SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Verdugo Extension Discussion
|
Post by bloomstaxonomy on Feb 20, 2023 16:27:02 GMT -5
With a report today that Verdugo desires a long-term contract and approached ownership about one, how do we feel about investing in his future? I remember there wasn’t much appetite for it after last year, but the BSOHL stories have materialized already.
What are the chances we’d be able to “buy-low” before he has a career year and his contract prospects increase dramatically? Is that a gamble we’d even feel confident about?
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Feb 20, 2023 16:33:55 GMT -5
Verdugo's got 10 million or so coming in arb next year. I'd guess his first three FA years project to be worth about 5 WAR. So something like 4/55 is about fair value. Verdugo strikes me as a guy that might accept a lousy deal though tbh.
|
|
|
Post by blizzards39 on Feb 20, 2023 17:07:43 GMT -5
Verdugo's got 10 million or so coming in arb next year. I'd guess his first three FA years project to be worth about 5 WAR. So something like 4/55 is about fair value. Verdugo strikes me as a guy that might accept a lousy deal though tbh. I like your number, but I could see the team offering something like 3/$24 with a 4th year option for $10. Bloom seems to think that ~2WAR players are highly fungible, so I'd guess he either low balls Verdugo or is content with the 2 years of control he does have and doesn't make an offer at all. No way he signs for anything near that. If AV continues to be 1.5-2 war it’s whatever. The gamble is can he breakout and become a better player. It’s an unanswerable question. At 4/60 you’re paying for 6 war or 4 years. That’s very probable. Also dosnt make the deal all that good considering cheaper options. But what if AV “figures it out”. Has all the talent to do so.
|
|
|
Post by julyanmorley on Feb 20, 2023 18:00:58 GMT -5
I'd offer him jlebowski's deal except I'd throw in an additional $6 million signing bonus to double his salary this year
|
|
|
Post by bloomstaxonomy on Feb 20, 2023 18:43:57 GMT -5
His performance has been inconsistent, but I think there’s another level there that has yet to be unlocked. I also think he’s a good fit for the team and for the city. He brings a certain energy. He’s got that dog in him.
The dog in me (Courage the Cowardly Dog) makes me want to wait a year before committing to an extension, to see if he can walk the walk. But I’d still find out if he’d take a home town discount before the end of spring training.
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on Feb 20, 2023 23:21:21 GMT -5
I'd offer him jlebowski's deal except I'd throw in an additional $6 million signing bonus to double his salary this year Would that affect this year's cap? I think that's around the right number, whether the bonus folded into the future salaries or separated out. Why would he take it? Well, if he stinks or gets seriously injured, he's guaranteed $30m more than what he has now (which is about $10m w/o endorsements, minus fancy cars and homes), whereas if he just plays out his arb years and is either bad or hurt, he'd probably wind up with about $8m max, followed by maybe a show-me contract from somewhere. That's more or less worst-case scenario. But if he really figures something out and has a breakout, he gets the $30m plus a crack at FA as a 29/30-yo who's just broken out, so he probably winds up in the high 8-figures/low 9-figures in total. If he "bets on himself" and doesn't agree to that extension, and has a breakout, he probably ends up in a similar neighborhood with a big arb raise and his subsequent contract. So by signing that extension, he would raise his floor earnings significantly while his ceiling earnings would be around the same. At least that's how I'd pitch it to him as a GM. Do I believe that he's worth the risk? I think so. The main reward with him is that he taps into some real power and I think it's possible, maybe a 30-40% probability. He's not a bad hitter, he just hasn't reached the type of power potential that it seems like he has. And it's not like the system is bursting at the seams with can't-miss OFs who are close to the majors. Do you wait a year to see how Rafaela and Abreu progress and risk that Doogie breaks out this year and his price goes way up? I don't really see the need to wait with Hernandez and Duvall coming off the books this year and Yoshida no guarantee to stay in the OF. Still, AV's production at the plate has been declining steadily since he got here, which is not how it's supposed to work from age 24 to 26 and he's not exactly JBJ with the leather. I might actually just abide by the dude's 3/$24m...
|
|
|
Post by wcsoxfan on Feb 21, 2023 0:13:31 GMT -5
For me, it's completely tied to his speed.
Over the past 4 seasons:
2019: 27.4 (ft/s), 4.23 (HP to 1st), 0.6 (BsR) 2020: 27.5 (ft/s), 4.25 (HP to 1st), 1.1 (BsR) 2021: 27.0 (ft/s), 4.33 (HP to 1st), 2.0 (BsR) 2020: 26.8 (ft/s), 4.38 (HP to 1st), -1.1 (BsR)
He was an average defender in CF/RF in 2019 & 2020, but if he remains average-to-below in speed, or gets even slower with age, then he will have to stick to left where they just invested in Yoshida (and would prefer Yoshida isn't a full-time DH).
