SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Patriots Offseason Thread
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 27, 2013 9:56:26 GMT -5
I'm guessing the cap ramifications will be resolved in the Pats favor (can't imagine the Player's Union standing up for this guy in an appeal). As to the actual money, not sure if the Pats could/would be brought in on the civil suit (i think we have some lawyers on the site who would be WAY better suited to respond to that one). However, it would not surprise me in any way if Kraft does something whether he is legally bound to or not. This is, obviously, the blackest mark on his/Pats legacy and he'd want to do whatever he could to "make it right".
|
|
|
Post by rangoon82 on Jun 27, 2013 18:41:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jun 28, 2013 7:55:52 GMT -5
I'm guessing the cap ramifications will be resolved in the Pats favor (can't imagine the Player's Union standing up for this guy in an appeal). As to the actual money, not sure if the Pats could/would be brought in on the civil suit (i think we have some lawyers on the site who would be WAY better suited to respond to that one). However, it would not surprise me in any way if Kraft does something whether he is legally bound to or not. This is, obviously, the blackest mark on his/Pats legacy and he'd want to do whatever he could to "make it right". Pats aren't responsible for what their employees do on their own time.
|
|
|
Post by vermontsox1 on Jun 28, 2013 14:12:57 GMT -5
I'm guessing the cap ramifications will be resolved in the Pats favor (can't imagine the Player's Union standing up for this guy in an appeal). As to the actual money, not sure if the Pats could/would be brought in on the civil suit (i think we have some lawyers on the site who would be WAY better suited to respond to that one). However, it would not surprise me in any way if Kraft does something whether he is legally bound to or not. This is, obviously, the blackest mark on his/Pats legacy and he'd want to do whatever he could to "make it right". I disagree that this is a black mark on the Pats legacy...it has nothing to do with the actual organization. When Hernandez declared for the draft, his stock fell because of failed drug tests, not acts of violence, etc. Pats (hopefully) had no way of knowing he was, allegedly, going to be involved with murders. There is no way the Patriots would touch the civil suit (they wouldn't have standing either way). They really have nothing to do with the way the events unfolded. The Pats will certainly push to rectify their cap situation and I believe it will work out in their favor. Hernandez will likely never see the guaranteed money "owed" to him.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 28, 2013 14:30:30 GMT -5
I get what you are saying but, from what I understand about the Krafts (and I agree, Chris, they aren't legally responsible), they could see it differently. They seem to love to project a certain image of having certain types of people connected with their organization (or, sometimes even better, rehabing people to act a certain way when on their team). I could easily see him taking a WWMW (What Would Myra Want) approach on this.
BTW - he didn't have a history of violence, but his potential gang connections are NOT a surprise according to many.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jun 28, 2013 15:43:01 GMT -5
BTW - he didn't have a history of violence, but his potential gang connections are NOT a surprise according to many. I'm almost certain this is all hindsight bias. It's obviously easy now to say "look, he smokes pot, has tattoos, and some of his friends seem shady, I always wondered if he had gang connections," but before the past couple weeks, there were no reports implying that Hernandez had anything close to gang affiliations or whatever.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 28, 2013 16:14:01 GMT -5
With all of the time that spent on/with these kids when they are being recruited, I can't imagine SOMEONE in the process didn't know who his friends were. Now, there are plenty of athletes in that same situation who have no issues but that doesn't mean the situation didn't exist.
Saying he's one of the examples of a kid who didn't "escape" that past situation isn't necessarily hindsight bias.
|
|
|
Post by vermontsox1 on Jun 28, 2013 19:41:28 GMT -5
FYI, the Pats voided all of Hernandez's guaranteed money. Hernandez would now have to build a case against the Pats to receive that $$$. If Hernandez is convicted, he is not getting any of that money back.
|
|
|
Post by jmei on Jun 28, 2013 20:41:19 GMT -5
They voided his guaranteed salary, but he'll still get his deferred signing bonus, which means the Patriots are still going to carry a big cap hit next year.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 28, 2013 20:52:04 GMT -5
They can try and recoup that too, right? It's probably more involved than simply voiding it (much like they are trying to recoup Fanene's bonus - albeit for a MUCH different reason).
