SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2014 New England Patriots Thread
|
Post by jmei on Nov 6, 2014 17:28:42 GMT -5
You're right, if you think the results from the first nine weeks of the season are not relevant to this discussion, then there's not much else to discuss.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 6, 2014 21:26:22 GMT -5
Yea if you could simply measure who's better going forward by a statistic then we can just look up the leaders. Unfortunately, football doesn't work that way. It's not statistic based like baseball is as it's all small samples and ever evolving.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 6, 2014 22:58:11 GMT -5
Yea if you could simply measure who's better going forward by a statistic then we can just look up the leaders. Unfortunately, football doesn't work that way. It's not statistic based like baseball is as it's all small samples and ever evolving. That's not entirely true, the main difference is that football fans seem to overreact more to recent hot or cold streaks. Of course it's "not statistic based like baseball", because it takes 10 seasons to get a sample size as large as 1 baseball season. However, there are advanced scouting measurements and yes even statistics that are pretty much reliable. I say let's wait and see how the D does against TY Hilton and Andrew Luck. Hilton is a short, explosive players who should give them all sort of fits, and Luck is a QB who can actually get him the ball. As much as the Chiefs game shouldn't be the end of the world, the recent awesome play shouldn't crown them SB champs.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 7, 2014 5:26:33 GMT -5
If you think week 9 DVO stats or stats of any kind matter in football then it's really not worth discussing. BB uses the first part of the season to build and later his teams. Those stats are heavily influenced by that. It's not the same defense, not even close - despite losing Mayo they are much stronger today. I wouldn't go so far as to say the stats don't matter at all, but I do understand the sentiment. BB does mention the reduced preseason (since the 2011 CBA) quite often, and one certainly gets the feeling that while some coaches prepare their teams to be fully ready by week 1, BB doesn't make compromises and that means sometimes the Patriots are fully ready only by week 6 or so. You guys are talking about the defense, but I think it can be seen even more clearly with the offense - one of the most visible differences between now and the beginning of the season is how smoothly the no-huddle hurry-up offense works. It feels like every season I'm expecting them to be able to do it in week 1, and then it just isn't there yet and they go at a snail's pace. But once that locomotive picks up steam, it's unstoppable. As for TY Hilton? He has 3 touchdowns this season. He is certainly an explosive player and there are good reasons to assume he will pick up the pace, but I'll be so bold as to say it's not going to happen against the Pats.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 7, 2014 9:28:58 GMT -5
Hilton will be a tough match-up but Indy has no run game outside of Luck and fortunately he tries to not run much. His mobility and general awesomeness will be a challenge. He does turn it over quite a bit though so that should be something the Patriots can capitalize on.
This team is coming together nicely, but they are fragile. Gronk goes down again, the offense is in major trouble. They aren't a Super Bowl lock (no team ever is), with him let alone without. I do. Not expect the Patriots to even end up with the number 1 seed in the AFC. It's going to be difficult to get thru @indy, @gb and @sd. There's most likely at least one loss there and then the three division games and Detroit is no picnick. Fortunately, the Jets are only away game.
Denver hasn't been good on the road,but they won't lose to Oakland. That leaves KC, SD and Cincy on the road. KC and Cincy are very hard places to win, but I'd expect only 1 loss tops from them.
This Indy game and every Conference game from here on out, is a game that needs to be won if you want a shot at home field.
Last thing I'll say on this. It's not that statistical analysis has no place in football. It's that in this case, 9 weeks into a season, they aren't predictive of the future or reliably representative of where a team is right now. You have to watch the games, see the changes and the schemes and watch how the piece work as a whole. Manning threw for well over 400 yards and was only sacked once, which makes a defense not look so good on paper. In reality the defense was great.
