SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots 2021 Offseason Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 24, 2021 13:41:58 GMT -5
Has he? His first one Jackson, Allen, Mayfield, Darnold and Rosen. I'm easily taking Allen and Mayfield over Jackson right now because they are much better passers. I wouldn't be surprised to see Darnold jump Jackson either if he actually gets a solid supporting cast. Jackson might be the best playmaker, yet he's still hasn't really proven he can win games with his arm. 2019 he has Stidham over Daniel Jones, I'd be damn happy if Stidham is better than Jones. I'll give him credit if he's right on Lawrence versus Wilson. I have Lawrence in the Payton Manning, Andrew Luck, once every ten years no doubt franchise QB tier. I'm not surprised by the Fields and Lance part, one is crazy raw and Fields lacks the advanced feel/stuff. The most surprising player is easily Mond at #4. That's the most extreme pick he's ever made. Ranking the top guys, first round guys decently is one thing, ranking a guy who's rated 4th/5th round over two guys who will get drafted most likely in the first is putting yourself out there. If he's right with those I'll give the guy some major credit. I still love Kyle Trask for our system, he wouldn't fit what a bunch of teams do, yet he fits our system like a glove. He doesn't have an elite arm or crazy athletic ability, yet he's tough, moves around, is highly accurate and does a bunch of advanced stuff like look off safeties and go through his reads. Go look at the numbers Fields put up against Bama versus Trask. One struggled against an advanced D filled with NFL talent, Trask was on fire lighting up that D. Yes he’s been good - good doesn’t mean perfect but he’s been good. Daniel Jones sucks so far - sure he’s better than Stidham but you don’t want either starting fir your team so who cares at this point. I think Daniel Jones has done a fine job considering the talent surrounding him and that horrible OL. He just needs to keep improving.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Mar 24, 2021 15:02:21 GMT -5
Reiss saying NE is closing on a 4yr deal with Guy.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 24, 2021 15:28:22 GMT -5
Reiss saying NE is closing on a 4yr deal with Guy. 4 years? Jeez hopefully that’s to keep cap number down.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Mar 24, 2021 15:44:51 GMT -5
Reiss saying NE is closing on a 4yr deal with Guy. 4 years? Jeez hopefully that’s to keep cap number down. The initial speculation is voidable years (so, yes, to keep the number down).
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,867
Member is Online
|
Post by cdj on Mar 24, 2021 16:20:35 GMT -5
Yeah I think it’s safe to say Bill did not like being run on
|
|
|
Post by costpet on Mar 24, 2021 16:52:40 GMT -5
I think Bill is trying to build a great defense to take the pressure off the offense. The offense has more tools this year, but no great quarterback. He’s hoping the defense rules until he can draft his next good quarterback. If that’s his thinking, then he trades up to get the one he wants.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 25, 2021 6:16:20 GMT -5
According to Bedard, the Bucs and Patriots were both in on Suh and Guy and when Suh picked the Bucs, Guy returned to New England.
