SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 14, 2024 10:49:28 GMT -5
Premise 1: Having a strong bullpen is extremely important. Premise 2: Bullpens are totally unpredictable. Conclusion: They should do what they can to improve the bullpen, but building a powerhouse bullpen should never be the centerpiece of an offseason strategy.
Just look at how things have gone the last two years. Not only did they invest big in the bullpen, to the tune of $25 million/year for Jansen and Martin; those investments actually worked. Jansen was very good, and Martin was great to phenomenal. Yet their bullpen ERA was 24th in the majors this season and 20th last season. It was great for long stretches (6th in the majors through June this season, in fact), but injuries and bouts of ineffectiveness did them in both years.
|
|
|
Post by taiwansox on Oct 14, 2024 11:33:08 GMT -5
Premise 1: Having a strong bullpen is extremely important. Premise 2: Bullpens are totally unpredictable. Conclusion: They should do what they can to improve the bullpen, but building a powerhouse bullpen should never be the centerpiece of an offseason strategy. Just look at how things have gone the last two years. Not only did they invest big in the bullpen, to the tune of $25 million/year for Jansen and Martin; those investments actually worked. Jansen was very good, and Martin was great to phenomenal. Yet their bullpen ERA was 24th in the majors this season and 20th last season. It was great for long stretches (6th in the majors through June this season, in fact), but injuries and bouts of ineffectiveness did them in both years. A large part of the bullpen failures has been lack of depth. Our bullpen was centered around two guys over the age of 36 and a rule 5 pick. Not that we should have signed someone like Hader, but there’s more options this off-season. Everything else is moot if we don’t have 3 dependable guys in the bullpen, but maybe they feel better about someone breaking out internally.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 14, 2024 12:46:26 GMT -5
Premise 1: Having a strong bullpen is extremely important. Premise 2: Bullpens are totally unpredictable. Conclusion: They should do what they can to improve the bullpen, but building a powerhouse bullpen should never be the centerpiece of an offseason strategy. Just look at how things have gone the last two years. Not only did they invest big in the bullpen, to the tune of $25 million/year for Jansen and Martin; those investments actually worked. Jansen was very good, and Martin was great to phenomenal. Yet their bullpen ERA was 24th in the majors this season and 20th last season. It was great for long stretches (6th in the majors through June this season, in fact), but injuries and bouts of ineffectiveness did them in both years. Fenway is an extreme hitter's park, so I wouldn't just look at ERA ranking. They finished 14th in WAR.
I mostly agree with your framing. They were excellent up until the trade deadline and horrendous after it. In totality it was about average. Of the specific guys who stunk after the deadline (there were a lot), I would say only Bailey Horn and Brad Keller were not reasonable guys to have pitching relief innings for you. Keller was acting as a starter with an opener. I would be wary of overindexing on the last two months.
|
|
|
Post by patford on Oct 14, 2024 14:09:12 GMT -5
Premise 1: Having a strong bullpen is extremely important. Premise 2: Bullpens are totally unpredictable. Conclusion: They should do what they can to improve the bullpen, but building a powerhouse bullpen should never be the centerpiece of an offseason strategy. Just look at how things have gone the last two years. Not only did they invest big in the bullpen, to the tune of $25 million/year for Jansen and Martin; those investments actually worked. Jansen was very good, and Martin was great to phenomenal. Yet their bullpen ERA was 24th in the majors this season and 20th last season. It was great for long stretches (6th in the majors through June this season, in fact), but injuries and bouts of ineffectiveness did them in both years. It depends on what a team's weakness is. With it becoming a trend starters often don't go more than five innings a robust bullpen is absolutely needed. Ian and Chris discussed on the recent pitching podcast the idea of having mop up types occupying a spot in the bullpen is a bad idea. A team carries a "long reliever" who is not very good or really not good at all to fill the role of going 5+ innings in a game where the starter blew up and the team is almost throwing in the towel and then the long reliever is taking up a spot but not available again for five days. These days we see teams in the post season employing bullpen games on a regular basis.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 14, 2024 15:22:52 GMT -5
Premise 1: Having a strong bullpen is extremely important. Premise 2: Bullpens are totally unpredictable. Conclusion: They should do what they can to improve the bullpen, but building a powerhouse bullpen should never be the centerpiece of an offseason strategy. Just look at how things have gone the last two years. Not only did they invest big in the bullpen, to the tune of $25 million/year for Jansen and Martin; those investments actually worked. Jansen was very good, and Martin was great to phenomenal. Yet their bullpen ERA was 24th in the majors this season and 20th last season. It was great for long stretches (6th in the majors through June this season, in fact), but injuries and bouts of ineffectiveness did them in both years. It depends on what a teams weakness is. With it becoming a trend starters often don't go more than five innings a robust bullpen is absolutely needed. Ian and Chris discussed on the recent pitching podcast the idea of having mop up types occupying a spot in the bullpen is a bad idea. A team carries a "long reliever" who is not very good or really not good at all to fill the role of going 5+ innings in a game where the starter blew up and the team is almost throwing in the towel and then the long reliever is taking up a spot but not available again for five days. These days we see teams in the post season employing bullpen games on a regular basis. Yes, that's why this was my first premise.
