SoxProspects News
|
|
|
|
Legal
Forum Ground Rules
The views expressed by the members of this Forum do not necessarily reflect the views of SoxProspects, LLC.
© 2003-2024 SoxProspects, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Home | Search | My Profile | Messages | Members | Help |
Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
2019 Celtics Offseason Thread
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 15, 2019 11:12:33 GMT -5
That's because everything has since that last Nets pick. Now we traded it, but everyone thought that was going to be way higher. Then the not taking the Lakers pick trying to get a higher pick blew up in our face, which wasn't surprising at all. Now the Grizz were just gifted an elite talent. That's a horrible run, three picks that most people thought would all be top 5 could net you so much less. Like 8th, 14th, and late lottery to non lottery pick.
Reports say we were one ping pong ball away from the 4th pick. That would have changed things, but we've used up all our draft luck it seems.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 15, 2019 13:14:44 GMT -5
I'm no draft expert, just a sport junkie that spends way too much time study crap like sports drafts. This draft is rather intriguing depending what you're looking for. Lots of higher upside riskier players, but a good amount of intriguing guards, small forwards, and bigs. Yet it's not a good PG draft after the top two guys. It's crazy early but the cut-off seems to be around pick 12-13. Most Mocks have mostly similar players there, then it gets crazy the next 10-15 guys are all over the place. Also this draft has a ton of bigs, yet the rankings are all over the place. ESPN seems down on the liked of Gafford, Fernando, Bassey, and Reid while others are much higher.
So assuming Alexander-Walker and Bol Bol are gone like most mocks have them
14. Pick a Kentucky player lol, I can't decide on Keldon Johnson, Tyler Herro, or PJ Washington. The combine should help separate the players. Yet all three fit. If I had to pick one right now Keldon Johnson because of his D and upside, yet it's almost like flipping a coin. Herro can really shoot it and has size and Washington is just a guy I love. Like this is why Danny gets paid the big bucks because there will be a big time player available, he just has to pick the right guy out of a big group.
20. I'd have a hard time passing on the upsides of Kevin Porter or Romeo Langsford if they dropped. Both are scorers with issues, risky, but high upside guys. Daniel Gafford and Nazreon Reid intrigue me a lot. Your crazy athlete vs. skilled big. You could add in guys like Fernando and Bassey also.
22. Grant Williams and Chuma Okeke. It factor guys, made players around them better.
Second round pick, best available PG, so Shamorie Pond right now.
Everyone wants a big trade and to win right now. I actually hope we don't punt this draft and Danny makes the picks. Also don't just draft international guys to stash overseas either. This can be the draft that cements in our young core for years. Work your magic Danny.
|
|
|
Post by philarhody on May 15, 2019 13:33:16 GMT -5
I like Tyler Herro a lot. He’s a killer who is better with the ball in his hands than people think. It would be awesome if he were there at 20
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 15, 2019 14:23:42 GMT -5
Goga. Goga. Goga . . .
I actually don't know a ton about him but
a) you could stash him b) hes right in that area on many boards so it's not the stretch that Yabu was. c) I can picture the Belushi scene on the jumbo tron when calling for his PT (when he does come over)
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 15, 2019 15:54:42 GMT -5
That's like the worst thing ever if the best thing about a guy is you can stash him or it's the number one reason you pick him. You like him but can't decide between him and a few guys so that is the tie breaker ok that makes sense.
If it's too many picks, look at moving up or trade them for Future picks. I have zero issue with international guys, but they better be best player available. Which depending which pick we are talking about could happen. By pick 20 or 22 maybe he is best available. I have zero clue, international bigs are so hard to judge. Yet there will be a bunch of College bigs with all types of styles and upsides available.
As far as Tyler Herro, he might be gone by 14. Hell yeah sign me up at 20, but not many pure shooters in the draft and his stock keeps going up. Some team is going to fall in love with him. It's one of the reason I went Johnson, I think Herro is the most likely to be gone by 14 unless he tanks the draft process.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on May 15, 2019 16:06:43 GMT -5
Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't Davis now consider staying in NO to play with Zion? Seems like something to build around even though they are similar type of players, added to Holliday.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 15, 2019 17:31:29 GMT -5
The worst thing ever might be you not getting the tongue-in-cheek component of that post.