Maybe it's the extra weight he put on and he will now make sure to consistently be in the BSOHL; or maybe he was dealing with nagging injuries and he will be healthier going forward; Or maybe he's just slowing earlier than typical mid-20s outfielders.
If I'm the Red Sox and I see that his speed is back to 2020 levels and I'm confident that he's fully committed, then he would be well worth the investment. Otherwise, I let him play-it-out and even consider trading him and filling RF with another player. 1.5-2 WAR OFers are easy to find and aren't worth double-digit long-term contracts.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Feb 21, 2023 13:12:28 GMT -5
Verdugo strikes me as a guy that might accept a lousy deal though tbh. Wait, WHAT? What gives you that impression?
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,039
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 21, 2023 13:51:00 GMT -5
Unless he wants to sign for something around 7m annually, then I'm saying no to Verdugo. He's a fine enough player, but this team needs to allocate resources to real impact players. Guys like Verdugo should be easily replaced by a good GM.
|
|
|
Post by freddysthefuture2003 on Feb 21, 2023 13:59:22 GMT -5
Unless he wants to sign for something around 7m annually, then I'm saying no to Verdugo. He's a fine enough player, but this team needs to allocate resources to real impact players. Guys like Verdugo should be easily replaced by a good GM. Easily replaced? Find me an acquirable 2 WAR outfielder who plays 145+ games, and for your $7m threshold.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,039
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Feb 21, 2023 14:49:57 GMT -5
Unless he wants to sign for something around 7m annually, then I'm saying no to Verdugo. He's a fine enough player, but this team needs to allocate resources to real impact players. Guys like Verdugo should be easily replaced by a good GM. Easily replaced? Find me an acquirable 2 WAR outfielder who plays 145+ games, and for your $7m threshold. If you have to pay real money on a guy like Verdugo, in your outfield, then you’re drafting and development sucks. He’s not a guy you spend money on for a long term contract unless it’s very team friendly.
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,075
|
Post by cdj on Feb 21, 2023 14:58:04 GMT -5
Doogie gonna put up 3+ WAR this year
Seems like the kind of guy that isn’t bothered by the spotlight, I want him around long term.
|
|
|
Post by wcsoxfan on Feb 21, 2023 15:05:55 GMT -5
Unless he wants to sign for something around 7m annually, then I'm saying no to Verdugo. He's a fine enough player, but this team needs to allocate resources to real impact players. Guys like Verdugo should be easily replaced by a good GM. Easily replaced? Find me an acquirable 2 WAR outfielder who plays 145+ games, and for your $7m threshold. This off-season there were 9 free agent outfielders who had more fWAR than Verdugo in the 2022 season. 3 of these outfielders (Carpenter, Peterson, Peralta) received AAVs on their contracts (1-2 years) lower than 7mil while a 4th (Profar) appears set to join them. We can hope Verdugo improves going forward (I think he will at least a bit) but if he doesn't, he's very easily replaceable.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Feb 21, 2023 15:11:34 GMT -5
Easily replaced? Find me an acquirable 2 WAR outfielder who plays 145+ games, and for your $7m threshold. This off-season there were 9 free agent outfielders who had more fWAR than Verdugo in the 2022 season. 3 of these outfielders (Carpenter, Peterson, Peralta) received AAVs on their contracts (1-2 years) lower than 7mil while a 4th (Profar) appears set to join them. We can hope Verdugo improves going forward (I think he will at least a bit) but if he doesn't, he's very easily replaceable. Those guys are all, at minimum, four years older than Verdugo, though. Carpenter is in his late 30's and was pretty much an afterthought in the league until he went nuclear for a stretch last year. They may be equivalent players based on last year's production but the market will not value them equally moving forward.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Feb 21, 2023 15:14:13 GMT -5
I wish there was a poll function that operated outside of the first comment in the post, because I'd be interested to see the result of who'd be interested in Verdugo at, say, 3/33. I think that's pretty fair value and would probably take it in a heartbeat, but it seems like there are people somehow opposed. Worst case, it's extremely tradeable.
