SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2015 Boston Celtics Offseason
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,638
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Jul 29, 2015 8:28:38 GMT -5
Turner is still a young guy. He's developed well under Stephens and could be a very good piece of this squad especially if his price to resign is low. I like his game a lot and think he's more valuable to this team than Avery Bradley. Way more versatile and will probably be cheaper. Plus Rozier can hopefully replace Bradley.
Wasn't a fan of the Bradley extension to begin with and regressed a lot last year. His defense was not very good and he's supposed to be great. It was good but that's not acceptable from him.
|
|
|
Post by ctfisher on Jul 29, 2015 9:45:04 GMT -5
Turner is still a young guy. He's developed well under Stephens and could be a very good piece of this squad especially if his price to resign is low. I like his game a lot and think he's more valuable to this team than Avery Bradley. Way more versatile and will probably be cheaper. Plus Rozier can hopefully replace Bradley. Wasn't a fan of the Bradley extension to begin with and regressed a lot last year. His defense was not very good and he's supposed to be great. It was good but that's not acceptable from him. Well his game we can agree to disagree on, but I don't think he's more valuable than Bradley, especially cause he can't really shoot at all, especially from deep, or even long 2s. If Bradley is allowed to play a less prominent role in the offense, which he probably will this year, I imagine that his defense will recover somewhat. Also, Turner is a definite minus defensively, just doesn't have the lateral quickness to stay with guys. He's also 26 and will definitely be looking for a raise next year which I wouldn't want to pay him. He's fine at $3m/year, when he's asking for $7-$8m next year they should let him walk
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Jul 29, 2015 13:17:41 GMT -5
Turner is still a young guy. He's developed well under Stephens and could be a very good piece of this squad especially if his price to resign is low. I like his game a lot and think he's more valuable to this team than Avery Bradley. Way more versatile and will probably be cheaper. Plus Rozier can hopefully replace Bradley. Wasn't a fan of the Bradley extension to begin with and regressed a lot last year. His defense was not very good and he's supposed to be great. It was good but that's not acceptable from him. Turner is trade bait. Build his value up as much as possible, then ship him elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 30, 2015 15:35:29 GMT -5
Here is why I mentioned "walking away" from Turner:
1. They need to get down to 15 guaranteed contracts 2. I wanted to give one more possibility besides PJIII 3. He's a non-shooting ball handler, something that our best player; our most likely candidate for a future star; and our #1 draft pick all can claim 4. He's a free agent after this year.
The likelihood of a move is probably as follows:
1. Release PJIII (assuming he hasn't shown the upside that he did when Durant was out) 2. Trade A player for a draft pick (in other words, the sum of all of the probabilities of any individual player getting traded) - actually, the math might even put this #1 3. Release a pending FA (which pretty much is Turner, maybe Jerebko but they seem to love him) 4. Trade a package of players for a better player
The thing with #2 is that it's kind of like the Lottery Odds. The number one team has a better chance than any other ONE team to win the lottery but less than the collective. So it's more likely that C's make a trade but I have no idea which player and the inherent likelihood of any ONE trade is less than releasing Turner. Strange logic, admittedly, but I'm not the only one who thought it's possible. Forsberg's Odd Man Out article cautioned not to rule out Turner.
I just looked at each individual player and was trying to see who Boston would A) want to get rid of and B) get something of value for that includes no other players (if it's just a "one Celtic outgoing" type of deal. Struggled to find one.
Given the cap situation for most teams, few have the ability to just absorb a player without something going out as well.
A package deal for an upgrade doesn't happen much so, again, I put that down at the bottom.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,638
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Aug 3, 2015 14:31:36 GMT -5
Jerebko should be the guy to go. PJIII has too much wild card ability to not take a chance on him if he's healthy.
This is one of the deepest teams of 7/8 rotation players in the history of the NBA.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Aug 3, 2015 15:18:04 GMT -5
I hear you on Jerebko. I just feel like they LOVE him. But he should be in the list of candidates for sure.
Clearly the best team, spots 4-12 in the rotation.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Aug 3, 2015 18:11:19 GMT -5
Jerebko's an excellent bench player, whether he's in the regular rotation or only fills in when there's an injury or two. He'll push the younger guys and force them to earn their time.
|
|
|
Post by bookiemetts on Aug 3, 2015 19:13:39 GMT -5
They really are a very deep team. Smart, Thomas, Bradley, Turner, Crowder, Sullinger, Johnson, Jerebko, Lee, Zeller and Olynyk are all players who can play reliable minutes on a solid team. These are all players which I could see getting valuable minutes on a championship team. It's probably going to be very difficult for Young, Jones III, Rozier, Hunter and Mickey to get minutes, and all four could spend significant time in the D Leage.
