SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Predicting The 2025 Opening Day Roster
|
Post by chaimtime on Oct 14, 2024 12:55:18 GMT -5
On Max Fried, should we at all be concerned that his last two seasons have been: 2023 - 77.2 innings 2024 - a very sharp decline in xERA, as well a slight dip in whiff rate and K-rate. He’s still elite as always at getting ground balls and limiting hard contact, but isn’t the Breslow/Bailey/Willard philosophy come with an increased emphasis on swing and miss? I’d happily take him at the contract as laid out by julyanmorley (maybe not so much the Tim Britton valuation) but was expecting a little bit more under the hood for a guy who is going to get a huge payday: baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/max-fried-608331?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlbFried does not do very well on Stuff+ but does do very well on Driveline's "Arsenal+" metric, which as I understand it is measuring how much do his different pitches look the same at the batter's decision point and then act different after it. Yeah, he’s a throwback pitchability type. PitchingBot does grade his stuff decently well, though, for what it’s worth. 90th percentile exit velo every year since 2020, ground ball rate over 50% every year of his career. He’s hard to square up, and he has a knack for getting double play balls and strikeouts when he needs them. He’s pretty consistently outpitched his peripherals, so it seems to work for him. I think that sounds like a decent bet to age well and fit well at Fenway, but it’s reasonable to be wary of the middling Stuff+ and whiff rate numbers. At the end of the day, overpaying Max Fried by $3 million/year isn’t going to hamstring this team long term. There’s really no reason not to do it unless they really prefer another pitcher or they’re actually going to make a push for Soto.
|
|
|
Post by 61bosox on Oct 14, 2024 12:58:55 GMT -5
I wish I knew how Fenway Sports Group operates so I could adjust my expectations on FA and payroll spending accordingly. I assume that FSG investments in auto racing, Liverpool soccer, golf, Penguins etc were made possible by us Red Sox fans and the money machine that the Sox were in the early 2000s. In other words, Sox fans were subsidizing these other investments.
Does each part of FSG operate totally independently? How is the budget set for each entity? Do profits or losses from one team stay with that team? How much goes to FSG for them to play with? If investment is needed in the Sox, can money be siphoned from the other teams? I think they owe us!
Suppose FSG wants to buy the Celtics- will the owners raid the other entities budgets or use their profits to finance this?
Are the Sox a priority within FSG so we might have hope for a return to glory days? Just wondering.
|
|
|
Post by greatscottcooper on Oct 14, 2024 13:10:10 GMT -5
baring anything concerning on his physical Fried is probably getting something closer to 192/6
|
|
|
Post by finaliz3d on Oct 14, 2024 14:36:41 GMT -5
Not concerned with Fried, his FIP and xFIP were both 3.33 while the ERA was 3.25. He had a bad playoff game this year, but during the WS Atlanta won, he had a 4.23 ERA, but a 2.92 FIP and gave them three quality starts in that playoff run.
|
|
|
Post by samb on Oct 14, 2024 15:24:55 GMT -5
I know for these types of players it does not matter but Snell does not cost us a draft pick.
|
|
|
Post by orcoaster on Oct 14, 2024 21:11:58 GMT -5
I will be very surprised if the Red Sox sign any free agent starter over 30 years old -- except if the team deems itself one player away and that's "the guy." Schilling was signed for that reason and he was 37 (hard to believe.) Lester was 30 and they let him walk. Price was 30; he was deemed "the guy" but the team came to regret that contract. They traded for 28 year old Sale and did well; he was extended at 31 and it proved painful.
Last offseason they were enthusiastic about 25 year old Yamamoto, but lukewarm about the older SPs. I don't expect them to be aggressive at all with Snell, Fried, or Burnes. It's still a season or two too early for that.
|
|
|
Post by dirtywaterinla on Oct 14, 2024 22:00:30 GMT -5
I will be very surprised if the Red Sox sign any free agent starter over 30 years old -- except if the team deems itself one player away and that's "the guy." Schilling was signed for that reason and he was 37 (hard to believe.) Lester was 30 and they let him walk. Price was 30; he was deemed "the guy" but the team came to regret that contract. They traded for 28 year old Sale and did well; he was extended at 31 and it proved painful. Last offseason they were enthusiastic about 25 year old Yamamoto, but lukewarm about the older SPs. I don't expect them to be aggressive at all with Snell, Fried, or Burnes. It's still a season or two too early for that. Saying they were in on Yamamoto is definitely a stretch…
|
|
|
Post by sxfan on Oct 14, 2024 22:25:21 GMT -5
Most I'm going for Fried is 5 years say 130-140 million. After that it's a bad contract and move on. He'll be lucky to last 5 years even with his injury history.