|
|
|
Post by vermontsox1 on Jun 28, 2013 22:07:09 GMT -5
They can try and recoup that too, right? It's probably more involved than simply voiding it (much like they are trying to recoup Fanene's bonus - albeit for a MUCH different reason). I don't know the specifics of the deferred signing bonus, but right off the bat, I would say it is a very different situation than Fanene. Fanene essentially committed fraud by misrepresenting a medical condition. www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000150822/article/decision-reached-in-jonathan-fanene-hearingMy guess is the Pats will simply withhold his remaining signing bonus. If Hernandez wants to sue the Pats for that money, I'm sure the Pats feel pretty comfortable they could defend their decision in court. I doubt Hernandez will try to recoup that signing bonus though, especially as the evidence against him piles up. Usually the NFLPA comes to bat for players in these situations... I can't find the source now, but there is early talk that the Pats will petition Goodell for a readjustment of their salary cap based off these circumstances. Certainly will be interesting to follow.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hatfield on Jun 30, 2013 20:15:56 GMT -5
I get what you are saying but, from what I understand about the Krafts (and I agree, Chris, they aren't legally responsible), they could see it differently. They seem to love to project a certain image of having certain types of people connected with their organization (or, sometimes even better, rehabing people to act a certain way when on their team). I could easily see him taking a WWMW (What Would Myra Want) approach on this. BTW - he didn't have a history of violence, but his potential gang connections are NOT a surprise according to many. Eh, I mean, the fact that they paid a man to play football who then, on his own time, killed someone doesn't make giving money to that victim's family the "right thing to do" or something like that. If an employee of Rand-Whitney Group, his packaging company, or International Forest Products, his paper company, killed someone, would you expect him to compensate the victim's family? Why does the fact that it's a former Patriot make that different?
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jun 30, 2013 20:35:12 GMT -5
You're probably right. I just see the Krafts acting differently than most on this front.
|
|
|
Post by beasleyrockah on Jun 30, 2013 21:46:05 GMT -5
The "gang banger" stuff seems like a lot of BS from the Fox News types, it's all centered around one picture of him throwing up gang signs in all red when he was in HS. TONS of suburban HS kids do that in facebook pictures trying to look cool and project an image that are complete posers. All this stuff about Hernandez seems to be a lot of revisionist history. Sure, he had a questionable background...but compared to a Aqib Talib or many other players it certainly wasn't some abnormally high risk scenario on paper. Police have a difficult enough time solving murders with tons of evidence, the Patriots can't be expected to project who is going to murder in the future. My last sentence sounds sarcastic, but reading the local media the past week you'd think the Patriots aided and embedded a known Al-Qaeda terrorist. If Hernandez was this openly crazy individual you'd think at least one of these media members would've caught onto something.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 11, 2013 9:17:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by xxdamgoodxx on Jul 11, 2013 10:47:56 GMT -5
Seriously CUT HIM. I know he is a pretty damn good corner but you have Logan Ryan and Ras-I if he ever stays healthy. I'm tired of this BS get the wannabe gangsters out of the Patriots locker room!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by rangoon82 on Jul 11, 2013 17:35:29 GMT -5
Worst offseason ever?
|
|
|
Post by mgoetze on Jul 15, 2013 18:30:16 GMT -5
Seriously CUT HIM. I know he is a pretty damn good corner but you have Logan Ryan and Ras-I if he ever stays healthy. I'm tired of this BS get the wannabe gangsters out of the Patriots locker room!!!!! Since when does DUI make you a wannabe gangster? Playing Ryan or Dowling as your starting #2 CB would be like slotting Ranaudo into the ML rotation - could work out well but more likely to blow up in your face. More likely you would see Arrington there, who is like Dempster - somewhat below average but at least you know he won't be worse than that.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on Jul 15, 2013 19:43:32 GMT -5
I hate the usage of "wannabe gangster" here but if anyone thinks this is just about a DUI . . . Well.
|
|
|
Post by amfox1 on Jul 21, 2013 20:21:40 GMT -5
Current roster (90, limit is 90). Age in parentheses. Projection to make the roster in black, to begin on PUP in green, to begin on practice squad in orange and to be cut in red.
