SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Predicting The 2025 Opening Day Roster
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 15, 2024 12:46:12 GMT -5
My guess on Soto is that it'll be a 5-6 team bidding war with the NYY & NYM the favorites, The Sox being involved and the Jays, Cubs and Nats as dark horses. As Incandenza points out how many large uber deals can the Phillies and Dodgers give out? Then again you can't rule either out.
|
|
|
Post by sxfan on Oct 15, 2024 12:51:44 GMT -5
Only way I see the Sox making a interesting Soto offer is if the Sox front load a deal.
3 years at 165 or 4 years at 215 on both. Opt outs after both those years on a 450 million dollar deal.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Oct 15, 2024 12:55:41 GMT -5
Wilyer for Lowder is my favorite fake trade. The Reds are perhaps the single most desperate team for a minimum salary OF. Lowder and a mid tier signing like Pivetta or Eovaldi and I would love the rotation. Solid top five with multiple top 100 prospects in the process of graduating as depth It's not like the Reds have some surplus of young controllable arms. I would think the Reds probably say no pretty immediately even if a deal sweetener is added. 50-55 FV MLB ready arms don't grow on trees. It would cost a premium to get one. I think you are underrating Wilyer here. He has 3.7 WAR and one year of service time. Spreadsheets will probably have Abreu a full win ahead of Lowder next year.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 11,540
|
Post by nomar on Oct 15, 2024 12:59:17 GMT -5
It's not like the Reds have some surplus of young controllable arms. I would think the Reds probably say no pretty immediately even if a deal sweetener is added. 50-55 FV MLB ready arms don't grow on trees. It would cost a premium to get one. I think you are underrating Wilyer here. He has 3.7 WAR and one year of service time. Spreadsheets will probably have Abreu a full win ahead of Lowder next year. Yeah I’m interested to see if they care more about limiting their payroll and go with a trade like this, or simply spend for someone like Santander. I like the trade idea but it does present the risk of losing big vs someone like Woo or Miller that you know is a solid MLB SP already (but whether Wilyer could net either of them is a better question)
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 15, 2024 13:02:04 GMT -5
It's not like the Reds have some surplus of young controllable arms. I would think the Reds probably say no pretty immediately even if a deal sweetener is added. 50-55 FV MLB ready arms don't grow on trees. It would cost a premium to get one. I think you are underrating Wilyer here. He has 3.7 WAR and one year of service time. Spreadsheets will probably have Abreu a full win ahead of Lowder next year. Yeah, I'm seeing Lowder prospect rankings in the 30-70 range. Where would Abreu rank now if he had prospect status? Certainly not below that range I don't think.
|
|
|
Post by greenmonster on Oct 15, 2024 13:27:13 GMT -5
My guess on Soto is that it'll be a 5-6 team bidding war with the NYY & NYM the favorites, The Sox being involved and the Jays, Cubs and Nats as dark horses. As Incandenza points out how many large uber deals can the Phillies and Dodgers give out? Then again you can't rule either out. I would guess that a "Mystery Team" will be in the mix
|
|
|
Post by sxfan on Oct 15, 2024 13:29:15 GMT -5
My guess on Soto is that it'll be a 5-6 team bidding war with the NYY & NYM the favorites, The Sox being involved and the Jays, Cubs and Nats as dark horses. As Incandenza points out how many large uber deals can the Phillies and Dodgers give out? Then again you can't rule either out. I think you're seriously underestimating Washington, too. They have zero payroll commitments (besides Strasbourg) and they've *already* made him a 440 million dollar offer. They've already said they're looking for middle of the order bats this off-season.