|
|
|
Post by texs31 on May 15, 2019 17:34:23 GMT -5
Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't Davis now consider staying in NO to play with Zion? Seems like something to build around even though they are similar type of players, added to Holliday. 2 things (both with some grain of salt required): 1. Shams reported last night that the results of the lottery hasn't changed his stance. 2. Stars rarely long to play with rookies (almost always growing pains of some sorts)
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 15, 2019 18:19:44 GMT -5
The worst thing ever might be you not getting the tongue-in-cheek component of that post. I get it and it's why I never said a thing about that component of the post. Just the part that followed it
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 15, 2019 19:23:43 GMT -5
Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't Davis now consider staying in NO to play with Zion? Seems like something to build around even though they are similar type of players, added to Holliday. 2 things (both with some grain of salt required): 1. Shams reported last night that the results of the lottery hasn't changed his stance. 2. Stars rarely long to play with rookies (almost always growing pains of some sorts) Yeap, Davis wants to win NOW. Not see Zion develop the first 3 years and then be great. He went through a rebuild in NO already. He's done with it. He's done with NO.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 15, 2019 23:05:26 GMT -5
LAL getting a better asset to add to a Davis package is worse. Fitting that it comes down to the Celtics and Lakers to make the move for that franchise altering trade for the next 5 years. BEAT LA Add- The Celtics have added pressure to get this deal done by July 1rst to convince Kyrie and KD to sign here.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 16, 2019 0:03:45 GMT -5
LAL getting a better asset to add to a Davis package is worse. Fitting that it comes down to the Celtics and Lakers to make the move for that franchise altering trade for the next 5 years. BEAT LA Add- The Celtics have added pressure to get this deal done by July 1rst to convince Kyrie and KD to sign here. How in the world does that happen? You need to renounce all cap holds to get 38 million and have everyone opt out, so that's Irving, Horford, Morris, Rozier, Baynes, Wannamaker and maybe even more like Semi. You can't renounce Irving's rights, then add in Horford even at 15 million per. Heck I don't think you get max money for Durant even if you get rid of everyone besides Irvings hold and trade Hayward. You'd have to unload Smart also no? What am I missing?
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 16, 2019 0:41:35 GMT -5
Fitting that it comes down to the Celtics and Lakers to make the move for that franchise altering trade for the next 5 years. BEAT LA Add- The Celtics have added pressure to get this deal done by July 1rst to convince Kyrie and KD to sign here. How in the world does that happen? You need to renounce all cap holds to get 38 million and have everyone opt out, so that's Irving, Horford, Morris, Rozier, Baynes, Wannamaker and maybe even more like Semi. You can't renounce Irving's rights, then add in Horford even at 15 million per. Heck I don't think you get max money for Durant even if you get rid of everyone besides Irvings hold and trade Hayward. You'd have to unload Smart also no? What am I missing? You can't sign and trade Horford to the Warriors and take on KD at max money? I know you can sign and trade Hayward with Tatum to NOP.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 16, 2019 1:57:26 GMT -5
How in the world does that happen? You need to renounce all cap holds to get 38 million and have everyone opt out, so that's Irving, Horford, Morris, Rozier, Baynes, Wannamaker and maybe even more like Semi. You can't renounce Irving's rights, then add in Horford even at 15 million per. Heck I don't think you get max money for Durant even if you get rid of everyone besides Irvings hold and trade Hayward. You'd have to unload Smart also no? What am I missing? You can't sign and trade Horford to the Warriors and take on KD at max money? I know you can sign and trade Hayward with Tatum to NOP. Nope, you need cap space or large trade exceptions for most of them. Reason is BYC rule using bird rights if raises are over 20%. The amount out going is say 40 million, yet other team can only send out 20 million. Making matching salary crazy hard without cap space. Your idea of two sign and trades is even harder, those rules would go both ways, each team would need cap space. It's why you almost never see sign and trades anymore. Well trading Hayward and Tatum for Davis isn't a sign and trade, all three would be under contract. Standard trade rules.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 16, 2019 2:48:55 GMT -5
Ohh alright, then that puts a damper in everything then. They changed all those rules in the last labor agreement and made building "super teams" via free agency almost inaccessible anymore. So basically you're looking at a trade of Horford/Hayward/Smart and Tatum plus more for AD. Or you're looking at Terry Rozier being your starting PG next year, extending Horford for less money, maybe making a play for Nikola Vučević. syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2836172-updated-trade-packages-landing-spots-for-anthony-davis-after-2019-nba-lottery.amp.html"Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Jayson Tatum, No. 20 pick, 2020 first-round pick (via Memphis; top-six protection in 2020; unprotected in 2021)" That trade package looks horrible. Even if you swap out Brown for Williams, it still looks horrible. theathletic.com/978355/2019/05/14/the-knicks-master-plan-came-and-went-with-the-nba-draft-lottery-so-whats-next/According to Visola, the plan seems to be go all in for Davis and try to keep Kyrie. So I don't know. Both scenarios look like crap to me. One risks everything and puts all your chips on the table. You have to then rely on Horford, Kyrie, Hayward, and Davis to carry you. All carry injury risk and all are up and down players except for Davis. The other scenario seems to wait 5 more freaking years to develop and a wait and see approach. That's crap too. God this sucks.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 16, 2019 11:22:53 GMT -5
That bleachers report is crazy, has the Celtics, Lakers, and Knicks giving up a massive amount. Then the Raptors give up almost nothing,OG, Pascal, Ibaka and a late first? So color me confused, that's an opinion piece nothing more.