|
|
|
Post by johnnygooch on Oct 14, 2024 15:44:48 GMT -5
I think replacing Wong with a defensive minded catcher who can frame and steal strikes could help the bullpen a lot. Patrick Bailey obviously would be ideal but who knows if the Giants would give him up and this thread is about the rotation and bullpen haha.
I know the feeling is that we are going to go big this offseason and sign top guys, but in the past few years we've also made a lot of shrewd moves to identify players that have been injured or need to rebuild their value (Giolito, Hendriks, Paxton, maybe also could count Slaten and Whitlock who went unprotected because of injuries before their debut). I don't these sort of deals should stop any time soon just because we may be are spending more going forward and going for a division title. Shane Bieber would make a lot of sense on a 1+1 contract. Would like that to be in addition to a top of the rotation addition. Also Jonathan Loaisiga from the Yankees would be an awesome signing that would have the potential to boost our pen quite a bit. I also think we need another lefty in the pen so AJ Minter could work if a Tanner Scott deal doesn't seem likely.
I'm starting to feel like one of my more ideal outcomes of this offseason is something like this:
1: Fried 2: Houck 3: Bieber 4: Bello 5: Giolito
Bullpen: - Weissert - Whitlock - Penrod - Scott - Guerrero - Loaisiga - Hendriks - Slaten
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 14, 2024 17:30:43 GMT -5
I think replacing Wong with a defensive minded catcher who can frame and steal strikes could help the bullpen a lot. Patrick Bailey obviously would be ideal but who knows if the Giants would give him up and this thread is about the rotation and bullpen haha. I know the feeling is that we are going to go big this offseason and sign top guys, but in the past few years we've also made a lot of shrewd moves to identify players that have been injured or need to rebuild their value (Giolito, Hendriks, Paxton, maybe also could count Slaten and Whitlock who went unprotected because of injuries before their debut). I don't these sort of deals should stop any time soon just because we may be are spending more going forward and going for a division title. Shane Bieber would make a lot of sense on a 1+1 contract. Would like that to be in addition to a top of the rotation addition. Also Jonathan Loaisiga from the Yankees would be an awesome signing that would have the potential to boost our pen quite a bit. I also think we need another lefty in the pen so AJ Minter could work if a Tanner Scott deal doesn't seem likely. I'm starting to feel like one of my more ideal outcomes of this offseason is something like this: 1: Fried 2: Houck 3: Bieber 4: Bello 5: Giolito Bullpen: - Weissert - Whitlock - Penrod - Scott - Guerrero - Loaisiga - Hendriks - Slaten Please no more injury bounce-back pitchers. No on Bieber. We already have one in Giolito.