Even if this team construction doesn't work, I'd be willing to bet that a contending team would gladly trade for any of these players, which gives Danny a lot of flexibility. They also have the depth to deal with any injury at really any position.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,638
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Aug 4, 2015 9:52:49 GMT -5
Jerebko's an excellent bench player, whether he's in the regular rotation or only fills in when there's an injury or two. He'll push the younger guys and force them to earn their time. I understand this and do see a lot of value in veteran leadership and someone to push the kids. I don't know if it truly applies to Jerebko but it's a nice narrative and if true I see the value.
|
|
rjp313jr
Veteran
Posts: 14,638
Member is Online
|
Post by rjp313jr on Aug 4, 2015 9:56:29 GMT -5
I believe in kids earning their spots and to be pushed but I think there needs to be a balance. I don't believe the kid needs to be more effective on the court than the veteran on the court. The kid just needs the right approach and work rate. At some point he needs to be more effective but as long as he's growing that's the important thing. I don't want Jerebko taking time from a kid who can be developing if that kid is working hard and improving. Jerebko helping to win games isn't more important.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Aug 4, 2015 13:07:53 GMT -5
You mention balance, which is key here.
There are a lot of talented rotation players here that would be in the top 8-10 for just about anyone in the league...including some contenders. Having a player or two who will accept a more limited role...but can also be productive when called upon... is important.
I absolutely despise having conversations about chemistry, but it's probably more important for bball than any other sport. That's why I think Jerebko's a good fit, especially as the Celtics are still evaluating their young guys to see who's in their future plans.
(He also showed proved himself enough last season as an NBA player. If all goes well, he won't be in the rotation come playoff time. But over the course of an 82-game season, you need a guy who can fill in for a week.)
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Aug 4, 2015 20:00:45 GMT -5
... Jerebko helping to win games isn't more important. The fellows at ESPN Insider would strongly disagree with you. They posit the next step for the C's is to win games to make the club attractive for a prospective game changing FA. Kevin Pelton expects the team as is to be superior to Atlanta in 2016. It's a fine read for those with Insider.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Aug 5, 2015 6:47:59 GMT -5
In the same piece, they thought AL Horford could be THE target (paraphrase) in FA and Johnson and Jerebko could prove to be key pieces if Cousins or Love (if things don't work out following the extension) become available.
|
|
|
Post by ctfisher on Aug 5, 2015 8:36:24 GMT -5
In the same piece, they thought AL Horford could be THE target (paraphrase) in FA and Johnson and Jerebko could prove to be key pieces if Cousins or Love (if things don't work out following the extension) become available. If we can get Horford and that Brooklyn pick turns into a top-5 pick, that's a 50+ win team that is extremely attractive to free agents
|
|
|
Post by benogliviesbrother on Aug 5, 2015 9:04:23 GMT -5
In the same piece, they thought AL Horford could be THE target (paraphrase) in FA and Johnson and Jerebko could prove to be key pieces if Cousins or Love (if things don't work out following the extension) become available. If we can get Horford and that Brooklyn pick turns into a top-5 pick, that's a 50+ win team that is extremely attractive to free agents Although no win predictions were made, I think they (Pelton anyway) view the C's already as a 50 win team. Or close. Remember: 26 - 12 post Rondo/Green, w/IT and JC and JJ.
|
|
|
Post by ctfisher on Aug 5, 2015 11:04:17 GMT -5
If we can get Horford and that Brooklyn pick turns into a top-5 pick, that's a 50+ win team that is extremely attractive to free agents Although no win predictions were made, I think they (Pelton anyway) view the C's already as a 50 win team. Or close. Remember: 26 - 12 post Rondo/Green, w/IT and JC and JJ. I think someone mentioned that ESPN's projections, presumably Pelton's, had the C's at 47, but personally I feel that's a little bullish. Plus the East is going to be better this year. Regardless, Horford would push them to being conference final contenders at least, and make them infinitely more attractive than they are now to free agents. Horford, Stevens, and a young core with cap flexibility and picks looks like an absolutely ideal spot for a true alpha dog star I'd say
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Aug 5, 2015 11:21:55 GMT -5
Not really sure why people think the east will be better this year. I guess it could be if things pan out, but plenty of talent switched over to the west.
