge and they draft no one. So yes they need to move need up the board when it's that huge of one. Even a late round pick like Tommy Sweeney would have likely helped. Also blows my mind they didn't trade for one.
We needed a short yardage RB. Kinda guys you can find late in the draft. They took Harris in the third and he basically doesn't play, Bolden got more carries. Yet our season is over because we didn't have a RB that can power the ball in.
They trade up for Williams when we are loaded at CB. Yet with the season on the line, bring in Brooks to cover a TE and give up a TD.
We value special teams so highly, but have Bolden returning kicks when he has zero ability to make huge plays. Traded up for our young punter but he sucked big time at pinning guys deep and his punts weren't even close last game.
I don't really mind the picks, but they seem like head scratchers right now. Williams and Harris took up roster spots all year and they seem to have had no plans on using them. Rather using crappy talent like Bolden and Brooks over them.
Bill is very good overall, but man he really built an incomplete team this year. The killer being that blocking TEs and short yardage RBs are two of the easiest things to find. You can likely find some sitting on teams practice squads. Given this D, if we were a good power running team, we might have won it all even with crap for weapons. It's a head scratcher just like not playing Butler against the Eagles. Bill is very good, but he's far from perfect.
If I'm Brady I sign a well below market deal. Yet I'm using my power as a free agent to get Bill to bring in talent on offense.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Jan 11, 2020 13:23:33 GMT -5
Brady has dead cap hits the next two years if he leaves. They wouldn’t be able to reinvest all of that money into this team. Only about half of it which doesn’t make much sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on Jan 11, 2020 14:52:39 GMT -5
Brady has dead cap hits the next two years if he leaves. They wouldn’t be able to reinvest all of that money into this team. Only about half of it which doesn’t make much sense to me. How is that possible when his contract is over?
|
|
|