See if the market plays into your hand on this one.
Don't want Snell. Don't want Burnes (I think Baltimore resigns him anyways. They love him down there).
|
|
|
Post by soxcontrol on Oct 15, 2024 0:59:46 GMT -5
Hi all, Long-time lurker on this forum and decided to finally throw my hat into the ring. Please let me know if a more extensive introduction is needed. I promise to limit the Dombrowski vs. Bloom pot stirring and will only ask for periodic updates on Noah Song. Qualifying offer decisions: - I would extend a QO to Nick Pivetta. I know this conversation is getting hashed out in another thread. And as others have pointed out there, Nick performs exceptionally well on the new-age pitch design metrics. For example, on the Pitching+ metric, Nick is tied with Zach Wheeler for the best score (108) and bests Dylan Cease (107), George Kirby (106), and Tarik Skubal (106). I expect another team will take a chance on Nick and will bank on the Red Sox' history of poor pitching development. I would expect Nick to receive a similarly sized contract to Chris Bassett's.
- I would not extend a QO to TON. I am concerned about his extensive injury history and do not expect TON to receive more than a 1-2 year deal. Also, Tyler was pretty mediocre at Fenway with a 40% strikeout rate and a WRC+ just slightly above average. Finally, his defense and speed are beginning to deteriorate. I think a LF with some ability to play first would fit the roster better.
Free agent signings / trades: - In an ideal-world, the Red Sox sign Soto to 12 / 500. I only give the Sox a 1/5 chance, with relatively even odds across the big market teams. The remaining items assume we miss out on signing Soto.
- A more likely scenario: sign Anthony Santander to 4 / 85. He offers similar traits to the current iteration of TON (29-year old, bat-first slugger who hits lefties well). But Santander offers greater durability and he has played an occasional first base
- Sign Nate Eovaldi to 3/63. I'd expect this signing will placate some of the fans calling for an ace
- Sign Andrew Kitteridge (2/10) and Caleb Ferguson (1/5). Both RP score well on the previously mentioned Stuff+ metrics and both relievers have experience in the AL east
- Sign Carson Kelly (3/15) and Danny Jansen (1/5). I like Connor Wong, but many of the top-performing teams continue to roll out defensive-specialist catchers. And I expect Teel will take over in late 2025. To minimize any turmoil with succession, I would trade Wong now to a team seeking an offensive-minded backup catcher
- Which transitions me to the aforementioned Connor Wong trade. Trade Wong to the Cubs for Brandon Birdsell and Keegan Thompson. The Cubs had horrific catcher production in 2024 (negative WAR with a 69 WRC+), and are generally over-indexed to defensive-first infielders. The Cubs are also facing a 40 man roster crunch.
- Another NL Central team also fits the Red Sox well - the Reds. The Reds are seeking an immediate overhaul of their outfield and have an abundance of young controllable pitchers. A trade of Rhett Lowder (20-25m surplus) for Wilyer (likely similar) would benefit both sides. I would attach Richard Fitts to facilitate this trade.
- Side note: I like the previously mentioned trade of Masa for Willson Contreras. As mentioned on the pod though, Masa's contract is underwater (likely 30m or so) with Contreras' contract only slightly (5m or so) underwater. To trade Masa for Willson would therefore require attaching a high-upside prospect (maybe Miguel Bleis?) and/or paying down Masa's contract. Alternative 1-1 fits for Masa could include Robbie Ray, Nick Castellanos, or Jordan Hicks. I'll also note that Luis Castillo's contract is heading underwater quickly.