|
|
|
Post by ctfisher on Aug 5, 2015 11:35:49 GMT -5
Not really sure why people think the east will be better this year. I guess it could be if things pan out, but plenty of talent switched over to the west. Who went to the West that wasn't already there that really moves the needle? Anyway, list of East teams that appear to have improved this offseason/will improve next season through health or development, aside from us: Hornets (Kaminsky, Hawes, no Lance) Sixers (Okafor paired with Noel is a really good frontcourt) Knicks (Melo plays, Porzingis, Lopez, Jerian Grant) Raptors (Demarre Carroll) Heat (Justise, full season of Dragic, Whiteside, healthy Bosh) Bucks (Monroe, development) Pacers (Paul George) Magic (Development, Hezonja) The Hawks lost Carroll and added Splitter and will probably slip a little, the Nets should suck, Detroit lost Monroe, and the Wizards replaced Paul Pierce with Jared Dudley, but should see more development out of Beal and Porter, so you can call them a wash. The Bulls are also tough to get a read on, but I think they'll benefit from not being run into the gorund by Thibs and they a couple fresh rotation guys (Mcdermott, Portis) to carry some of the burden that should be able to contribute this year. Aside from that, I'd expect every other team in the East to be better next year than they were last year, even the Cavs, with continuity and full seasons from Shump, Mozgov, and possibly JR, plus Mo Williams.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Aug 5, 2015 20:39:54 GMT -5
It's probably one-sided to only look at the additions though. I won't go through them all but, while Toronto gained Carroll, the lost Johnson and Lou Williams. Rim protection and bench scoring are rather important.
Also, Charlotte gained 2 guys with similar skill sets (which is also what Zeller brings) so there additions are a bit mitigated. Biyombo (rim protection) and MO Williams (scoring, distribution and leadership off the bench) will be felt as well.
I don't disagree that some teams could be better. I just think those same teams lost as much as they gained in some cases.
PS. I like Okafor, but talk to me when Philly starts showing interest in winning games. Then I'll buy their improvement.
|
|
|
Post by ctfisher on Aug 6, 2015 8:30:56 GMT -5
It's probably one-sided to only look at the additions though. I won't go through them all but, while Toronto gained Carroll, the lost Johnson and Lou Williams. Rim protection and bench scoring are rather important. Also, Charlotte gained 2 guys with similar skill sets (which is also what Zeller brings) so there additions are a bit mitigated. Biyombo (rim protection) and MO Williams (scoring, distribution and leadership off the bench) will be felt as well. I don't disagree that some teams could be better. I just think those same teams lost as much as they gained in some cases. PS. I like Okafor, but talk to me when Philly starts showing interest in winning games. Then I'll buy their improvement. Zeller doesn't really offer the same skill set as Kaminsky or Hawes at all, he hasn't developed into the shooter people thought he would be. Biyombo is a loss, but not a huge one, and they also added Jeremy Lin to replace Williams, which I think could easily end up being a wash. Overall, I think it's pretty clear they got better, especially when you factor in Kemba Walker coming back from injury, and adding Nic Batum. With Toronto, that's fair, but they do still have Valanciunas, and James Johnson can block shots as well, plus Carroll is a massive improvement for their perimeter D, which mitigates losing rim protection. And I get your point with Philly, but they actually drafted a guy who can play his rookie season, so I'm taking that as a step in the right direction. Plus with all those young guys, you have to factor in some improvement internally, and it's not like they really lost anyone
|
|
|
Post by sarasoxer on Oct 9, 2015 10:37:52 GMT -5
Sullinger does not look significantly different to me than last year. I predict that Danny will try to move him and that he will not last the season with the C's. His only appreciable asset to me is his ability to carve space for rebounds. He does not have much of a close-to-the basket game, can't elevate to finish or block shots and shoots marginally from outside.
He did not lose a lot of weight in an off-season where emphasis was placed on that. Where we now have redundancies, Sully's Panda-esq approach does not show the drive/commitment that Danny expects and his teammates deserve.
|
|
mobaz
Veteran
Posts: 3,044
|
Post by mobaz on Oct 14, 2015 9:49:04 GMT -5
Sullinger does not look significantly different to me than last year. I predict that Danny will try to move him and that he will not last the season with the C's. His only appreciable asset to me is his ability to carve space for rebounds. He does not have much of a close-to-the basket game, can't elevate to finish or block shots and shoots marginally from outside. He did not lose a lot of weight in an off-season where emphasis was placed on that. Where we now have redundancies, Sully's Panda-esq approach does not show the drive/commitment that Danny expects and his teammates deserve. Too bad; he might end up one of those guys who doesn't "get it" until he's in a new situation or facing leaving the league. I bet he does turn at some point for the better, but I'm not sure how long the Celtics can wait for him, especially with a payday coming up. Very frustrating because I really think he has unique skills and could work his way into being a top 50 player.
|
|
wcp3
Veteran
Posts: 3,860
|
Post by wcp3 on Oct 15, 2015 15:14:52 GMT -5
Sullinger does not look significantly different to me than last year. I predict that Danny will try to move him and that he will not last the season with the C's. His only appreciable asset to me is his ability to carve space for rebounds. He does not have much of a close-to-the basket game, can't elevate to finish or block shots and shoots marginally from outside. He did not lose a lot of weight in an off-season where emphasis was placed on that. Where we now have redundancies, Sully's Panda-esq approach does not show the drive/commitment that Danny expects and his teammates deserve. Huh? Comparing him to Panda is not smart.
|
|
|