SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots 2021 Offseason Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 24, 2021 15:15:29 GMT -5
How does that work? That's what he got last year to be a backup. He only played one game. So I'd say at best he gets around last year's deal without those crazy incentives if your signing him to be a maybe starter.
Yeah I guess it makes perfect sense if you think Bill just overpays players on one year deals, while trading a draft pick.
I look at it like pick QB in top three rounds, a guy that has a chance to play this year.
Signing him to a market rate deal this year. After the talk last year with Newton and hitting incentives, I want no part of that unless it's a crazy cheap deal like Newton's was.
I'd look at these guys not in this order though, Taylor, Brissett, Fitzpatrick, Winston and Trubisky. Look at trades for Darnold and Jimmy. If I wanted to spend 20 million on a QB, it's Jimmy, see what Matt Ryan costs if available or go see if Drew Brees wants to do what Brady did. I didn't mention Watson because I don't believe that's possible.
I think Mariota is the best option, I don't think just having to do what Newton just did should equal 20 million either though. We have tons of holes and need a lot more than just a QB.
Now if you think Mariota is a guy that likely comes in and excels taking us to the playoffs. I can see why you'd say 20 million isn't bad. I'm just not at that level with him. I want to give him the chance to prove that.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 24, 2021 15:20:13 GMT -5
Rapsheet saying teams are concerned about Mariota's Max Value (starter incentives) and that has slowed down his market for trade. Rap wondering if it could lead to a release.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 24, 2021 16:50:24 GMT -5
I predict Cam Newton is the QB next year in NE.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 24, 2021 16:59:48 GMT -5
I predict Cam Newton is the QB next year in NE. Agreed
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 25, 2021 7:17:44 GMT -5
How does that work? That's what he got last year to be a backup. He only played one game. So I'd say at best he gets around last year's deal without those crazy incentives if your signing him to be a maybe starter. Yeah I guess it makes perfect sense if you think Bill just overpays players on one year deals, while trading a draft pick. I look at it like pick QB in top three rounds, a guy that has a chance to play this year. Signing him to a market rate deal this year. After the talk last year with Newton and hitting incentives, I want no part of that unless it's a crazy cheap deal like Newton's was. I'd look at these guys not in this order though, Taylor, Brissett, Fitzpatrick, Winston and Trubisky. Look at trades for Darnold and Jimmy. If I wanted to spend 20 million on a QB, it's Jimmy, see what Matt Ryan costs if available or go see if Drew Brees wants to do what Brady did. I didn't mention Watson because I don't believe that's possible. I think Mariota is the best option, I don't think just having to do what Newton just did should equal 20 million either though. We have tons of holes and need a lot more than just a QB. Now if you think Mariota is a guy that likely comes in and excels taking us to the playoffs. I can see why you'd say 20 million isn't bad. I'm just not at that level with him. I want to give him the chance to prove that. How did we go from Mariota being "crossed off the list" to being the best option? I'm half joking, I know you're looking at value but that list of other options seriously sucks. Unless Trubisky comes real cheap, I'd rather see the team start Stidham and just spend the money elsewhere. One thing to add, this will be the first season in a long time where New England wasn't a destination for players looking to win. Will be interesting to see how that impacts the offseason, even if salaries are lower players might not be lining up to play for the Pats the way they have in the past. It’s not that hard as two things can be true at once. All things being equal, contract wise. Mariotta is the best option (per UMass), but he’s not enough of a difference from other guys to absorb a 20m cap charge versus a smaller one. Another way to say it. Mariotta at 8m > Fitzpatrick at 8m Mariotta at 20m < Fitz at 8m
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Feb 25, 2021 8:25:12 GMT -5
More details on Mariota's incentives. overthecap.com/is-marcus-mariota-tradeable/I'd rather play in the Trubisky/Fitz/Dalton realm where you can created a better incentive structure if draft or Cousins/Jimmy G/Ryan aren't options. If Mariota is released, I'd probably take him over either of the first 3.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Feb 25, 2021 8:35:31 GMT -5
I predict Cam Newton is the QB next year in NE. Agreed NO NO thank you!! I can't go thru another season watching him miss easy throws. I mean wide open guys in the flat with no pressure and he would throw it into the ground. Maybe I was spoiled watching Tom for 20 years but is it my imagination or did Cam make multiple bad throws a game? His throwing motion didn't even look smooth like he was battling a shoulder injury. And that doesn't even touch on his bad game management. He would be looking at a stacked box and not audible to a pass. Bad, just bad QB play last year.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Feb 25, 2021 8:46:04 GMT -5
Mel Kiper, bless him, allows for trades for the first time ever in a Mock, and he goes a bit nuts.