Speaking of the Bucs, can I now say “told you so” that they’d bring the band back? I mean it’s basically all back together there.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 25, 2021 8:42:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 25, 2021 9:06:57 GMT -5
According to Bedard, the Bucs and Patriots were both in on Suh and Guy and when Suh picked the Bucs, Guy returned to New England. Speaking of the Bucs, can I now say “told you so” that they’d bring the band back? I mean it’s basically all back together there. You only get one and you already got it! Yeah I didn't think they'd give out a one year deal to Gronk with four voidable years to make his cap hit 3 million on a ten million dollar contract. I didn't think Gronk would want to make it that much harder if he wants to come back for another year. I didn't envision so many voidable years, like the three with Brady that results in massive cap savings. I didn't see Shaq Barrett taking a deal that basically means he's going to be cut after two years given what he could have got from other teams. If you thought they were going to use voidable years in almost every deal to reach savings no one predicted congratulations. I've never seen an NFL team use so many voidable years in my life. It's like Hockey years ago before they banned those crazy long deal with low salaries in years they would never play to lower the AAV. That sucks because Suh is what we needed, he can actually dominate games unlike Guy. If you could have signed Suh, then draft Parsons they might have had the leagues best D.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 25, 2021 9:22:19 GMT -5
According to Bedard, the Bucs and Patriots were both in on Suh and Guy and when Suh picked the Bucs, Guy returned to New England. Speaking of the Bucs, can I now say “told you so” that they’d bring the band back? I mean it’s basically all back together there. You only get one and you already got it! Yeah I didn't think they'd give out a one year deal to Gronk with four voidable years to make his cap hit 3 million on a ten million dollar contract. I didn't think Gronk would want to make it that much harder if he wants to come back for another year. I didn't envision so many voidable years, like the three with Brady that results in massive cap savings. I didn't see Shaq Barrett taking a deal that basically means he's going to be cut after two years given what he could have got from other teams. If you thought they were going to use voidable years in almost every deal to reach savings no one predicted congratulations. I've never seen an NFL team use so many voidable years in my life. It's like Hockey years ago before they banned those crazy long deal with low salaries in years they would never play to lower the AAV. That sucks because Suh is what we needed, he can actually dominate games unlike Guy. If you could have signed Suh, then draft Parsons they might have had the leagues best D. Just making sure - i didn’t think i got credit fir it last time so I wanted to make sure I got it... it’s not often my predictions are correct so I need to cash in when they are 🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 26, 2021 12:31:46 GMT -5
Jimmy G coming back shortly...
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 26, 2021 12:56:36 GMT -5
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,814
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Mar 26, 2021 13:10:42 GMT -5
If they need a veteran QB to pair with their QB draftee, wouldn't Cam Newton going back to SF in a deal (along with draft picks) for Garropolo fit the bill? I mean it seems obvious that SF is moving on from Jimmy G sooner than later and the Pats at this point want him to be their starting QB for the long-term. I can't help but wonder if the Pats would be better off simply finding a way to draft Mac Jones and start anew. Upon reading other stories, to even get Mac Jones the Pats would have to give up a lot just to trade up to get him. This doesn't bode well for the Patriots to get their QB of the future and then present situation doesn't exactly inspire and unless the 49ers are getting a lot back there's no real reason for them to downgrade their season with Jimmy G to go to Cam. Feels like the Pats are boxed in.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,045
|
Post by mobaz on Mar 26, 2021 13:18:15 GMT -5
Miami traded back up to 6, which pulls Philly out of the QB market. Hot spot will be Atlanta at 4 and then I bet Panthers take Mac Jones at 8 (if they don't move up to 4). Atlanta might wait until pick time to see who falls if they have a preference on a Ryan replacement. Kudos to SF for being aggressive this early, but puts the Pats in a bind until/unless Jimmy G ends up on the table. Still don't know how they fit him (Trade Gilmore, renegotiate McCourty/Hightower/Mason?).
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 26, 2021 14:34:06 GMT -5