QB (3): Tom Brady (35), Ryan Mallett (24), Tim Tebow (25)
RB/FB (6): Stevan Ridley (24), Shane Vereen (24), Brandon Bolden (23), Leon Washington (30), LaGarrett Blount (26), James Develin (24)
WR (6): Danny Amendola (27), Julian Edelman (26), Matthew Slater (27), Kamar Aiken (23), Michael Jenkins (30), Johnathan Haggerty (25)
TE (4): Jake Ballard (25), Michael Hoomanawanui (24), Daniel Fells (29), Rob Gronkowski (23)(PUP)
T (5): Nate Solder (24), Sebastian Vollmer (28), Will Svitek (31), Markus Zusevics (23), Kevin Haslam (26)
G/C (6): Logan Mankins (31), Dan Connolly (30), Ryan Wendell (27), Marcus Cannon (24), Tyronne Green (27), Luke Patterson (25)
DL (4): Vince Wilfork (30), Tommy Kelly (32), Marcus Forston (23), Armond Armstead (22)(non-football illness)
DE/OLB (7): Rob Ninkovich (29), Chandler Jones (23), Justin Francis (24), Marcus Benard (27), Jake Bequette (23), Jermaine Cunningham (24), Jason Vega (25)
LB (8): Jerod Mayo (27), Dont'a Hightower (23), Brandon Spikes (25), Dane Fletcher (26), Jeff Tarpinian (25), Mike Rivera (27), Niko Koutouvides (31), AJ Edds (25)
CB (5): Aqib Talib (27), Alfonzo Dennard (23), Kyle Arrington (25), Ras-I Dowling (24), Marquice Cole (29)
S (5): Devin McCourty (25), Adrian Wilson (33), Steve Gregory (30), Nate Ebner (23), Tavon Wilson (22)
ST (3): Stephen Gostkowski (29) (K), Zoltan Mesko (27) (P), Danny Aiken (24) (LS)
Draft picks (7): LB Jamie Collins (23) WR Aaron Dobson (21) CB Logan Ryan (22) S Duron Harmon (22) WR Josh Boyce (21) DE Michael Buchanan (22) LB Steve Beauharnais (22)
Undrafted free agents (21):
CB Brandon Jones (23) CB Justin Green (22) S Kanorris Davis (23) DT Cory Grissom (23) DT Scott Vallone (23) DT Joe Vellano (24) DT Anthony Rashad White (23) FB Ben Bartholomew (23) RB George Winn (22) WR Kenbrell Thompkins (24) WR Mark Harrison (22) WR Quentin Sims (23) TE Zach Sudfeld (24) TE Brandon Ford (23) OL Chris McDonald (23) OL Matt Stankiewitch (23) OL Josh Kline (23) OL R.J. Mattes (23) OL Brice Schwab (23) LS Mike Zupancic (23) P Ryan Allen (23)
Injured reserve (3): WR T.J. Moe (22) WR Lavasail Tuinei (22) OL Elvis Fisher (24)
Unrestricted FA: Josh Barrett (28), Deion Branch (33), Derrick Martin (27), Jamey Richard (28), Trevor Scott (28), Donte Stallworth (32), Tracy White (31)
|
|
|
Post by semperfisox on Jul 24, 2013 10:38:51 GMT -5
Dobson and Boyce need to have a good camp.
|
|
|
Post by amfox1 on Jul 31, 2013 17:09:02 GMT -5
Nick McDonald, Hawkins and Ashford waived
|
|
|
Post by amfox1 on Aug 1, 2013 13:56:53 GMT -5
Morris waived, DL Travis Chappelear, WR Johnathan Haggerty, DL Scott Vallone and WR Lavasier Tuinei signed.
|
|
|
Post by semperfisox on Aug 2, 2013 11:44:56 GMT -5
apparently Kenbrell Thompkins is really impressing. Could end up as the 3rd WR.
|
|
|
Post by amfox1 on Aug 2, 2013 13:04:33 GMT -5
OL Luke Patterson & OL Brice Schwab signed; DL Travis Chappelear & LS Mike Zupancic released.
|
|
|