Lawrence at 1, Atlanta moves to 2 for Wilson, SF moves to 7 for Fields, Mac Jones at 8 to the Panthers, and Lance to the Pats at 9. Others of note are Kyle Pitts to the Jets at 4, CB Caleb Farely from VT at 15, and 5 WR but no running backs in the 1st round.
I highly doubt Jones goes over Lance, just because NFL GMs seem to lean into upside and Lance also has a running game that the kids love so much these days. But I'd be all for the Pats moving up to 9 for one of Lance/Fields/Wilson. I trust their evaluation if they're willing to invest that much, and QB purgatory isn't fun 1 year in.
On a non-QB note, anyone have thoughts on Kadarius Toney? He's shot up draft boards since late fall and now seems like a sure-fire first rounder. He's definitely quick, I just never see these smaller gadget guys succeed. Percy Harvin was bigger but really only had 3 good years. Tavon Austin is a classic bust. Can't think of a similar guy I'd spend a 1st rounder on.
espn.com/nfl/draft2021/insider/story/_/id/30957145/nfl-mock-draft-2021-mel-kiper-new-predictions-all-32-first-round-picks-including-mac-jones-trey-lance-three-trades
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 25, 2021 9:26:25 GMT -5
If Jimmy is going to be available and in Kipers world he is, I feel very confident they go after him. As for Lance if he's your guy that isn't a crazy trade. The question is, who is their guy or guys? Then does Bill stay true to his board or just pick for need?
It might be unlikely, yet I really want Parsons unless you love a QB or someone else slides.
I hate small speed guys in the first round, yet there's always an exception to the rule. I can't wait for draft mags this year. Heck I think I'm going to splurge on PFF this year.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Feb 25, 2021 9:36:16 GMT -5
I lean towards Jimmy being my preference for a veteran QB (though not in a trade but if/when he's cut). My only hesitation is that I'm not sure he (or any other realistic Vet QB) is the answer anyway. Let's say that's true for a moment. Does BB try to "force it" with him to prove that he was right (passing on other opportunities - the draft - to get the right guy in here)?
UMass' questions about who is "their guy" and BB staying true to his board vs picking for need are the most compelling for me this draft. Every other year, the answer is easy. But QB has never been THIS much of a need before. So will that change his line of thinking?
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 25, 2021 10:26:03 GMT -5
I think Bill will always stay true to his board. He's the guy that trades up for a CB when he has the best cornerback depth in the league because he had him as a first round pick.
So for me, if he does that trade for Lance he has to see Lance as a top 5/10 pick type QB. I don't see him making that move based out of need if he rates Lance a top 25 pick. Now the interesting thing is, would he slightly gamble? Like Lance or Jones fall to pick 15, yet he has them rated slightly lower. I could see him slightly gambling on need, just not going all in.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 25, 2021 10:30:17 GMT -5
At this point, I don’t think there’s much of a reason to believe Jimmy is or will be available.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,862
|
Post by cdj on Feb 25, 2021 12:08:26 GMT -5
Fitzmagic gettin better with age like a fine wine, let’s get freaky with it
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 25, 2021 12:14:44 GMT -5
I was just using Fitz as an example, but he’s already on record as saying he’d play here.