|
|
|
Post by abrinker on Oct 15, 2024 13:51:22 GMT -5
My guess on Soto is that it'll be a 5-6 team bidding war with the NYY & NYM the favorites, The Sox being involved and the Jays, Cubs and Nats as dark horses. As Incandenza points out how many large uber deals can the Phillies and Dodgers give out? Then again you can't rule either out. I think you're seriously understating Washington, too. They have zero payroll commitments (besides Strasbourg) and they've *already* made him a 440 million dollar offer. They've already said they're looking for middle of the order bats this off-season. Curious why Baltimore isn't mentioned here. New deep-pocketed owner. Still low payroll. Contention window now. They need starting pitching, too, but can you imagine that lineup? I wonder if Rubenstein would be interested in making a culture-altering splash, sending a signal to industry that Baltimore is willing to mix it up with anyone. They have a team that's already poised to compete year in and year out for the foreseeable future. Re-upping Burnes, bringing in another starter, and signing Soto would make them a juggernaut, perhaps unmatched other than by LAD. AL East is just brutal. After arb payroll factored in (based on MBLTR estimates), their total payroll will be $110M. They have sooooo much room to spend.
|
|
|
Post by itinerantherb on Oct 15, 2024 14:03:15 GMT -5
I think you are underrating Wilyer here. He has 3.7 WAR and one year of service time. Spreadsheets will probably have Abreu a full win ahead of Lowder next year. Yeah, I'm seeing Lowder prospect rankings in the 30-70 range. Where would Abreu rank now if he had prospect status? Certainly not below that range I don't think. Seriously underrating Wilyer is a favorite pastime among Sox fans. Given the bust/disappointment rate even among top 30 prospects, I have to think that someone who is guaranteed to be a 3+ WAR player (not that such guarantees exist with actual prospects) would be around #20 or higher. Personally, I put the chances that Mayer (#7 on MLB) outpaces Wilyer in WAR over their six years of control somewhat below 50%. Admittedly, I'm not that high on Mayer, but if you told me that he, Campbell, and Teel would each put up 3 to 4 WAR for six years, I'd be satisfied with Mayer and Teel and modestly disappointed with Campbell.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaydouble on Oct 15, 2024 14:14:45 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm seeing Lowder prospect rankings in the 30-70 range. Where would Abreu rank now if he had prospect status? Certainly not below that range I don't think. Seriously underrating Wilyer is a favorite pastime among Sox fans. Given the bust/disappointment rate even among top 30 prospects, I have to think that someone who is guaranteed to be a 3+ WAR player (not that such guarantees exist with actual prospects) would be around #20 or higher. Personally, I put the chances that Mayer (#7 on MLB) outpaces Wilyer in WAR over their six years of control somewhat below 50%. Admittedly, I'm not that high on Mayer, but if you told me that he, Campbell, and Teel would each put up 3 to 4 WAR for six years, I'd be satisfied with Mayer and Teel and modestly disappointed with Campbell. I think there is next to no chance that Teel ends up a consistent 4 WAR player. That would have made him the fourth best catcher in baseball this year, and all the guys ahead of him are either elite defensively or offensively. I frankly think he has a tough path to hitting 3 WAR with any regularity. Sure the bar is low to have a career at catcher, but there are very, very few guys who are able to be genuine stars at the position.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Oct 15, 2024 14:25:32 GMT -5
I like Abreu a lot but I don't know if folks are really underrating him, he's in my opinion the clear choice for an MLB player who should have good trade value and should be easiest to replace via Anthony or even Campbell. There is also the fact he's strictly a platoon guy at this point, they seem to think he's close to unplayable vs lefties.
|
|
|
Post by chaimtime on Oct 15, 2024 14:34:31 GMT -5
I think you are underrating Wilyer here. He has 3.7 WAR and one year of service time. Spreadsheets will probably have Abreu a full win ahead of Lowder next year. Yeah, I'm seeing Lowder prospect rankings in the 30-70 range. Where would Abreu rank now if he had prospect status? Certainly not below that range I don't think. Jacob Melton in the Astros system seems like a decent enough comp—guy with plus raw power and good swing decisions who should add value on the bases and in the field, but can’t hit lefties at all. Top 50 on Fangraphs, 89 on MLB, and not ranked by BA. That tracks with my read in Abreu’s value, which is that some teams are gonna value him a lot higher than others depending on how much stomach they have for the platoon issues and the swing and miss in his profile. Gold Glove defense certainly makes his profile more interesting, though.