|
|
|
Post by ematz1423 on Feb 21, 2023 15:21:13 GMT -5
Easily replaced? Find me an acquirable 2 WAR outfielder who plays 145+ games, and for your $7m threshold. If you have to pay real money on a guy like Verdugo, in your outfield, then you’re drafting and development sucks. He’s not a guy you spend money on for a long term contract unless it’s very team friendly. Herein lies the rub, I'm not going to say their drafting and development has "sucked" but other than Rafaela they currently don't have anyone else in the upper minors who I would look at and say he can replace Verdugo and they won't skip a beat. The good news is they have two years before they need to replace Verdugo if they don't try and sign him to an extension so perhaps a guy like Bleis pushes the issue and becomes that guy. I think I am in the camp of lets see what Verdugo does this year before approaching him about an extension, the flipside there is if he has a good 2.5-3+ WAR type of year he probably isn't going to be giving any team discounts and if he's 2 or less then as has been said is it really worth signing him to an extension unless it's very team friendly?
|
|
|
Post by wcsoxfan on Feb 21, 2023 15:40:42 GMT -5
This off-season there were 9 free agent outfielders who had more fWAR than Verdugo in the 2022 season. 3 of these outfielders (Carpenter, Peterson, Peralta) received AAVs on their contracts (1-2 years) lower than 7mil while a 4th (Profar) appears set to join them. We can hope Verdugo improves going forward (I think he will at least a bit) but if he doesn't, he's very easily replaceable. Those guys are all, at minimum, four years older than Verdugo, though. Carpenter is in his late 30's and was pretty much an afterthought in the league until he went nuclear for a stretch last year. They may be equivalent players based on last year's production but the market will not value them equally moving forward. No, but 'youth' wasn't in question, so you're completely missing the point and creating a new narrative. Verdugo, as he was in 2022, is very easily replaceable. His youth gives reason for optimism that he will improve, but if he doesn't, there will be a few outfielders available every off-season who can do what he's been doing for similar money. So you don't give him more money/years unless you're confident he will improve. As mentioned, 1.5-2 WAR outfielders are very easy to find, even for less than 7mil a year.
|
|
nomar
Veteran
Posts: 10,825
Member is Online
|
Post by nomar on Feb 21, 2023 15:45:38 GMT -5
Doogie gonna put up 3+ WAR this year Seems like the kind of guy that isn’t bothered by the spotlight, I want him around long term. He needs to prove he can stick in Fenway’s RF long term before making that commitment IMO. I hope he takes the next step though. It does feel like there is another level for him to get to, but right now extending a LHH that might be LF only here doesn’t seem like the safest thing, especially with so many LHH in our long term scope (Devers, Yoshida, Casas, Mayer, and the big dogs on campus… Kavadas and Valdez)
|
|
cdj
Veteran
Posts: 14,075
|
Post by cdj on Feb 21, 2023 16:07:36 GMT -5
Doogie gonna put up 3+ WAR this year Seems like the kind of guy that isn’t bothered by the spotlight, I want him around long term. He needs to prove he can stick in Fenway’s RF long term before making that commitment IMO. I hope he takes the next step though. It does feel like there is another level for him to get to, but right now extending a LHH that might be LF only here doesn’t seem like the safest thing, especially with so many LHH in our long term scope (Devers, Yoshida, Casas, Mayer, and the big dogs on campus… Kavadas and Valdez) He would definitely have to earn it, this front office isn’t just gonna toss away dollars. But I do think he will earn it.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Feb 21, 2023 16:12:59 GMT -5
Those guys are all, at minimum, four years older than Verdugo, though. Carpenter is in his late 30's and was pretty much an afterthought in the league until he went nuclear for a stretch last year. They may be equivalent players based on last year's production but the market will not value them equally moving forward. No, but 'youth' wasn't in question, so you're completely missing the point and creating a new narrative. Verdugo, as he was in 2022, is very easily replaceable. His youth gives reason for optimism that he will improve, but if he doesn't, there will be a few outfielders available every off-season who can do what he's been doing for similar money. So you don't give him more money/years unless you're confident he will improve. As mentioned, 1.5-2 WAR outfielders are very easy to find, even for less than 7mil a year. I'm pretty sure 4 guys being available doesn't really qualify as "easy to find", but whatever. Youth absolutely factors into it because with Verdugo you are paying him with the understanding that his performance is likely to sustain or improve, you aren't paying a 35 year old hoping he gets better, you're doing it praying he can hang on. There's only one person here trying to force a narrative, partner, and it ain't me.