Through these moves, the payroll for 2025 ends up back around $230m and the Red Sox maintain their prospect dry powder. On that front: I view Roman and Kristian as long-term blue chip stars. In contrast, Grissom and Marcelo are held back at AAA as top trade chips and additional infield redundancy.
Across items 2-7 above, the lineup would look like: Duran (CF) Devers (3B) Story (SS) Santander (LH/DH/1B) Casas (1B) Campbell (2nd) Masa (DH though would prefer Contreras) Kelly (C) Anthony/Refsnyder (RF/LF)
Bench: Jansen (C) Rafaela (Super) Hamilton (2nd/SS) Romy (IF)
Rotation: Eovaldi Houck Crawford Bello Giolito Lowder (AAA) Priester (AAA) Birdsell (AAA)
Bullpen: Kitteridge (RH) Hendricks (RH) Slaten (RH) Whitlock (RH) Ferguson (LH) Penrod (LH) Guerrero (RH) Bernie (LH)
|
|
|
Post by alexcorahomevideo on Oct 15, 2024 6:14:18 GMT -5
I will be very surprised if the Red Sox sign any free agent starter over 30 years old -- except if the team deems itself one player away and that's "the guy." Schilling was signed for that reason and he was 37 (hard to believe.) Lester was 30 and they let him walk. Price was 30; he was deemed "the guy" but the team came to regret that contract. They traded for 28 year old Sale and did well; he was extended at 31 and it proved painful. Last offseason they were enthusiastic about 25 year old Yamamoto, but lukewarm about the older SPs. I don't expect them to be aggressive at all with Snell, Fried, or Burnes. It's still a season or two too early for that. Saying they were in on Yamamoto is definitely a stretch… True. But at the same time, Yamamoto was a Dodger bag job. He was a Dodger as soon as Ohtani signed. Now if you want to criticize the Sox about an international pitcher, Imanaga would be more acceptable than Yamamoto.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by asm18 on Oct 15, 2024 7:25:49 GMT -5
soxcontrol - welcome!
That’s an interesting suggestion of Santander - he certainly is an alternative to the O’Neill, Teoscar group in free agency if they want someone in that group (or if they move Yoshida/Abreu etc). He’s a switch hitter, but would have to imagine his righty stats would be benefit from going from the farthest wall in baseball to the shortest.
I don’t know about him, Eovaldi, and Kittredge specifically, but I’d tend to agree that more moderate size free agent signings is more likely what we’re going to see. As you note it keeps the prospect powder dry, and they keep the money investment relatively short.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 15, 2024 7:39:12 GMT -5
Santander is a nice player, would be a solid short term fit with his switch hitting but I don't really see the Sox wanting to go four years on a guy like that nor should they IMO. I'd rather just keep Yoshida on his deal then to go after a guy like Santander on the deal outlined there.
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 15, 2024 9:25:59 GMT -5
I feel like the Pirates are going to be quite active on the trade market this offseason, and they would seem to match up well with us in some areas. They already have a starting rotation with Skenes, Jones, and Ortiz (all league minimum) at 1-3, and Keller at 4. Then they have Chandler, Braxton, and Harrington seemingly ready to burst on the scene in 2025. The problem is their lineup. They really need a lot of help. Would be a shame to let that rotation go to waste, so I feel like there's a sense of urgency to add quality in the lineup. But it's Pittsburgh, so they're not likely to spend on quality in the FA market. They have massive holes at 1B, 3B, and RF. Abreu could be a nice get for them, and I imagine they'd be all over Casas, too. They're also probably desperate to unload Hayes, who remains a stellar defender at 3B and a strong batter vs LHP, but was absolutely unplayable at the plate vs RHP last season. He's committed for five more seasons at 8.8M, which is a massive problem for a team that eschews spending. I imagine if a team were willing to take Hayes back in a deal (even if they end up DFA'ing him and swallowing the LT hit), they could buy some assets there. Not saying we should do that (there aren't many worse uses of an active roster spot than a 3B-only short-side-of-a-platoon player), but I could see one of the big spending clubs willing to swallow that whale to add value to a trade for one of the Pirates young SP studs. If Hayes doesn't rebound to at least prior year levels vs RHP next year, PIT may even just DFA him.