And your opinion is a fair one, it’s just not shared by the guy you were questioning. Which is perfectly ok.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 25, 2021 12:43:44 GMT -5
It’s not that hard as two things can be true at once. All things being equal, contract wise. Mariotta is the best option (per UMass), but he’s not enough of a difference from other guys to absorb a 20m cap charge versus a smaller one. Another way to say it. Mariotta at 8m > Fitzpatrick at 8m Mariotta at 20m < Fitz at 8m Yeah I know, what did you think I meant when I said "I know you're looking at value"? Fitzmagic is fun and all, but he's 38, only played a full slate of games 3 times and has a history of fading after his first few games. Plus you have no idea if he wants to play for the Pats. I'm not saying Mariotta is some savior, but if the Pats trade for him then he has to play for the Pats. FAs have options and the Pats are not a destination this year. $20m for Mariotta and potentially winning is better than the Pats having to settle for their 4th QB option at $5m and going 4-12. So you think Mariota takes us to the playoffs with like an 80% chance? I like Mariota, I think he fits our system and his mobility makes things easier. I think his team didn't do him many favors getting new OC every year and not letting him grow in a system. Yet his best season was 2016. I do think he has a chance to pull a Ryan Tannehill, I just don't think it's anywhere close to 80%. To give him that contract you'd have to think your getting 2016 Mariota or an even better version. I'm not going to argue you're wrong, I just don't feel that way. I certainly don't think Bill would be thinking that way. They might not be a huge free agent destination. Yet as last year showed there are only so many spots for QBs. Last year he took the best deal to be a backup, how did that workout? He only played in one game. I'm going to assume he's going to be looking for a better chance to play this time around. I'm also assuming a big pitch to the QBs will be that Bill is going to add a bunch of good players. Something that is much harder if your QB is making a ton. Take the one year deal and focus on getting a big deal next year if you play well. That's just not happening if you sit on the bench. I also like other guys too. I think Mitch Trubisky would look a lot better in our system, he's kinda like Mariota in that they kept changing the system to make improvements and in the end did him no favors.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 25, 2021 13:31:41 GMT -5
I have no clue, there are still so many shoes to drop this year that will determine what happens. It's why I had a big list, I'm confident that I can get one of those guys in my salary range.
Trubisky, Mariota and Winston fall into my group of young guys that have shown you they can play in the NFL. They just have certain issues and aren't game changing type players. Yet they aren't close to trainwrecks either, so certain coaches think they can fix them, coach then up. I'm not surprised Gruden and Payton signed Mariota and Winston.
Trubisky has had a major amount of bad press and basically been blamed for killing the team for years. I watched that Bears playoff game and was like Damn he makes throws Newton can't. I'm intrigued what he'd look like in a more creative offense, that loves to dink and dunk it's way down the field.
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Feb 26, 2021 9:01:47 GMT -5
There's a good chance that Bill waits until the draft to see if a good QB falls to him at 15. If they're all gone, he might grab a good WR, then trade for a decent QB later on. If he commits to a QB before the draft, then he will have to get a WR to help the new QB. Of course, predicting what Bill will do is impossible. But, it seems logical.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 26, 2021 13:55:57 GMT -5
I think Bill will always stay true to his board. He's the guy that trades up for a CB when he has the best cornerback depth in the league because he had him as a first round pick. I think you're right, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. Personally I'd like to see something a little more dynamic from Bill, like last year trading up a couple spots to draft Justin Jefferson or Jalen Reagor and filling a very obvious need rather than trading back and taking a 2nd round safety for the bazillionth year in a row. This team has a lot of needs. I find it a little funny you pick on taking a safety, because who was the last one? I've thought they needed a young safety for years and he looks good. At the same time he could have just taken Claypool, who fills the biggest need. A matchup nightmare, that makes big plays and stretches the field. Instead of Keene, take one of the three guys that were rated higher and played much better. Instead of a kicker in the 5th, which you easily could have taken in the 7th round, take one of the many good players available. That was just crazy, you had WRs, DTs and a center there that would all help more. Yet then he hits gold in the 6th round, which you can't overlook. We just have a lot of needs, so I won't say he should do this or that. Bunch of ways to find talent and build teams. I just wish he'd stop way overdrafting certain players. He trades up to take Keene a few rounds early and takes a kicker who wasn't getting drafted in the 5th. While most people top rated kicker goes undrafted and has a damn good year. I actually prefer the trading down and taking more players, than trading up and only taking a few. Yet trading back up for Keene and waisting a 5th round pick kinda defeat that strategy. That being said, he does need to start drafting WRs and it can't be guys in the 6/7 rounds either. Frankly we just need an epic draft or a good draft and a darn good free agency. Who are your non first round QBs?