If they need a veteran QB to pair with their QB draftee, wouldn't Cam Newton going back to SF in a deal (along with draft picks) for Garropolo fit the bill? I mean it seems obvious that SF is moving on from Jimmy G sooner than later and the Pats at this point want him to be their starting QB for the long-term. I can't help but wonder if the Pats would be better off simply finding a way to draft Mac Jones and start anew. Upon reading other stories, to even get Mac Jones the Pats would have to give up a lot just to trade up to get him. This doesn't bode well for the Patriots to get their QB of the future and then present situation doesn't exactly inspire and unless the 49ers are getting a lot back there's no real reason for them to downgrade their season with Jimmy G to go to Cam. Feels like the Pats are boxed in. I don't think they'd want Newton, nor do I think Bill wants to trade him. Newton is Jimmy insurance given the way he gets injured. The easiest way is that Jimmy restructures, say add on a few years and I've always thought Gilmore could be the key to getting him. Gilmore isn't just a draft pick, he's a massive upgrade for them at a position where they have a need. Yet if there plan was to trade up to get a QB, then trade Jimmy why didn't they sign a backup? There plan may very well be to keep Jimmy for another year to groom the guy they draft and he'd be their insurance policy. So no I don't think this means as much as some do. How do you rate the QBs? Because right now it seems like three are going in the first three picks. Most have Lawrence and Wilson as the top two, after that it gets tricky. The 49ers have been linked to Fields, yet maybe they want Mac Jones. Look at the costs they just set the market with, 3 first round picks and a third to jump up 9 spots. Then Dolphins paid a first and switching lower picks to move up 6 spots. To make matters worse, it now appears both Darnold and Jimmy won't be traded, just messing up the supply and demand even more. The draft just got a whole lot more interesting and it’s still a month plus out.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 26, 2021 15:03:32 GMT -5
If they need a veteran QB to pair with their QB draftee, wouldn't Cam Newton going back to SF in a deal (along with draft picks) for Garropolo fit the bill? I mean it seems obvious that SF is moving on from Jimmy G sooner than later and the Pats at this point want him to be their starting QB for the long-term. I can't help but wonder if the Pats would be better off simply finding a way to draft Mac Jones and start anew. Upon reading other stories, to even get Mac Jones the Pats would have to give up a lot just to trade up to get him. This doesn't bode well for the Patriots to get their QB of the future and then present situation doesn't exactly inspire and unless the 49ers are getting a lot back there's no real reason for them to downgrade their season with Jimmy G to go to Cam. Feels like the Pats are boxed in. I don't think they'd want Newton, nor do I think Bill wants to trade him. Newton is Jimmy insurance given the way he gets injured. The easiest way is that Jimmy restructures, say add on a few years and I've always thought Gilmore could be the key to getting him. Gilmore isn't just a draft pick, he's a massive upgrade for them at a position where they have a need. Yet if there plan was to trade up to get a QB, then trade Jimmy why didn't they sign a backup? There plan may very well be to keep Jimmy for another year to groom the guy they draft and he'd be their insurance policy. So no I don't think this means as much as some do. How do you rate the QBs? Because right now it seems like three are going in the first three picks. Most have Lawrence and Wilson as the top two, after that it gets tricky. The 49ers have been linked to Fields, yet maybe they want Mac Jones. Look at the costs they just set the market with, 3 first round picks and a third to jump up 9 spots. Then Dolphins paid a first and switching lower picks to move up 6 spots. To make matters worse, it now appears both Darnold and Jimmy won't be traded, just messing up the supply and demand even more. The draft just got a whole lot more interesting and it’s still a month plus out. Or it opened the doors for the Jets to have to trade us Darnold.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 26, 2021 15:04:48 GMT -5
Or maybe the Jets don’t want to draft a QB
|
|
|
Post by rasimon on Mar 26, 2021 18:12:51 GMT -5
the way I read this is, if SF releases Jimmy G, they take a $2.8MM cap hit and then any team can sign him as a FA for whatever it takes to sign him. If another team were to trade for Jimmy G, then that team would need to pay him $25.5MM for 2021 and $25.6MM for 2022 to keep him. Why should BB trade for him? why not just wait for SF to release him? www.spotrac.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/jimmy-garoppolo-14472/Second question: is Jimmy G really a substantial improvement over Cam? Just asking...
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 26, 2021 18:12:52 GMT -5
Playoff Lenny back in Tampa... i remember when he was getting 8m a year in free agency. 🤷🏻♂️
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 15,867
Member is Online
|
Post by cdj on Mar 26, 2021 20:37:16 GMT -5
the way I read this is, if SF releases Jimmy G, they take a $2.8MM cap hit and then any team can sign him as a FA for whatever it takes to sign him. If another team were to trade for Jimmy G, then that team would need to pay him $25.5MM for 2021 and $25.6MM for 2022 to keep him. Why should BB trade for him? why not just wait for SF to release him? www.spotrac.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/jimmy-garoppolo-14472/Second question: is Jimmy G really a substantial improvement over Cam? Just asking... They’d have him restructure the deal in the trade but yeah, clearly the release is the ideal way to get him
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on Mar 27, 2021 0:10:08 GMT -5
So I watched Kellen Mond's tape. Was on my list, yet after seeing someone rank him fourth I moved him up.
Better than I expected, like I don't agree with my draft magazines ranking him 4/5th round. Watch his highlights and you think he's first round talent. Athletic, can move around, really run it and has very good arm strength. Can make NFL throws and has really improved from his early years.