They were willing to trade Priester for Yorke, indicating their willingness to trade from strength, even for a mid-prospect like Yorke. I wonder if Abreu, who's a significantly better asset than Yorke (Wilyer would seem to be a consensus Top 100 guy if he were still eligible), could be swapped for Braxton. And we could backfill Abreu's spot on the roster with someone like Grichuk on a two-year deal--a competent RFer and a strong RHH bat who could slide into Refsnyder's role next year. We'd be trading on RF defense in exchange for another strong SP asset, but Grichuk's a decent fielder with OF versatility.
|
|
|
Post by Guidas on Oct 15, 2024 10:02:50 GMT -5
On Max Fried, should we at all be concerned that his last two seasons have been: 2023 - 77.2 innings 2024 - a very sharp decline in xERA, as well a slight dip in whiff rate and K-rate. He’s still elite as always at getting ground balls and limiting hard contact, but isn’t the Breslow/Bailey/Willard philosophy come with an increased emphasis on swing and miss? I’d happily take him at the contract as laid out by julyanmorley (maybe not so much the Tim Britton valuation) but was expecting a little bit more under the hood for a guy who is going to get a huge payday: baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/max-fried-608331?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Fried does not do very well on Stuff+ but does do very well on Driveline's "Arsenal+" metric, which as I understand it is measuring how much do his different pitches look the same at the batter's decision point and then act different after it. As I recall, Pivetta was a Stuff+ stud, FWIW. I like Fried but was this his first TJ? If so, I'm good with 5 years. Soto is the guy I want to be all in for. Even at $500M.
|
|
jimoh
Veteran
Posts: 4,173
|
Post by jimoh on Oct 15, 2024 10:15:17 GMT -5
I will be very surprised if the Red Sox sign any free agent starter over 30 years old -- except if the team deems itself one player away and that's "the guy." Schilling was signed for that reason and he was 37 (hard to believe.) Lester was 30 and they let him walk. Price was 30; he was deemed "the guy" but the team came to regret that contract. They traded for 28 year old Sale and did well; he was extended at 31 and it proved painful. Last offseason they were enthusiastic about 25 year old Yamamoto, but lukewarm about the older SPs. I don't expect them to be aggressive at all with Snell, Fried, or Burnes. It's still a season or two too early for that. Letting Lester go at 30 was a huge mistake; the hole his departure created led to other mistakes. Lester gave the Cubs 1002.2 innings over six years with a 3.86 ERA and 1.248 WHIP; only his age 36 year was poor. In his second year with the Cubs he was #2 for Cy Young, and another year #9. They should have offered Lester a big pile of money for 4-5 years.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 15, 2024 11:08:53 GMT -5
Hi all, Long-time lurker on this forum and decided to finally throw my hat into the ring. Please let me know if a more extensive introduction is needed. I promise to limit the Dombrowski vs. Bloom pot stirring and will only ask for periodic updates on Noah Song. Qualifying offer decisions: - I would extend a QO to Nick Pivetta. I know this conversation is getting hashed out in another thread. And as others have pointed out there, Nick performs exceptionally well on the new-age pitch design metrics. For example, on the Pitching+ metric, Nick is tied with Zach Wheeler for the best score (108) and bests Dylan Cease (107), George Kirby (106), and Tarik Skubal (106). I expect another team will take a chance on Nick and will bank on the Red Sox' history of poor pitching development. I would expect Nick to receive a similarly sized contract to Chris Bassett's.
- I would not extend a QO to TON. I am concerned about his extensive injury history and do not expect TON to receive more than a 1-2 year deal. Also, Tyler was pretty mediocre at Fenway with a 40% strikeout rate and a WRC+ just slightly above average. Finally, his defense and speed are beginning to deteriorate. I think a LF with some ability to play first would fit the roster better.
Free agent signings / trades: - In an ideal-world, the Red Sox sign Soto to 12 / 500. I only give the Sox a 1/5 chance, with relatively even odds across the big market teams. The remaining items assume we miss out on signing Soto.