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 14, 2024 17:48:25 GMT -5
I'd be happy with:
Rotation 1. Fried/Snell 2. Houck 3. Bello 4. Giolito 5. Crawford Our starting pitching was decent last season, but Houck and (especially) Crawford eroded post-ASB, which may be attributed more to fatigue than anything, a problem that should be mitigated in 2025. Additionally, we had terrible depth until the very end of the season. Criswell was decent, but nothing after that. So, upgrade Pivetta (Fried/Snell) and bolster depth (done, more or less, given late season emergence of Fitts, Priester, and Dobbins)
Bullpen - Criswell - Whitlock - Hendriks - Slaten - 3 TBD (Williams/Hoffman/Martin/Soroka/Stanek/Minter/Treinen/Fulmer, if he's back) - 1 Closer (Scott/Robertson/Jansen) Agree 100% on depth problem here as well, which is why we sign 4 guys, a backfill AAA with quality arms like Guerrero, Penrod, and other experienced guys like Weissert, Kelly, Winckowski, etc. If we don't sign several arms, we'll be left with another season of subpar relief. We have the $$$ to invest in depth. Also, hard to get too confident about Whitlock, Hendriks and Fulmer, considering they'll be recovering from significant arm surgeries. It's 4 RPs or bust, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Soxfansince1971 on Oct 14, 2024 18:31:58 GMT -5
fWAR of the best starting pitcher on each of the LCS teams:
Dodgers - 3.8 Guardians - 3.3 Yankees - 2.9 Mets - 2.8
Houck - 3.9
It is kind of amazing the amount of talk concerning the starting rotation when the teams in the post season all have pretty "meh" rotations. I read yesterday that the Red Sox blew 16 saves after the All-Star break. A half way decent bullpen would have the Red Sox playing October baseball even with the same rotation.
|
|
|
Post by patford on Oct 14, 2024 19:44:53 GMT -5
It is kind of amazing the amount of talk concerning the starting rotation when the teams in the post season all have pretty "meh" rotations. I read yesterday that the blew 16 saves after the All-Star break. A half way decent bullpen would have the Red Sox playing October baseball even with the same rotation. There were also several games where the team didn't show much if any punch. A healthy Devers, Casas, Story and hopeful impacts from Campbell and Anthony would go a long way towards solving that. Yoshida was also pretty impressive once he was fully healthy and I don't buy into the idea a DH has to be a big HR guy. If a team has plenty of power a high average DH with 15-20 HR is totally fine.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Oct 14, 2024 20:38:07 GMT -5
Why wouldn't you be set on a top of rotation arm? When we are large market team so well below the cap and solid at nearly every roster spot so much so that we'd have to trade players to make room for 4 top 26 in all of baseball prospects. On top of that adding a TOR pitcher means all of our starters move down a spot and the rotation eats up more quality innings putting less pressure on the bullpen. Sign a relief pitcher and trade for one. Sign a quality veteran defensive catcher to a 2 year deal and in the unlikely chance Teel hits the ground running it allows you have the option to trade the FA catcher or Wong should they want to. I am under the assumption the front office isn’t going to spend over the first threshold until they see a winner with World Series type aspirations, so given that constraint, my preference is to fill other holes, namely the bullpen, while continuing to trust the pitching dev to identify and set in place performance plans to get the most out of those players. Not having a #1 is not ideal, we are in agreement there, but they can’t possibly fill every hole unless they make a big dent in their farm system, or going over the first threshold. I’d rather not to do the first yet, while it seems Henry is quite against the second scenario. My priorities would be the bullpen, defense, and depth. And my whole point is to not make any gaping holes in the roster for the big 4 to fill. They should have competent enough players in those spots that if any of them need the full year for development, it’s not a killer to the team like the Dalbec/Casas situation in ‘22. And even with that said, I don’t think any of them are blocked. Grissom/hamilton won’t stop Campbell, Rafaela/Yoshida aren’t blocking Anthony, and Wong/whatever defensive catcher they sign won’t be blocking Teel. Mayer is the most blocked, but the person blocking him has barely played a season full of games over the last 3 years, with Mayer having his own health concerns. And if those current MLB players over perform and any of the prospects do end up blocked, great! They have some good ammunition for the deadline. I would rather have too many competent players at a position than not enough. That, more than a lack of top of the rotation pitcher, has hurt the team these last few years. They have been plagued by a few positions over the last few years which has often led to the team’s downfall. Positions ranked 20th or lower by bWAR: 2022: RP, 1B, LF, CF, RF 2023: 2B, SS 2024: RP, C, 1B, 2B SP bWAR rank the last three years: 19th, 8th, 11th. Minimize those low spots and they likely make the playoffs a couple of those years even without a bonafide ace. Why are you under that assumption? You created the distance to the goal and frame everything around that. I think they are about 2 years away from being a serious contenders as even stud rookies take about 2 years to find their level. By that point we should have well above average players at most positions. Pitching is always the key in the postseason. We sign an ace and we are in the playoffs next year. Once the rookies bloom so does the whole team. In order to hit the ground running, they need to sign a TOTR pitcher either this year or next or they are wasting an opportunity. The ownership knows that interest in the club is waning without their own investments toward a winning product. After last years comments I understand mistrust in ownership, but I think they know they messed up and the comments made this year seem to be transparent so I'm expecting them to get at least another TOR type pitcher to be added. Some bullpen help and a veteran defensive catcher added
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,791
|
Post by asm18 on Oct 15, 2024 9:45:17 GMT -5
I wonder how much of an influence Driveline Founder and Breslow advisor Kyle Boddy has beyond incorporating their methods for improving performance in development - if Boddy is also advising in acquisitions we could see some surprising additions beyond the high name ID options we’ve been talking about for months
|
|
|
Post by dirtdog on Oct 16, 2024 14:18:56 GMT -5
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,646
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 16, 2024 14:34:19 GMT -5
Do we think Fulmer sticks this offseason? If I had to guess I'd say probably but I wouldn't be surprised either way.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Oct 16, 2024 14:49:42 GMT -5
Maybe this will make me look dumb but uhhh since when is Michael Fulmer in the org?