|
|
|
Post by sxfan on Oct 15, 2024 15:02:21 GMT -5
I think you're seriously understating Washington, too. They have zero payroll commitments (besides Strasbourg) and they've *already* made him a 440 million dollar offer. They've already said they're looking for middle of the order bats this off-season. Curious why Baltimore isn't mentioned here. New deep-pocketed owner. Still low payroll. Contention window now. They need starting pitching, too, but can you imagine that lineup? I wonder if Rubenstein would be interested in making a culture-altering splash, sending a signal to industry that Baltimore is willing to mix it up with anyone. They have a team that's already poised to compete year in and year out for the foreseeable future. Re-upping Burnes, bringing in another starter, and signing Soto would make them a juggernaut, perhaps unmatched other than by LAD. AL East is just brutal. After arb payroll factored in (based on MBLTR estimates), their total payroll will be $110M. They have sooooo much room to spend. I think it's because they're going to try and resign Burnes this off-season. They have no one to replace him. That and the fact that Baltimore needs to extend Gunner Henderson. Offer him the moon. He'll be really expensive. Baltimore seems like a better favorite to sign Marcell Ozuna. They need a right handed thumper in the middle of their lineup and seemingly have a DH spot open. That thought is just as scary because Ozuna was one of the 5-10 best bats in MLB this past year.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by asm18 on Oct 15, 2024 15:21:40 GMT -5
There are only 11 teams on this list - and the Red Sox are one of them! [/div]
Of these teams, by the way, I think we can safely cross the Marlins, Reds, Angels, Mariners, Rangers, and Padres off the list; and the Phillies and even Dodgers might have too much payroll tied up long term to make a run at Soto. That leaves the Mets, Yankees, and Red Sox as the most probable landing places for Soto.
Now I'd have the Red Sox comfortably behind both New York teams in likelihood to land him. Some other dark horse team like the Blue Jays or Cubs might emerge too. It's not likely that the Red Sox sign Soto. But the idea that they won't sign Soto because the Red Sox would never do something like that seems to be willfully ignoring history.
[/quote] (Note apologies for botching the quote button) I mean… giving $300 million to Devers is a real data point. But the difference between what they paid him and what Soto might get could be like what, 150-200 million dollars more? (I’ve seen estimates of 450-500 mil but I don’t know what the spreadsheets say.) Like the difference being like 50% to 66% of the TOTAL value of the Devers deal? Maybe they value Soto at that number as both a baseball player and for brand/marketing purposes (which they should!), but that’s quiteeeee a large gap
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 15, 2024 15:27:32 GMT -5
As I said at the outset of this conversation - if you want to say that only teams that have a track record of making $500 million contract offers should be included in discussion of the Soto sweepstakes, you are going to run into a pretty obvious problem.
|
|
asm18
Veteran
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by asm18 on Oct 15, 2024 15:49:07 GMT -5
As I said at the outset of this conversation - if you want to say that only teams that have a track record of making $500 million contract offers should be included in discussion of the Soto sweepstakes, you are going to run into a pretty obvious problem.