- A more likely scenario: sign Anthony Santander to 4 / 85. He offers similar traits to the current iteration of TON (29-year old, bat-first slugger who hits lefties well). But Santander offers greater durability and he has played an occasional first base
- Sign Nate Eovaldi to 3/63. I'd expect this signing will placate some of the fans calling for an ace
- Sign Andrew Kitteridge (2/10) and Caleb Ferguson (1/5). Both RP score well on the previously mentioned Stuff+ metrics and both relievers have experience in the AL east
- Sign Carson Kelly (3/15) and Danny Jansen (1/5). I like Connor Wong, but many of the top-performing teams continue to roll out defensive-specialist catchers. And I expect Teel will take over in late 2025. To minimize any turmoil with succession, I would trade Wong now to a team seeking an offensive-minded backup catcher
- Which transitions me to the aforementioned Connor Wong trade. Trade Wong to the Cubs for Brandon Birdsell and Keegan Thompson. The Cubs had horrific catcher production in 2024 (negative WAR with a 69 WRC+), and are generally over-indexed to defensive-first infielders. The Cubs are also facing a 40 man roster crunch.
- Another NL Central team also fits the Red Sox well - the Reds. The Reds are seeking an immediate overhaul of their outfield and have an abundance of young controllable pitchers. A trade of Rhett Lowder (20-25m surplus) for Wilyer (likely similar) would benefit both sides. I would attach Richard Fitts to facilitate this trade.
- Side note: I like the previously mentioned trade of Masa for Willson Contreras. As mentioned on the pod though, Masa's contract is underwater (likely 30m or so) with Contreras' contract only slightly (5m or so) underwater. To trade Masa for Willson would therefore require attaching a high-upside prospect (maybe Miguel Bleis?) and/or paying down Masa's contract. Alternative 1-1 fits for Masa could include Robbie Ray, Nick Castellanos, or Jordan Hicks. I'll also note that Luis Castillo's contract is heading underwater quickly.
Through these moves, the payroll for 2025 ends up back around $230m and the Red Sox maintain their prospect dry powder. On that front: I view Roman and Kristian as long-term blue chip stars. In contrast, Grissom and Marcelo are held back at AAA as top trade chips and additional infield redundancy.
Across items 2-7 above, the lineup would look like: Duran (CF) Devers (3B) Story (SS) Santander (LH/DH/1B) Casas (1B) Campbell (2nd) Masa (DH though would prefer Contreras) Kelly (C) Anthony/Refsnyder (RF/LF)
Bench: Jansen (C) Rafaela (Super) Hamilton (2nd/SS) Romy (IF)
Rotation: Eovaldi Houck Crawford Bello Giolito Lowder (AAA) Priester (AAA) Birdsell (AAA)
Bullpen: Kitteridge (RH) Hendricks (RH) Slaten (RH) Whitlock (RH) Ferguson (LH) Penrod (LH) Guerrero (RH) Bernie (LH)
Meaty stuff! I have no idea what to make of Santander. On the one hand, he outperformed his xwOBA by 17 points this season, his career year. On the other hand, he had a preposterous .225 BABIP. But also he has only a .263 BABIP for his career. His baseballsavant page has a lot of red for 2024 but not so much for 2023. Fenway would have been one of his worst home run parks - only 31 expected there vs. his actual 44. But you'd have a very different approach at Fenway than Camden Yards, so that may be misleading. He's 29, which is the age when decline tends to set in, but he was sort of a late bloomer so maybe he's on a different aging curve. Unless he already is in decline; his xwOBAs have been pretty pedestrian the last two seasons. I would not be surprised if he was a top slugger for the next few years, nor would I be surprised if he totally flamed out. But $85 million would feel like a pretty big gamble to me.
I like the Wilyer + Fitts for Lowder idea. That seems like fair value to me, though I never really have any idea about these things.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 15, 2024 11:34:21 GMT -5
Wilyer for Lowder is my favorite fake trade. The Reds are perhaps the single most desperate team for a minimum salary OF.