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 26, 2021 17:13:26 GMT -5
I think you're right, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. Personally I'd like to see something a little more dynamic from Bill, like last year trading up a couple spots to draft Justin Jefferson or Jalen Reagor and filling a very obvious need rather than trading back and taking a 2nd round safety for the bazillionth year in a row. This team has a lot of needs. I find it a little funny you pick on taking a safety, because who was the last one? I've thought they needed a young safety for years and he looks good. At the same time he could have just taken Claypool, who fills the biggest need. A matchup nightmare, that makes big plays and stretches the field. Instead of Keene, take one of the three guys that were rated higher and played much better. Instead of a kicker in the 5th, which you easily could have taken in the 7th round, take one of the many good players available. That was just crazy, you had WRs, DTs and a center there that would all help more. Yet then he hits gold in the 6th round, which you can't overlook. We just have a lot of needs, so I won't say he should do this or that. Bunch of ways to find talent and build teams. I just wish he'd stop way overdrafting certain players. He trades up to take Keene a few rounds early and takes a kicker who wasn't getting drafted in the 5th. While most people top rated kicker goes undrafted and has a damn good year. I actually prefer the trading down and taking more players, than trading up and only taking a few. Yet trading back up for Keene and waisting a 5th round pick kinda defeat that strategy. That being said, he does need to start drafting WRs and it can't be guys in the 6/7 rounds either. Frankly we just need an epic draft or a good draft and a darn good free agency. Who are your non first round QBs? Claypool and his taunting and mouth wouldn’t last in New England... bad fit
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 26, 2021 17:46:28 GMT -5
This team has a lot of needs. I find it a little funny you pick on taking a safety, because who was the last one? I've thought they needed a young safety for years and he looks good. At the same time he could have just taken Claypool, who fills the biggest need. A matchup nightmare, that makes big plays and stretches the field. Instead of Keene, take one of the three guys that were rated higher and played much better. Instead of a kicker in the 5th, which you easily could have taken in the 7th round, take one of the many good players available. That was just crazy, you had WRs, DTs and a center there that would all help more. Yet then he hits gold in the 6th round, which you can't overlook. We just have a lot of needs, so I won't say he should do this or that. Bunch of ways to find talent and build teams. I just wish he'd stop way overdrafting certain players. He trades up to take Keene a few rounds early and takes a kicker who wasn't getting drafted in the 5th. While most people top rated kicker goes undrafted and has a damn good year. I actually prefer the trading down and taking more players, than trading up and only taking a few. Yet trading back up for Keene and waisting a 5th round pick kinda defeat that strategy. That being said, he does need to start drafting WRs and it can't be guys in the 6/7 rounds either. Frankly we just need an epic draft or a good draft and a darn good free agency. Who are your non first round QBs? Claypool and his taunting and mouth wouldn’t last in New England... bad fit I'd say that says a lot more about the Steelers team and culture frankly. I watched every game of his in College, he never did that crap, Brian Kelly wouldn't allow it.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 27, 2021 6:41:02 GMT -5
Claypool and his taunting and mouth wouldn’t last in New England... bad fit I'd say that says a lot more about the Steelers team and culture frankly. I watched every game of his in College, he never did that crap, Brian Kelly wouldn't allow it. Could be right
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 27, 2021 11:45:18 GMT -5
It sucks that Brock Purdy went back to school, I thought he would be a good fit.