To date I suppose that’s anyone who seriously bid on Ohtani - which weirdly enough did not include the Yankees, Mets, and Red Sox. 🤷♂️ Like you and many I don’t expect it to happen. I just want to see a little light flirting with Soto, that’s all I ask for. Buy him a drink, give him some compliments - we can get the ego boost, he can make his significant other Brian jealous for financial gain. Everyone wins! Just give me a meeting where he ambles around Fenway for like an hour before signing in New York for way more money
|
|
|
Post by bg23 on Oct 15, 2024 15:56:54 GMT -5
It's not like the Reds have some surplus of young controllable arms. I would think the Reds probably say no pretty immediately even if a deal sweetener is added. 50-55 FV MLB ready arms don't grow on trees. It would cost a premium to get one. I think you are underrating Wilyer here. He has 3.7 WAR and one year of service time. Spreadsheets will probably have Abreu a full win ahead of Lowder next year. Position player WAR and pitcher WAR rarely line up in trades. And that isn't even to mention Wilyer's platoon issues and overperforming on his xwOBA by 20 points. He is a very valuable player, and likely to be more valuable than Lowder in the coming years, but teams generally aren't willing to trade controllable pitching for equal value on the position player side. A more extreme example to show this: Jarren Duran was worth 8.7 bWAR/6.7 fWAR this year and has 4 years of control left, while Tarik Skubal was worth 6.3 bWAR/5.9 fWAR with two years of control left. Detroit would never trade Skubal for Duran, even though he is likely to accumulate much more WAR over his years of control. I think Wilyer is really good and very valuable. I just also think trading for controllable starting pitching is among the hardest things to do for a front office.
|
|
|
Post by alexcorahomevideo on Oct 15, 2024 17:38:30 GMT -5
True. But at the same time, Yamamoto was a Dodger bag job. He was a Dodger as soon as Ohtani signed. Now if you want to criticize the Sox about an international pitcher, Imanaga would be more acceptable than Yamamoto. I think the Red Sox had serious interest in signing Yamamoto. Whether or not they had a chance to do so it's another question. Imanaga is 30. They're not keen on that. True. But then again if they’re going to hold fast on that none of the FA starters will be a serious consideration. At some point they’ll need to bite the bullet again.
|
|
|
Post by jodyreidnichols on Oct 15, 2024 18:07:05 GMT -5
I think the Red Sox had serious interest in signing Yamamoto. Whether or not they had a chance to do so it's another question. Imanaga is 30. They're not keen on that. True. But then again if they’re going to hold fast on that none of the FA starters will be a serious consideration. At some point they’ll need to bite the bullet again. Unless Roki Sasaki can somehow get posted, but I still agree fully with your statement. If you build up a great farm system that's heavily weighed toward hitting your going to have to pay for pitching.
|
|
|
Post by bishop on Oct 15, 2024 19:01:35 GMT -5
Seriously underrating Wilyer is a favorite pastime among Sox fans. Given the bust/disappointment rate even among top 30 prospects, I have to think that someone who is guaranteed to be a 3+ WAR player (not that such guarantees exist with actual prospects) would be around #20 or higher. Personally, I put the chances that Mayer (#7 on MLB) outpaces Wilyer in WAR over their six years of control somewhat below 50%. Admittedly, I'm not that high on Mayer, but if you told me that he, Campbell, and Teel would each put up 3 to 4 WAR for six years, I'd be satisfied with Mayer and Teel and modestly disappointed with Campbell. I think there is next to no chance that Teel ends up a consistent 4 WAR player. That would have made him the fourth best catcher in baseball this year, and all the guys ahead of him are either elite defensively or offensively. I frankly think he has a tough