|
|
|
Post by xxdamgoodxx on Nov 9, 2014 8:09:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 14, 2014 8:38:12 GMT -5
This is a good read on Ayers/Ninkovich and the Patriots Defense. nesn.com/2014/11/akeem-ayers-rob-ninkovich-make-patriots-defense-tough-to-predict/It highlights what I was saying before about players fitting into schemes and the versatility of the Patriots defense. While some look at Ayers as a nothing player "because he was so cheap to acquire", the early returns look like much more than that. When he was first acquired, I expected nothing, but just two games in its clear he was a very shrewd move. How good he can be for the Pats is to be determined, but this is the same coach who turned nobodies, at a similar position,like Pfifer, Vrable and Ninkovich into household names. Obviously, you can't pronounce something like that after two games, but you can rewrite your possible outcomes. The Denver performance alone was worth the trade down, now is all just gravy and its nice to know his versatility fits well, his knees are healthy, he picks things up quickly and he has a legit pedigree (high pick) to fall back on.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 16, 2014 15:30:48 GMT -5
Let's go Rams!
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 16, 2014 17:37:27 GMT -5
A Patriots loss to Indy would devastate hole field - they need to win tonight for so many reasons
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 16, 2014 21:55:44 GMT -5
In a parallel world where Bill Cowher somehow is coaching the Patriots he is flat out choking Tom Brady right now. Still very well positioned to win this, but Jesus Christ what a stupid throw.
EDIT: On a bright side, tremendous job by the D on Hilton. That was my main concern (small quick receiver) and they're holding up extremely well.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 16, 2014 22:05:01 GMT -5
Not just one but two stupid throws by Brady. Our secondary has been a bit inconsistent, so we are pretty lucky the Colts only have 10 points.
Fortunately our running game is working great, leave out the interceptions and we should be able to score 20+ points in the 2nd half if necessary.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 16, 2014 23:38:39 GMT -5
Great game! Weird saying this after the Miami game, but we are out muscling everybody right now.
|
|
|
Post by pedroelgrande on Nov 16, 2014 23:52:10 GMT -5
Jonas Gray is still running...
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 17, 2014 9:25:45 GMT -5
Another great performance by the defense. Basically, only gave up 13 points as Brady gift wrapped 7. That no safety call was either a bogus rule or a piss poor interpretation of the rule, which actually preceded the other touchdown drive.
In any event, people need to start taking notice that this defense is legit even if it doesn't have the star names of some of these others. They fit together well and BB and MP are doing a good job scheming it up which helps separate this group as well.
Branch was a force on the line last night which was encouraging but so was everyone so can't get too excited. It's s positive sign.
Praying for good health the rest of the way.
On a side note: gronk isn't human and the Patriots need to start treating him differently to protect him. That TD was amazing but stupid and dangerous and not necessary. Jumping into the end zone like that was scary and he shouldn't have been in the game at that point. He only knows one speed which makes him great and is why the coaches need to protect him.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 17, 2014 11:13:41 GMT -5
The running back glorification hype machine is operating at full capacity, Peter King at the helm. Just like in baseball, sportswriters are oblivious to what every GM knows. The 20th-highest paid RB in the league makes $3.33m/year, and the 20th-highest paid OL in the league makes $7.5m/year.
I mean, Jonas Gray did a pretty decent job, granted. But as Collinsworth explained, all he was doing was hitting the hole that was supposed to be there when the play got drawn up. And why were those holes always there and never stuffed? Because the OL and TEs did such a great job.