Top 4 likely top 15 picks or around there, Lawrence, Wilson, Fields and Lance. Games played 40, 30, 34 and 18.
So you see the big issue with Trey Lance, that's a crazy low amount of games.
Mac Jones and Kyle Trask, games played 30 and 27. The only two old school no running at all QBs. Yet starting QB level arm talent, with intangibles.
Kellen Mond and Jamie Newman, this is the tier I'd have Purdy if he declared. Games started 46 and 19. This is the end of basically starting level QB upside. Two good dual threat QBs one with tons of games, the other a crazy low amount. Newman was a big hype guy going to Georgia, yet sat out the year and wasn't very good at the senior bowl. Do they have the drive, intelligence, football IQ/junky part? I don't feel great about this tier, yet they have a chance. If you had Purdy here, I like the depth of the draft a lot more.
I will say Peyton Ramsey stands out as a late round/free agent backup type QB. Brian Hoyer type guy. Lacks really good arm talent, adequate at best, yet does everything else you'd want. 40 games played, top three in 2020 draft Wonderlic test with a score of 30.
If you assume Lawrence, Wilson and Fields go before pick 15, which seems likely. You could hope Trey Lance falls yet you do you comp him too? 18 games played in a low level conference. He's one of the least experience QBs every to be talked about as a high first round pick. Even Josh Allen played in 27 games. I'm really leaning towards making a choice at 15 with him, yet I have very limited information.
Jones and Trask are highly intriguing players from the Patriots point of view. Could very well be undervalued because they aren't able to make plays with their legs. Yet you have to dig into how much was them and his much was the systems and talent. I'd spend a crap ton of time looking at these two guys and figuring out where you value them, from 15th pick to 2nd/3rd round. A trade down to pick them late first could make a ton of sense for that extra year on the contract.
Mond is kinda like this year's Hurts for me, yet a lite version. Jamie Newman is intriguing, yet who really knows what he is in 19 games. Getting to see him on a good team with Talent was going to be massive for him over what Wake forest had. How Georgia could refine his mechanics. Yet he's 6'4" 230 pounds plus who's a tough runner with a very good arm. Your third to fourth round guys for me.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Feb 27, 2021 12:12:01 GMT -5
First impressions of the WR group, it's really small, six of the top 20 guys are under 6', two more guys are 6' even. I'll have to do a lot more studying, yet it doesn't look like the last couple of great classes. A lot of this classes value is in the top 3 guys. Let's hope it's deep on the backend.
The TE group just looks bad. I like Hunter Long as a solid two way TE, yet he's the 4th rated guy projected to go in the 3-4 rounds. After Pitts you only have two 2-3 round type guys. That's not a lot of talent.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,862
|
Post by cdj on Mar 2, 2021 14:45:04 GMT -5
He was threw picks at a worse rate than Newton did, I feel like the people I’ve seen discuss him keep thinking he’s the QB he was before almost dying from a leg injury. He’s not and it’s very understandable- maybe you bring him in to mentor a rookie like Mac Jones and have him start a handful of games before turning the team over to Jones. But yeah I don’t even really view him as a stopgap. He’s more of a backup to me.
Van Noy is getting cut by Miami and that interests me on a relatively cheap deal (like 2/12 or something)
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 2, 2021 15:08:25 GMT -5
He was threw picks at a worse rate than Newton did, I feel like the people I’ve seen discuss him keep thinking he’s the QB he was before almost dying from a leg injury. He’s not and it’s very understandable- maybe you bring him in to mentor a rookie like Mac Jones and have him start a handful of games before turning the team over to Jones. But yeah I don’t even really view him as a stopgap. He’s more of a backup to me. Van Noy is getting cut by Miami and that interests me on a relatively cheap deal (like 2/12 or something) I would go even higher than that. Damn that would be a huge signing and fix so many issues. You also know Bill loves guys that get cut and don't count towards comp picks.
|
|
|