path to hitting 3 WAR with any regularity. Sure the bar is low to have a career at catcher, but there are very, very few guys who are able to be genuine stars at the position. I don't think it's fair to judge Catcher's vs other positions on the WAR scale and do agree Teel (or any C) will have trouble consistently being a 4 WAR guy when all of 8 guys even topped 3 this year, but what makes you think he can't be an elite offensive one? Rutschman, Smith, Murphy were all between 120-126 wRC+, Teel's raked everywhere with the exception of like a 2 week stretch in AAA that may have been an adjustment period or may have just been a random 3/35 cold stretch. He even followed that up with a 1.058 OPS in September even if his overall AAA line still looks a little weak. (Defense who knows, so much of that is tied to pitch framing and I don't think there's any public and reliable data on MiLB catchers, all I'm confident in saying he'll be there is worse than Patrick Bailey but better than Connor Wong in 2024)
|
|
|
Post by fenwaydouble on Oct 15, 2024 19:52:03 GMT -5
I think there is next to no chance that Teel ends up a consistent 4 WAR player. That would have made him the fourth best catcher in baseball this year, and all the guys ahead of him are either elite defensively or offensively. I frankly think he has a tough path to hitting 3 WAR with any regularity. Sure the bar is low to have a career at catcher, but there are very, very few guys who are able to be genuine stars at the position. I don't think it's fair to judge Catcher's vs other positions on the WAR scale and do agree Teel (or any C) will have trouble consistently being a 4 WAR guy when all of 8 guys even topped 3 this year, but what makes you think he can't be an elite offensive one? Rutschman, Smith, Murphy were all between 120-126 wRC+, Teel's raked everywhere with the exception of like a 2 week stretch in AAA that may have been an adjustment period or may have just been a random 3/35 cold stretch. He even followed that up with a 1.058 OPS in September even if his overall AAA line still looks a little weak. (Defense who knows, so much of that is tied to pitch framing and I don't think there's any public and reliable data on MiLB catchers, all I'm confident in saying he'll be there is worse than Patrick Bailey but better than Connor Wong in 2024) I think his minor league stats are inflated by insane BABIPs. His good eye at the plate will help him get on base, but his combination of meh K-rates and only okay power/exit velos make it hard for me to see a ton of upside there. If the Big 4 all had equal trade value (which they obviously don’t) and I had to trade one, I’d deal Teel first 100 time out of 100 even with the lack of catching options in the system. You’re right that I probably shouldn’t speculate much on his framing abilities, as I’m not an expert. If he’s elite there this conversation changes very quickly - but FWIW I’ve seen him in person several times and it’s never felt like I’m watching a superb defender back there. But I’m derailing the wrong thread here, so apologies everyone!
|
|
|
Post by finaliz3d on Oct 15, 2024 21:38:32 GMT -5
With Teel right, there are three catchers with 4 WAR per year over the last three years (Raleigh, Rutschman, Contreras). Six catchers have had 3.5 WAR per year over the last three years (The previous three, plus Murphy, Smith, Realmuto). On average, a 3 WAR player over the last three years would be equivalent to Willson Contreras who had 8.9 WAR, I think he can get to at least being a 2-3 WAR player assuming he develops the way we expect him too, with a chance to become a 4 WAR player, but there's probably also a risk that he only becomes a replacement level catcher, and that's just because he's still a prospect and you never know.