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 16, 2024 14:53:43 GMT -5
Do we think Fulmer sticks this offseason? If I had to guess I'd say probably but I wouldn't be surprised either way. Would be kinda weird to sign him to that deal, have year one of the recovery go well, and then not plan for him to make the 2025 opening day roster.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,646
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 16, 2024 15:02:28 GMT -5
Do we think Fulmer sticks this offseason? If I had to guess I'd say probably but I wouldn't be surprised either way. Would be kinda weird to sign him to that deal, have year one of the recovery go well, and then not plan for him to make the 2025 opening day roster. Fair point but it was just a minor league contract. I do think chances are he makes it and is worth keeping but it's also not out of the realm they can find an option they like better for the 40 man spot.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Oct 16, 2024 15:47:00 GMT -5
Would be kinda weird to sign him to that deal, have year one of the recovery go well, and then not plan for him to make the 2025 opening day roster. Fair point but it was just a minor league contract. I do think chances are he makes it and is worth keeping but it's also not out of the realm they can find an option they like better for the 40 man spot. I don't think you're disagreeing. I think the point is, if healthy and looking good, he's got the inside track. If he's not healthy or looks like crap, then yeah, you cut him loose.
|
|
|
Post by GyIantosca on Oct 16, 2024 16:07:46 GMT -5
I wonder if the fans will buy this if the team just maximizes there resources towards the rotation and bullpen and just promote these kids that are ready for the lineup. Unless a great trade comes up. Pretty much the kids plug the holes in this lineup. I mean I can be convinced.
|
|
|
Post by awalkinthepark on Oct 17, 2024 11:14:36 GMT -5
Watching the game last night and I'm still all for signing Walker Buehler. With the way his last few years have gone I have no idea what sort of contract he'll get but I can't imagine it will be too outrageous.
|
|
|
Post by kwodes on Oct 17, 2024 15:25:04 GMT -5
Watching the game last night and I'm still all for signing Walker Buehler. With the way his last few years have gone I have no idea what sort of contract he'll get but I can't imagine it will be too outrageous. I'd be all for a guy like buehler, but only if he was the 2nd SP they signed. I'd spend on Flaherty/Fried then look for a 2nd guy like buehler or bieber
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,646
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 17, 2024 20:04:10 GMT -5
Walk off HR tonight aside, maybe I'm crazy but I wouldn't be upset at the sox adding Holmes to the BP this offseason.
|
|
redsox04071318champs
Veteran
Always hoping to make my handle even longer...
Posts: 16,641
Member is Online
|
Post by redsox04071318champs on Oct 18, 2024 11:20:56 GMT -5
Walk off HR tonight aside, maybe I'm crazy but I wouldn't be upset at the sox adding Holmes to the BP this offseason. I wouldnt want him closing.
|
|
ematz1423
Veteran
Posts: 6,646
Member is Online
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 18, 2024 13:12:25 GMT -5
Walk off HR tonight aside, maybe I'm crazy but I wouldn't be upset at the sox adding Holmes to the BP this offseason. I wouldnt want him closing. Not going to disagree there but to fill the Martin role I'd take holmes for sure.
|
|
|
Post by kwodes on Oct 18, 2024 13:47:26 GMT -5
I wouldnt want him closing. Not going to disagree there but to fill the Martin role I'd take holmes for sure. he's the guy you can bring in in a clean inning or he'd be best used coming in with guys on base for a quick double play.
|
|
|