Lowder and a mid tier signing like Pivetta or Eovaldi and I would love the rotation. Solid top five with multiple top 100 prospects in the process of graduating as depth
|
|
|
Post by sxfan on Oct 15, 2024 11:43:18 GMT -5
Fried does not do very well on Stuff+ but does do very well on Driveline's "Arsenal+" metric, which as I understand it is measuring how much do his different pitches look the same at the batter's decision point and then act different after it. As I recall, Pivetta was a Stuff+ stud, FWIW. I like Fried but was this his first TJ? If so, I'm good with 5 years. Soto is the guy I want to be all in for. Even at $500M. Regarding Soto. The most years this franchise has offered was Mookie at age 25. The most money offered was 320+ to Devers at age 26 for nine years. I think it's pretty unrealistic that the Sox offer 10-12 years at age 27 for Soto at 500 million. They'll probably be as "in it" as they were with Yamamoto I'm guessing. 450 million for 8 years sounds like what they'd go.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 15, 2024 11:52:19 GMT -5
As I recall, Pivetta was a Stuff+ stud, FWIW. I like Fried but was this his first TJ? If so, I'm good with 5 years. Soto is the guy I want to be all in for. Even at $500M. Regarding Soto. The most years this franchise has offered was Mookie at age 25. The most money offered was 320+ to Devers at age 26 for nine years.I think it's pretty unrealistic that the Sox offer 10-12 years at age 27 for Soto at 500 million. They'll probably be as in it ad the were with Yamamoto I'm guessing. 450 million for 8 years sounds like what they'd go. By this logic, should we only expect teams that have already offered $500 million contracts to be in the bidding for Soto?
You cited two examples that are actually the perfect precedents for why the Red Sox would be in on him. (Soto has not yet turned 26, fyi.)
|
|
|
Post by sxfan on Oct 15, 2024 12:15:32 GMT -5
Regarding Soto. The most years this franchise has offered was Mookie at age 25. The most money offered was 320+ to Devers at age 26 for nine years.I think it's pretty unrealistic that the Sox offer 10-12 years at age 27 for Soto at 500 million. They'll probably be as in it ad the were with Yamamoto I'm guessing. 450 million for 8 years sounds like what they'd go. By this logic, should we only expect teams that have already offered $500 million contracts to be in the bidding for Soto?
You cited two examples that are actually the perfect precedents for why the Red Sox would be in on him. (Soto has not yet turned 26, fyi.)
I expect the highest bidders to go beyond 500 million. Sorry about the age thing. Then yeah I can see the Sox going to nine years then, but not beyond that. The Sox have shown a unwillingness to go past the age of 35 on contracts for the most part. Why would the contracts I present serve as precedent? You're talking over 175 million for more years when when Soto is older than Mookie was when they offered him the only 10 year deal in team history?
|
|
|
Post by orcoaster on Oct 15, 2024 12:18:35 GMT -5
I will be very surprised if the Red Sox sign any free agent starter over 30 years old -- except if the team deems itself one player away and that's "the guy." Schilling was signed for that reason and he was 37 (hard to believe.) Lester was 30 and they let him walk. Price was 30; he was deemed "the guy" but the team came to regret that contract. They traded for 28 year old Sale and did well; he was extended at 31 and it proved painful. Last offseason they were enthusiastic about 25 year old Yamamoto, but lukewarm about the older SPs. I don't expect them to be aggressive at all with Snell, Fried, or Burnes. It's still a season or two too early for that. Letting Lester go at 30 was a huge mistake; the hole his departure created led to other mistakes. Lester gave the Cubs 1002.2 innings over six years with a 3.86 ERA and 1.248 WHIP; only his age 36 year was poor. In his second year with the Cubs he was #2 for Cy Young, and another year #9. They should have offered Lester a big pile of money for 4-5 years. You are correct. It was a mistake not to sign a hometown hero destined to have his number retired. I'm not saying it was the right move; I'm saying that's how this front office rolls. If the past is prologue, they are not signing a starter over 30 to a long term deal. Not this year.