Danny makes that trade I stop watching the Celtics. All those trades are f*cking crazy besides the Raptors one. I never seen such big trades. Like Davis is a very good player, yet he's closer to Irving than a true Superstar. He's the only guy people call top 5 that has trouble getting his teams into the playoffs. Like how isn't that a red flag? That team had more than enough talent to make the playoffs. Sometimes you need to not look at stats, how the player looks and focus on his effect on wins.
So I hope Davis gets traded elsewhere if that is the price. I don't see how you have a Championship team if you gut the team. Nevermind that is going to be a short run team. 3-4 year's guys will opt out and it's over. No Tatum and Brown reaching peak years to offset Horford and Irving getting old. The big three trades made sense, you formed the best team in the NBA. Irving, Davis, Hayward, and Horford isn't the best team or most talented.
A team of Tatum, Brown, Horford, and Rozier have had more playoff success than Davis has had or Irving minus LeBron. Stay the course, build a team that plays team ball, great D and is better than the sum of it's parts.
So the real question is what do we do without Davis and Irving? Davis to the Lakers, Irving to the Knicks. Have Danny find a way to get Dennis Smith Jr. or a guy like him. Focus on the draft and buy low younger players. I'd rather wait a few years then throw everything away and have no future.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 16, 2019 13:46:32 GMT -5
So the real question is what do we do without Davis and Irving? Davis to the Lakers, Irving to the Knicks. Have Danny find a way to get Dennis Smith Jr. or a guy like him. Focus on the draft and buy low younger players. I'd rather wait a few years then throw everything away and have no future. Get Justise Winslow to play PG. It sounds insane, but he was very good at in somewhat limited minutes and he'd see the court a lot with Marcus Smart anyway. Go big on the league.
|
|
|
Post by jimed14 on May 16, 2019 13:54:50 GMT -5
If they keep Irving, they may as well trade Tatum since every time Irving goes ball hog crazy, Tatum completely disappears. Those two seem to never play well together. Brown disappears a lot as well when Irving tries to put the team on his back while shooting 30%.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 16, 2019 15:37:42 GMT -5
If they keep Irving, they may as well trade Tatum since every time Irving goes ball hog crazy, Tatum completely disappears. Those two seem to never play well together. Brown disappears a lot as well when Irving tries to put the team on his back while shooting 30%. Tatum had a knack of disappearing in his rookie year too. He's not aggressive enough. Stop blaming Irving, it's a Tatum thing. It's ridiculous. Brown got more aggressive later in the year regardless of the narrative here also. Stevens just opted to play Hayward more to get him going.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 16, 2019 16:28:54 GMT -5
So the real question is what do we do without Davis and Irving? Davis to the Lakers, Irving to the Knicks. Have Danny find a way to get Dennis Smith Jr. or a guy like him. Focus on the draft and buy low younger players. I'd rather wait a few years then throw everything away and have no future. Get Justise Winslow to play PG. It sounds insane, but he was very good at in somewhat limited minutes and he'd see the court a lot with Marcus Smart anyway. Go big on the league. Just signed a three year 39 million extension with the Heat last year.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 16, 2019 16:34:30 GMT -5
Ricky Rubio talking about wanting to play in Boston. If you wanted the opposite of Irving he's a good choice. All about team play and D.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 16, 2019 19:12:44 GMT -5
Ricky Rubio talking about wanting to play in Boston. If you wanted the opposite of Irving he's a good choice. All about team play and D. Great. Let's have bench players starting, as long the Celtics are playing team ball, it's alright to stink. Should just resign Rozier for the QO anyways.
|
|
|
Post by umassgrad2005 on May 16, 2019 22:23:02 GMT -5
That "bench player" helped the Jazz a less talented team to more wins last year than the Celtics had. Rondo who is just like him, helped us win our last Championship. He fits our team, style and culture.
|
|
|
Post by Don Caballero on May 16, 2019 23:38:54 GMT -5
Just signed a three year 39 million extension with the Heat last year. I missed that. Either way, the Heat aren't going anywhere with him, so you never know. A tall PG is second only to "goofy euro" as my basketball love, seriously more teams should do that.
|
|
|
Post by pedrofanforever45 on May 17, 2019 0:08:25 GMT -5
That "bench player" helped the Jazz a less talented team to more wins last year than the Celtics had. Rondo who is just like him, helped us win our last Championship. He fits our team, style and culture. My god, he's nothing like Rondo. Rondo was more skilled than him. Rondo was WAY better distributing the basketball and would have daily triple doubles when he was young and great. Rubio is a player you sign when you throw in the towel and don't realistically think you have a shot at a title. Add- I have no doubt you'll give him all the credit for the Jazz record while blaming Kyrie for all the regression.
|
|
|