Watch the Bama tape highlights, again why isn't he a first/second round guy? Watch advanced film breaking down his NFL level throws, he makes a ton of them. Now watch Bama tape, every play of his in that game. There it is, his mechanics can breakdown and result in a lot of bad throws. I mean BAD throws, like not even close. Both Bama and senior bowl he starts out slow and then gets going. When he's right he looks like a 1st/2nd round guy, when he's off he doesn't look like he belongs in the NFL.
Mac Jones and Trask put on clinics with accuracy compared to Mond. Yet Mond is a much better athlete with a stronger arm. Second most game played of any QB in the draft. He's got starter upside, it's just can you improve his mechanics, his feet and coach him up more on advanced stuff?
You watch Mac Jones/Trask and you see Patriot type QBs. Advanced level QBs that really run an offense that are highly accurate. The misses are close, very few horrible balls. Mond had like 15 horrible throws versus just Bama, yet also some really good NFL quality ones. I can see it, yet your drafting him with the hopes of what you can make him into, how much you believe in the player and his ability to keep getting better. I can certainly see someone ranking him over Trask based on upside, yet if you rank him over Fields/Lance that says more about them than him.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 27, 2021 5:59:47 GMT -5
So I watched Kellen Mond's tape. Was on my list, yet after seeing someone rank him fourth I moved him up. Better than I expected, like I don't agree with my draft magazines ranking him 4/5th round. Watch his highlights and you think he's first round talent. Athletic, can move around, really run it and has very good arm strength. Can make NFL throws and has really improved from his early years. Watch the Bama tape highlights, again why isn't he a first/second round guy? Watch advanced film breaking down his NFL level throws, he makes a ton of them. Now watch Bama tape, every play of his in that game. There it is, his mechanics can breakdown and result in a lot of bad throws. I mean BAD throws, like not even close. Both Bama and senior bowl he starts out slow and then gets going. When he's right he looks like a 1st/2nd round guy, when he's off he doesn't look like he belongs in the NFL. Mac Jones and Trask put on clinics with accuracy compared to Mond. Yet Mond is a much better athlete with a stronger arm. Second most game played of any QB in the draft. He's got starter upside, it's just can you improve his mechanics, his feet and coach him up more on advanced stuff? You watch Mac Jones/Trask and you see Patriot type QBs. Advanced level QBs that really run an offense that are highly accurate. The misses are close, very few horrible balls. Mond had like 15 horrible throws versus just Bama, yet also some really good NFL quality ones. I can see it, yet your drafting him with the hopes of what you can make him into, how much you believe in the player and his ability to keep getting better. I can certainly see someone ranking him over Trask based on upside, yet if you rank him over Fields/Lance that says more about them than him. This is partly where you can only learn so much from tape. Talent 1000% matters but without knowing the person, the work ethic, drive, intelligence, etc, it’s all kind of meaningless. So many first round busts are because of the headspace and inner drive, not talent. Add: I want them to take Jones at 15 but if they don’t, I’ll be happy with a stud pick up at 15 and Mond in the 2/3.
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Mar 27, 2021 6:36:27 GMT -5
I really think Mac Jones will be available at 15, although his impressive pro day might change that. I am onboard with taking him there and would also be happy with another impact guy. Some have Parsons falling that far or maybe Payne or Rousseau. Please stay away from a WR though, too much bad history, as in like cursed.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,045
|
Post by mobaz on Mar 27, 2021 6:51:45 GMT -5
I really think Mac Jones will be available at 15, although his impressive pro day might change that. I am onboard with taking him there and would also be happy with another impact guy. Some have Parsons falling that far or maybe Payne or Rousseau. Please stay away from a WR though, too much bad history, as in like cursed. The Herald's Andrew Callahan said a few weeks ago (and he has some Penn St connections) that Parsons would "not be a program fit" in New England. He has well known off the field issues and some that seem to be less well know. I'll pass. Waiting on a WR in the 2nd or 3rd works for me!
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Mar 27, 2021 7:50:25 GMT -5
I would like a WR but as the roster sits currently, there is no room for a higher round receiver to be drafted. They’d have to trade Harry or Meyers first or gulp, move on from Edelman.
|
|
|