I didn't have a problem with Gronk's leap into the endzone - and by the way, awesome block by Edelman on that play - but I expect he will get a pretty hefty fine for driving Sergio Brown into a camera.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on Nov 17, 2014 11:24:26 GMT -5
That no safety call was either a bogus rule or a piss poor interpretation of the rule, which actually preceded the other touchdown drive. It was the correct call, it was very clearly not a safety. Come on man, don't get greedy (:
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 17, 2014 12:41:38 GMT -5
That no safety call was either a bogus rule or a piss poor interpretation of the rule, which actually preceded the other touchdown drive. It was the correct call, it was very clearly not a safety. Come on man, don't get greedy (: I'm fully admitting it may be the RIGHT call, but IF it is the right call, then it's a bad rule. That ball clearly without question was not going into the end zone without the help of the Colts. You are not allowed to bring the ball back into the end zone as a return team and get a touchback, it's a safety. Now perhaps the rule allows for them to "muff" it into the end zone and not be penalized, but that's just dumb. I'm not mad about it; just pointing out how stupid that is.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 17, 2014 12:50:58 GMT -5
The running back glorification hype machine is operating at full capacity, Peter King at the helm. Just like in baseball, sportswriters are oblivious to what every GM knows. The 20th-highest paid RB in the league makes $3.33m/year, and the 20th-highest paid OL in the league makes $7.5m/year. I mean, Jonas Gray did a pretty decent job, granted. But as Collinsworth explained, all he was doing was hitting the hole that was supposed to be there when the play got drawn up. And why were those holes always there and never stuffed? Because the OL and TEs did such a great job. I didn't have a problem with Gronk's leap into the endzone - and by the way, awesome block by Edelman on that play - but I expect he will get a pretty hefty fine for driving Sergio Brown into a camera. I think most writers realize that running backs shouldn't be paid a lot since there are a lot of them who can adequately fill in and their shelf lives are so short. That doesn't mean having a stud running back isn't extremely valuable. The Chiefs would be ordinary without Charles, instead they are a threat for the number 1 seed in the AFC. You are underselling some of those Jonas Gray runs though. Brandon Bolden would not have run for close to that yardage. The line did a tremendous job and this isn't to take away from that. The Colts also did a poor job. However, Gray got extra yards constantly and that run on third down directly preceding the TD by Tim Wright was all Jonas Gray. He should have been stuffed for a 2/3 yard loss, instead he fought through and got a key first down. Gray also was masterful at letting his blocks set up then cutting perfectly behind them. Letting blockers get set-up is a skill.... we shouldn't act like anyone would have had the day Gray did yesterday. I have to admit I'm a bit surprised you don't have any issue with Gronk unnecessarily putting himself in an extremely vulnerable position when the game was in hand. I don't blame him for it; he's got one mode and that's unstoppable beast mode. The coaches need to be smarter.
|
|
|
Post by FenwayFanatic on Nov 17, 2014 13:55:58 GMT -5
Does anyone know how Fleming is holding up after that injury?
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Nov 17, 2014 14:13:54 GMT -5
He was on the field, following the game, chatting it up with Luck and Fleener and appeared to be smiling. Not sure what that means, but I was surprised that he was even on the field. The way he looked after the play, I would've thought he'd be in the locker room.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Nov 17, 2014 14:24:04 GMT -5
The linebackers and secondary have been excellent, but I still worry about their ability to manufacture a pass rush. Maybe that doesn't matter as much since the coverage has been so good and Belichick/Patricia have done a great job of dialing up A-gap blitzes (which Hightower/Collins execute brilliantly), but with Jones injured, I don't think any of their DL/DE are above-average pass rushers (maybe Ninkovich on a good day, but he's not much above average), which is a concern. But yeah, the defense has looked terrific.
I'm not sure how you can "protect" Gronk. Like you alluded to, you can't really get him to play less aggressively without losing the things that make him such a great player in the first place. You could bench him for a few extra plays, but that comes with obvious downsides.
I agree that Gray legitimately looks like an excellent back and that a replacement-level back wouldn't have performed as well last night. He's got surprisingly good straight-line speed for his size, good patience, hits holes hard, and enough size/power to break tackles and push the pile. He's a great fit for the power scheme they've been running lately where you need the patience to let the blocks develop and the decisiveness/speed/size to hit them hard once they do. He looks like a keeper and I've very excited about his future in New England.