|
|
|
Post by johnnygooch on Oct 15, 2024 12:18:48 GMT -5
As I recall, Pivetta was a Stuff+ stud, FWIW. I like Fried but was this his first TJ? If so, I'm good with 5 years. Soto is the guy I want to be all in for. Even at $500M. Regarding Soto. The most years this franchise has offered was Mookie at age 25. The most money offered was 320+ to Devers at age 26 for nine years. I think it's pretty unrealistic that the Sox offer 10-12 years at age 27 for Soto at 500 million. They'll probably be as "in it" as they were with Yamamoto I'm guessing. 450 million for 8 years sounds like what they'd go. Devers was 26 and was given a 10 year extension after we bought out his last year of arbitration, which adds up to making an 11 year guarantee to a 26 year old. Soto will play all of next year at 26 years old. If we're going with that logic, we probably would go for an 11 year deal for Soto. I would also think that it's not very farfetched that if we are actually going to be interested in Soto, that we would be willing to offer more years / money because of the fact that he is on track to be an inner circle hall of famer and one of the better all around hitters in league history.
|
|
|
Post by orcoaster on Oct 15, 2024 12:23:17 GMT -5
Saying they were in on Yamamoto is definitely a stretch… True. But at the same time, Yamamoto was a Dodger bag job. He was a Dodger as soon as Ohtani signed. Now if you want to criticize the Sox about an international pitcher, Imanaga would be more acceptable than Yamamoto. I think the Red Sox had serious interest in signing Yamamoto. Whether or not they had a chance to do so it's another question. Imanaga is 30. They're not keen on that.
|
|
|
Post by bg23 on Oct 15, 2024 12:34:48 GMT -5
Wilyer for Lowder is my favorite fake trade. The Reds are perhaps the single most desperate team for a minimum salary OF. Lowder and a mid tier signing like Pivetta or Eovaldi and I would love the rotation. Solid top five with multiple top 100 prospects in the process of graduating as depth It's not like the Reds have some surplus of young controllable arms. I would think the Reds probably say no pretty immediately even if a deal sweetener is added. 50-55 FV MLB ready arms don't grow on trees. It would cost a premium to get one.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 15, 2024 12:41:20 GMT -5
By this logic, should we only expect teams that have already offered $500 million contracts to be in the bidding for Soto?
You cited two examples that are actually the perfect precedents for why the Red Sox would be in on him. (Soto has not yet turned 26, fyi.)
I expect the highest bidders to go beyond 500 million. Sorry about the age thing. Then yeah I can see the Sox going to nine years then, but not beyond that. The Sox have shown a unwillingness to go past the age of 35 on contracts for the most part. Why would the contracts I present serve as precedent? You're talking over 175 million for more years when when Soto is older than Mookie was when they offered him the only 10 year deal in team history? So again, facts... Devers got a 10-year deal, it was for his age 27-36 seasons; plus the buyout of his last year of arb making it an 11-year deal. Going through Soto's age 36 season would make that an 11-year deal too. But Soto is a generational talent so it would stand to reason that they'd go for a longer deal than that.
In any case, you're missing the thrust of my comment, which is that you can't just look at precedent to determine what the Red Sox would do because a 26-year-old free agent who is a generational talent is basically an unprecedented situation. Here are all the 10+ year contracts that have gone to players who were at or near free agency (so not counting extensions for very young guys like Witt, Tatis, etc.):
Will Smith (Dodgers) Ohtani (Dodgers) Machado (Padres) Devers (Red Sox) Bogaerts (Padres) Turner (Phillies) Betts (Dodgers) Harper (Phillies) Lindor (Mets) Seager (Rangers) Trout (Angels) Stanton (Marlins) Cano (Mariners) Votto (Reds) Pujols (Angels) AlexRod (Yankees) Jeter (Yankees)
There are only 11 teams on this list - and the Red Sox are one of them!
Of these teams, by the way, I think we can safely cross the Marlins, Reds, Angels, Mariners, Rangers, and Padres off the list; and the Phillies and even Dodgers might have too much payroll tied up long term to make a run at Soto. That leaves the Mets, Yankees, and Red Sox as the most probable landing places for Soto.
Now I'd have the Red Sox comfortably behind both New York teams in likelihood to land him. Some other dark horse team like the Blue Jays or Cubs might emerge too. It's not likely that the Red Sox sign Soto. But the idea that they won't sign Soto because the Red Sox would never do something like that seems to be willfully ignoring history.
|
|
|