I get the argument about Wilyer that he's put up 3 WAR, but that's also one of the best outcomes considering his projections... like his ceiling was being a 1-3 WAR player according to this site, and he hit 3 WAR this year. Mayer being a 3 WAR player is about an average outcome based on his potential. Anthony being a 3 WAR player would be a slight disappointment.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 15, 2024 21:57:45 GMT -5
One thing about this conversation is that I don't think WAR has any idea how to deal with catchers.
|
|
|
Post by fenwaydouble on Oct 16, 2024 7:20:09 GMT -5
One thing about this conversation is that I don't think WAR has any idea how to deal with catchers. On the one hand that might be true, especially with regard to framing. On the other hand, this is starting to feel like a catch-all argument people use when they don’t like what WAR is telling them. “I don’t think WAR has any idea how to deal with 𝚍̶𝚎̶𝚜̶𝚒̶𝚐̶𝚗̶𝚊̶𝚝̶𝚎̶𝚍̶ 𝚑̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚝̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶, 𝚛̶𝚎̶𝚕̶𝚒̶𝚎̶𝚏̶ 𝚙̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚌̶𝚑̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶, 𝚞̶𝚝̶𝚒̶𝚕̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚢̶ 𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶,𝚝̶𝚠̶𝚘̶-̶𝚠̶𝚊̶𝚢̶ 𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶,̶ 𝚐̶𝚞̶𝚢̶𝚜̶ ̶𝚠̶𝚑̶𝚘̶ ̶𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶ ̶𝚛̶𝚒̶𝚐̶𝚑̶𝚝̶ ̶𝚏̶𝚒̶𝚎̶𝚕̶𝚍̶ ̶𝚋̶𝚞̶𝚝̶ ̶𝚊̶𝚛̶𝚎̶ ̶𝚜̶𝚝̶𝚛̶𝚘̶𝚗̶𝚐̶ ̶𝚎̶𝚗̶𝚘̶𝚞̶𝚐̶𝚑̶ ̶𝚍̶𝚎̶𝚏̶𝚎̶𝚗̶𝚍̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶ ̶𝚝̶𝚑̶𝚊̶𝚝̶ ̶𝚝̶𝚑̶𝚎̶𝚢̶ ̶𝚌̶𝚘̶𝚞̶𝚕̶𝚍̶ ̶𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶ ̶𝚌̶𝚎̶𝚗̶𝚝̶𝚎̶𝚛̶ ̶𝚏̶𝚒̶𝚎̶𝚕̶𝚍̶, 𝚃̶𝙾̶𝚁̶ ̶𝚙̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚌̶𝚑̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶, catchers.” And while we have evidence that teams feel this way about some of these (they really do “overpay” for aces according to WAR), there doesn’t seem to be any sort of premium on catchers who are only pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by incandenza on Oct 16, 2024 8:58:59 GMT -5
One thing about this conversation is that I don't think WAR has any idea how to deal with catchers. On the one hand that might be true, especially with regard to framing. On the other hand, this is starting to feel like a catch-all argument people use when they don’t like what WAR is telling them. “I don’t think WAR has any idea how to deal with 𝚍̶𝚎̶𝚜̶𝚒̶𝚐̶𝚗̶𝚊̶𝚝̶𝚎̶𝚍̶ 𝚑̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚝̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶, 𝚛̶𝚎̶𝚕̶𝚒̶𝚎̶𝚏̶ 𝚙̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚌̶𝚑̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶, 𝚞̶𝚝̶𝚒̶𝚕̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚢̶ 𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶,𝚝̶𝚠̶𝚘̶-̶𝚠̶𝚊̶𝚢̶ 𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶,̶ 𝚐̶𝚞̶𝚢̶𝚜̶ ̶𝚠̶𝚑̶𝚘̶ ̶𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶ ̶𝚛̶𝚒̶𝚐̶𝚑̶𝚝̶ ̶𝚏̶𝚒̶𝚎̶𝚕̶𝚍̶ ̶𝚋̶𝚞̶𝚝̶ ̶𝚊̶𝚛̶𝚎̶ ̶𝚜̶𝚝̶𝚛̶𝚘̶𝚗̶𝚐̶ ̶𝚎̶𝚗̶𝚘̶𝚞̶𝚐̶𝚑̶ ̶𝚍̶𝚎̶𝚏̶𝚎̶𝚗̶𝚍̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶ ̶𝚝̶𝚑̶𝚊̶𝚝̶ ̶𝚝̶𝚑̶𝚎̶𝚢̶ ̶𝚌̶𝚘̶𝚞̶𝚕̶𝚍̶ ̶𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚊̶𝚢̶ ̶𝚌̶𝚎̶𝚗̶𝚝̶𝚎̶𝚛̶ ̶𝚏̶𝚒̶𝚎̶𝚕̶𝚍̶, 𝚃̶𝙾̶𝚁̶ ̶𝚙̶𝚒̶𝚝̶𝚌̶𝚑̶𝚎̶𝚛̶𝚜̶, catchers.” And while we have evidence that teams feel this way about some of these (they really do “overpay” for aces according to WAR), there doesn’t seem to be any sort of premium on catchers who are only pretty good. I don't really dislike the conclusions WAR comes to. I just think the role of the catcher - game-calling, pitch-framing - is inherently hard to measure. Even stuff like throwing out base-stealers and blocking pitches is highly dependent on the pitchers they're working with.
The market signals are interesting to note. But it's possible that in such an analytic age the teams themselves are unwilling to pay a premium for good catchers because they themselves have a hard time measuring their value. (Though you do occasionally see a commitment that goes beyond what WAR would imply would be reasonable, like the Astros with Maldonado.)
|
|
|