My guess is a high ankle sprain for Fleming, which is usually the diagnosis when a guy gets rolled up like that. He'll be out 3-4 weeks but it shouldn't be a season-ending injury.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 17, 2014 15:58:45 GMT -5
I'm fully admitting it may be the RIGHT call, but IF it is the right call, then it's a bad rule. That ball clearly without question was not going into the end zone without the help of the Colts. You are not allowed to bring the ball back into the end zone as a return team and get a touchback, it's a safety. Now perhaps the rule allows for them to "muff" it into the end zone and not be penalized, but that's just dumb. I'm not mad about it; just pointing out how stupid that is. Of course they're not allowed to just intentionally bat it into the endzone to get a touchback, but you can see on the play the Colts player was clearly trying to grab the ball and it just squirted off his fingers, so no intentional batting and no possession. The fact of the matter is that these "balls" have a weird shape and will do weird things when they are loose, punishing the Colts for the ball squirting into the endzone like that would just be a bit too random.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 17, 2014 16:05:42 GMT -5
You are underselling some of those Jonas Gray runs though. Brandon Bolden would not have run for close to that yardage. The line did a tremendous job and this isn't to take away from that. The Colts also did a poor job. However, Gray got extra yards constantly and that run on third down directly preceding the TD by Tim Wright was all Jonas Gray. He should have been stuffed for a 2/3 yard loss, instead he fought through and got a key first down. Gray also was masterful at letting his blocks set up then cutting perfectly behind them. Letting blockers get set-up is a skill.... we shouldn't act like anyone would have had the day Gray did yesterday. It's true enough that Gray did a good job, certainly better than replacement-level, I'm just annoyed how the media always tries to hype up the RB. DeMarco Murray is not better than Jonas Gray, he just plays behind an even better OL. Charles is not a good comp because he is a dual-threat guy who can catch passes. I think guys like Charles, Vereen, Woodhead are essentially playing a different position. I guess it just didn't look as dangerous to me as it did to you, it's not like there was someone coming at him head-on, that would be a different matter. But with the opponents just grabbing at him from the sides it seemed almost reasonable.
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Nov 17, 2014 16:12:03 GMT -5
The linebackers and secondary have been excellent, but I still worry about their ability to manufacture a pass rush. Maybe that doesn't matter as much since the coverage has been so good and Belichick/Patricia have done a great job of dialing up A-gap blitzes (which Hightower/Collins execute brilliantly), but with Jones injured, I don't think any of their DL/DE are above-average pass rushers (maybe Ninkovich on a good day, but he's not much above average), which is a concern. But yeah, the defense has looked terrific. Wilfork on a good day can still create a pretty nice interior rush, so at least the QB can't just step up in the pocket when our outside guys do get there. I still wish we had kept Tommy Kelly, though. He's in there almost every snap for the Cardinals. And if we meet the Cardinals in the Super Bowl (I don't believe in Drew Stanton but the only other NFC team that has been truly convincing is the Packers) he may just gain superhuman powers for a day, because he obviously wasn't happy about being cut.
|
|
|
Post by rjp313jr on Nov 17, 2014 17:13:40 GMT -5
I'm fully admitting it may be the RIGHT call, but IF it is the right call, then it's a bad rule. That ball clearly without question was not going into the end zone without the help of the Colts. You are not allowed to bring the ball back into the end zone as a return team and get a touchback, it's a safety. Now perhaps the rule allows for them to "muff" it into the end zone and not be penalized, but that's just dumb. I'm not mad about it; just pointing out how stupid that is. Of course they're not allowed to just intentionally bat it into the endzone to get a touchback, but you can see on the play the Colts player was clearly trying to grab the ball and it just squirted off his fingers, so no intentional batting and no possession. The fact of the matter is that these "balls" have a weird shape and will do weird things when they are loose, punishing the Colts for the ball squirting into the endzone like that would just be a bit too random. Not to get too picky here but your description of what happened is incorrect. It did not "squirt of his fingers" as you say clearly happened. He kicked it into the end zone. I don't think for a second that he meant to but he put the force on the ball to make it go that way. If the ball was moving and bounced thru, but off his hands and the momentum of the ball from the kickoff carried it in that's clearly fine. The issue I have is the player put the force on the ball that carried it in.
|
|
|