|
|
|
Post by scottysmalls on Feb 21, 2023 16:31:23 GMT -5
My take is we should have a pretty good sense half way through the season on if this is worthwhile or not. Mostly to me it's about how his defense looks, if he can fix that trend I'd sign up for three more years at $10-$15 each (higher end would also depend on his hitting being more like a 110 wRC+)
|
|
|
Post by freddysthefuture2003 on Feb 21, 2023 16:31:45 GMT -5
No, but 'youth' wasn't in question, so you're completely missing the point and creating a new narrative. Verdugo, as he was in 2022, is very easily replaceable. His youth gives reason for optimism that he will improve, but if he doesn't, there will be a few outfielders available every off-season who can do what he's been doing for similar money. So you don't give him more money/years unless you're confident he will improve. As mentioned, 1.5-2 WAR outfielders are very easy to find, even for less than 7mil a year. I'm pretty sure 4 guys being available doesn't really qualify as "easy to find", but whatever. Youth absolutely factors into it because with Verdugo you are paying him with the understanding that his performance is likely to sustain or improve, you aren't paying a 35 year old hoping he gets better, you're doing it praying he can hang on. There's only one person here trying to force a narrative, partner, and it ain't me. Matt Carpenter is your example for an outfielder who could replace Verdugo? In 12 years, he's played 40 total games there, give me a break with that. Same with Peterson, guy hasn't played more than 30 games in the OF since 2018. You just gave me 2 infielders on the back 9 of their careers. By that logic, may as well trade Verdugo and plug Brandon Crawford in right field next offseason
|
|
|
Post by oldfaithful2019 on Feb 21, 2023 16:34:38 GMT -5
I wish there was a poll function that operated outside of the first comment in the post, because I'd be interested to see the result of who'd be interested in Verdugo at, say, 3/33. I think that's pretty fair value and would probably take it in a heartbeat, but it seems like there are people somehow opposed. Worst case, it's extremely tradeable. 3/36 that kicks in for the 2024 season sounds about right. That's Renfroe money. That buys us 2 yrs of his FA years and means a dependable, but far from elite, corner OF at a decent cost. To your point, this should be a very tradeable contract if he gets pushed out of the way.
|
|
|
Post by wcsoxfan on Feb 21, 2023 17:09:40 GMT -5
Matt Carpenter is your example for an outfielder who could replace Verdugo? In 12 years, he's played 40 total games there, give me a break with that. Same with Peterson, guy hasn't played more than 30 games in the OF since 2018. You just gave me 2 infielders on the back 9 of their careers. By that logic, may as well trade Verdugo and plug Brandon Crawford in right field next offseason Assuming Crawford is a pretty good defender in the OF, which I bet he would be with a little practice, then yes, he could probably match or exceed Verdugo's overall production from last year. That's just another example of how easy it is to find that level of corner outfielder. I'm pretty sure 4 guys being available doesn't really qualify as "easy to find", but whatever. Youth absolutely factors into it because with Verdugo you are paying him with the understanding that his performance is likely to sustain or improve, you aren't paying a 35 year old hoping he gets better, you're doing it praying he can hang on. There's only one person here trying to force a narrative, partner, and it ain't me. 1 guy being available for less than 7mil is 'easy to find' - you only need 1. 4 is ridiculously easy to find. I'm not sure what your deal is with bringing up Verdugo's ag oe over and over - it's not what we're discussing and is very troll-ish. Please make a separate post with your case of why Verdugo will be better, or whatever it is you're after, rather than trying to change the narrative of a discussion.
|
|
|
Post by thegoodthebadthesox on Feb 21, 2023 17:18:01 GMT -5
Matt Carpenter is your example for an outfielder who could replace Verdugo? In 12 years, he's played 40 total games there, give me a break with that. Same with Peterson, guy hasn't played more than 30 games in the OF since 2018. You just gave me 2 infielders on the back 9 of their careers. By that logic, may as well trade Verdugo and plug Brandon Crawford in right field next offseason Assuming Crawford is a pretty good defender in the OF, which I bet he would be with a little practice, then yes, he could probably match or exceed Verdugo's overall production from last year. That's just another example of how easy it is to find that level of corner outfielder. I'm pretty sure 4 guys being available doesn't really qualify as "easy to find", but whatever. Youth absolutely factors into it because with Verdugo you are paying him with the understanding that his performance is likely to sustain or improve, you aren't paying a 35 year old hoping he gets better, you're doing it praying he can hang on. There's only one person here trying to force a narrative, partner, and it ain't me. 1 guy being available for less than 7mil is 'easy to find' - you only need 1. 4 is ridiculously easy to find. I'm not sure what your deal is with bringing up Verdugo's ago over and over - it's not what we're discussing and is very troll-ish. Please make a separate post with your case of why Verdugo will be better, or whatever it is you're after, rather than trying to change the narrative of a discussion. I'm pretty sure adding context to your very narrow-minded view of the situation isn't changing the narrative, and calling it trollish is extremely laughable, all things considered. Considering 1 available player "easy to find", let alone 4, when there are 29 other teams that are theoretically vying for those players, is pretty hilarious. Thanks for the chuckles!
|
|
|